_No quarter! We want all that you possess. We will be content
with nothing less than all that you possess. We want in our
hands the reins of power and the destiny of mankind. Here are
our hands. They are strong hands. We are going to take your
governments, your palaces, and all your purpled ease away from
you, and in that day you shall work for your bread even as the
peasant in the field or the starved and runty clerk in your
metropolises. Here are our hands. They are strong hands._—_Jack
London._
The above is taken from a postal card sent out by the publishers of
Jack London’s books. Jack is a Marxian Socialist all day long, and he
is much more frank than most of his party. All the other Socialists I
ever met, alternately admit and deny that what they want is a division
of property ❦ Jack London stands by his guns and declares, “We want
all you possess.” And when he says “you” he means the people who own
property. He is talking to the owners and managers of the “tools,” by
which he means the railroads, mills, shops, stores, factories, mines
and steamships. That is to say, Jack is going to take things away from
the present owners and give these things to “we.” Jack assumes that
property in the hands of the Socialist would be much better managed than
it is now in the hands of those who own it. ¶ This threat of Jack’s
would be a tragic thing if Jack and his pals were really going to do
all they say they are. But they are not going to do anything but talk.
That is their “hold.” Folks who can, do; those who can’t, chin. Jack is
a writing tramp who roams the world for thrills and copy. He is kindly,
intelligent, amusing, indolent, and absolutely without the power to
manage anything—even his own tongue. He is a good fellow; and he makes
folks think. In fact, he is the sparker to this paragraph. Jack made me
think, he made me mad, he made me laugh, and he made me write. Personally
I like the rogue—he is most companionable, especially if you have no work
to do. ¶ The tendency of property of every sort is towards depreciation
and dissolution. Only eternal vigilance and tireless industry keep a
manufacturing plant or a farm effective ❦ Jack does not know this. Jack
thinks that to own property is to be immune from work. The truth is,
ownership is a responsibility and a burden. Most of the Socialists I know
do not work—they only talk about work. ¶ What they want is an orthodox
heaven of ease, where the harps are always in tune and the robes are
always laundered. If Jack could take away the property from those who
have it and set them to work like peasants and “runty clerks,” then the
Socialists would live in “purpled ease,” as Jack and many other childish,
silly folks think that rich people do now. ¶ There is an “idle rich”
class, but it is a very small class, and it is not made up of the people
who manage things. It is made up of remittance-men—and some of these are
Socialists, who play at equality, badger the busy, and patronize the
poor. Leave the idle rich to Nemesis. Disease and death are at their
heels. ¶ The men who operate our great enterprises—mills, factories,
elevators, banks and department-stores—know nothing of ease. Their
working-hours are not limited by the whistle ❦ They sweat blood to meet
payrolls and to keep the wheels of trade revolving. Modern business is a
most exacting taskmaster. It says, “Thou shalt have no other gods before
me.” It demands every ounce of energy its devotee has. The thought of a
“good time” is not for the businessman. He works, and works eternally.
He works because he can’t stop ❦ And this is the man the Socialists are
going to send to the fields! Jack London’s view of railroading is only
from the bumpers. His philosophy can not deceive the section-hands, nor
the train-crews, nor the operators, nor the managers. They work, and they
work with care, precision, energy and economy. Each one does the thing
he can do best. That is what we all do. If Jack’s hands were the strong
hands he pretends, they would be grabbing plow-handles or a shovel,
instead of reaching for a hand-me-out ❦ If the hands of Jack and his
friends were strong enough, they would own this property towards which
they now look with lustful eyes. ¶ The world will be redeemed; it is
being redeemed. It is being redeemed not by those who shake the red rag
of wordy warfare, who threaten and demand, but by its entrepreneurs—its
workers, its inventors, its toilers—the men and women who do the duty
that lies nearest them. ¶ The fallacy of the Jack philosophy lies in
the assumption that the industries of the world would be much better
managed by Jack and his kith than by the men who are now at the helm ❦
In other words, Jack’s claim is that Socialists are a peculiar, separate
and distinct class of able, unselfish, competent persons with hands
especially strong, who accidentally are out of the game, but who are
soon to take possession of things and run everything in such a way that
Society will be blessed and benefited as never before. ¶ The fact is,
Socialists are not a separate and distinct class. We are all children of
Adam and Eve, and the differences in us are more apparent than real ❦ We
all have our limitations—read Carlyle! The weaknesses of humanity are
inherent in Socialists—only perhaps in greater degree. Their doctrine
of reaching Utopia through firing the men who now manage things is the
doctrine of despair. Fabian Socialism is something else—it is opportunism
❦ It does what it can, now. It does not wait for a revolution—rather
it believes in evolution ❦ We climb step by step. Fabian Socialism does
not preach class hatred. In fact, it does not recognize that either
the “class” or the “mass” exists. People who belong to one so-called
class today are in another tomorrow. Most of our so-called predatory
rich wiggled up out of the mass—and they may be poor again ❦ Many of
the poor will be rich. Watch the immigrants landing at Ellis Island.
Can you prophesy to what “class” these boys and girls—curious, quaint,
half-frightened—will belong twenty years from now? Many of them will be
contractors, lawyers, bankers, scientists, doctors, teachers—it is all
a matter of individual energy, intelligence and desire, modified by the
antics of the gods of Chance. There is no conspiracy in America to hold
people down and under. Class hatred, represented by Marxian Socialism,
says there is. There is nothing so savage, cruel and blindly unjust
as class hatred. ¶ I’ve been accused of class hatred because I make
statements from time to time that seem to reveal a lack of appreciation
for the three learned professions. Granted that I do, it is not the man
I criticize—it is the office. Doctors, lawyers and preachers are men,
caught in a certain environment, trying to win the world’s plaudits and
plunder in a certain way ❦ I may consider the way a mistaken one, but I
surely do not hate the man. And the fact that I have hundreds of close
friends among the professions proves that I am not entirely misunderstood
in this matter ❦ Doctors are men. Lawyers are men. Preachers are men.
So, also, are judges. Marxian Socialists are men, and all these are very
much like the people with whom they mix and associate ❦ Rogue clients
evolve rogue lawyers to do their work; fool patients evolve fool doctors;
and superstitious, silly people in the pew secrete a pretentious, punk
party in the pulpit. For the man, himself, I have only admiration,
respect and love—and sometimes pity. I may despise his business and some
of his acts, but how can I hate the man, when I realize that his life is
a part of the Great One from which mine is derived? This man may quit
his business and take up something else. ¶ The criminal is not wholly a
criminal—he is only a criminal at times. Some of his impulses are good,
and most of them may be excellent; but one mistaken act will brand him
forever as a criminal in the world’s assize. ¶ Under the same conditions,
if I were of the same quality and temper, I would have done the same
❦ If I criticize lawyers, doctors and preachers, it is simply because
there courses through my veins a quality and kind of corpuscle which
fits me eminently for success either as a lawyer, doctor or preacher.
“A hair, perhaps, divides the false and true,” says old Omar. ¶ Yes,
and I missed becoming a practising physician by a hair. Had I gone into
Medicine I would have had a team of bays, a coon driver, and a whisker
that would have put all the other doctors in my town to the bad. I have
the fingers of a diagnostician, a voice that soothes, a presence that
heals. If you didn’t have it, I could convince both myself and you
that you had. Then I would have cut into your cosmos to find out who
was right—and I would have charged you five hundred dollars for the
operation. If I were wrong in my diagnosis, you would never have known
the difference, for on occasion I can be discreet. ¶ The law is a game
that lures: it isn’t a matter of securing justice—not that. Truth has
a secondary place in the practise of law, and only very ignorant folks
imagine otherwise. The law is a game, and you play to win. The whole
thing is fascinating. It is a clash of wits—mind matching mind. As a
lawyer, I would have quibbled you six nights and days together; and I
would have been a legal lallapaloosa. ¶ Bill Reedy writes, “We are all
touched with the essence of the thing against which we strive.” And Bill
is sometimes right. That is all we can expect, even from the wisest and
best of men, and Bill is both ❦ Yes, I would take kindly to the law, for
guff, bluff and stuff come easily within my grasp. I can cross-buttock
a fact; side-step an equity; befuddle a judge—some judges; kerflumix a
jury; juggle with justice; put reason astride of a barb-wire fence; and
prevent a witness from keeping his oath to tell the truth, the whole
truth and nothing but the truth. And a fat fee would always reanimate
any flagging zeal I might have as to the justice of my client’s cause. ¶
As for the pulpit, I would take it now, were it not so securely fastened
down—hypocrisy, gush, glibness, Chicago Tongue,—yes, let Billy Sunday
look to his laurels! I, too, could tear a passion to tatters and make
the judicious grieve. I could hypnotize myself into a belief that souls
were “lost,” like collar-buttons under a bureau, and I was the one man
to rescue them ❦ Sure! Especially am I qualified for making Pastoral
Calls—or I was once. Also, I have great capacity for chicken-pie,
pretense, cheap social honors, and the applause of the unthinking. As a
Churchman, reversed haberdashery would have done me proud; breeks would
become me, for my shanks have individuality; and a dinky hat would set
off my sky-piece in a way not only to arouse curiosity but mirth. Let
Dean Hart beware—his job is not so secure as he thinks! ¶ Doctor Samuel
Johnson was for a time a member of Parliament in the capacity of cub
reporter. One certain speech he reported, and when the gentleman who had
made the speech read the report he didn’t exactly recognize it. So he
went to Johnson and said, “Look ’ere, young feller, I didn’t say that.”
“Certainly not,” said Johnson, “certainly not; but that is what you
should have said!” ❦ In recounting his reportorial experiences, Johnson
was once asked this question: “What kind of men are there in the House
of Commons?” And Johnson replied, “Take the first fifty men you find
walking up Fleet Street.” Johnson knew that all men, regardless of their
condition in life, are, at heart, very much alike. ¶ And when Fate has
flung a man into a certain situation, the man will, if it is a place
of some honor, give himself all the credit for having attained it. If
it is a position that perhaps carries no honor, the party will always
blame some one else for putting him there. We credit ourselves for our
successes; we blame others for our faults. Also, we justify ourselves in
everything we do ❦ And wise men see plainly that this self-justification
is a part of Nature’s great law of self-preservation. The exaggerated Ego
is a primal necessity. Good men all and everywhere multiply the value
of their work by ten. ¶ Success in life consists in convincing yourself
that you are the whole cheese, and then getting the world to accept your
view. Rostand’s rooster was fully assured in his own mind that the sun
would not come up if he did not crow. The hens being told this by the
rooster cackled it back to him, and it became a crystallized part of the
orthodox Zeitgeist ❦ And it would have so remained for all time, but for
an accident—an accident of love, when a guinea-hen became enamored of the
boss of the barnyard. So Life is a paradox—and love is not only illusion,
but it is also the great enlightener. ¶ Now, I know Jack London; I know
the proletariat; I know the “predatory rich.” And this I know, that so
far as happiness is concerned each and all of them have an equal portion
❦ The struggle in getting out of the mass has given Jack’s predatory
party a certain power, but he has paid for it with his peace of mind, and
has to struggle to hold it. “Purpled ease” is a thing that exists only
in Jack’s mental vacuum ❦ That is where the tramp has the start of the
millionaire. The tramp can dream it; the other fellow has no time even
to think it. ¶ When John Wesley saw the condemned criminal being taken to
Tyburn Tree, he turned to his friend and exclaimed, “But for the grace of
God, there goes John Wesley!” When Walt Whitman looked upon the wounded
and dying soldier, he said, “I am that man!” Emerson wrote in his _Essay
on Justice_, “I have in me the capacity for every crime.” ¶ And here is
what I say to Jack London: If you and your pals were in possession of
the tools of trade, you would commit all the so-called crimes of which
you accuse the industrial leaders, and more. The fact that your heart is
full of hate proves your unfitness to govern. ¶ These men now in power
have climbed step by step to their present position, and at every step
had to prove their worth, before they were allowed to go on. These tools
of which you speak are sharp, and men like you, unskilled in their use,
would cut others with them, and they in turn would take the tools and
cut your head off. ¶ Your hands are not as strong as you imagine. The
strength of the hands of men is not proven by assertion—it is proven by
use. How far can you put the shot? Power unrestrained is always tragic.
The world is held in place by the opposition of forces. The men in
power are ballasted by responsibility, as never before in history. You
have your use as an agitator; so go it, Jack, and say your say. ¶ That
fly on the wheel of the chariot of Achilles said, “Oh, just see what
a dust we do kick up!” ¶ And this remark of the fly has added to the
gaiety of nations. But get enough flies on the chariot of Achilles and
not a wheel revolves. The Egyptians in Moses’ time battled with swarms
of flies, when the flies scored home-runs and base-hits. Self-interest
and the tug of inertia have hypnotized you, Jack, until you, being down
in the gutter—through choice—see only your side. Yet, your barbaric
yawp is being heard, and I am your antipodal organ, passing it along.
¶ Meanwhile you ride on the bumpers provided by the Trusts, and these
bumpers carry you forward to your destination. The pie you eat is made
by the Pie Trust, yet you find it palatable and ask for more. If the Pie
Trust didn’t make good pies and sell them at a fair valuation, housewives
would make their own pies. Or they might find pie-timber too expensive,
and then you would go pieless ❦ The great consolidated industries serve
society, and their very existence turns on their ability to minister and
to help. That which does not serve, dies. If the Trusts overcharge they
invite competition and dissolution. ¶ Success lies in co-operation and
reciprocity, and the hope of the future is in the fact that the world
knows it. We can’t go back to chaos, and start over. We must go on. Light
lies ahead, not behind. We are not going to take off the train-crews,
and put the tramps in possession. There are accidents occasionally now,
but there would be more then. Safety lies in getting rid of the tramps.
One wide-awake, vigilant man at the switch is worth more to society than
all the tramps who ride the brakebeams. Get to work, Jack, and if you
can’t find the job you want, then take the one you can get! To prove
yourself able to rastle a big job, get busy and take care of a little
one. Power does not reveal itself in scolding. And with all your getting,
get busy! ¶ Yours for the Evolution!
[Illustration]
[Illustration]