188. Third and Fourth Series of Luther's Theses against Antinomianism.

Having complied with the conditions, and publicly (also in two sermons

delivered April 23) retracted his error, and declared his assent to the

views expressed in Luther's second disputation, Agricola was again

permitted to preach and teach. As a result, Luther also, though he had

no faith in the sincerity of Agricola's retraction, did not carry out

his original plan of discussing a third and fourth series of theses

which he had prepared against antinomianism. (Drews, 419ff.; E. 4,

430ff.)

From the third series, comprising 40 theses, we quote the following: "1.

The repentance of the Papists, Turks, Jews, and of all unbelievers and

hypocrites is alike in every respect. 2. It consists in this, that they

are sorry and make satisfaction for one or several sins, and afterwards

are secure as to other sins or original sin. 5. The repentance of

believers in Christ goes beyond the actual sins, and continues

throughout life, till death. 8. For the sin in our flesh remains during

the entire time of our life, warring against the Spirit, who resists it.

[Rom. 7, 23.] 9. Therefore all works after justification are nothing

else than a continuous repentance, or a good purpose against sin. 10.

For nothing else is done than that sin, revealed by the Law and forgiven

in Christ, is swept out. 17. The Lord's Prayer, taught by the Lord

Himself to the saints and believers, is a part of repentance, containing

much of the doctrine of the Law. 18. For whoever prays it aright

confesses with his own mouth that he sins against the Law and repents.

27. Therefore also the Lord's Prayer itself teaches that the Law is

before, below, and after the Gospel (_legem esse ante, sub et post

evangelium_), and that from it repentance must begin. 30. From this it

follows that these enemies of the Law [Antinomians] must abolish also

the Lord's Prayer if they abolish the Law. 31. Indeed, they are

compelled to expunge the greatest part of the sermons of Christ Himself

from the Gospel-story. 32. For Matt. 5, 17ff. He does not only recite

the Law of Moses, but explains it perfectly, and teaches that it must

not be destroyed. 34. Everywhere throughout the Gospel He also reproves,

rebukes, threatens, and exercises similar offices of the Law. 35. So

that there never has been nor ever will be more impudent men than those

who teach that the Law should be abolished." (St. L. 20, 1636ff.; E. 4,

430ff.)

From the fourth series of 41 theses directed by Luther against the

Antinomians we quote: "12. Therefore we must beware of the doctrine of

the Papists concerning repentance as of hell and the devil himself. 13.

Much more, however, must we avoid those who leave no repentance whatever

in the Church. 14. For those who deny that the Law is to be taught in

reality simply wish that there be no repentance. 15. The argument:

'Whatever is not necessary to justification, neither in the beginning,

nor in the middle, nor in the end, must not be taught,' etc., amounts to

nothing. 17. It is the same as though you would argue: The truth that

man is dead in sin is not necessary to justification, neither in the

beginning, nor in the middle, nor in the end; hence it must not be

taught. 18. To honor parents, to live chaste, to abstain from murders,

adulteries, and thefts is not necessary to justification; hence such

things must not be taught. 22. Although the Law helps nothing toward

justification it does not follow therefrom that it ought to be abolished

and not to be taught. 26. Everywhere in Paul [the phrase] 'without the

Law' must be understood (as Augustine correctly explains) 'without the

assistance of the Law,' as we have always done. 27. For the Law demands

fulfilment, but helps nothing toward its own fulfilment. 35. But faith

in Christ alone justifies, alone fulfils the Law, alone does good works,

without the Law. 37. It is true that after justification good works

follow spontaneously, without the Law, _i.e._, without the help or

coercion of the Law. 38. In brief, the Law is neither useful nor

necessary for justification, nor for any good works, much less for

salvation. 39. On the contrary, justification, good works, and salvation

are necessary for the fulfilment of the Law. 40. For Christ came to save

that which was lost [Luke 19, 10], and for the restitution of all

things, as St. Peter says [Acts 3, 21]. 41. Therefore the Law is not

destroyed by Christ, but established, in order that Adam may become such

as he was, and even better." (St. L. 20. 1639ff.; E. 4. 433.)

Historical Introductions to the Symbolical Books of the Evangelical Lutheran Church · 第 204 / 313 题