When the concours of 1874 arrived--the annual prize contest of

the _Conservatoire_--Gabrielle’s progress had been such that her

fellow-students and her professor all thought her sure of the first

prize in comedy. Regnier chose for her one of Roxelane’s scenes in

_Les Trois Sultanes_. When she had finished she felt that she had

done herself scant justice. Then the unexpected happened. She was

also to appear in a dialogue called _La Jeunesse_, by Emile Augier. A

youthful couple met at a fountain. The young man says: “Cyprienne!” She

exclaims: “Ah! Mon Dieu!” Gabrielle delivered this commonplace speech

with such a sincerity and intensity of emotion that the audience broke

into applause. Reassured, she played the dialogue through to the end

with a command of emotional acting that surprised even her friends, for

she had been thought of as only a _comédienne_, a soubrette.

When the prizes were announced, Gabrielle found that she had not only

missed getting the first comedy prize, but that she was to get only a

share of the second; the other half was to go to Mlle. Jeanne Samary,

she “of the perfect laugh.”

Regnier was chagrined. “_Malfaiteurs_,” he called the judges. And some

of the newspaper comment showed a recognition of unusual merit in the

young Réjane. Sarcey, the reigning king of the Paris critics, had

again been present, and _Le Temps_ rang with his praises of her. And

his praises were perhaps better than official prizes. A score of years

later, M. Meunier wrote:

“To-day, as then, though twenty years have passed, there is no

possibility of success, no chance of getting an engagement, for a pupil

on leaving the _Conservatoire_, unless a certain all-powerful critic,

supreme judge, arbiter beyond appeal, sees fit to pronounce a decision

confirming the verdict of the Examining Jury.... He smiles or frowns,

the Jury bows its head. The pupils tremble before this monstrous

Fetich--for the Public thinks with him, and sees only through his

spectacles; and no star can shine till his short sight has discovered

it. This puissant astronomer is Monsieur Francisque Sarcey....

“Monsieur Sarcey smiled upon and applauded Réjane’s début at the

_Conservatoire_. He consecrated to her as many as fifty lines of

intelligent criticism; and I pray to Heaven they may be remembered to

his credit on the Day of Judgment. Here they are, in that two-penny,

half-penny style of his, so dear to the readers of _Le Temps_:

“‘I own that, for my part, I should have willingly awarded to the

latter (Mlle. Réjane) a first prize. It seems to me that she deserved

it. But the Jury is frequently influenced by extrinsic and private

motives, into which it is not permitted to pry. A first prize carries

with it the right of entrance into the _Comédie Française_; and the

Jury did not think Mademoiselle Réjane, with her little wide-awake

face, suited to the vast frame of the House of Molière. That is well

enough; but the second prize which it awarded her authorized the

director of the _Odéon_ to receive her into his company; and that

perspective alone ought to have sufficed to dissuade the Jury from the

course it took.... Every one knows that at present the _Odéon_ is,

for a beginner, a most indifferent school.... Instead of shoving its

promising pupils into it by the shoulders, the _Conservatoire_ should

forbid them to approach it, lest they should be lost there. What will

Mademoiselle Réjane do at the _Odéon_? Show her legs in _La Jeunnesse

de Louis XIV_, which is to be revived at the opening of the season?

A pretty state of things. She must either go to the _Vaudeville_ or

to the _Gymnase_. It is there that she will form herself; it is there

that she will learn her trade, show what she is capable of, and prepare

herself for the _Comédie Française_, if she is ever to enter it....

She recited a fragment from _Les Trois Sultanes_.... I was delighted

by her choice. _Les Trois Sultanes_ is so little known nowadays....

What wit there is in her look, her smile! With her small eyes, shrewd

and piercing, with her little face thrust forward, she has so knowing

an air, one is inclined to smile at the mere sight of her. Does she

perhaps show a little too much assurance? What of it? ’Tis the result

of excessive timidity. But she laughs with such good grace, she has

so fresh and true a voice, she articulates so clearly, she seems so

happy to be alone and to have talent, that involuntarily one thinks of

Chenier’s line: “_Sa bienvenue au jour lui rit dans tous les yeux_.”...

I shall be surprised if she does not make her way.’”

Second prize or first, it mattered not, really; for she had, almost at

once, offers from three theatres: the _Odéon_, the government theatre

that by the conditions of the award had a right to her services, and

also from the _Vaudeville_ and the _Gymnase_. M. Duquesnel of the

_Odéon_ proposed, as Sarcey had predicted, that she take a part in the

impending _La Jeunesse de Louis XIV_. Réjane, however, declined to cut

short her studies at the _Conservatoire_, which had yet a few weeks to

run.

Her choice fell to the _Vaudeville_, as the theatre best suiting her

methods and sympathies. Also, the pay there was to be four thousand

francs per year, and costumes, as against one hundred and fifty francs

per month at the _Odéon_. With the directors of the _Vaudeville_ she

signed a provisional contract, by the terms of which she was to join

their forces if the _Odéon_ did not press home its claim to her.

Weeks passed, the October openings came round, and still there was

no summons. In her anxiety she went to the office of the Minister of

Fine Arts and from him obtained a letter releasing her, in two days’

time, from her obligations to the _Odéon_. Before the two days were

up, however, she received from Duquesnel a summons to a rehearsal

of _La Jeunnesse_. Réjane hastened to see him. “Well,” he said, “we

shall rehearse to-morrow at one.” Réjane replied that she had one at

the _Vaudeville_ at the same hour. Duquesnel objected to the loss of

his promising recruit and showed an official letter bestowing her

services upon the _Odéon_. Gabrielle in turn showed the letter from the

Minister. Duquesnel was forced to yield, but afterwards lodged a suit

in which the _Odéon_ was awarded damages. “So,” said Réjane to Jules

Huret, “if the _Odéon_ can to-day boast its velvet chairs, it has me to

thank for them.”

And so Réjane began her career, when she was less than eighteen, with

a two years’ engagement at the _Vaudeville_. Her first few rôles[98]

were unimportant, and in them she attracted no particular notice, but

in September (1875) she appeared in _Madame Lili_, a one-act play in

verse, to such good purpose that Sarcey wrote of her: “Mademoiselle

Réjane is charming, with her roguery, her ingenuousness, her

tenderness. This pretty and piquant girl is spirited to her fingertips.

What a piece of good luck it is that she cannot sing; for if she had a

voice operetta would gobble her up.”

Yet Regnier wrote to her in the following April, on the day following

her appearance in _Le Premier Tapis_ (in which she sang an interpolated

song by Lecocq): “I was really astonished by your singing. You had

better cultivate this talent, which I didn’t know you had.” Offenbach

also heard her in this piece, and liked her singing so well that he

offered her twenty thousand francs a year for her signature to a

contract at the _Variétés_. Luckily she made no attempt to break her

contract with the _Vaudeville_.

That contract she renewed again and again until she had played eight

seasons at the theatre of her first choice. The best guide to her

growing art, and to the beginnings of her fame, are found in her

letters from Regnier, who followed her career with loving watchfulness,

and often with frank, kindly comment on her work. Their correspondence

forms a charming chapter of her youth.

Regnier’s birthday fell on the first of April. Every year Réjane wrote

to him on March 31 and sent him some small gift. In the year when she

was beginning her work at the _Vaudeville_ he wrote her:

“Ought you really send me presents, my child? Do I need assurances of

your affection? Do follow my advice, dear girl, save your money and

give me nothing but your friendship. That is the only present I desire

from you and, I warn you, it is the only one I shall accept in the

future. You hope to be able to celebrate my birthday for many years

to come. I hope so too. You will never have a better friend, a better

adviser, and no one, save only your mother, will ever bear your welfare

more at heart. I thank you, none the less, and with all my heart I

embrace you.”

At the close of a health-seeking trip she took in Holland and Belgium

in the summer of 1875 he wrote: “I knew you would get many new

impressions. You must always be on the search for like ones, for your

spirit, your ideas, your taste, your talent will thus find themselves.

Frequent our museums, stimulate your mind, read a great deal, even do a

little writing. Such is the intellectual regimen that will profit your

soul as the exercises I have advised will benefit your gentle body.”

Less exalted advice comes after _Le Verglas_ and _Le Premier Tapis_,

besides the commendation of her singing in the latter piece: “Keep

at your study and your work and let me repeat that it is the simple

and the veracious that brings the true effect. But I was more

than satisfied with you yesterday. _But_, please remember your

carriage--don’t waddle on one leg and then on the other; don’t

swallow your syllables and your words. Pronounce everything without

affectation, but also without negligence. I embrace you.”

After she had been a year and a half in harness, he was still

emphasizing the fundamentals. After _Le Perfide comme l’Onde_ he

wrote (November 26, 1876): “You are very pretty and very amusing in

your rôle.... _You are a comédienne_,--that you have proved. Between

ourselves, the other young ladies frightened me a bit. Do not you

allow yourself to fall into the general carelessness of carriage and

pronunciation. Really talk to those to whom your words are addressed,

and when your eyes peer into the auditorium remember it is a vacuum,

and never talk to any one therein. You know how to avoid this fault,

so look out for it, and remain natural. But you played well, were

applauded, and deserved to be.”

Her work must have pleased the directors of the _Vaudeville_, for

when the time came to renew her contract she signed for nine thousand

francs, a considerable advance over four thousand. Her mother, however,

had set her heart on nine thousand six hundred francs, and her

objections threatened to break off the negotiations. Réjane promised,

however, unknown to her mother, to repay the disputed six hundred

francs during the engagement.

“I economized on cress,” she relates. “Instead of getting two boxes at

three sous apiece, I got two boxes at five sous. From time to time I

put fifteen centimes into my boots. And one fine day I carried to the

managers one hundred and fifty laboriously collected francs. I must

say, to their credit, that they wouldn’t take the money. But my mother

never knew, and sometimes, endeavoring to crush me with the superiority

of a strong-minded woman, she would say: “There now! Without me, you

would never have had those six hundred francs.”

In the summer of 1877 she grew nervous over the forthcoming production

of _Pierre_. She wrote Regnier from Abbeville: “If you could only

give me one hour for the third act of _Pierre_. The nearer the

time approaches, the more I fear that act--all sentiment. If I am

unsupported by your good advice, my dear master, I cannot answer for

myself.”

Regnier was eager to help her; and in his response he gives her more

fatherly advice: “My greatest wish is to help you in your work.... But

is it necessary for you to go to La Bourbelle, where you will stay

hardly two weeks? The time seems to me much too short for serious

treatment. Can’t you simply betake yourself to the waters of Enghien?

“Talk this over with your doctor: ask him if it is really good for

the nerves that that abominable musk or amber odor which perfumes

your letters should permeate your whole system. No doubt the odor is

agreeable, but still that is a matter of taste.”

The _première_ of _Pierre_ proved the first crowning success for the

young actress. Immediately after the performance, unable to restrain

her overflowing joy, she wrote to Regnier this enthusiastic letter:

“I have just had a _grand succès_, and I don’t wish to sleep before

thanking you, to whom I owe it. I have never been so happy as I am

tonight, and I believe that, if such a thing is possible, even my

affection for you has grown. One thing alone distresses me, and that

is my inability to repay you for all you have done. At each burst

of applause, I thought of you, dear master, who have given me your

time and made sure for me my future. No affection has ever been more

profound nor any gratitude so sincere, believe me. Without you I would

have been nothing, but with you--two hours ago they told me I was an

artist! I can open my heart to you. You cannot imagine how much is

included in that one word “artist” especially to a young girl, who

yesterday had doubts about the future and had need of reading all your

letters in order to give courage.... I am doubly happy. Do not mistake

for vanity the effects of the great joy I have been experiencing. How I

would work, dear master, to do you the honor of registering a multitude

of such nights!”

But good parts fell to Réjane’s lot only infrequently. The reigning

queen of the _Vaudeville_ was Mme. Bartet, and it was she, naturally,

who got most of the leading rôles. The public had begun to like

the young newcomer, whom it had come to know in her small but

repeated successes; but nevertheless she was kept more or less in

the background, encouraged only by Regnier and patiently waiting her

opportunities.

It was in this fashion that she spent the remaining time at the

_Vaudeville_ until she left it in the spring of 1882. That period,

whatever dissatisfactions it brought to her, is not without its high

lights. In _Le Club_ she has “_un vrai rôle_,” and played it, with

gratifying success, a hundred times. In April, 1879, Mme. Bartet fell

suddenly ill, and with only a few hours notice Réjane assumed the

older woman’s rôle in _Les Tapageurs_. When _Les Lionnes Pauvres_ was

revived, in November 1879, her Séraphine aroused one of those artistic

controversies which delight the French mind. Sarcey disapproved,

for once. M. Defère advised her to change her costumer. M. Barbey

d’Aurevilly on the other hand said she recalled Rachel and was a true

artist; Augier, the author of the play, sustained her; and stanch old

Regnier wrote her at length, discoursing on the art of acting and of

his _affection véritable_. Her Mimi in _La Vie de Bohème_ again saw the

critics at odds about her.

Altogether in her eight seasons at the _Vaudeville_, she had played

more than a score of parts, some of them genuine successes. Yet she

had not won genuine recognition at the hands of the directors, and

her position in the company was hardly in accord with her promise and

deserts. Sardou and the others responsible for the affairs of the

_Vaudeville_ seemed strangely blind to the fact that in Réjane they had

a _comédienne_ of the first order. But though she was by her superiors

much of the time either kept idle or employed in almost insignificant

parts, the rest of Paris speedily knew her for what she was. She was

in keen demand for all the special, semi-informal performances that

make up so large a part of the artistic life of the normal Paris. The

“spectacles” of the _Cercle de la rue Royale_, the _revues_ at the

_Epatant_, the dramatic trifles that were the adjuncts of authors’

readings, all found in Réjane a willing and able helper. She took these

artistic informalities seriously, rehearsed for them and costumed them

with care, and was so particularly well adapted to the work that she

became a marked favorite with the very social and artistic circles to

which the _Vaudeville_ catered.

As the directors, however, continued to give her insignificant parts,

it is not strange that she listened to those friends, like Pierre

Berton, who urged her to shake the dust of _Vaudeville_ from her feet.

“You are a star,” Berton told her. It happened that a star was the

quest just then of M. Bertrand of the _Variétés_ and with him she

signed a three years’ contract.

This moment may be said to mark the definite arrival of Réjane. She was

no longer to cool her heels in the greenroom or at home, and henceforth

she was to play, as a rule, principal parts. Moreover, the agreement

with the _Variétés_ was elastic enough to allow appearances at other

theatres, often in plays of more import than the light material of

which the _Variétés_ was the avowed medium. And when she returned, on

occasion, to the _Vaudeville_, it was not in minor rôles. Réjane had

assumed her due place on the stage of Paris.

It had not been a difficult rise. Though it is not possible to overlook

the elements of steadfast ambition, patience, and hard work in Réjane’s

early career, it is true that her native spirits, her _flair_, and

the training and friendship of Regnier made inevitable her right to a

prominent place on the stage of Paris.

With that place assured, we see her thenceforth steadily enlarging it,

progressing from part to part, appearing now in this theatre of Paris

and now in that, shortly venturing into the other capitals of Europe,

then making a tour--to be later repeated--in America, and finally

acquiring a theatre of her own in Paris,--an international figure, a

queen of comedy.

M. Porel, whom Réjane afterward married, has given a graphic account

of one of her earlier triumphs--and a typical Parisian first night.

The play was de Goncourt’s _Germinie Lacerteux_, the date, 1888; the

theatre the _Odéon_.

“Oh, that première! The beautiful theatre was crowded to the last inch

with an audience that was restless and seemed none too good-natured.

The journalists were furious because the dress rehearsal had been

behind closed doors. The women were puzzling themselves about

the subject of the play, and some of the literary gossips were

loudly telling all they thought they knew. The _cafétiers_ of the

neighborhood, disgruntled because the usual five _entr’actes_ had

been cut down to two, were protesting to the _claque_ against the

change, which interfered with the sale of the usual five bocks. Amid

the confusion of the lobbies were heard remarks that the piece was

impossible.

“The curtain rises; Réjane makes her appearance, with her arms as red

as those of a kitchen-girl. In the ball gown of a servant-maid she is

indeed amazing. This little scene she plays well, and wins applause. In

the scene of the fortifications, some of the hissers are in evidence

before she enters; and then Réjane, so prettily modest, plays her

idyllic scene so well that the delighted audience breaks into cries

of ‘Bravo!, and the curtain is raised and raised again.... In one of

the following scenes, some of the audience refuse to listen to Mme.

Crosnier; she becomes confused, loses her head and begins over again.

Some cry aloud, some laugh, some hiss. Without Réjane the piece will

go on the rocks. A gesture, a poignant, sincere cry, and Réjane has

the house with her again. They applaud her, they recall her again and

again. During the _entr’acte_, there is a stormy time. Antoine is

indignant over the sneering of his neighbors and calls them scoundrelly

imbeciles. There is shaking of fists, challenges are exchanged, some

hiss, others applaud. It is in this atmosphere that the scene in

the creamery begins. Then it was that she quite won the house. She

is again recalled again and again, applauded by the whole audience.

She is acclaimed again, after the fall of the curtain in the scene

of the _Rue du Roiher_. The ladies were completely upset; they wept,

they clapped their hands. Even without Réjane, the two last scenes

finished themselves somehow. After that, de Goncourt’s play was to

live more than one night; and after that Réjane was assuredly a great

_comédienne_.”

Two years later, when _Ma Cousine_, a comedy in three acts by

Henri Meilbac, was produced, Paris saw that Réjane had again made

extraordinary progress. “Playing,” says M. Huret, “in a vast

auditorium, a rôle that demanded large dramatic power, she responded

to that demand, and, exhibited new poise, control of voice, and

exactness of articulation. She who had heretofore almost expired of

apprehension at each new impersonation, was now calm, sure of herself,

almost indifferent. She sensed the authority that had come to her; she

held the audience in her hand. In _Décoré_, in _Monsieur Betsy_, she

had been one of a remarkable trio of actresses; now, in _Ma Cousine_,

she outshone her _confrères_ at all points. The author had set her

the difficult task of playing an act three quarters of an hour long

without rising from her couch. But she was equal to the occasion, and,

by the intelligence and sprightliness of her inflections, gestures and

facial expression, she made that chair itself a miniature theatre.”

It was in _Ma Cousine_ that Réjane introduced on the boards of the

_Variétés_, after careful study, a bit of dancing like that on view

at the _Elysée-Montmartre_; “she seized on and imitated the grotesque

effrontery of Mlle. Grille-d’Egout.” In other words the sprightly

Gabrielle performed a veritable can-can.

A little later M. Meunier, who was not remarkable for his kindness in

print to the dean of his craft, wrote: “Sarcey’s exultation knew no

bounds when, in 1890, Réjane again appeared in _Décoré_. Time, that had

metamorphosed the lissom critic of 1875 into a round and inert mass of

solid flesh, cruel Father Time, gave back to Sarcey, for this occasion

only, a flash of youthful fire, which stirred his wits to warmth and

animation. He shouted out hardly articulate praise; he literally rolled

in his stall with pleasure; his bald head blushed like an aurora

borealis. ‘Look at her!’ he cried, ‘See her malicious smiles, her

feline graces, listen to her reserved and biting diction; she is the

very essence of the Parisienne! What an ovation she received! How they

applauded her! and how she played!’ From M. Sarcey the laugh spreads;

it thaws the skepticism of M. Jules Lemaître, engulfs the timidity of

the public, becomes unanimous and universal, and is no longer to be

silenced.”

The day of Réjane’s greatest and most lasting success came with the

production, in 1893, of _Madame Sans-Gêne_, by Sardou, the latest of

the Parisian dramatists to answer the call of the great _comédienne_ in

their midst.

“Just as the first dressmakers of Paris measure Réjane’s fine figure

for the costumes of her various rôles, so the best writers of the

French Academy now make plays to her measure,” wrote M. Meunier in

1894. “They take the size of her temperament, the height of her talent,

the breadth of her acting; they consider her taste, they flatter her

mood; they clothe her with the richest draperies she can covet. Their

imagination, their fancy, their cleverness, are all put at her service.

The leaders in this industry have hitherto been Messrs. Meilhac and

Halévy, but now M. Victorien Sardou is ruining them. _Madame Sans-Gêne_

is certainly, of all the rôles Réjane has played, that best suited to

bring out her manifold resources. It is not merely that Réjane play

the washerwoman, become a great lady, without blemish or omission; she

_is Madame Sans-Gêne_ herself, with no overloading, nothing forced,

nothing caricatured. It is portraiture; history.

“Many a time has Réjane appeared in cap, cotton frock, and white apron;

many a time in robes of state, glittering with diamonds; she has worn

the buskin or the sock, demeaned herself like a gutter heroine, or

dropped the stately curtsey of the high-born lady. But never, except

in _Madame Sans-Géne_, has she been able to bring all her rôles into

one focus, exhibit her whole wardrobe, and yet remain one and the same

person, compress into one evening the whole of her life.”

What sort of woman presented herself to the gaze of her Parisian

admirers--and soon to American eyes--at this, the time of her greatest

triumph? Whatever other gifts she brought to her work, sheer beauty was

not one of them. “Is it her beauty?” asked M. Filon, seeking the source

of her power, and of her perfect understanding with her audiences.

“Certainly not. She is not pretty; one might even say ... but it

is more polite not to say it. To quote a famous _mot_, ‘She is not

beautiful, she is worse.’”[99]

Heroines of the Modern Stage · 第 7 / 25 段