Corporal Punishment

Children’s diseases are a logical result of children’s beatings ❦ To

shock, pain, grieve, anger or violently suppress a human being is to run

a grave risk of lowering that individual’s physical vitality to a point

where the person is an easy prey for any disease that happens along. That

which interferes with the vital functions, even in a transient way, is

not wise nor good. ¶ Extreme anger is apt to be followed by lassitude

or some marked physical disturbance. In fact, it is well known that

hate secretes a toxin which manifests itself in the breath, and in the

tissues ❦ What we call a disease is a symptom of vitality decreased

to a point where the forces of dissolution are active. A shock which

will blanch the cheek disturbs the circulation, and interferes with the

digestion. ¶ Perhaps the whipping did not mutilate, but it angered and

shocked until a fever followed. Dyspepsia is a matter of the nerves. Much

of our bad theology, if we could trace it, would be found to have its

rise in indigestion. And that it has caused pathological disturbances

of countless varieties, from catarrh to acute mania, is known to every

thinking physician. ¶ And of all causes of sickness, I know of none that

has borne a greater crop of cosmic cockleburs than the old-time plan of

whipping children. When Solomon put forth that unwise saying, “Spare

the rod and spoil the child,” an extent of harm was done the human race

that no pen can compute. That one statement should have convinced every

intelligent person that the Bible was just like every other book—good

and bad in spots. If accepted literally, the Bible is an atrocious

book, false, obscene and misleading, tending to insanity, disease and

death. Fortunately, we are now allowed to take the Bible as the garbled

literature of a barbaric and superstitious past, collected from many

sources, and good and bad, wise and silly, sublime and vicious—all as

the case may be. ¶ That millions of parents have bolstered their brutal

tendency to punish and inflict pain by that remark about sparing the

rod, every one knows. And always the tendency to beat the little thing,

too weak to strike back, was more to ease the feelings of the parent

than to improve and benefit the child. Moreover, it was educating the

child, for the youngster grew up and inflicted upon its own children all

the horror that it had, itself, endured. It was heir to the brutality,

heir to the Bible, heir to the strap, birch, rod, ferrule and hairbrush,

so these were in daily use in all Christian homes. ¶ In my childhood,

I remember a Baptist preacher who lived neighbor to us ❦ This man was

loud, lacrimose, brutal, a devout Christian, and a preacher of power,

snatching many souls from the burning. The way that gospel sharp used

to pass out his tidings of great joy broke in on my childish fancies,

so I became convinced that if God was really just, that pious, bawling

beast who fed fat on our chickens would go to hell, sure. But I kept

my suspicions to myself. This preacher had a strap cut from a side of

sole-leather—a strap three feet long, with tails, with which he used

to beat up one of his nine or ten children every day ❦ From the baby

wearing diapers to a big boy of sixteen, and a girl full-grown, they

all got it. I have heard their cries for mercy ring out on a winter’s

night when they would run out into the yard to escape their pious parent

intent on saving their souls. ¶ Once, one of his daughters, a girl of

fifteen, spent ten cents for a blue ribbon, and appeared in church with

the ribbon in her hair. Her father saw her from his place in the pulpit.

He noted her mark of pride ❦ He denounced her before the congregation,

and expressed a hypocritical, pious pain that his own flesh and blood

should be guilty of such devilish frivolity. Then he ordered her out of

the church. When he got home after the service, he fell upon her with the

strap. It pained him, but he felt it was his duty to correct her. The

mother was a sick and undone little creature, who twice had twins, and

bore at least one baby a year, except the year when her lord and master

crossed the plains and got alkalied. And this woman really believed, too,

that the children should be punished, and so she had a way of reporting

them, thus, “I’ll tell your father on you when he comes home!” She, too,

believed in Solomon, and she believed also in her husband’s religion.

Poor thing, she was too busy bearing babies to really think anything

out for herself ❦ But that Sunday afternoon, when her husband felt it

his duty to whip the daughter, the girl ran to the mother and demanded

protection. The good man was laying on the strap, anywhere, over the

girl’s head, shoulders, her arms and hands, although usually he picked

out some choice portion of anatomy and did an artistic job. ¶ Yet this

time the girl fought back, and she was only a slim slip of a thing. But

now, the womanhood in her was aroused. She felt insulted. She struck,

she bit, she scratched, she screamed. And then she ran to her mother ❦

Something in the little yellow mother was now aroused. Her child was

being abused. Well, what of it! Hadn’t she seen these whippings going on

daily for twenty years? But this was different ❦ The adolescent girl had

only given way to her innocent and natural desire to put forth a little

color and be beautiful. Now it was brute man against woman. The mother

seized the strap. It was jerked through her clenched hands with such

violence that it took the skin with it. The preacher had backed the girl

into a corner, and with one hand clutching her hair was laying on the

strap with the other, in the name of the Lord. The mother was behind.

Suddenly she seized a long-handled skillet that was on the kitchen-stove,

she swung it with both hands, and it landed square on the man’s head ❦

He was dazed, and turned half-around. Then he got another one. He was

getting a kitchen shower. One sharp edge of the skillet skinned one of

his ears and cut it half-off, as Peter touched up the servant of the

High Priest. The blood ran in a stream. The woman seeing the gore, and

amazed at her own temerity, fell in a dead swoon. The girl escaped and

ran over to our house. My father and mother hurried over, and, kid-like,

I followed. We found the preacher on his knees, praying over his wife,

begging God for her recovery ❦ He told us he had stumbled and fallen

against the cook-stove. My father took a stitch in the ecclesiastic

souse, and washed off the blood of the lamb ❦ The woman soon recovered

and was put to bed. The girl took care of herself. She told my mother

the truth of the incident, but was cautioned not to repeat it to others,

and she didn’t. ¶ The next Sunday the holy man preached as usual,

unctuous and oily, smiling and smirking, thundering ponderously betimes,

warning us to flee the wrath to come. ¶ This daughter died at eighteen,

of galloping consumption. One of the boys achieved considerable local

fame as a horse-thief. I believe he was the only one of that big family

who reached maturity, and this was because he had a pachyderm hide and

a heart of gneiss ❦ Several of the children died in babyhood, the rest

ran the gamut of about all the diseases in the books. And finally, the

Lord’s will was done. A long row of little white headstones in the

village graveyard marks where they sleep, freed from the strap, awaiting

a glorious resurrection at the Last Great Day. ¶ What killed them? The

strap, I should say, carried to its logical limit, with a plentiful lack

of love. Spare the rod and save the child, for love is life, and hate is

death. Love is better than a cat-o’-nine-tails, and Solomon, the wisest

man who ever lived, was a lobster—at least part of the time.

[Illustration]

[Illustration]

The philosophy of Elbert Hubbard · 第 28 / 50 题