Although the fluid first collects over the posterior portion of the

diaphragm, flatness on percussion is first observed over the axillary

portion of the diaphragm, because, as explained by Calvin Ellis, the

conditions there are more favorable for percussion. As the effusion

increases the line of flatness, when the patient is in the upright

position, advances, not directly up the back and horizontally across

the chest, as was formerly supposed, but across the back in a curve

reaching its highest point in the axilla, from which it descends toward

the sternum.[30] R. Douglass Powell[31] says the upper margin of the

effusion in typical cases is not a water-level, but presents a curve

having its convexity upward and in the lateral region. Since the

attention of the author was first called to a careful examination of

the curve of flatness as ascertained by light and delicate percussion

(in the erect position), he has found it to be more or less of an Ellis

curve at an early stage of the effusion. The line is sometimes better

defined than at others. All observers, however, must acknowledge that

at the stage of the disease when cases of chronic fibro-serous pleurisy

are first seen the letter _S_ curve is not well marked. Mason states

that although in some of his 200 cases this peculiarity was observed,

in others the line was horizontal. When fluid fills the chest to excess

and overcomes the elasticity of the lung, it gives flatness on

percussion high up, even to the clavicle, and behind to the

supra-spinous fossa. The fluid filling the cavity, the line of flatness

becomes nearly horizontal. Then it is that percussion reveals the

displacement of the diaphragm and abdominal organs. On removing the

excess of fluid by aspiration or by absorption, this curved line

reappears, and continues as previously.

[Footnote 30: See section on Pathological Anatomy of Pleurisy,

distribution line.]

[Footnote 31: _London Med. Times and Gazette_, Oct., 1882.]

{501} Contrary to the general belief, when the fluid is moderate in

quantity change of position of the patient modifies but little the area

of flatness, owing to its being retained between the lung and

diaphragm. Woillez[32] noticed slight mobility (never more than to the

extent of one intercostal space) only in 5 of his 82 cases. He

concluded that the conditions were very different from what they were

in ordinary vessels outside the body. Woillez does not attempt to

explain what these conditions are. Skoda acknowledged that in the

majority of cases the fluid does not change its position as the patient

moves. Skoda and Wintrich attribute the non-movement of fluid to

adhesions. Garland, and subsequently W. H. Stone and Douglass Powell,

showed that the effusions were immovable when in moderate amounts,

because they were kept so by the retractility of the lung, and that the

large amounts were movable because the retractility had been overcome

by them. When in large quantities the fluid accumulates in depending

positions of the chest. Later on in the disease, adhesions and bands

mechanically interfere with the line of flatness; or if there be any

disease of the lung interfering with its retractive force, the fluid

may not take its usual line. These peripheral adhesions frequently

occur at the upper margin, and are sometimes wavy and irregular. They

often occur early in the disease, and prevent in a marked degree the

fluid from yielding to the negative lung-traction.

[Footnote 32: _Mal. Aigues des Org. Resp._, Paris, 1872.]

By these bands the pleuritic fluids become sacculated in different

parts of the thorax--between the lungs and the walls of the chest,

between the diaphragm and lungs and the pericardium, the mediastinum,

the vertebral column, and actually between the lobes of the lung.

Fraentzel holds that the percussion sound is dull over the thorax

whenever the effusion attains the depth of from one inch and a half to

two inches between the lung and the chest wall. Garland by his

experiments on dogs shows that the fluid does not thus rise between the

lung and parietes, except a very thin layer, by capillary attraction,

not sufficient to cause flatness on percussion or to interfere with the

expansion of the lung unless the amount is very excessive, and not

until the lifting power of the lung is completely overpowered. When the

effusion is very large, it fills up the posterior portion of the

thorax, compressing the lung against the uppermost portion of the spine

or the mediastinum. The percussion sound is absolutely flat, provided

the force of the blow be not too great; in that case the ribs are

thrown into vibration or the vibrations extend to the sound lung. This

materially impairs the dulness and may lead to error of diagnosis.

The lung may be prevented from contracting by reason of various kinds

of adhesions or by means of widespread infiltrations, by emphysema, and

by laryngeal stenosis. In such cases, as the effusion increases, it

quickly rises in the thinner layers without displacing the organs.

Fraentzel warns us that sometimes, in left-sided effusions, the lung

having become adherent to the heart, the heart is drawn back with the

lung away from the wall of the chest, and then it cannot be felt

anywhere: the absence of the apex-beat and the feebleness of the

heart-sounds may lead us to assume, incorrectly, that there is effusion

in the pericardium. If the fluid collects between the external layer of

the pericardium and the mediastinum, the heart is surrounded and

pressed by the pleuritic effusion.

The Skodaic resonance is a remarkable tubular quality of resonance

heard on percussion when the effusion extends up to the fourth rib or

beyond it, nearly filling the pleural cavity. It is a high-pitched,

long vibration, semi-tympanitic sound, rarely absent when, from an

effusion, the lung is retracted to a very small size, but still

contains some air. It is most frequently found anteriorly under the

clavicle, near the sternum, because to that point the lung withdraws as

long as it has any retractility left. If the air be forced {502} out of

the lung by pressure, this sound is no longer heard. Flint called this

peculiar tympanitic sound, heard above the level of the fluid in

pleurisy, by the descriptive name vesiculo-tympanitic resonance. The

vesicular, though feeble, is combined with the tympanitic quality, and

the intensity of the resonance is abnormally increased. This

subclavicular tympanitic sound is not peculiar to pleurisy. It exists

in pneumonia preceding hepatization, and was noticed by Hudson, Graves,

and Williams before Skoda called attention to it in pleurisy. Skoda's

explanation of this phenomenon is now generally accepted--namely, that

it comes from diminished tension of the lung-tissue, caused by

diminution in the quantity of air, and consequently relaxation of

lung-tension. The residuary air in the alveoli does not mix properly

with the tidal column: it is indeed pent up by the narrowed diameter of

the minute bronchi. Thus it becomes surcharged with carbonic-acid gas;

this relaxes the air-sacs and lessens their tension. In fact, the

percussion sounds are invariably tympanitic when the parietes of the

organ which contains air are not stretched. When they are firmly

stretched, the sound elicited by percussion becomes less and less

tympanitic, and finally dull: such, we know, is the case in striking a

drumhead. The chief characteristic of the sign relates to the quality

of the sound; the resonance is nearly devoid of vesicular quality. A

resonance absolutely non-vesicular is always tympanitic (Flint). This

tympanitic sound is so constant under the clavicle that although it may

be from other causes, its appearance would lead us to suspect effusion,

especially in children. It is not only at the apex, but wherever the

lung shrinks from pleuritic exudation and loses in tension, the

percussion sound has the tympanitic quality. We find it occasionally

near the sternum, and sometimes in sacculated effusions we observe it

in different parts of the thorax. Traube, and subsequently Fraentzel

(_Ziemssen's Cyc._), called attention to the fact that sometimes a long

expiration would cause a temporary abolition of this tympanitic sound

at the apex. Their explanation is that the sound is heard over the

compressed lung. Garland urges that this explanation cannot be a

satisfactory one, for a certain amount of pulmonary expansion is

essential to the production of tympanitic resonance.

This exaggerated resonance elicited by percussion has received its name

from the eminent German who wrote so much about it; but it did not

escape the accurate ear of the discoverer of percussion, Avenbrugger,

who clearly defined the subclavicular tympanitic resonance in

pleurisy.[33] Skoda's sign, however, is not unique, for observation

proves, when the lung is contracted with fluid below, that there are

several varieties of resonance. Notta,[34] who was not aware of Skoda's

ideas, describes the sound as hydroaérique where the lung is above the

level of the fluid. Roger,[35] who called especial attention to Skoda's

views, admitted that there were several varieties of tympanitic

resonance heard above the fluid. He compares them to those heard on

percussing over the stomach of the cadaver. Woillez[36] describes five

varieties or types of sonorousness, according to their intensity, their

tone, and their quality. He noticed these under the clavicle at

different points above the liquid--ordinarily on the level of the

second or the third rib. (1) The most common and the best defined was a

short sound, dry and superficial; the tone of this was acute, with

exaggeration of intensity. Williams[37] in 1841 called attention to

these peculiarities. With this variety we frequently have a

reverberation, pointed out by Stokes in 1837--a cracked-jar sound more

or less marked. Woillez noticed this variety in 11 of his 82 cases; of

this number 9 were in pleurisy of left side. (2) There was exaggeration

of intensity or tympanism with a grave tone: 7 of Woillez's cases

showed {503} this variety, of which 6 were on left side. (3) A

subclavicular resonance, unnaturally acute, but with exaggerated

intensity. (4) Exaggeration of intensity, with equal tone on both

sides; only 2 patients out of 82 showed this variety. (5) Exaggerated

abnormal resonance, more acute than healthy side, and with normal

fulness of sound. These are all modifications of percussion sounds

elicited in pleurisy and other pathological physical conditions

resembling it, where there are variations of tension together with

other modification of the structure of the lung. The bruit de pôt fêlé

is sometimes clearly marked, as it is also in hepatization of lung.

[Footnote 33: Avenbrugger, _Ouv._, ed. de Corvisart, 1808, Paris.]

[Footnote 34: _Arch. gén. de Méd._, 1850, t. xxii.]

[Footnote 35: _Ibid._, 1852, t. xxix.]

[Footnote 36: _Mal. Aig. des Org. Resp._, Paris, 1872.]

[Footnote 37: _The Path. and Diagnosis of Dis. of the Resp. Organs_,

1841.]

Traube's Semi-lunar Space.--There is a point on the left side where we

find normally a vesiculo-tympanitic sound, first pointed out by Traube

and enforced by Fraentzel. It is situated at the anterior base of the

left side, and is of a half-moon shape. It is bounded inferiorly by the

margin of the thorax, and superiorly by a curved line whose concavity

is turned downward. It begins in front, below the fifth or sixth costal

cartilage, and extends backward along the margin of the chest as far as

the top of the ninth or tenth rib. Its greatest breadth is from four to

four and a half inches. This tympanitic sound is caused by the air in

the stomach, which lies well up against the diaphragm. When the stomach

is pushed down by the falling of the diaphragm, from excessive fluid,

the tympanitic sound disappears. The value of this semi-lunar space in

the diagnosis of pleuritic effusions has been variously estimated.

Fraentzel considers it of great significance in the differential

diagnosis between pleurisy and pneumonia; Ferber and Garland do not.

Weil suggests that the area of this space may be diminished by filling

the stomach and colon with solid or fluid food. Garland shows that as

the diaphragm's depression depends upon the excess of fluid overcoming

the lifting force of the lung, we may have, with a vigorous, unimpaired

lung, a large amount of effusion in the pleural cavity, yet the

resonance of the semi-lunar space may remain tympanitic. The condition

of this semi-lunar space is of most diagnostic value in extensive

left-sided effusions. The more the diaphragm is pressed down by the

effusion, the smaller becomes the space of tympanitic resonance. It may

gradually disappear altogether.

Auscultatory percussion may sometimes be advantageously employed to

detect fluid in the pleura, especially in the younger subjects, for

intercostal fluctuation may frequently be appreciated when we press

carefully with the palm or surface of the finger between the ribs while

the percussion shock is applied to another part of the same side. If we

auscultate with a stethoscope, the chest extremity of which is made to

fit in between the ribs, while another person percusses the chest, we

can sometimes detect the fluctuation within the cavity of the chest.

We thus see that in the diagnosis of pleuritic effusions percussion is

very valuable, perhaps the most valuable of the physical signs. We must

not, however, forget that its significance may deceive us if the fluid

is prevented from gravitating by pre-existing adhesions, or if it is

encapsuled between the diaphragm and lung or between the lobes. Cases

occasionally occur where, from fibrinous bands, the fluid is kept in

the posterior part of the thorax, consequently there is pronounced

clearness and fulness in front. Percussion does not enable us to

diagnose the consistence of the contents of the pleura, or its nature,

whether it be fibro-serous or purulent. To do this we must resort to

Bacelli's method, or, still better, to exploratory punctures by the

hypodermic syringe.

Palpation.--The sense of touch gives valuable physical signs in

pleurisy. At the commencement, before there is any effusion of fluid,

even of fibrinous deposit, we notice by palpation the decreased

movement of the walls of the chest, and also the sensitiveness of the

walls. When the eye cannot {504} notice modifications of the expansion

and elevation movements or movements of the ribs, correct views may be

formed by palpation, especially in regard to the amount of local

expansion in the upper part of the chest. In the lower part, by

inserting a finger in the intercostal space we notice the modification

of local expansion, also the convergence of the ribs taking place

coincidently with the continuance of the elevation movement. We are

thus furnished with additional presumptive proofs of the impermeability

of the pulmonary tissue. When fibrinous effusion exists, the hand,

early in the disease, recognizes the pleuritic friction or grazing.

Later on, palpation perceives the rubbing when the muscles have

recovered from their temporary paresis.

As soon as the effusion begins to form we detect a lessening of the

delicate vibrations of the voice as communicated to our hands, always

guarding ourselves against error by remembering that the normal sound

is greater in the infra-clavicular region of the right side, and that

it is always weaker in children and women, unless they have shrill,

weak voices, in which case it may be entirely absent. It, indeed,

requires a certain sonority of voice to be felt through the walls of

the chest. When we find that both sides convey the vocal vibrations to

our touch, we may be sure there is no effusion of fluid. Errors are

often made by applying palpation over too extensive a surface, thus

reaching beyond the fluid. It is important to use light, delicate

palpation, employing the finger-tips instead of the whole hand, in

order to exclude the vibrations from above as we approach the confines

of the effusion. This vocal fremitus is entirely lost from the base up

to the point to which the fluid reaches, and later on when it separates

the two pleural surfaces. This absence of vocal fremitus is one of the

most valuable physical signs of pleuritic effusion. It enables us to

diagnose it from nearly all cases of lung-consolidation except when

caused by malignant disease. When there are considerable pleuritic

adhesive bands, they interfere with the complete absence of fremitus;

but in children this sign is not so reliable. With them vocal fremitus

is often scarcely perceptible in health. In dry tubercular pleurisy

palpation gives us the characteristic friction. Palpation detects also

the rubbing of the two lymph-covered surfaces after the absorption of

the fluid. When there are thick fibrinous bands extending between the

parietal and pulmonary pleuræ, there may be a vocal fremitus

notwithstanding the presence of a quantity of fluid in the pleural

cavity.

Displacement of Adjacent Organs.--The displacement of the heart as a

physical sign indicating the presence of fluid in pleurisy is one of

great significance. It is indeed a cardinal sign, second only in value

to percussion flatness. It is almost invariably met with. Stokes[38]

stated that it was observed at an early period, and was one of the very

first signs of effusion; "that it may exist even before the upper

portions of the chest have become dull, and is a circumstance of

constant occurrence long before any yielding of the muscular portions

of the thoracic walls." The heart is displaced at the very commencement

of the effusion, and its dislocation increases pari passu with the

effusion. The absence of the displacement, unless it can be explained

by some special circumstance which rarely occurs, such as the retention

of the pericardium by old adhesions or consolidation of the opposite

lung, would negative the diagnosis of unilateral effusion. In this

condition there is a marked contrast with the displacement and

depression of the diaphragm and the resulting alterations of position

of liver, spleen, and stomach. These only occur when the effusion is in

great excess--not until from the large quantity of fluid the

retractility of the lung is overcome, and it is consequently unable to

lift up the fluid and the diaphragm. This altered position of the

diaphragm drags the heart {505} downward by means of the ligamentous

attachment of the pericardial sac to its tendinous portion. The

deviations from the normal positions of the heart in slight effusions

can always be noticed if the exact point of the apex-beat is sought for

by palpation and listened for with the stethoscope. Careful percussion

will show the shifting area of flatness.

[Footnote 38: _Dis. of Heart and Aorta_, 1854, Dublin.]

Powell calls attention to a fallacy with reference to cardiac

displacements in the earlier stages of effusion--that, as the base of

the lung retracts, the left or the right margin of the heart, as the

case may be, becomes uncovered. This may lead to an apparent delay in

the displacement of the organ, the more extreme left or right boundary

being now within reach of palpation. The axis of the heart is not

greatly changed by an ordinary degree of effusion. It becomes a little

more vertical, and in extreme cases it may become slightly twisted.

Only in rare and extreme cases does the axis of the heart become

altered in direction beyond the vertical line. Powell[39] found at a

post-mortem a heart that had become so twisted as to present itself

obliquely edgeways in front. Sibson had previously pointed out this

disposition of the heart to turn over and to present its posterior

surface forward in cases of effusion.

[Footnote 39: _Consumption and Dis. of Lung_, London, 1878.]

In examining into the cause and significance of the displacement of the

heart in pleurisy we find that until within a few years, it was, and

indeed very generally now it is, believed that the sole cause was from

direct pressure of the fluid actually pushing the heart away from its

normal position. Skoda, Traube, Stokes, Powell, and Garland were, we

believe, the first authors to show that such was not the case,

certainly in moderate effusions. The displacements take place when the

amount is very small--too small to exert any positive pressure. It is

true that nature places the heart in such a position that it can yield

readily to slight forces. It hangs in the pericardial sac, which is

suspended by the aorta, and which is bound by ligaments to the body of

the third dorsal vertebra. Every change of position of the body causes

certain anatomical alterations of the heart's position. Wintrich,

Skoda, and Braune think that the heart swings like a pendulum from its

base, and that its apex is therefore elevated with every deviation to

the right or left. Lebert says the heart is first depressed by the

sinking of the diaphragm, and then elevated by being pushed to the

right. Fraentzel says that in displacements to the right the heart is

simply pushed over, and is never elevated as Wintrich describes it. The

mediastinum offers but slight resistance, and is very easily pushed to

the right side, where there is no compact organ to resist, and where

the cavity is larger; whereas it is with more difficulty pushed to the

left, where the heart occupies so large a space.

It has been satisfactorily demonstrated that until the pleura is about

two-thirds full of fluid no positive pressure is exercised upon the

lungs or heart. According to Rokitansky, the lung cannot be compressed

until seven-eighths of the pleural cavity is occupied by fluid. The

fluid cannot be drawn off by a canula unless air enters to replace the

fluid. Unless the pressure on the fluid from within the cavity is

greater than that of the atmosphere we cannot draw off a large

quantity: if the pressure balances that of the atmospheric air, only a

few drops of fluid are discharged externally, except by forced

expirations and coughs. This is the case even when the quantity reached

several liters. The feebler the expiratory force the less fluid

escaped. Yet the heart is displaced as soon as the effusion appears.

The significance of the displacement is that it shows the presence of

fluid, but does not show the measure of intra-thoracic pressure

(Powell).

Garland's explanation is that the heart, with the sac and its

connections, "is placed between two highly elastic bodies (the lungs)

which are striving to retract in opposite directions. The heart,

therefore, being acted upon on {506} either side by opposing forces,

occupies a position where these forces just balance each other; and

this is the status of physiological repose in the vertical position of

the body. Now, when an effusion is poured into either chest, the lung

of that side contracts, and thereby exhausts a certain amount of its

retractile energy. The opposing lung, however, still remaining normal,

immediately begins to draw the heart toward itself, and the degree of

displacement thereby induced will be proportional to the diminution of

energy in the compromised lung." Stokes divided displacements of the

heart into excentric and concentric. The former he considered due to

direct pressure of the fluid, and the latter, when from any cause there

was diminution in volume of one lung, the other lung, by its increased

volume, forced it over. The concentric displacements, he thought, were

generally the result of some chronic disease producing atrophy of lung.

A system of practical medicine. By American authors. Vol. 3 · 第 77 / 161 段