But, in the earliest periods of French history, long before the

foundation of the Norman throne, Fécamp was honored as a regal

residence. The palace is said to have been rebuilt by William

Longue-Epée, with extraordinary magnificence. That prince took great

pleasure in the chace; and he and his immediate successors frequently

lived here. He also selected the castle as a place of retirement for his

duchess, during her pregnancy with Richard. His choice, in this respect,

was probably not altogether guided by his partiality for the place; but,

threatened at that time with a dangerous war, he was desirous of fixing

his wife and infant heir in a situation, whence they might, in case of

necessity, be with ease removed to the friendly shores of

England.--Richard, born at Fécamp, preserved through life an attachment

to the town, and omitted no opportunity of benefiting it. He rebuilt,

endowed, and enriched the abbatial church at vast expense; and he

finally ordered it to be the resting-place for his bones, which,

however, he would not permit to be interred in any spot whatever within

the structure, but, with his dying breath, expressly enjoined his son to

deposit them on the outside, immediately beneath the eaves, in order

that, to use the words put by the monastic historians into his mouth

upon the occasion, "stillantium guttarum sacro tecto diffluens infusio

abluat jacentis ossa, quæ omnium peccatorum tabe foedavit et maculavit

negligens et neglecta vita mea."--A curious question might be raised,

whether the monarch, in this injunction, was solely impressed with the

feeling of his own unworthiness, or whether he had also in view, the

mystic doctrine of the efficacy of water towards the ablution of sins.

Richard II. and the succeeding dukes, appear to have regarded Fécamp

with an equally friendly eye; till, in process of time, the increasing

splendor of its monastery altogether eclipsed the waning honors of the

town; and Henry II. of England, finally sealed its downfall, by making a

regular donation of the town to the abbey, from which period till the

revolution, the latter was every thing, the former nothing.

"Fécamp," as it is remarked by Nodier, "was to the Dukes of Normandy,

what the pyramids were to the Egyptian monarchs,--a city of tombs:

Richard II. rested there by the side of Richard I. and, near him, his

brother Robert, his wife Judith, and his son William."[161]--The list

might be lengthened by the addition of many other scarcely less noble

names.

"The abbey of Fécamp is said to have been founded in the year 664 or

666, for a community of nuns, by Waning, the count or governor of the

Pays de Caux, a nobleman who had already contributed to the endowment of

the monastery of St. Wandrille. St. Ouen, Bishop of Rouen, dedicated the

church in the presence of King Clotaire; and so rapidly did the fame of

the sanctity of the abbey extend, that the number of its inmates

amounted, in a very short period, to more than three hundred. The

arrival, however, of the Normans, under Hastings, in 841, caused the

dispersion of the nuns; and the same story is related of the few who

remained at Fécamp, as of many others under similar circumstances, that

they voluntarily cut off their noses and their lips, rather than be an

object of attraction to their conquerors. The abbey, in return for their

heroism, was levelled with the ground; and it did not rise from its

ashes till the year 988, when the piety of Duke Richard I. built the

church anew, under the auspices of his son, Robert, archbishop of Rouen.

Departing, however, from the original foundation, he established therein

a chapter of regular canons, who soon proved so irregular in their

conduct, that within ten years they were doomed to give way to a body of

Benedictine monks, headed by an abbot, named William, from a convent at

Dijon. From his time the monastery continued to increase in splendor.

Three suffragan abbeys, that of Notre Dame at Bernay, of St. Taurin at

Evreux, and of Ste. Berthe de Blangi, in the diocese of Boullogne, owned

the superior power of the abbot of Fécamp, and supplied the three

mitres, which he proudly bore on his abbatial shield. Kings and princes,

in former ages, frequently paid the abbey the homage of their worship

and their gifts; and, in a more recent period, Casimir of Poland, after

his voluntary abdication of the throne, selected it as the spot in which

he sought for repose, when wearied with the cares of royalty. The

English possessions of Fécamp do not appear to have been large; but,

according to the author of the _History of Alien Priories_, the abbot

presented to one hundred and thirty benefices, some in the diocese of

Rouen, others in those of Bayeux, Lisieux, Coutances, Chartres, and

Beauvais; and it enjoyed so many estates, that its income was said to be

forty thousand crowns per annum."[162]

The work, from which this account of the abbey of Fécamp has been

extracted, also contains some details relative to a few of the principal

miracles connected with the convent, and relative to the _precious

blood_, to the possession of which Fécamp was indebted for no small

portion of its celebrity. But the reader must be referred for all these

to the _Neustria Pia_, where he will find them recorded at great length.

The author of that most curious volume, appears to have treated no

subject more entirely _con amore_ than Fécamp; and if the more

enlightened progeny of the present day incline, in the plentitude of

their wisdom, to "think their fathers fools" for listening to such

tales, let it at least be recollected, that even these tales, with all

their absurdity, are most interesting documents of the progress of the

human mind; and, above all, let it never be forgotten, that books of

this description contain a mass of materials for the elucidation of the

manners and customs of the age, which would in vain be sought for in any

other quarter.

The abbatial church of Fécamp is still standing uninjured, and is a work

of various ages. Some circular chapels attached to the sides of the

choir, are probably remains of the building erected by Duke Richard: the

rest is all of the pointed style of architecture; and the earliest part

is scarcely anterior to the end of the twelfth century.--The church of

St. Stephen, selected here for publication, is undeserving of notice,

except for its southern portal, which is an elegant specimen of what is

called by Mr. Rickman, the decorated English architecture.

NOTES:

[160] _Turner's Tour in Normandy_, I. p. 60.

[161] _Voyages Pittoresques et Romantiques dans l'Ancienne France_, I.

p. 110.--Seven plates in this work are devoted to the illustration of

the religious buildings at Fécamp.

[162] _Turner's Tour in Normandy_, I. p. 62.

PLATE LXXII.

SCREEN IN THE CHURCH OF ST. LAWRENCE, AT EU.

[Illustration: Plate 72. SCREEN IN THE CHURCH OF ST. LAWRENCE, AT EU.]

The town of Eu has, by some writers, been supposed to have been the

capital of the Gallic tribe mentioned in Cæsar's Commentaries, under the

name of the Essui; but a conjecture of this description, founded

altogether upon the similarity of the name, and unsupported by any

collateral testimony, must be allowed to be at best only problematical;

and ancient geography presents so wide a field for the display of

ingenuity and learning, that it is in no department of science more

necessary to be upon the guard against plausible theories.--There are

others who contend for the Teutonic origin of the town, and refer to

etymology with equal zeal, and with greater plausibility. The word _Eu_,

otherwise spelt _Ou_ or _Au_ signifies a meadow, in Saxon; and the same

name was likewise originally applied to the river Bresle,[163] which

washes the walls of Eu, within a distance of two miles from its

confluence with the ocean at Tréport.[164]

The first mention that occurs of Eu in history, is in the pages of

Flodoard, according to whom, the town was in existence in the year 925;

but, whether the Roman or the Saxon derivation of its name be preferred,

in either case etymology would fairly allow the inference, that its

foundation was considerably more ancient. During the reign of Louis XI.

Eu obtained a melancholy celebrity: a report was circulated in the

summer of 1475, that it was the intention of the English to make a

descent upon the coast of France, and to establish themselves there for

the winter. At the same time, this town was confidently mentioned as the

place where they proposed to fix their quarters. To deprive them of such

an advantage, the French monarch had recourse to a measure which could

only be justified by the most urgent necessity: he ordered the Maréchal

de Gamaches to enter the place with four hundred soldiers, on the

eighteenth of July, and to set fire to the houses of the citizens,

together with the castle. His commands were executed; and the whole was

reduced to a heap of ashes, with the exception of the churches. The

neighboring towns of Dieppe, St. Valeri, and Abbeville, profited from

the misfortunes of Eu, which has never recovered its prosperity,

notwithstanding the various privileges subsequently granted to it.--The

present population consists of about three thousand four hundred

inhabitants, whose only trade is a trifling manufactory of lace.

From as early a period as the year 1102, the title of Count was bestowed

by Richard I. Duke of Normandy, upon the lords of Eu, who, in 1458,

received the additional dignity of _Comtes et Pairs_; probably as some

recompense for the misery inflicted upon the place three years before.

In the number of these counts, was the celebrated Duc de Guise, commonly

known by the name of _Le Balafré_. His monument of black and white

marble, in the church of the Jesuits at Eu, was executed by Genoese

artists; as was that of his wife, the Duchess of Cleves. Both of them

have long been subjects of admiration.[165] The last of the line of

counts of Eu, was the Duc de Penthièvre, a nobleman of the most

estimable character: the title was his at the breaking out of the

revolution; and it is not a little to his honor, that a writer of the

most decidedly republican principles could be found, in the midst of

that stormy period, to bear the following testimony in his favor:--"Né

au milieu d'une cour, oú la corruption et les vices avoient pris le nom

de la sagesse et des vertus, il dédaigna leurs délices funestes; il

repoussa l'air empesté de Versailles; supérieur à leurs prestiges, il

oublia sa naissance; il prouva enfin, par de longues années consacrées à

faire le bien, qu'il étoit digne d'être né simple citoyen.[166]"--The

castle, the residence of the counts, is now converted into a military

hospital.

The abbey of Eu is said to have been founded in 1002,[167] by William,

first count of the place, natural son of Richard _Sans-peur_, Duke of

Normandy. It was at its origin dedicated to the Virgin; but, after a

lapse of somewhat more than two hundred years, was placed under the

invocation of St. Lawrence, archbishop of Dublin. That prelate had, in

the year 1181, crossed into Normandy, with the view of restoring a

friendly understanding between the King of Ireland, his brother, and the

King of England; and, at the moment of his approaching Eu, and beholding

the lofty towers of the abbey, he is said to have exclaimed in strains

of pious fervor, "Hæc requies mea in seculum seculi: hic habitabo,

quoniam elegi eam." Having accomplished the object of his mission, he

died shortly after at the convent, and was there interred; and the fame

of his sanctity attracting crowds of devotees to his tomb, he was

canonized by a papal bull, dated the 11th of December, 1218, since which

time the monastery has borne his name.

The church of St. Lawrence, though no longer abbatial, has been suffered

to exist; even before the revolution, it served at once as the church to

the convent and to the first parish of Eu. The screen here figured, a

beautiful specimen of the decorated English architecture, is placed at

the entrance of one of the chapels. Another chapel contains a _Holy

Sepulchre_, said to be superior, in point of the execution of the

figures, to any other in France. In the south transept is a

spirally-banded column of extraordinary elegance. The church stands upon

the foundations of an earlier building, erected at the close of the

twelfth century, and destroyed by lightning in 1426. According to the

records of the monastery, it was either wholly, or in great measure,

rebuilt by John de Vallier, the twenty-fourth abbot, in 1464.[168]--The

following description of the building is borrowed from the journal of a

very able friend of the writer of this article, who visited Eu in

September, 1819:--"The abbey church of Eu is plain and massy on the

outside of the nave and transepts. The east end of the choir is highly

enriched with flying buttresses, &c. The windows of the nave are

lancet-headed, and very tall: on the outside is a circular arch, which

may be a restoration. The west window has been in three lancet

divisions, which have been filled up with more modern tracery. The nave

is singularly elegant: the triforium, or rather the upper tier of

arches, is new in design, and most extraordinary. In the choir, the

triforium is composed of tracery. The north transept is something like

Winchester, only the arches are pointed: there are two arches. This

arrangement is probably general; as I saw it at Troyes and other places.

In a side-chapel is an entombment: the figures as large as life, or

nearly so, and richly painted; quite perfect. Inscriptions on the hems

of the garments. The _culs de lampe_ are of the most elegant reticulated

work. In the north transept is a circular window filled with late

tracery. No towers at the west end. East end, a polygon, as usual.--This

church, which is well worthy of an attentive study, is quite distinct in

character from the churches in the east of France: it has no marigold

window; no row of niches over the portal; no massed door-way; so that

the general outline of the front agrees wholly with the earliest pointed

style. But the exterior is more chaste than any thing we have in

England; and its architectural unity is better preserved. On the other

hand, its parts are less elaborate."

NOTES:

[163] _Description de la Haute Normandie_, I. p. 45.

[164] "Le païs d'Auge a tiré son nom de ses prairies. Au, Avv, Avve, et

Ou, en Allemand, signifient un Pré.... Aventin est mon témoin dans son

explication des noms Allemans. La ville d'Eu, située dans des prairies,

a tiré son nom de la même origine. Elle est nommée dans les vieux

Ecrivains, _Auga_, _Augam_, et _Aucum_; et dans les auteurs Anglois

_Ou_, d'où est formé le nom d'Eu. De cette même origine vient le nom

d'_Au_, qu'on a depuis écrit et prononcé _O_, et que portent plusieurs

Seigneuries de Normandie et d'ailleurs, et qui est le même que celui

d'_Ou_. _Ou_ est une Comté qui a appartenue à ce Robert, que Robert du

Mont qualifie Comte d'_Ou_. Ces mots d'_Eu_, d'_Au_, et d'_Ou_, se

trouvent encore dans la composition de plusieurs noms de terres et de

Seigneuries. _Eu_, dans le nom d'_Eucourt_, d'_Eumesnil_, et

d'_Eulande_, terre dans le païs d'Auge, entre le Mare-Aupoix et

Angerville, et ce nom est le même, sans aucune différence, que celui

d'_Oelande_, isle de la mer Baltique, du domaine de la couronne de

Suede. Les Suedois et les Danois prononcent _Oelande_ ce que nous

prononçons _Eulande_. _Au_ dans _Aubeuf_, _Aubose_, _Aumesnil_,

_Aumont_, _Auvillers_. _Ou_ dans _Ouville_. Pour _Auge_ on a dit _Alge_

en quelques lieux; et c'est de là que vient le nom d'une terre au païs

de Bray, qui ne consiste presque qu'en prairies. Le même nom d'_Auge_,

que portent quelques familles, montre assez qu'il a été appellatif. Mais

la chartre de confirmation de la fondation de l'Abbaye de St. Etienne,

donnée par Henry II. Roy d'Angleterre, le montre incontestablement par

ces paroles, "_cum sylvâ et algiâ et cum terris_"."--_Huet, Origines de

Caen_, p. 294.

[165] The church of St. Lawrence likewise contained the monuments of

several distinguished personages, as appears by the following extract

from the _Description de la Haute Normandie_, I. p. 72.--"Là sont

inhumez Jean d'Artois, Comte d'Eu, fils de Robert d'Artois, Comte de

Beaumont le Roger, et de Jean de Valois, mort le 6 Avril, 1386: Isabelle

de Melun, son epouse: Isabelle d'Artois, leur fille, dans la chapelle de

Saint Denys, sous une belle table de marbre noir, qui sert de table

d'autel: Charles d'Artois, Comte d'Eu, sous l'autel de la chapelle de

Saint Laurent: Jeanne de Saveuse, sa premiere femme: Helène de Melun, sa

seconde femme, dans la chapelle de Saint Antoine, dite aujourd'hui de

Saint Crepin: le Coeur de Catherine de Cleves, Comtesse d'Eu, au bas du

Sanctuaire, sous une magnifique colonne de marbre noir: N.... de Bourbon,

dit le Duc d'Aumale, fils de Louis-Auguste de Bourbon, legitimé de

France, Duc de Maine, mort le 8 Septembre, 1708: enfin Philippe

d'Artois, Comte d'Eu, et Connétable de France, mort selon son epitaphe à

_Micalice_ en Turquie, c'est-à-dire Nicopoli, le 16 Juin, 1397. Le

Mausolée de celui-ci, qui est de marbre, est enfermé dans une espece de

Cage de fer, dont les barreaux n'empêchent point qu'on ne puisse en

approcher et y porter la main. Le Prince y est representé armé, mais

sans casque et sans gantelets, pour marquer, dit-on, qu'il est mort à la

guerre, mais non dans le combat: il a deux petits chiens à ses pieds,

pour signifier, ajoute-t-on, qu'il est mort dans son lit: enfin la

grille qui l'environne represente, dit-on encore, qu'il est mort en

prison. Le monument, selon l'Ecrivain de qui j'emprunte ces conjectures,

n'a coûté que 100 livres."

[166] _Noel, Essais sur le Département de la Seine Inférieure_, I. p.

84.

[167] _Neustria Pia_, p. 694.

[168] _Neustria Pia_, p. 700.

PLATE LXXIII.-LXXV.

CHURCH OF ST. PETER, AT LISIEUX.

[Illustration: Plates 73-74. CHURCH OF ST. PETER AT LISIEUX.]

The effects produced by the French revolution upon the religious state

of the country, were scarcely less important than upon the political. In

both cases, the nation hurried, with the blindest fury, from extreme to

extreme; in both, they followed phantoms of ideal perfection through an

unexampled series of excesses and sufferings; in both, they rested at

length from exhaustion much more than from conviction; and, happily for

mankind and for themselves, they finally attained in both nearly the

same end, reverting indeed to their original constitutions, but

tempering them with a most seasonable mixture of civil and

ecclesiastical liberty. The _concordat_ effected for the church, what

the charter did for the state. The former of these was one of the

master-pieces of Napoleon's policy, and was likewise one of the earliest

acts of his power. It was established in the year 1801, while France yet

retained the name of a republic, and the ambition of its ruler had not

ventured to grasp, at more than the consular dignity. By this

instrument, the whole ecclesiastical constitution was changed; and not

only was all the power placed in the hands of the chief of the state,

but the provinces and dioceses were entirely remodelled; and, instead of

twenty-three archbishoprics and one hundred and thirty-four bishoprics,

the number of the former, notwithstanding the vast extension of the

French territory, was reduced to ten, and that of the latter to fifty.

The archbishop of Rouen was one of those who suffered least upon the

occasion. His dignity was curtailed only by the suppression of two of

his suffragans, the bishops of Avranches and of Lisieux.[169] The

church, here figured, then resigned the mitre, which it had conferred

from the middle of the sixth century, upon an illustrious, though not an

uninterrupted, line of prelates. It is admitted, in the annals of the

cathedral, that either the see must have been vacant for the space of

four hundred years, or at least that the names of those who filled it

during that period, are lost. Ordericus Vitalis, who resided fifty-six

years in the diocese, and has collected, in the sixth book of his

_Ecclesiastical History_, whatever was to be found in his time, relative

to its early state, acknowledges the chasm, and accounts for it by the

following general remarks.--"Piratæ de Daniâ egressi sunt, in Neustriam

venerunt, et christianæ fidei divinique cultûs penitùs ignari, super

fidelem populum immanitèr debacchati sunt. Antiquorum scripta cum

basilicis et ædibus incendio deperierunt, quæ fervida juniorum studia,

quamvis insatiabilitèr sitiant, recuperare nequiverunt. Nonnulla verò,

quæ per diligentiam priscorum manibus barbarorum solertèr erepta sunt,

damnabili subsequentium negligentiâ interierunt."

The city of Lisieux represents the capital of the Gallic tribe,

mentioned by Cæsar, and other almost contemporary writers, under the

name of _Lexovii_; and it is supposed by modern geographers, that the

territory occupied by these latter, was nearly co-extensive with the

late bishopric of Lisieux. On this subject it has been observed, that

"it is to be remarked, that the bounds of the ancient bishoprics of

France were usually conterminal with the Roman provinces and

prefectures."[170] _Neomagus_ or _Noviomagus Lexoviorum_, the capital of

the Lexovii, had always been supposed to have occupied the site of the

present town, till some excavations made in the year 1770, for the

purpose of forming a _chaussée_ between Lisieux and Caen, proved the

ancient and the modern city to have been placed at the distance of about

three quarters of a mile from each other. Extensive ruins of buildings,

situated in a field, called _Les Tourettes_, were then brought to light;

and among them were dug up various specimens of ancient art. The

researches of more modern times, principally conducted by M. Louis

Dubois, a very able antiquary of Lisieux, have materially added to the

number as well as the value of these discoveries; and the quantity of

Roman coins and medals that have rewarded his researches, would have

left little doubt as to the real site of Neomagus, even if the

circumstance had not within a very few years been established almost

beyond a question, by the detection of a Roman amphitheatre in a state

of great perfection.

Tradition, which there is in this instance no reason to impugn, relates

that the Gallo-Roman capital disappeared during the incursions of the

Saxons, about the middle of the fourth century. In farther confirmation

of such opinion, it is to be observed, that none of the medals dug up

within the ruins, or in their vicinity, bear a later date than the reign

of Constantine; and that, though the city is recorded in the _Itinerary

of Antoninus_, no mention of it is to be found in the curious chart,

known by the name of the _Tabula Peutingeriana_, formed under the reign

of Theodosius the Great; so that it then appears to have been completely

swept away and forgotten.

Modern Lisieux is supposed to have risen at no distant period of time

after the destruction of Neomagus. In the writings of the monkish

historians, it is indifferently called _Lexovium_, _Lexobium_,

_Luxovium__, Lixovium_, and _Lizovium_, names obviously borrowed from

the classical appellation of the tribe, as the French word _Lisieux_ is

clearly derived from them. In the early portion of Norman history,

Lisieux is mentioned as having felt the vengeance of these invaders,

during one of their predatory excursions from the Bessin, about the year

877. It was shortly afterwards sacked by Rollo himself, when that

conqueror, elated with the capture of Bayeux, was on his march to take

possession of the capital of Neustria. But the territory of Lisieux was

still the last part of the duchy which owned Rollo as its lord: it was

not ceded to him by Charles the Simple, till 923, at which time he had

for eleven years been the undisputed sovereign of the rest of Normandy.

Architectural Antiquities of Normandy · 第 16 / 25 段