CHAPTER XIX.

A Double Wedding.--Its Celebration.--The Honeymoon.--Its

Interruption.--Warlike Preparations.--Soong-kong

Invested.--General Ching's Despatch.--Tsing-poo

Recaptured.--Ti-ping Seventy Excused.--England's

Responsibility.--Curious Chinese Custom.--The Chung-wang's

Policy.--His Explanation.--The Ti-ping Court of Justice.--How

Conducted.--Opium Smoking.--Its Effects.--Evidence

thereof.--Forbidden by Ti-ping Law.--Opium Trade.

Soon after our return to Nankin, the Chung-wang, having left the Shi,

Mo, Ting, and other Wangs, in charge of the lately captured Shanghae and

Hang-chow districts, despatched considerable reinforcements to the

Ying-wang, on the northern side of the Yang-tze river, and to the

Ti-ping positions along the southern bank. These troops quickly

dispersed the Imperialist force supposed to be investing Nankin from the

hills on the opposite side of the river, and recaptured many towns on

the southern side.

Meanwhile, at the Ti-ping capital, Marie became my wife, while my friend

L. received the Chung-wang's youngest daughter in marriage. When

Cum-ho's father ascertained the state of that young lady's affections,

he sanctioned her union with L., although his better half made no little

opposition at first, her ambitious mind being directed to the Mo-wang as

a suitable son-in-law. This, however, she eventually accomplished by

giving the chief her next eldest daughter as a wife. We were married

according to the ritual of the Ti-ping church, but with the addition of

using a ring, in conformity with the usage of our own. The Kan-wang's

own chaplain, who was an ordained teacher of the London Missionary

Society at Hong-kong, performed the ceremony.

Since the arrival of the Kan-wang at Nankin, he had altered the Ti-ping

marriage service so as to closely resemble that of the English church,

to which he had been used when principal native instructor and catechist

of the London Mission. Although by the laws of the state polygamy was

allowed, the improvements introduced by the Prime Minister, in fact we

may term them regulations, had almost abolished the custom, so that few

among the people married more than one wife.

Although L. and myself were married on the same day, and nearly at the

same time, there was a vast difference between the style of the two

ceremonies. Marie agreed with me in preferring a quiet solemnization,

with only a few friends present; but L., taking to wife a chief's

daughter, was obliged to undergo the usual pomp and festivity.

After my own marriage had been concluded, preparations for that of my

friend were made in the "Heavenly Hall" of the Chung-wang's palace. The

Hall was decorated with flowers and a profusion of silken flags and

streamers. Several large tables in a side chamber were loaded with

bridal presents from friends, who, with all the household, were

assembled to witness the ceremony. The Chung, Kan, Foo, and all the

other Wangs present, wore their state robes and coronets, while the

dresses of many of the ladies were still more beautiful and dazzling.

Besides the Kan-wang's chaplain, the principal ecclesiastic in Nankin

officiated, dressed in a splendid black silk garment broidered with gold

and silver crosses, both of whom, attended by several priests, took up

their position before the altar, which was decorated with large garlands

of flowers.

At last, when everything was ready, the bride, completely enveloped in a

long white veil, was escorted to the Hall by nine young girls dressed

in scarlet, and with red flowers in their hair. At the same time L., in

the full costume of a Ti-ping chief of the "Woo" rank (to which he had

been raised by the Chung-wang's wish), came to the right side of the

altar attended by nine young chiefs. After the bridegroom and bride were

united, the ceremony was concluded by a short service, nearly

approaching to that of the Sabbath, and then, entering two magnificent

sedans, they were conveyed to their new home (a house given them by the

Chung-wang) by a vast and gorgeous cavalcade. The newly-married couple

now entertained a number of guests to a festive meal in the principal

hall of their house. Meanwhile, with my wife, I removed from the

Chung-wang's palace and took up my abode with L., the house being

divided between us.

During several months, as it is, I presume, with nearly all

newly-married people, we paid but little attention to the outside world,

and, with the exception of the periodical arrival and departure of our

friends D. and Captain P. with the vessels, and the addition of three

Frenchmen, who had served in the French artillery at Shanghae, to our

corps of the Chung-wang's army, but little occurred to divert us from

our honeymoon. In the mean time the Commander-in-Chief was occupied

making his plans for further operations against the Manchoo, with the

intention of recapturing the towns and territory that had lately fallen

into their possession, and making a movement against their capital,

Pekin. Before, however, these tactics could be put into execution, news

came from the Shanghae district of the hostilities commenced by the

British and French, and of the consequent defeat of the Ti-ping local

forces, and the capture of their cities and villages. Immediately,

orders were sent recalling the reinforcements despatched to the

Ying-wang, and the force operating along the southern bank of the

Yang-tze, while from the garrisons of Nankin and other cities troops

were concentrated upon Soo-chow.

With natural reluctance I prepared to accompany the Chung-wang on his

march to the threatened districts, accompanied by my friend, who felt

how difficult it was to part with his youthful Ti-ping bride. Our

feelings were not indeed to be envied when, upon a misty, heavily

raining, and more than usually disagreeable Chinese morning in May,

between the chilly hours of three and four, we set out on the march for

Soo-chow. Even Phillip, although his honeymoon had terminated long

before ours began, appeared to feel as gloomy as myself and L. upon

parting with our wives.

As we slowly rode through the high city portal, dimly lighted by the

glare of lanterns and torches, the rain poured down in continuous

streams, as though it never intended to cease again. Fortunately we had

the promise of the rainbow, and I imagine the Chinese must have known it

also, or the whole force might have become panic-stricken with the dread

of another deluge. Splash, splash went our horses, and tramp, tramp came

the soldiery, through the mud, the former drooping and the latter

dripping. The tenacity, consistency, and otherwise sticky properties of

Chinese mud, are really wonderful, and in wet weather cause the

pedestrians' feet, to sound like a huge sucker suddenly torn from some

sympathetic substance. The rain beating in our faces every now and then

compelled us to close our eyes and risk their being picked out by the

iron spikes on the ends of the bamboos carried by the surrounding

spearmen. Every thing and animal presented a miserable and draggled

appearance. The few trees in the neighbourhood of the city, dimly seen

in the hazy grey of morning as we passed under their shadows, looked

more like huge spectres outlined against the foggy background. The very

houses presented a weird and desolate aspect as they became faintly

visible through the heavy rain and dense atmosphere.

A march of five days brought our forces to the city of Soo-chow, when

preparations were immediately made to move the troops to the defence of

the Ti-ping territory in the vicinity of Shanghae and Ningpo. The

Tow-wang, with the principal part of his forces, had been recalled from

the northern side of the Yang-tze, leaving the Ying-wang in command of

the different positions still held. This contingent, with those from

Nankin and Soo-chow, the Chung-wang's immediate command, and other

detachments, composed an army of some 50,000 men. The Commander-in-Chief,

a few days after his arrival at Soo-chow, moved forward in three columns

to the threatened quarter. With my company of partly disciplined men and

a few light pieces of artillery, I accompanied the division attached to

the Chung-wang himself. Each of the other _corps d'armee_ were

respectively commanded by the Mo and Tow Wangs.

Marching rapidly upon the places lately captured by the allied

Anglo-Franco-Manchoo forces, those garrisoned only by Imperialists were

very quickly retaken. On Kah-ding and other cities held by the

foreigners with their irresistible artillery, no direct assault was at

first made. The Chung-wang's tactics were, circulating exaggerated

rumours that with an immense force he was marching for Shanghae, and by

continual mock attacks upon Kah-ding, Na-ziang, &c., with men carrying

numberless flags, to harass the garrisons so as to compel them to

abandon their positions. These tactics were entirely successful. General

Staveley, and the other commanders, fearing for the safety of Shanghae

and the fate of their detachments guarding the lately captured towns,

evacuated all excepting Soong-kong, which was held in conjunction with

the filibuster General Ward's disciplined Chinese.

Having recaptured Kah-ding, the Chung-wang established his head-quarters

at the city of Chang-za, some forty miles north-west of Shanghae, while

his subordinate generals successively occupied the places evacuated by

the allies. The brave Ling-ho, with his regiment of Honan guards, made a

dashing attempt to carry Soong-kong by storm. Just at daylight on the

morning of May the 30th, this gallant chief, with less than 1,500 men,

made a desperate attack upon the north-east side of the city. So

suddenly was the attempt made, that when the garrison had manned the

walls, the scaling-ladders were actually planted against them. These

ladders consisted simply of two long bamboos secured together at either

end about two feet apart, the man to ascend being pushed up by men from

below with another bamboo, while he assisted himself with the uprights.

Soong-kong would certainly have been captured but for the circumstance

of its being held by a strong detachment of the seamen and marines of

Ward's dear and invaluable friend Admiral Hope, who, at the expense of

the British tax-payers, instead of attending to his ships, chose to

scour Chinese territory, hunting for Ti-pings wherever they were to be

found. The first to man the walls of Soon-kong were the men of H.B.M.S.

_Centaur_, who opened a heavy fire upon the assaulting column at a few

yards' distance. In spite of this, Ling-ho led his men up their

scaling-ladders, and was himself the first upon the wall, the second

being the French commander of his regiment. Their gallantry, however,

was unavailing, the deadly Enfield rifles and the showers of grape and

canister crashing among the Ti-pings within half pistol-range proved

irresistible. Ling-ho fell mortally wounded while striving with his

usual surpassing courage to animate his men to follow him, and his brave

French officer was killed by his side. This settled the action, and

sorrowfully carrying off their wounded leader, the Ti-pings retired from

the attack.

During the next few days a part of the Chung-wang's division having

arrived before the place, Soong-kong was closely invested. On the 2nd of

June a large Imperialist force was driven out of some strong stockades

they had erected close to the city, while one of the _Centaur's_ gigs

and a dozen Chinese gunboats loaded with arms and ammunition were

captured in a neighbouring creek. Seeing this, the whole British force,

accompanied by a body of Ward's Chinese, made a powerful sortie, and

succeeded in recapturing the gig and two or three of the gunboats, the

rest being carried off by the Ti-pings. During the 3rd, 4th, and 5th of

June, each day an attempt was made to storm the city, and outside the

west gate a battery was erected, from which the besiegers opened fire in

the morning, but upon every occasion it was effectually silenced by the

superior fire of the British guns on the walls.

The gig's crew and some other Europeans captured in the gunboats were

not harmed by the Ti-pings, although, had the latter simply followed the

law of retaliation, they would have met with the fate of the

unfortunates who were delivered over to the Manchoo execution-grounds,

after having fallen into the hands of British soldiers during the late

freebooting raids of Admirals Hope and Protet, and General Staveley.

I cannot do better than give a few extracts from the summons to

surrender sent into Soong-kong by Ching, the chief in command of the

besiegers. General Ching, after a preamble setting forth the object of

the Ti-ping revolution, stated:--

"Now, having received our king's commands to hold the city of

Soo-chow, we had intended to remain there, and give the

Heavenly[19] soldiers rest, and not to take your place, not

imagining you would league with the foreigners and attack my

cities, forcing me to rise up and retake them. _For this

causeless misfortune, for this injury to the people, who then is

to blame?_ Had you not invaded my territories, I should not have

troubled you; _the people would have remained undisturbed._

Would not this have been better for both sides?

"Again, all the officers, both military and civil, all the

soldiers, too, and the people, are without exception Chinese;

and you eat the bread of the Tsing[20] dynasty, serving a

stranger....

"As for you, O foreign troops, you had best return to your

native country, as quickly as may be; _for, being a distinct

race_, AND SEEKING TRADE ONLY, _why should you contend with me,

or why should I be compelled to overcome you?_... If you are

resolved and will fight with me, I fear, indeed, your trade will

suffer."

Upon the l0th of June the Mo-wang succeeded in recapturing Tsing-poo,

the garrison of Ward's Chinese, a British force 600 strong, with six

guns, evacuating the city _after almost completely destroying it by

fire_! The filibuster officer (Colonel Forrester) in command of Ward's

force having, in his hurry, forgotten to carry off some of his loot

(gathered during the late successful campaign against the Ti-ping

cities), ran back for it, and was captured by the Mo-wang's men just as

he was rushing away loaded with sycee and dollars. This man, whom the

Europeans captured at Soong-kong, as also eleven British seamen taken

prisoners at the evacuation of Kah-ding by the allies, were all

liberated by the Ti-pings. In vain I represented to the Chung-wang the

policy of retaining them as hostages for any of his own chiefs who might

fall into the hands of the enemy, and most probably be delivered over to

the reeking execution-shambles at Shanghae and elsewhere. He would not

retain them, but had them released, so as to exhibit his unalterable

friendship for Europeans.

I would not willingly screen a single fault upon the part of my Ti-ping

friends; but, after viewing all events calmly, when many thousand miles

away from aught that could bias or warp the judgment, I must confess

that I can scarcely find the slightest grounds for censure upon any

point.

I had certainly intended to blame the Tow and Mo-wangs for the severity

of their measures towards the people of those villages, which, upon the

successful raids of the allied forces, had proved renegade, and had

given in their allegiance to the Manchoo. But, consideration of the

primary cause of the destruction of many Ti-ping cities and villages,

and the subsequent devastation of some that had been left whole by the

allies, conclusively fixes the guilty responsibility upon the latter, by

reason of their wanton attack upon the Ti-ping territory. After the

recapture of some places, people who had been well known as subjects of

the Tien-wang were found with the shaved head (the badge of the Manchoo)

and other strong and irrefragable proof of their traitorous conduct;

many of these were decapitated, and their property confiscated. In like

manner, some of the villages that had, with Chinese apathy, at once gone

over to the Imperialists, were burned down, and the people compelled to

labour as coolies. These measures may appear harsh; but, if events had

occurred otherwise, and the Imperialists had occupied the position of

the Ti-pings, fresh evidence would be given that there were prototypes

of the notorious Yeh in every Manchoo official!

The Shanghae district had been captured by the revolutionists; after

that event, the people were gradually settling down to the new state of

affairs, while those who had naturally fled from the shock of war were

fast returning to their homes and giving in allegiance to the dominant

power. In fact, so well were the lately disturbed departments recovering

from the effect of the civil war, that in a short time they would

certainly have attained the high state of prosperity enjoyed by the silk

districts, then thoroughly settled under Ti-ping rule. The question as

to the relative right of each belligerent has nothing to do with the

present argument. Each party to the civil war had their own causes and

reasons, and these certainly concerned no one but themselves. The simple

question is this:--After the Ti-pings had proved their power to

successfully dispute the Manchoo authority, and had wrested large tracts

of land from their foreign yoke, who became responsible for again

carrying the horrors of war, with its attendant misery and desolation,

into a country which would otherwise have remained happy in its freedom,

peaceful and nominally Christian? Who other than England?

Upon the suppositional "mights" elsewhere described, Admiral Hope and

his colleagues captured the cities and villages within a radius of

thirty miles from Shanghae, burning and destroying (as proved in this

work by the words of the Admiral himself) everywhere. These places were

then captured a second time by the Ti-pings, and subsequently recaptured

by the allies. Now, for the cruelties and devastations inflicted four

times over by the sword of Asiatic warfare, in the words of the Ti-ping

general long since in the presence of his God, I ask, "For this

causeless misfortune, for this injury to the people, who then is to

blame?"

Plain it is to all who will judge fairly and honourably, that England is

heavily responsible for the effects of the unprovoked hostilities

carried by her soldiers and sailors into the Ti-ping dominions. Besides

the more direct evil consequences of that most evil policy, there were

others not so well known though closely connected with it. In the first

place, few people are aware, or trouble themselves to reflect, that the

wholesale destruction of grain and rice by the allies (as per Admiral

Hope's despatches) led to the starvation of many thousands of the

unfortunate country people. The Ti-ping system of Government is one of a

paternal form (so favorite with the Chinese, but so seldom obtained),

involving a community of interests upon the part of every subject.

Consequent upon this, all rice crops and other descriptions of grain

were gathered regularly into the state granaries, and from thence

supplied to every person and family in the respective departments of the

"Land divisions of the Ti-ping dynasty." Consequently, when the whole

stores of food were destroyed in the districts ravaged by Admiral Hope

and others, the miserable people had literally nothing to eat; so that,

although the Ti-ping soldiery were killed in hundreds by the

irresistible foreign artillery, the non-combatants perished by tens of

thousands from famine.

Then again: the only means of support for the large Ti-ping armies, the

Government and administrative machinery, were precisely similar to those

of other nations; that is to say, from direct and indirect taxation.

Naturally, therefore, when England maintained the treaty ports against

the Ti-pings, and when Admiral Hope invaded their territory, many

valuable sources of revenue were cut off. If a nation, or organized body

of people, possess neither settled territory nor regular revenue, they

must plunder their neighbours in order to exist, and by this mode of

reasoning it is evident that England is responsible for all plundering

or brigandage committed by the Ti-pings when driven from their

dominions, and defrauded of their just dues by her intervention. At the

time, however, to which we have now arrived (summer of 1862), the

revolutionists had not been expelled from the valuable silk, and a great

proportion of the tea, districts, the revenue upon the productions of

which exceeded L2,500,000 sterling per annum. Previous to their

expulsion from these districts, the Ti-pings only acted as marauders

when literally compelled to do so in order to save their own lives, and

when any people in the world would have acted in the same manner. When

driven back by the raids of Admiral Hope and General Staveley, the

troops and people, rendered destitute, fell upon the nearest places to

forage and subsist. Otherwise, the only plundering ever indulged in by

Ti-ping soldiery was upon the _public_ property of the enemy. Private

property, except in dire cases of necessity, was always respected: most

especially were the troops careful to avoid injuring the standing crops

of grain--a course of conduct which forcibly contrasts with the

destruction of the cultivated fields of the unfortunate New Zealanders

by English soldiers, and with the outrages committed by the forces of

the Emperor of the French in Algeria! Most unjustly the Ti-pings have

been represented as "hordes of banditti," "ruthless marauders," &c.; but

these statements may invariably be traced to interested quarters. If a

few examples of sack and pillage have been selected to blacken the

character of the Ti-pings, are we to forget the names of Magdeburg,

Badajos, and Ciudad Rodrigo? Are we not to remember the progress of the

Federal General, Sheridan, through the Shenandoah Valley, as recorded in

the columns of the _Times_ of the 30th March, 1865? "Burning houses and

barns, he passed through the valley, and may boast of a destruction such

as _no_ Asiatic chief ever surpassed!"

When Admiral Hope ascertained that Soong-kong, the only remaining

Manchoo place outside the walls of Shanghae, was seriously threatened by

the Ti-ping forces, he sent up strong reinforcements to it, commanded by

Captain Borlase, R.N. Upon this, the Chung-wang gave orders to abandon

the siege; and, after placing strong garrisons in all the recaptured

cities, returned with the rest of his forces to Nankin. During the march

from Soo-chow to the capital, I became acquainted with a singular custom

of the Chinese. We had just passed through a village, when we came upon

a party of country people carrying a coffin to the burial-place. To the

great surprise of myself and European comrades, instead of interring the

corpse or building a grave over it, according to the usual Chinese

customs, two forked wooden stakes were fixed in the ground, and the

coffin placed upon them at either end. Upon inquiry, we were informed

that the dead man had been killed by lightning, and that the common

practice throughout the country was to dispose of the bodies of those

who perished in such a manner by placing their coffin on stakes which

would support them above the ground.

Soon after reaching Nankin, the Chung-wang seriously turned his

attention towards operating against the Manchoo forces further up the

Yang-tze, whose successes, though unimportant when compared with the

great Ti-ping victories in Che-kiang and Kiang-su, were yet becoming

dangerous to the supremacy of the revolutionists in that part of China.

When the Commander-in-Chief drew off all his troops from the Shanghae

district, after having retaken all the places previously captured by the

allies, he did so under the impression that neither England nor France

would again make war upon the re-established Ti-ping territories. A man

so noble-hearted, large-minded, and honourable, could not realize the

determined hostility entertained against his cause, or credit the

intention of Admiral Hope and General Staveley to resume active warfare

upon the arrival of reinforcements from Tien-tsin and India; he

therefore left garrisons amply sufficient to repel any effort of his

natural enemies, but neglected the precaution of leaving in the district

even a single _corps d'armee_, which would have frustrated the future

triumphs of his unexpected foemen. It was certainly necessary that large

additions should be made to the Ti-ping forces opposing the progress of

the Imperialists from the upper waters of the Yang-tze towards the city

of Nankin; still, this could have been thoroughly accomplished, and a

field force of at least 50,000 men left in the neighbourhood of Shanghae

at the same time. Had any such disposition been made, the easy success

of the allies, during their next campaign, would have been exceedingly

different; the disasters that subsequently befell the Ti-ping cause

would never have taken place; while the standard of liberty and

Christianity would now wave erect and triumphant.

During the interval between our return to Nankin and the commencement of

further military operations, I was frequently closeted with the Chung,

Kan, and other chiefs, upon the discussion of political matters. On one

occasion, at an interview with the Commander-in-Chief, my friend D----

was present, and translated a certain speech, which was subsequently

published in some of the Shanghae papers. He asked the Chung-wang "why

he had ventured within the limits of Consular Ports;" and received this

reply:--

"Why? Because foreigners have broken faith with us! The English

and Americans stipulated with us to remain strictly neutral in

regard to our war with the Manchoos. This agreement was kept on

their part by assisting, in every way they could, in the

collection of the very 'sinews of war' for the Imperialists;

allowing their subjects to enter the Manchoo employ, and at the

same time sending a man-of-war to force, at the cannon's mouth,

the return, and even punishment of the few foreigners who had

joined us! Was _this_ neutrality?

"This was not all: they actually, with their own Government

troops, _invaded_ our territory, and violated the most sacred

usages of war, by permitting, or not preventing, the Chinese

troops from committing the most atrocious barbarities. It has

been told us that, among foreigners, the proof of courage is

clemency towards the vanquished. But the torture inflicted

lately upon some of your helpless prisoners proves to us the

quality of your _neutrality_! Neutrality! Every few days we see

several Manchoo steam vessels, laden with munitions of war, all

to be expended to our destruction, passing under the very walls

of our capital, but flying the American flag! They are called by

foreigners the _Koong-foo-tze_ (Confucius), _Kee-me-et_

(Williamette), _An-te-lok_ (Antelope), etc. But for that flag we

would have sunk them hundreds of times. Is _this_ neutrality? Is

it not a most shameful perversion of the American nationality?

Is it not a vile trading--a base jobbery in the dignity and

honour of a noble people, who have never permitted their

officers to _openly_ violate our rights? Would not these great

foreign sovereigns blush to see the degradation of their flags,

perverted to such ends as private aggrandisement and infamous

prostitution?

"Moreover, as lords of our immense territory, we have a perfect

right to levy taxes on goods of natives passing through our

dominions; but by acts of gigantic fraud,[21] the foreign

consuls have given to native craft papers, and their national

flag, simply for a fee--thus robbing us of our revenues, in as

far as they _could_! Would any _other_ nation have borne these

outrages for years, as we have done, without making reprisal?

And we have been accused of relentless barbarity; of burning

towns, slaughtering the people, &c. Well, granted. It is the

hard necessity of war, which we would avoid if we could; but

knowing, as we do, the conduct of Napoleon in Europe, of the

British in India, &c., and the Americans in their own country,

we think such accusations come with a bad grace from

foreigners. The Ming dynasty was founded by a revolution such

as is now in progress; and we have never heard of a people who

expelled tyrants from their country who did not suffer both

offensively and defensively.

"That the foreign Powers are playing a game to suit their own

profit in China, is to us perfectly clear. When, some time ago,

we addressed their authorities on this subject (at the Consular

Ports), our communications were returned _unopened_. This

contemptible insult taught us that you foreigners" [the

translation of this part cannot be literally given, by reason of

the Chung-wang's use of idiomatic and figurative language, but

may best be expressed as follows:--] "thought our cause a

sinking one, or intended to make it so; and, like rats on

shipboard, you would desert--_not us, but your own professions

towards us_. Not long after, our capital was called, in a public

print, the 'City of Coolie Kings.' This title, which was meant

for a sneer, we thought the highest compliment possible: we are

indifferent as to what the Duke of Pa-le-chiau[22] thought of

the remark, or the Americans, whose capital might be called by

the same name with equal justice. It was easy to judge, from

these circumstances, and many others, at what value we could

esteem the lofty sentiments of honour, justice, and equity,

which foreigners professed towards the Chinese people. 1st. They

struck a nearly fatal blow to the Manchoo power; then, in

pretence of seeking the real good of the nation, they bolster up

the tottering _simulacrum_, and actively carry on operations

against us. They reform not one abuse of the Tartar Government,

and send for Captain Osborne's fleet![23] Will the most noble

Empress of England, the mother of her people, permit her brave

soldiers, and noble-minded naval officers, to serve under the

most cruel and corrupt Government officials in the world, and

furnish them with means to come to the Middle Kingdom, to crush

out at the cannon's mouth the last vestige of liberty, and

freedom of being governed, while professing our religion, as

seems to us most conformable to the sacred book (Bible)? We

cannot think so, though her officers have refused to receive our

communications!

"Will not one of you here present make it known to the

sovereigns of England and America, that by this conduct we can

only judge of them, and that it seems that they desire to

exterminate us. Of the French we have nothing to hope; _they_

have never professed any friendship for us! They (the French

Jesuits) materially assisted the Manchoos in getting possession

of the throne, for the sake of propagating a religion which

English missionaries have taught us to condemn. But, at least,

they have never deceived us by false professions!"

Within two months after our return to Nankin, I became utterly

prostrated by one of the forms of low fever prevalent in China. My

illness was long in duration and slow in disappearing, even when

recovery commenced. During many months I was confined to a sickbed, from

whence, but for the tender and unremitting attentions of my wife, I

should never have risen again. In the meanwhile my comrades had all left

the city, having proceeded with another expedition against the Manchoo.

Shih-ta-kae, the I-wang and brother of the Ti-ping king, had been

recalled to the capital, and in the month of September, 1862, marched

forth in command of an army destined to operate along the south bank of

the Yang-tze. The Chung-wang, with a still larger army, crossed the

river, and commenced a campaign having for its principal objects the

recapture of Ngan-king and the capture of Pekin.

While these armies are marching along their several routes, we will

digress for a little and notice two subjects particularly favourable to

the moral aspect of the Ti-ping revolution, though one of them has

excited no little hostility to the great movement.

The justice courts of Ti-pingdom form the theme of our first eulogy.

These are invariably conducted with the strictest and most simple

equity. The disgusting scenes, the inseparable concomitants of the

Manchoo magisterial dwelling, or _yamun_,--such as the torture of

litigants, criminals, and prisoners,--are entirely abolished. Defendant,

plaintiff, and witness, are fairly confronted; but under the sway of the

Tartar despotism either the one or the other is tortured if any party

chooses to bribe the presiding mandarin; or, if none have the sense and

means to sooth the majesty of justice with lumps of virgin sycee, the

_whole_ are tortured by that impartial functionary. The infamous system

of bribery is entirely unknown in a Ti-ping court of justice; _not one_

form of torture is permitted by law,[24] and prisoners or litigants are

afforded every facility to defend themselves consistent with justice. In

no way can a rich and superior adversary obtain any unfair advantage

over a poor man, none being convicted or punished but upon the clearest

and most decisive proof of guilt.

Ti-pingdom is one of the last places in the world likely to please a

lawyer; plaintiff, defendant, and prisoner having to plead their own

cases, which are then decided upon according to their respective merits

by the presiding chief and his assistant officers. All trials are

conducted more by the dictates of right and justice than the trammels of

law, so that the glaring injustice frequently caused by European legal

technicalities and quibbles is seldom committed.

The Ti-pings have one very singular custom in connection with their

"Judgment Halls." Two large drums are always kept hanging just inside

the porch of the outer gate, and are at the use of any person who may

consider himself aggrieved, or may wish to present a complaint, when he

is at liberty to strike upon the drums and demand justice from the

chief. A Ti-ping court of justice is generally a very imposing affair.

The gorgeous dress of the chiefs, their numerous attendants and body

guard, the many beautiful silken banners around the walls, and

especially the brilliancy of colour, strongly impress the observer's

imagination with an idea of what Europe must have been during its

earlier career, when it delighted in the same barbaric splendour and

feudal display.

The second subject of our digression is the abolition of opium-smoking

by the Ti-pings, which is almost the principal cause of the hostility

the British Government and nearly all merchants who trade in the drug

have hitherto entertained against the revolutionists. Although the

arguments to prove the utterly health-destroying and mind-pervading

effect of opium are many and incontrovertible, we may dispense with them

and give a few facts to establish the value of the prohibition by the

Ti-pings. In India, as well as in China, the unfortunate natives are

thereby utterly destroyed. In a communication forwarded by General

Alexander to Earl Shaftesbury (then Lord Ashley), from Mr. A. Sym, dated

the 13th of March, 1840, the following passages occur:--

"The health and morals of the people suffer from the production

of opium. We are demoralizing our own subjects in India; one

half of the crime in the opium districts--murders, rapes, and

affrays--have their origin in opium-eating.... One opium

cultivator demoralizes a whole village. Thus thousands of our

fellow-subjects in India are oppressed, and their health and

morals destroyed, for the sake of this infernal opium trade. So

completely is the production of opium in the hands of the East

India Company[25] that not a single poppy can be grown in the

extent of their vast territories without either the permission

of the Government or an infraction of its laws. The grower of

the poppy derives only a bare subsistence for its cultivation,

and the difference between 250 rupees and 1,200 to 1,600 rupees

a chest goes to the Government, which exchanges the drug for

silver at the auction mart."

This sort of thing has been continually on the increase since the above

statements were written, and the opium trade has now reached an enormous

extent, being fully equal to if not greater in value than either the

silk or tea trade. While the price of opium has been steadily maintained

or increased, that of western manufactures has gradually fallen off to

one-third the former rates, although the latter trade has not largely

increased, and that in opium has been more than doubled. The vast amount

of specie drawn from China in payment of this deleterious drug is

diverted from a more beneficial and righteous trade in British

manufactures, or in the cultivation of cotton, which the East Indian

districts now devoted to the poppy are so well adapted to produce. If

Lancashire would only look abroad it might see a mode of easily

increasing the British exports to China, till the eight or nine millions

annually paid in cash for the produce of China were replaced by them,

and the abolition of the opium trade had enabled the Chinese to barter

for English manufactures to a greater extent. The amount of clear profit

realized by the Indian Government upon the sale of opium is considerably

upwards of L5,000,000 per annum,[26] being the difference between L25 a

chest they give for it, and L115 they sell it at. The opium, upon

reaching China, extracts from that country the vast amount of specie

above mentioned, which would otherwise be expended on British produce.

Only a few years ago the following evidence was adduced before the

Select Committee of the House of Commons, on our commercial relations

with China, by Mr. Montgomery Martin, who was Her Majesty's treasurer in

India:--

"I inquired of the Taou-tae of Shanghae what would be the best

means of increasing our commerce with China, and his first

answer, in the presence of Captain Balfour, was:--'_Cease to

send us so much opium, and we shall be able to take your

manufactures._'... The true remedy for our deficient trade with

China is not to be found in the reduction of L1,000,000 to

L2,000,000 sterling of tea duties, but in perfect freedom of

intercourse with China; in facilities of access to the interior

of that vast country; and in the abolition of the pernicious

opium traffic, which absorbs L4,000,000 per annum, which would

be devoted to the purchase of British manufactures."

Proofs of the immense injury the opium traffic inflicts upon British

export trade to China might be multiplied _ad infinitum_. The drug not

only destroys the moral and physical principles of those who connect

themselves with it in any way, but it has been the direct cause of every

war England has had with China. The following statement by Mr. Martin is

so identical with what I would say myself that I cannot do better than

quote it with the appreciation it so well deserves. It was adduced

before the Committee of the House of Commons already referred to:--

"Minute 3491. In what respect do you think the trade injurious

to us in our relations with China?

"3492. Politically, with reference to our position with the

Government of China, had France, or America, or Russia, granted

us an island on their coast as a commercial station,[27] had

they prohibited the use of opium, believing it to be injurious,

we dare not, in that case, have made it a smoking-shop for the

empire; and I would not act to the Chinese Government in a

different manner than I would act to a Government in Europe.

Then, socially speaking, I believe it is the duty of this

Government to uphold moral principles and to disseminate

religious truth, and she cannot do that with one hand, while on

the other she is introducing into China an amount of opium which

furnishes 17 grains a day to each of 3,000,000 of people, and

which, in the language of Mr. Lay, Her Majesty's late consul at

Amoy, 'is ham-stringing the nation.' I think it is desolating

China, corrupting its Government, and bringing the fabric of

that extraordinary empire to a state of rapid dissolution.

Commercially speaking, it is injurious to us, because it

prevents the extension of our manufactures in China. Four or

five mercantile houses are engaged in the traffic, and derive a

large amount of revenue from it; _but the trade of England is

materially cramped by the extension of its consumption in China

to the extent of at least four million sterling a year_."

Now, this truthful statement was made in the year 1857, since when the

evils mentioned have increased to more than double their extent at that

period. We will also examine the opinion of the Chinese themselves with

regard to the introduction of opium into their country. Kinshan, one of

the most celebrated of the _literati_ of China, has written on the

subject, and how correctly all can affirm who know anything of

opium-smoking in that empire. The following is his statement:--

[Illustration:

London. Published March 15^{th} 1866 by Day & Son, Limited Lithog^{rs}

Gate Str. Lincoln's Inn Fields. Day & Son, Limited, Lith.

INTERIOR OF AN OPIUM SMOKING SALOON.]

"Opium is a poisonous drug brought from foreign countries. At

first the smokers of it merely strive to follow the fashion of

the day, but in the sequel the poison takes effect, and the

habit becomes fixed. The sleeping smokers are like corpses--lean

and haggard as demons; such are the injuries it does to life; it

throws whole families into ruin, dissipates every kind of

property, and destroys man himself. There cannot be a greater

evil than this. 1st. It exhausts the animal spirits; hence the

youth who smoke will hasten the termination of their years. 2nd.

It wastes the flesh and blood; the faces of the weak who smoke

become black and cadaverous. 3rd. It dissipates every kind of

property. 4th. It renders the person ill-favoured--mucus flows

from his nostrils, and tears from his eyes. 5th. It promotes

obscenity. 6th. It discovers secrets. 7th. It violates laws.

8th. It attacks the vitals. 9th. It destroys life. When the

smoker has pawned everything in his possession, he will pawn his

wife and sell his daughters; such are the inevitable

consequences."

To every word of the above statement, from my own personal experience, I

can give the most unqualified assent. The following extract from a

manifesto addressed by the distinguished Imperial Commissioner Lin to

the Queen of England, with regard to the _forcible_ introduction of

opium by British subjects, places the wrongly despised Chinaman in

pleasing contrast with the opium trafficking European. Commissioner Lin

said:--

"That in the ways of Heaven no partiality exists, and no

sanction is allowed to the injury of others for the advantage of

one's self--that there is not any great diversity (for where is

he who does not abhor death and seek life?), these are

acknowledged principles. Though not using opium one's self, to

venture, nevertheless, on the manufacture and sale of it, and

with it to seduce the simple folk of this land, is to seek one's

own livelihood by the exposure of others to death--to seek one's

own advantage by other men's injury; and such acts are utterly

abhorrent to the nature of men, and are utterly opposed to the

ways of Heaven."

No wonder the Rev. Dr. Medhurst, one of the most experienced

missionaries in China, has said: "Opium is demoralizing China, and

become the greatest barrier to the introduction of Christianity which

can be conceived of." And to prove this he states that almost the first

reply of a native, when urged to believe in Christ, is, "Why do

Christians bring us opium, and bring it directly in defiance of our

laws? The evil drug has poisoned my son, has ruined my brother, and well

nigh led me to barter my wife and children. Surely those who import

such a deleterious substance, and injure me for the sake of gain, cannot

wish me well or be in possession of a religion better than my own. Go

first and persuade your own countrymen to relinquish this nefarious

traffic, _and give me a prescription to correct this vile habit_,[28]

and then I will listen to your exhortations on the subject of

Christianity."

Never has there been a viler or more utterly debasing institution upon

earth than that of the opium-smoking dens in China. "Truly," as the Rev.

E. B. Squire, formerly a missionary to that empire, once said, "it is an

engine in Satan's hands, and a powerful one." It is necessary to

remember that this same engine of wickedness and abomination has been

systematically, and by the medium of several wars, forced upon China by

the English nation and the produce of her Indian possessions.

The very day that the monopoly of the China trade by the East India

Company ceased, the British Government commenced forcing the opium

traffic, by which means they brought about the first opium war. Although

the drug destroyed by Commissioner Lin was surrendered up _according to

agreement_ by H. B. Majesty's representative, Captain Elliot, yet its

destruction was afterwards perverted into a _casus belli_. From that

event may be dated a course of policy that all posterity will assuredly

condemn, terminating as it did in the Chinese Government being compelled

to legalize this nefarious trade.

Opium has ever been made contraband by the Ti-ping law, its use being

forbidden under penalty of death, and all cases of infraction being

strictly visited with the punishment of decapitation. As opium has in

every case been the primary cause of each war with China, and as it was

universally known that the success of the Ti-pings would have utterly

abolished the trade, it is by no means unfair or unreasonable to ascribe

a great proportion of the hostility the revolutionists have experienced

(from those bound by every other motive to be their warmest friends) to

the same cause. It is indisputable that nearly all who became acquainted

with the Ti-pings during the early part of their career, and even many

who did not, entertained for them the most friendly feelings; but no

sooner was it thoroughly understood that they were determined not to

submit to the introduction of opium, when, in spite of their

Christianity, &c., a strong party arose against them.

In China it is quite notorious that one of the principal mercantile

houses (Dent & Co.), after vainly endeavouring to establish an opium

trade with the Ti-pings at Wuhu (a city some fifty miles above Nankin,

on the Yang-tze River), by the means of their opium-ship _Nimrod_, which

was stationed there for six months, and where I have myself seen her,

did, after the failure of the attempt, become their most signal

revilers, and use all the interest they possessed against them.

Too many merchants, and, unfortunately, their national representatives

interested in maintaining the great opium revenue, have, in China, by

the blind pursuit of profit, sacrificed principle to lucre, heedless of

the grievous consequences. It is no less unfortunate that many of those

who are now designated "merchant princes" some years before made their

capital by opium smuggling; equally deplorable is it that still their

largest profits result from what by fire and sword has become the

legalized trade. Such, however, is the case, and principally for this

reason has it become popular to stifle the birth of freedom and

Christianity in the opium-ruined Chinese nation.

FOOTNOTES:

[19] The title (Tien-ping) of the Ti-ping soldiery.

[20] The Manchoo.

[21] Perfectly true.

[22] The French General in command during the Pekin campaign, who

received this title from his emperor.

[23] The proceedings to raise the "Vampyre" fleet in England were then

nearly concluded, and were known to the Ti-pings.

[24] The different methods of legal torture are numerated in the

Imperialist code by hundreds.

[25] The power has, of course, reverted to the Home Government since the

Sepoy revolt.

[26] By the last official return (1863-4) the export of opium from India

to China is given as 42,621 chests, and the gross revenue derived

therefrom, Rupees, 52,072,358.

[27] Alluding to Hong-Kong.

[28] These very words have frequently been addressed to myself by

Chinese opium-smokers, and I fancy scarcely any European has been in

China without having experienced the same.

Ti-Ping Tien-Kwoh: The History of the Ti-Ping Revolution (Volume II) · 第 5 / 12 章