Khâtusaru himself was on the point of perishing, when the troops which

had been shut up in Qodshû, together with the inhabitants, made a

general sortie; the Egyptians were for a moment held in check, and

the fugitives meanwhile were able to enter the town. Either there was

insufficient provision for so many mouths, or the enemy had lost all

heart from the disaster; at any rate, further resistance appeared

useless. The next morning Khâtusaru sent to propose a truce or peace to

the victorious Pharaoh. The Egyptians had probably suffered at least

as much as their adversaries, and perhaps regarded the eventuality of

a siege with no small distaste; Ramses, therefore, accepted the offers

made to him and prepared to return to Egypt. The fame of his exploits

had gone before him, and he himself was not a little proud of the energy

he had displayed on the day of battle. His predecessors had always shown

themselves to be skilful generals and brave soldiers, but none of them

had ever before borne, or all but borne, single-handed the brunt of an

attack. Ramses loaded his shield-bearer Manna with rewards for having

stood by him in the hour of danger, and ordered abundant provender and

sumptuous harness for the good horses--“Strength-in-Thebaid” and “Nûrît

the satisfied”--who had drawn his chariot.*

* A gold ring in the Louvre bears in relief on its bezel two

little horses; which are probably “Strength-in-Thebaid” and

“Nûrît satisfied.”

He determined that the most characteristic episodes of the campaign--the

beating of the spies, the surprise of the camp, the king’s repeated

charges, the arrival of his veterans, the flight of the Syrians, and the

surrender of Qodshû--should be represented on the walls and pylons of

the temples. A poem in rhymed strophes in every case accompanies

these records of his glory, whether at Luxor, at the Eamesseum, at the

Memnonium of Abydos, or in the heart of Nubia at Abu Simbel. The author

of the poem must have been present during the campaign, or must have had

the account of it from the lips of his sovereign, for his work bears no

traces of the coldness of official reports, and a warlike strain runs

through it from one end to the other, so as still to invest it with life

after a lapse of more than thirty centuries.*

* The author is unknown: Pentaûr, or rather Pentaûîrît, to

whom E. de Rougé attributed the poem, is merely the

transcriber of the copy we possess on papyrus.

But little pains are bestowed on the introduction, and the poet does not

give free vent to his enthusiasm until the moment when he describes

his hero, left almost alone, charging the enemy in the sight of his

followers. The Pharaoh was surrounded by two thousand five hundred

chariots, and his retreat was cut off by the warriors of the “perverse”

Khâti and of the other nations who accompanied them--the peoples of

Arvad, Mysia, and Pedasos; each of their chariots contained three men,

and the ranks were so serried that they formed but one dense mass. “No

other prince was with me, no general officers, no one in command of the

archers or chariots. My foot-soldiers deserted me, my charioteers

fled before the foe, and not one of them stood firm beside me to fight

against them.” Then said His Majesty: “Who art thou, then, my father

Amon? A father who forgets his son? Or have I committed aught against

thee? Have I not marched and halted according to thy command? When he

does not violate thy orders, the lord of Egypt is indeed great, and he

overthrows the barbarians in his path! What are these Asiatics to

thy heart? Amon will humiliate those who know not the god. Have I

not consecrated innumerable offerings to thee? Filling thy holy

dwelling-place with my prisoners, I build thee a temple for millions of

years, I lavish all my goods on thy storehouses, I offer thee the whole

world to enrich thy domains.... A miserable fate indeed awaits him who

sets himself against thy will, but happy is he who finds favour with

thee by deeds done for thee with a loving heart. I invoke thee, O my

father Amon! Here am I in the midst of people so numerous that it cannot

be known who are the nations joined together against me, and I am alone

among them, none other is with me. My many soldiers have forsaken me,

none of my charioteers looked towards me when I called them, not one of

them heard my voice when I cried to them. But I find that Amon is more

to me than a million soldiers, than a hundred thousand charioteers, than

a myriad of brothers or young sons, joined all together, for the number

of men is as nothing, Amon is greater than all of them. Each time I have

accomplished these things, Amon, by the counsel of thy mouth, as I do

not transgress thy orders, I rendered thee glory even to the ends of the

earth.” So calm an invocation in the thick of the battle would appear

misplaced in the mouth of an ordinary man, but Pharaoh was a god, and

the son of a god, and his actions and speeches cannot be measured by

the same standard as that of a common mortal. He was possessed by the

religious spirit in the hour of danger, and while his body continued

to fight, his soul took wing to the throne of Amon. He contemplates the

lord of heaven face to face, reminds him of the benefits which he had

received from him, and summons him to his aid with an imperiousness

which betrays the sense of his own divine origin. The expected help was

not delayed. “While the voice resounds in Hermonthis, Amon arises at my

behest, he stretches out his hand to me, and I cry out with joy when he

hails me from behind: ‘Face to face with thee, face to face with thee,

Ramses Miamun, I am with thee! It is I, thy father! My hand is with

thee, and I am worth more to thee than hundreds of thousands. I am the

strong one who loves valour; I have beheld in thee a courageous heart,

and my heart is satisfied; my will is about to be accomplished!’ I am

like Montû; from the right I shoot with the dart, from the left I seize

the enemy. I am like Baal in his hour, before them; I have encountered

two thousand five hundred chariots, and as soon as I am in their midst,

they are overthrown before my mares. Not one of all these people has

found a hand wherewith to fight; their hearts sink within their breasts,

fear paralyses their limbs; they know not how to throw their darts, they

have no strength to hold their lances. I precipitate them into the water

like as the crocodile plunges therein; they are prostrate face to the

earth, one upon the other, and I slay in the midst of them, for I have

willed that not one should look behind him, nor that one should return;

he who falls rises not again.” This sudden descent of the god has, even

at the present day, an effect upon the reader, prepared though he is

by his education to consider it as a literary artifice; but on the

Egyptian, brought up to regard Amon with boundless reverence, its

influence was irresistible. The Prince of the Khâti, repulsed at the

very moment when he was certain of victory, “recoiled with terror. He

sends against the enemy the various chiefs, followed by their chariots

and skilled warriors,--the chiefs of Arvad, Lycia, and Ilion, the

leaders of the Lycians and Dardanians, the lords of Carchemish, of the

Girgashites, and of Khalupu; these allies of the Khâti, all together,

comprised three thousand chariots.” Their efforts, however, were in

vain. “I fell upon them like Montû, my hand devoured them in the space

of a moment, in the midst of them I hewed down and slew. They said one

to another: ‘This is no man who is amongst us; it is Sûtkhû the great

warrior, it is Baal incarnate! These are not human actions which he

accomplishes: alone, by himself, he repulses hundreds of thousands,

without leaders or men. Up, let us flee before him, let us seek to save

our lives, and let us breathe again!’” When at last, towards evening,

the army again rallies round the king, and finds the enemy completely

defeated, the men hang their heads with mingled shame and admiration as

the Pharaoh reproaches them: “What will the whole earth say when it is

known that you left me alone, and without any to succour me? that not a

prince, not a charioteer, not a captain of archers, was found to place

his hand in mine? I fought, I repulsed millions of people by myself

alone. ‘Victory-in-Thebes’ and ‘Nûrît satisfied’ were my glorious

horses; it was they that I found under my hand when I was alone in the

midst of the quaking foe. I myself will cause them to take their food

before me, each day, when I shall be in my palace, for I was with them

when I was in the midst of the enemy, along with the Prince Manna my

shield-bearer, and with the officers of my house who accompanied me, and

who are my witnesses for the combat; these are those whom I was with.

I have returned after a victorious struggle, and I have smitten with my

sword the assembled multitudes.”

The ordeal was a terrible one for the Khâti; but when the first moment

of defeat was over, they again took courage and resumed the campaign.

This single effort had not exhausted their resources, and they rapidly

filled up the gaps which had been made in their ranks. The plains of

Naharaim and the mountains of Cilicia supplied them with fresh chariots

and foot-soldiers in the place of those they had lost, and bands of

mercenaries were furnished from the table-lands of Asia Minor, so that

when Ramses II. reappeared in Syria, he found himself confronted by a

completely fresh army. Khâtusaru, having profited by experience, did not

again attempt a general engagement, but contented himself with disputing

step by step the upper valleys of the Litany and Orontes. Meantime his

emissaries spread themselves over Phoenicia and Kharû, sowing the seeds

of rebellion, often only too successfully. In the king’s VIIIth year

there was a general rising in Galilee, and its towns--Galaput in the

hill-country of Bît-Aniti, Merorn, Shalama, Dapur, and Anamaîm*--had to

be reduced one after another.

* Episodes from this war are represented at Karnak. The list

of the towns taken, now much mutilated, comprised twenty-

four names, which proves the importance of the revolt.

Dapur was the hardest to carry. It crowned the top of a rocky eminence,

and was protected by a double wall, which followed the irregularities of

the hillside. It formed a rallying-point for a large force, which had to

be overcome in the open country before the investment of the town could

be attempted. The siege was at last brought to a conclusion, after

a series of skirmishes, and the town taken by scaling, four Egyptian

princes having been employed in conducting the attack. In the Pharaoh’s

IXth year a revolt broke out on the Egyptian frontier, in the Shephelah,

and the king placed himself at the head of his troops to crush it.

Ascalon, in which the peasantry and their families had found, as they

hoped, a safe refuge, opened its gates to the Pharaoh, and its fall

brought about the submission of several neighbouring places. This, it

appears, was the first time since the beginning of the conquests in

Syria that the inhabitants of these regions attempted to take up arms,

and we may well ask what could have induced them thus to renounce their

ancient loyalty. Their defection reduced Egypt for the moment almost to

her natural frontiers. Peace had scarcely been resumed when war again

broke out with fresh violence in Coele-Syria, and one year it reached

even to Naharaim, and raged around Tunipa as in the days of Thûtmosis

III. “Pharaoh assembled his foot-soldiers and chariots, and he commanded

his foot-soldiers and his chariots to attack the perverse Khâti who were

in the neighbourhood of Tunipa, and he put on his armour and mounted his

chariot, and he waged battle against the town of the perverse Khâti at

the head of his foot-soldiers and his chariots, covered with his armour;”

the fortress, however, did not yield till the second attack. Ramses

carried his arms still further afield, and with such results, that,

to judge merely from the triumphal lists engraved on the walls of the

temple of Karnak, the inhabitants on the banks of the Euphrates, those

in Carchemish, Mitanni, Singar, Assyria, and Mannus found themselves

once more at the mercy of the Egyptian battalions. These victories,

however brilliant, were not decisive; if after any one of them the

princes of Assyria and Singar may have sent presents to the Pharaoh, the

Hittites, on the other hand, did not consider themselves beaten, and it

was only after fifteen campaigns that they were at length sufficiently

subdued to propose a treaty. At last, in the Egyptian king’s XXIst year,

on the 21st of the month Tybi, when the Pharaoh, then residing in his

good town of Anakhîtû, was returning from the temple where he had been

offering prayers to his father Amon-Eâ, to Harmakhis of Heliopolis,

to Phtah, and to Sûtkhû the valiant son of Nûît, Eamses, one of the

“messengers” who filled the office of lieutenant for the king in Asia,

arrived at the palace and presented to him Tartisubu, who was authorised

to make peace with Egypt in the name of Khâtusaru.* Tartisubu carried

in his hand a tablet of silver, on which his master had prescribed the

conditions which appeared to him just and equitable. A short preamble

recalling the alliances made between the ancestors of both parties, was

followed by a declaration of friendship, and a reciprocal obligation to

avoid in future all grounds of hostility.

* The treaty of Ramses II. with the Prince of the Khâti was

sculptured at Karnak.

Not only was a perpetual truce declared between both peoples, but they

agreed to help each other at the first demand. “Should some enemy march

against the countries subject to the great King of Egypt, and should he

send to the great Prince of the Khâti, saying: ‘Come, bring me forces

against them,’ the great Prince of the Khâti shall do as he is asked by

the great King of Egypt, and the great Prince of the Khâti shall destroy

his enemies. And if the great Prince of the Khâti shall prefer not to

come himself, he shall send his archers and his chariots to the great

King of Egypt to destroy his enemies.” A similar clause ensured aid

in return from Ramses to Khâtusaru, “his brother,” while two articles

couched in identical terms made provision against the possibility of any

town or tribe dependent on either of the two sovereigns withdrawing its

allegiance and placing it in the hands of the other party. In this case

the Egyptians as well as the Hittites engaged not to receive, or at

least not to accept, such offers, but to refer them at once to the

legitimate lord. The whole treaty was placed under the guarantee of the

gods both, of Egypt and of the Khâti, whose names were given at length:

“Whoever shall fail to observe the stipulations, let the thousand gods

of Khâti and the thousand gods of Egypt strike his house, his land, and

his servants. But he who shall observe the stipulations engraved on the

tablet of silver, whether he belong to the Hittite people or whether

he belong to the people of Egypt, as he has not neglected them, may the

thousand gods of Khâti and the thousand gods of Egypt give him health,

and grant that he may prosper, himself, the people of his house, and

also his land and his servants.” The treaty itself ends by a description

of the plaque of silver on which it was engraved. It was, in fact, a

facsimile in metal of one of those clay tablets on which the Chaldæans

inscribed their contracts. The preliminary articles occupied the upper

part in closely written lines of cuneiform characters, while in the

middle, in a space left free for the purpose, was the impress of

two seals, that of the Prince of the Khâti and of his wife Pûûkhîpa.

Khâtusaru was represented on them as standing upright in the arms of

Sûtkhû, while around the two figures ran the inscription, “Seal of

Sûtkhû, the sovereign of heaven.” Pûûkhîpa leaned on the breast of a

god, the patron of her native town of Aranna in Qaauadana, and the

legend stated that this was the seal of the Sun of the town of Àranna,

the regent of the earth. The text of the treaty was continued beneath,

and probably extended to the other side of the tablet. The original

draft had terminated after the description of the seals, but, to

satisfy the Pharaoh, certain additional articles were appended for the

protection of the commerce and industry of the two countries, for the

prevention of the emigration of artisans, and for ensuring that steps

taken against them should be more effectual and less cruel. Any criminal

attempting to evade the laws of his country, and taking refuge in that

of the other party to the agreement, was to be expelled without delay

and consigned to the officers of his lord; any fugitive not a criminal,

any subject carried off or detained by force, any able artisan quitting

either territory to take up permanent residence in the other, was to be

conducted to the frontier, but his act of folly was not to expose him

to judicial condemnation. “He who shall thus act, his fault shall not

be brought up against him; his house shall not be touched, nor his wife,

nor his children; he shall not have his throat cut, nor shall his eyes

be touched, nor his mouth, nor his feet; no criminal accusation shall be

made against him.”

This treaty is the most ancient of all those of which the text has

come down to us; its principal conditions were--perfect equality

and reciprocity between the contracting sovereigns, an offensive and

defensive alliance, and the extradition of criminals and refugees. The

original was drawn up in Chaldæan script by the scribes of Khâtusaru,

probably on the model of former conventions between the Pharaohs and

the Asiatic courts, and to this the Egyptian ministers had added a few

clauses relative to the pardon of emigrants delivered up by one or other

of the contracting parties. When, therefore, Tartisubu arrived in the

city of Eamses, the acceptance of the treaty was merely a matter of

form, and peace was virtually concluded. It did not confer on the

conqueror the advantages which we might have expected from his

successful campaigns: it enjoined, on the contrary, the definite

renunciation of those countries, Mitanni, Naharaim, Alasia, and Amurru,

over which Thûtmosis III. and his immediate successors had formerly

exercised an effective sovereignty. Sixteen years of victories had left

matters in the same state as they were after the expedition of Harmhabî,

and, like his predecessor, Ramses was able to retain merely those

Asiatic provinces which were within the immediate influence of Egypt,

such as the Phoenician coast proper, Kharû, Persea beyond Jordan, the

oases of the Arabian desert, and the peninsula of Sinai.*

* The _Anastasi Papyrus I_. mentions a place called _Zaru of

Sesostris_, in the neighbourhood of Aleppo, in a part of

Syria which was not in Egyptian territory: the frontier in

this locality must have passed between Arvad and Byblos on

the coast, and between Qodshû and Hazor from Merom inland.

Egyptian rule on the other side of the Jordan seems to be

proved by the monument discovered a few years ago in the

Haurân, and known under the name of the “Stone of Job” by

the Bedawîn of the neighbourhood.

This apparently unsatisfactory result, after such supreme efforts, was,

however, upon closer examination, not so disappointing. For more than

half a century at least, since the Hittite kingdom had been developed

and established under the impulse given to it by Sapalulu, everything

had been in its favour. The campaign of Seti had opposed merely a

passing obstacle to its expansion, and had not succeeded in discouraging

its ambitions, for its rulers still nursed the hope of being able

one day to conquer Syria as far as the isthmus. The check received at

Qodshû, the abortive attempts to foment rebellion in Galilee and the

Shephelah, the obstinate persistence with which Ramses and his army

returned year after year to the attack, the presence of the enemy at

Tunipa, on the banks of the Euphrates, and in the provinces then forming

the very centre of the Hittite kingdom--in short, all the incidents of

this long struggle--at length convinced Khâtusaru that he was powerless

to extend his rule in this direction at the expense of Egypt. Moreover,

we have no knowledge of the events which occupied him on the other

frontiers of his kingdom, where he may have been engaged at the same

time in a conflict with Assyria, or in repelling an incursion of the

tribes on the Black Sea. The treaty with Pharaoh, if made in good faith

and likely to be lasting, would protect the southern extremities of his

kingdom, and allow of his removing the main body of his forces to the

north and east in case of attack from either of these quarters. The

security which such an alliance would ensure made it, therefore, worth

his while to sue for peace, even if the Egyptians should construe his

overtures as an acknowledgment of exhausted supplies or of inferiority

of strength. Ramses doubtless took it as such, and openly displayed

on the walls at Karnak and in the Eamesseum a copy of the treaty so

flattering to his pride, but the indomitable resistance which he had

encountered had doubtless given rise to reflections resembling those of

Khâtusaru, and he had come to realise that it was his own interest not

to lightly forego the good will of the Khâti. Egypt had neighbours

in Africa who were troublesome though not dangerous: the Timihû, the

Tihonu, the Mashûasha, the negroes of Kûsh and of Pûanît, might be a

continual source of annoyance and disturbance, even though they were

incapable of disturbing her supremacy. The coast of the Delta, it is

true, was exposed to the piracy of northern nations, but up to that time

this had been merely a local trouble, easy to meet if not to obviate

altogether. The only real danger was on the Asiatic side, arising

from empires of ancient constitution like Chaldæa, or from hordes who,

arriving at irregular intervals from the north, and carrying all before

them, threatened, after the example of the Hyksôs, to enter the Delta.

The Hittite kingdom acted as a kind of buffer between the Nile valley

and these nations, both civilized and barbarous; it was a strongly armed

force on the route of the invaders, and would henceforth serve as a

protecting barrier, through which if the enemy were able to pass

it would only be with his strength broken or weakened by a previous

encounter. The sovereigns loyally observed the peace which they had

sworn to each other, and in his XXXIVth year the marriage of Ramses with

the eldest daughter of Khâtusaru strengthened their friendly relations.

[Illustration: 214.jpg KHÂTUSARU, PRINCE OF KHÂTI, AND HIS DAUGHTER]

Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from the plate in Lepsius; the triad

worshipped by Khâtusaru and his daughter is composed of

Ramses II., seated between Amon-Râ and Phtah-Totûnen.

Pharaoh was not a little proud of this union, and he has left us a naive

record of the manner in which it came about. The inscription is engraved

on the face of the rock at Abu Simbel in Nubia; and Ramses begins by

boasting, in a heroic strain, of his own energy and exploits, of the

fear with which his victories inspired the whole world, and of the

anxiety of the Syrian kinglets to fulfil his least wishes. The Prince of

the Khâti had sent him sumptuous presents at every opportunity, and,

not knowing how further to make himself agreeable to the Pharaoh, had

finally addressed the great lords of his court, and reminded them how

their country had formerly been ruined by war, how their master Sûtkhû

had taken part against them, and how they had been delivered from their

ills by the clemency of the Sun of Egypt. “Let us therefore take our

goods, and placing my eldest daughter at the head of them, let us

repair to the domains of the great god, so that the King Sesostris may

recognise us.” He accordingly did as he had proposed, and the embassy

set out with gold and silver, valuable horses, and an escort of

soldiers, together with cattle and provisions to supply them with food

by the way. When they reached the borders of Khâru, the governor wrote

immediately to the Pharaoh as follows: “Here is the Prince of the Khâti,

who brings his eldest daughter with a number of presents of every kind;

and now this princess and the chief of the country of the Khâti, after

having crossed many mountains and undertaken a difficult journey from

distant parts, have arrived at the frontiers of His Majesty. May we be

instructed how we ought to act with regard to them.” The king was

then in residence at Ramses. When the news reached him, he officially

expressed his great joy at the event, since it was a thing unheard of

in the annals of the country that so powerful a prince should go to such

personal inconvenience in order to marry his daughter to an ally. The

Pharaoh, therefore, despatched his nobles and an army to receive them,

but he was careful to conceal the anxiety which he felt all the while,

and, according to custom, took counsel of his patron god Sûtkhû: “Who

are these people who come with a message at this time to the country of

Zahi?” The oracle, however, reassured him as to their intentions, and

he thereupon hastened to prepare for their proper reception. The embassy

made a triumphal entry into the city, the princess at its head, escorted

by the Egyptian troops told off for the purpose, together with the

foot-soldiers and charioteers of the Khâti, comprising the flower of

their army and militia. A solemn festival was held in their honour, in

which food and drink were served without stint, and was concluded by the

celebration of the marriage in the presence of the Egyptian lords and of

the princes of the whole earth.*

* The fact of the marriage is known to us by the decree of

Phtah Totûnen at Abu Simbel in the XXXVth year of the king’s

reign. The account of it in the text is taken from the stele

at Abu Simbel. The last lines are so mutilated that I have

been obliged to paraphrase them. The stele of the Princess

of Bakhtan has preserved the romantic version of this

marriage, such as was current about the Saite period. The

King of the Khâti must have taken advantage of the

expedition which the Pharaoh made into Asia to send him

presents by an embassy, at the head of which he placed his

eldest daughter: the princess found favour with Ramses, who

married her.

Ramses, unwilling to relegate a princess of such noble birth to the

companionship of his ordinary concubines, granted her the title of

queen, as if she were of solar blood, and with the cartouche gave her

the new name of Ûirimaûnofîrurî--“She who sees the beauties of the Sun.”

She figures henceforth in the ceremonies and on the monuments in the

place usually occupied by women of Egyptian race only, and these unusual

honours may have compensated, in the eyes of the young princess, for the

disproportion in age between herself and a veteran more than sixty years

old. The friendly relations between the two courts became so intimate

that the Pharaoh invited his father-in-law to visit him in his own

country. “The great Prince of Khâti informed the Prince of Qodi:

‘Prepare thyself that we may go down into Egypt. The word of the king

has gone forth, let us obey Sesostris. He gives the breath of life to

those who love him; hence all the earth loves him, and Khâti forms but

one with him.’” They were received with pomp at Ramses-Anakhîtû, and

perhaps at Thebes. It was with a mixture of joy and astonishment that

Egypt beheld her bitterest foe become her most faithful ally, “and the

men of Qimît having but one heart with the chiefs of the Khâti, a thing

which had not happened since the ages of Pa.”

The half-century following the conclusion of this alliance was a period

of world-wide prosperity. Syria was once more able to breathe freely,

her commerce being under the combined protection of the two powers who

shared her territory. Not only caravans, but isolated travellers, were

able to pass through the country from north to south without incurring

any risks beyond those occasioned by an untrustworthy guide or a few

highwaymen. It became in time a common task in the schools of Thebes to

describe the typical Syrian tour of some soldier or functionary, and we

still possess one of these imaginative stories in which the scribe takes

his hero from Qodshû across the Lebanon to Byblos, Berytus, Tyre, and

Sidon, “the fish” of which latter place “are more numerous than the

grains of sand;” he then makes him cross Galilee and the forest of

oaks to Jaffa, climb the mountains of the Dead Sea, and following the

maritime route by Raphia, reach Pelusium. The Egyptian galleys thronged

the Phoenician ports, while those of Phoenicia visited Egypt. The latter

drew so little water that they had no difficulty in coming up the Nile,

and the paintings in one of the tombs represent them at the moment of

their reaching Thebes. The hull of these vessels was similar to that

of the Nile boats, but the bow and stern were terminated by structures

which rose at right angles, and respectively gave support to a sort of

small platform. Upon this the pilot maintained his position by one of

those wondrous feats of equilibrium of which the Orientals were masters.

[Illustration: 218.jpg PHOENICIAN BOATS LANDING AT THEBES]

Drawn by Boudier, from the photograph published by Daressy.

An open rail ran round the sides of the vessel, so as to prevent goods

stowed upon the deck from falling into the sea when the vessel lurched.

Voyages to Pûanît were undertaken more frequently in quest of incense

and precious metals. The working of the mines of Akiti had been the

source of considerable outlay at the beginning of the reign. The

measures taken by Seti to render the approaches to them practicable at

all seasons had not produced the desired results; as far back as the

IIIrd year of Ramses the overseers of the south had been forced to

acknowledge that the managers of the convoys could no longer use any of

the cisterns which had been hewn and built at such great expense. “Half

of them die of thirst, together with their asses, for they have no means

of carrying a sufficient number of skins of water to last during the

journey there and back.” The friends and officers whose advice had been

called in, did not doubt for a moment that the king would be willing to

complete the work which his father had merely initiated. “If thou sayest

to the water, ‘Come upon the mountain,’ the heavenly waters will spring

out at the word of thy mouth, for thou art Râ incarnate, Khopri

visibly created, thou art the living image of thy father Tûmû, the

Heliopolitan.”--“If thou thyself sayest to thy father the Nile, father

of the gods,” added the Viceroy of Ethiopia, “‘Raise the water up to the

mountain,’ he will do all that thou hast said, for so it has been with

all thy projects which have been accomplished in our presence, of which

the like has never been heard, even in the songs of the poets.” The

cisterns and wells were thereupon put into such a condition that the

transport of gold was rendered easy for years to come. The war with the

Khâti had not suspended building and other works of public utility;

and now, owing to the establishment of peace, the sovereign was able

to devote himself entirely to them. He deepened the canal at Zalû; he

repaired the walls and the fortified places which protected the frontier

on the side of the Sinaitic Peninsula, and he built or enlarged the

strongholds along the Nile at those points most frequently threatened

by the incursions of nomad tribes. Ramses was the royal builder _par

excellence_, and we may say without fear of contradiction that, from the

second cataract to the mouths of the Nile, there is scarcely an edifice

on whose ruins we do not find his name. In Nubia, where the desert

approaches close to the Nile, he confined himself to cutting in the

solid rock the monuments which, for want of space, he could not build in

the open. The idea of the cave-temple must have occurred very early

to the Egyptians; they were accustomed to house their dead in the

mountain-side, why then should they not house their gods in the same

manner? The oldest forms of speos, those near to Beni-Hasan, at Deîr

el-Baharî, at Bl-Kab, and at Gebel Silsileh, however, do not date

further back than the time of the XVIIIth dynasty. All the forms of

architectural plan observed in isolated temples were utilised by Ramses

and applied to rock-cut buildings with more or less modification,

according to the nature of the stratum in which he had to work. Where

space permitted, a part only of the temple was cut in the rock, and the

approaches to it were built in the open air with blocks brought to

the spot, so that the completed speos became only in part a grotto--a

hemi-speos of varied construction. It was in this manner that the

architects of Ramses arranged the court and pylon at Beît-Wally, the

hypostyle hall, rectangular court and pylon at Gerf-Hosseîn, and the

avenue of sphinxes at Wady es-Sebuah, where the entrance to the

avenue was guarded by two statues overlooking the river. The pylon

at Gerf-Hosseîn has been demolished, and merely a few traces of the

foundations appear here and there above the soil, but a portion of the

portico which surrounded the court is still standing, together with its

massive architraves and statues, which stand with their backs against

the pillars.

[Illustration: 221.jpg THE PROJECTING COLUMNS OF THE SPEOS OF

GERF-HOSSEÎN]

Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from a photograph by Insinger.

The sanctuary itself comprised an antechamber, supported by two columns

and flanked by two oblong recesses; this led into the Holy of Holies,

which was a narrow niche with a low ceiling, placed between two lateral

chapels. A hall, nearly square in shape, connected these mysterious

chambers with the propylæa, which were open to the sky and faced with

Osiride caryatides.

[Illustration: 221.jpg THE CARYATIDES OF GERF-HOSSEÎN]

Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from a photograph by Insinger and

Daniel Héron.

These appear to keep rigid and solemn watch over the approaches to the

tabernacle, and their faces, half hidden in the shadow, still

present such a stern appearance that the semi-barbaric Nubians of the

neighbouring villages believe them to be possessed by implacable genii.

They are supposed to move from their places during the hours of night,

and the fire which flashes from their eyes destroys or fascinates

whoever is rash enough to watch them.

Other kings before Ramses had constructed buildings in these spots, and

their memory would naturally become associated with his in the future;

he wished, therefore, to find a site where he would be without a rival,

and to this end he transformed the cliff at Abu Simbel into a monument

of his greatness. The rocks here project into the Nile and form

a gigantic conical promontory, the face of which was covered with

triumphal stelæ, on which the sailors or troops going up or down the

river could spell out as they passed the praises of the king and his

exploits. A few feet of shore on the northern side, covered with dry and

knotty bushes, affords in winter a landing-place for tourists. At the

spot where the beach ends near the point of the promontory, sit four

colossi, with their feet nearly touching the water, their backs leaning

against a sloping wall of rock, which takes the likeness of a pylon. A

band of hieroglyphs runs above their heads underneath the usual cornice,

over which again is a row of crouching cynocephali looking straight

before them, their hands resting upon their knees, and above this line

of sacred images rises the steep and naked rock. One of the colossi is

broken, and the bust of the statue, which must have been detached by

some great shock, has fallen to the ground; the others rise to the

height of 63 feet, and appear to look across the Nile as if watching the

wadys leading to the gold-mines.

[Illustration 224.jpg THE TWO COLOSSI OF ABU SIMBEL TO THE SOUTH OF THE

DOORWAY]

Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from a photograph by Insinger and

Daniel Héron.

The pschent crown surmounts their foreheads, and the two ends of the

head-dress fall behind their ears; their features are of a noble type,

calm and serious; the nose slightly aquiline, the under lip projecting

above a square, but rather heavy, chin. Of such a type we may picture

Ramses, after the conclusion of the peace with the Khâti, in the full

vigour of his manhood and at the height of his power.

[Illustration: 225.jpg THE INTERIOR OF THE SPEOS OF ABU SIMBEL]

Drawn by Boudier, from a photograph by Insinger and Daniel

Héron.

The doorway of the temple is in the centre of the façade, and rises

nearly to a level with the elbows of the colossi; above the lintel,

and facing the river, stands a figure of the god Râ, represented with a

human body and the head of a sparrow-hawk, while two images of the king

in profile, one on each side of the god, offer him a figure of Truth.

The first hall, 130 feet long by 58 feet broad, takes the place of the

court surrounded by a colonnade which in other temples usually follows

the pylon. Her eight Osiride figures, standing against as many square

pillars, appear to support the weight of the superincumbent rock. Their

profile catches the light as it enters through the open doorway, and

in the early morning, when the rising sun casts a ruddy ray over their

features, their faces become marvellously life-like. We are almost

tempted to think that a smile plays over their lips as the first beams

touch them. The remaining chambers consist of a hypostyle hall nearly

square in shape, the sanctuary itself being between two smaller

apartments, and of eight subterranean chambers excavated at a lower

level than the rest of the temple. The whole measures 178 feet from the

threshold to the far end of the Holy of Holies. The walls are covered

with bas-reliefs in which the Pharaoh has vividly depicted the wars

which he carried on in the four corners of his kingdom; here we see

raids against the negroes, there the war with the Khâti, and further

on an encounter with some Libyan tribe. Ramses, flushed by the heat of

victory, is seen attacking two Timihu chiefs: one has already fallen

to the ground and is being trodden underfoot; the other, after vainly

letting fly his arrows, is about to perish from a blow of the conqueror.

[Illustration: 228.jpg THE FACE OF THE ROCK AT ABU SIMGEL]

His knees give way beneath him, his head falls heavily backwards, and

the features are contracted in his death-agony. Pharaoh with his left

hand has seized him by the arm, while with his right he points his

lance against his enemy’s breast, and is about to pierce him through

the heart. As a rule, this type of bas-relief is executed with a

conventional grace which leaves the spectator unmoved, and free to

consider the scene merely from its historical point of view, forgetful

of the artist.

[Illustration: 229.jpg RAMSES II. PIERCES a Libyan chief with his lance]

Drawn by Boudier, from a photograph by Mons. do Bock.

An examination of most of the other wall-decorations of the speos will

furnish several examples of this type: we see Ramses with a suitable

gesture brandishing his weapon above a group of prisoners, and the

composition furnishes us with a fair example of official sculpture,

correct, conventional, but devoid of interest. Here, on the contrary,

the drawing is so full of energy that it carries the imagination hack to

the time and scene of those far-off battles.

[Illustration: 230.jpg RAMSES II. STRIKES A GROUP OF PRISONERS]

Drawn by Boudier, from a photograph by Insinger.

The indistinct light in which it is seen helps the illusion, and we

almost forget that it is a picture we are beholding, and not the action

itself as it took place some three thousand years ago. A small speos,

situated at some hundred feet further north, is decorated with standing

colossi of smaller size, four of which represent Ramses, and two of them

his wife, Isit Nofrîtari. This speos possesses neither peristyle

nor crypt, and the chapels are placed at the two extremities of the

transverse passage, instead of being in a parallel line with the

sanctuary; on the other hand, the hypostyle hall rests on six pillars

with Hathor-headed capitals of fine proportions.

[Illustration: 231.jpg THE FAÇADE OF THE LITTLE SPEOS OF HAUTHOR AT ABU

SIMBEL]

Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from the plates in Champollion.

A third excavated grotto of modest dimensions served as an accessory

chamber to the two others. An inexhaustible stream of yellow sand

poured over the great temple from the summit of the cliff, and partially

covered it every year. No sooner were the efforts to remove it relaxed,

than it spreads into the chambers, concealing the feet of the colossi,

and slowly creeping upwards to their knees, breasts, and necks; at the

beginning of this century they were entirely hidden. In spite of all

that was done to divert it, it ceaselessly reappeared, and in a few

summers regained all the ground which had been previously cleared.

It would seem as if the desert, powerless to destroy the work of the

conqueror, was seeking nevertheless to hide it from the admiration of

posterity.*

* The English engineers have succeeded in barring out the

sand, and have prevented it from pouring over the cliff any

more.--Ed.

Seti had worked indefatigably at Thebes, but the shortness of his reign

prevented him from completing the buildings he had begun there. There

existed everywhere, at Luxor, at Karnak, and on the left bank of the

Nile, the remains of his unfinished works; sanctuaries partially roofed

in, porticoes incomplete, columns raised to merely half their height,

halls as yet imperfect with blank walls, here and there covered with

only the outlines in red and black ink of their future bas-reliefs,

and statues hardly blocked out, or awaiting the final touch of the

polisher.*

* This is the description which Ramses gave of the condition

in which he found the Memnonium of Abydos. An examination of

the inscriptions existing in the Theban temples which Seti

I. had constructed, shows that it must have applied also to

the appearance of certain portions of Qurneh, Luxor, and

Karnak in the time of Ramses II.

Ramses took up the work where his father had relinquished it. At Luxor

there was not enough space to give to the hypostyle hall the extension

which the original plans proposed, and the great colonnade has an

unfinished appearance.

[Illustration: 230.jpg COLUMNS OF TEMPLE AT LUXOR]

The Nile, in one of its capricious floods, had carried away the land

upon which the architects had intended to erect the side aisles; and if

they wished to add to the existing structure a great court and a pylon,

without which no temple was considered complete, it was necessary to

turn the axis of the building towards the east.

[Illustration: 233.jpg THE CHAPEL OF THUTMOSIS III. AND ONE OF THE

PYLONS OF RAMSES II. AT LUXOR]

Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from a photograph by Beato.

In their operations the architects came upon a beautiful little edifice

of rose granite, which had been either erected or restored by Thûtmosis

III. at a time when the town was an independent municipality and was

only beginning to extend its suburban dwellings to meet those of Karnak.

They took care to make no change in this structure, but set to work to

incorporate it into their final plans. It still stands at the north-west

corner of the court, and the elegance of its somewhat slender little

columns contrasts happily with the heaviness of the structure to which

it is attached. A portion of its portico is hidden by the brickwork of

the mosque of Abu’l Haggag: the part brought to light in the course of

the excavations contains between each row of columns a colossal statue

of Ramses II. We are accustomed to hear on all sides of the degeneracy

of the sculptor’s art at this time, and of its having fallen into

irreparable neglect. Nothing can be further from the truth than this

sweeping statement. There are doubtless many statues and bas-reliefs of

this epoch which shock us by their crudity and ugliness, but these owed

their origin for the most part to provincial workshops which had been

at all times of mediocre repute, and where the artists did not receive

orders enough to enable them to correct by practice the defects of their

education. We find but few productions of the Theban school exhibiting

bad technique, and if we had only this one monument of Luxor from which

to form our opinion of its merits, it would be sufficient to prove that

the sculptors of Ramses II. were not a whit behind those of Harmham or

Seti I. Adroitness in cutting the granite or hard sandstone had in no

wise been lost, and the same may be said of the skill in bringing

out the contour and life-like action of the figure, and of the art of

infusing into the features and demeanour of the Pharaoh something of

the superhuman majesty with which the Egyptian people were accustomed to

invest their monarchs. If the statues of Ramses II. in the portico are

not perfect models of sculpture, they have many good points, and their

bold treatment makes them effectively decorative.

[Illustration: 235.jpg THE COLONNADE OF SETI I. AND THE THREE COLOSSAL

STATUES OF RAMSES II. AT LUXOR]

Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from a photograph by Beato.

Eight other statues of Ramses are arranged along the base of the

façade, and two obelisks--one of which has been at Paris for half a

century*--stood on either side of the entrance.

* The colonnade and the little temple of Thûtmosis III. were

concealed under the houses of the village; they were first

brought to light in the excavations of 1884-86.

The whole structure lacks unity, and there is nothing corresponding to

it in this respect anywhere else in Egypt. The northern half does

not join on to the southern, but seems to belong to quite a distinct

structure, or the two parts might be regarded as having once formed

a single edifice which had become divided by an accident, which the

architect had endeavoured to unite together again by a line of columns

running between two walls. The masonry of the hypostyle hall at Karnak

was squared and dressed, but the walls had been left undecorated, as

was also the case with the majority of the shafts of the columns and the

surface of the architraves. Ramses covered the whole with a series of

sculptured and painted scenes which had a rich ornamental effect; he

then decorated the pylon, and inscribed on the outer wall to the south

the list of cities which he had captured. The temple of Amon then

assumed the aspect which it preserved henceforward for centuries. The

Ramessides and their successors occupied themselves in filling it with

furniture, and in taking steps for the repair of any damage that might

accrue to the hall or pillars; they had their cartouches or inscriptions

placed in vacant spaces, but they did not dare to modify its

arrangement. It was reserved for the Ethiopian and Greek Pharaohs, in

presence of the hypostyle and pylon of the XIXth dynasty, to conceive of

others on a still vaster scale.

[Illustration: 236.jpg PAINTINGS OF CHAIRS]

Ramses, having completed the funerary chapel of Seti at Qurneh upon the

left bank of the river, then began to think of preparing the edifice

destined for the cult of his “double”--that Eamesseum whose majestic

ruins still stand at a short distance to the north of the giants of

Amenôthes. Did these colossal statues stimulate his spirit of emulation

to do something yet more marvellous? He erected here, at any rate,

a still more colossal figure. The earthquake which shattered Memnon

brought it to the ground, and fragments of it still strew the soil where

they fell some nineteen centuries ago. There are so many of them that the

spectator would think himself in the middle of a granite quarry.*

* The ear measures 3 feet 4 inches (feet ?) in length; the

statue is 58 feet high from the top of the head to the

sole of the foot, and the weight of the whole has been

estimated at over a thousand tons.

[Illustration: 237.jpg THE REMAINS OF THE COLOSSAL STATUE OF RAMSES II.

AT THE RAMESSEUM]

Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from a photograph by Beato

The portions forming the breast, arms, and thighs are in detached

pieces, but they are still recognisable where they lie close to each

other. The head has lost nothing of its characteristic expression, and

its proportions are so enormous, that a man could sleep crouched up

in the hollow of one of its ears as if on a sofa. Behind the court

overlooked by this colossal statue lay a second court, surrounded by a

row of square pillars, each having a figure of Osiris attached to it.

The god is represented as a mummy, the swathings throwing the body and

limbs into relief.

[Illustration: 238.jpg THE RAMESSEUM]

Drawn by Boudier, from a photograph by Beato; the great

blocks in the foreground are the fragments of the colossal

statue of Ramses II.

His hands are freed from the bandages and are crossed on the breast, and

hold respectively the flail and crook; the smiling face is surmounted by

an enormous head-dress. The sanctuary with the buildings attached to

it has perished, but enormous brick structures extend round the ruins,

forming an enclosure of storehouses. Here the priests of the “double”

were accustomed to dwell with their wives and slaves, and here they

stored up the products of their domains--meat, vegetables, corn, fowls

dried or preserved in fat, and wines procured from all the vineyards of

Egypt.

These were merely the principal monuments put up by Ramses II. at Thebes

during the sixty-seven years of his rule. There would be no end to the

enumeration of his works if we were to mention all the other edifices

which he constructed in the necropolis or among the dwellings of the

living, all those which he restored, or those which he merely repaired

or inscribed with his cartouches. These are often cut over the name of

the original founder, and his usurpations of monuments are so numerous

that he might be justly accused of having striven to blot out the memory

of his predecessors, and of claiming for himself the entire work of the

whole line of Pharaohs. It would seem as if, in his opinion, the glory

of Egypt began with him, or at least with his father, and that no

victorious campaigns had been ever heard of before those which he

conducted against the Libyans and the Hittites.

The battle of Qodshû, with its attendant episodes--the flogging of the

spies, the assault upon the camp, the charge of the chariots, the flight

of the Syrians--is the favourite subject of his inscriptions; and the

poem of Pentaûîrît adds to the bas-reliefs a description worthy of the

acts represented. This epic reappears everywhere, in Nubia and in the

Said, at Abu Simbel, at Beît-Wally, at Derr, at Luxor, at Karnak, and

on the Eamesseum, and the same battle-scenes, with the same accompanying

texts, reappear in the Memnonium, whose half-ruined walls still crown

the necropolis of Abydos.

[Illustration: 240.jpg THE RUINS OF THE MEMNONIUM OF RAMSES II. AT

ABYDOS]

Drawn by Boudier, from a photograph by Emil Brugsch-Bey.

He had decided upon the erection of this latter monument at the very

beginning of his reign, and the artisans who had worked at the similar

structure of Seti I. were employed to cover its walls with admirable

bas-reliefs. Ramses also laid claim to have his own resting-place at

“the Cleft;” in this privilege he associated all the Pharaohs, from whom

he imagined himself to be descended, and the same list of their names,

which we find engraved in the chapel of his father, appears on his

building also. Some ruins, lying beyond Abydos, are too formless to do

more than indicate the site of some of his structures. He enlarged

the temple of Harshafîtû and that of Osiris at Heracleopolis, and, to

accomplish these works the more promptly, his workmen had recourse

for material to the royal towns of the IVth and XIIth dynasties; the

pyramids of Usirtasen II. and Snofrûi at Medûm suffered accordingly the

loss of the best part of their covering. He finished the mausoleum at

Memphis, and dedicated the statue which Seti had merely blocked out;

he then set to work to fill the city with buildings of his own

device--granite and sandstone chambers to the east of the Sacred Lake,*

monumental gateways to the south,** and before one of them a fine

colossal figure in granite.*** It lay not long ago at the bottom of a

hole among the palm trees, and was covered by the inundation every year;

it has now been so raised as to be safe from the waters. Ramses could

hardly infuse new life into all the provinces which had been devastated

years before by the Shepherd-kings; but Heliopolis,**** Bubastes,

Athribis, Patûmû, Mendis, Tell Moqdam, and all the cities of the eastern

corner of the Delta, constitute a museum of his monuments, every object

within them testifying to his activity.

* Partly excavated and published by Mariette, and partly by

M. de Morgan. This is probably the temple mentioned in the

_Great Inscription of Abu Simbel_.

** These are probably those mentioned by Herodotus, when he

says that Sesostris constructed a propylon in the temple of

Hephaistos.

*** This is Abu-1-hôl of the Arabs.

**** Ruins of the temple of Râ bear the cartouche of Ramses

II. “Cleopatra’s Needle,” transported to Alexandria by one

of the Ptolemies, had been set up by Ramses at Heliopolis;

it is probably one of the four obelisks which the

traditional Sesostris is said to have erected in that city,

according to Pliny.

He colonised these towns with his prisoners, rebuilt them, and set to

work to rouse them from the torpor into which they had fallen after

their capture by Ahmosis. He made a third capital of Tanis, which

rivalled both Memphis and Thebes.

[Illustration: 242.jpg THE COLOSSAL STATUE OF RAMSES II. AT MITRAHINEH]

Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from a photograph brought back by

Bénédite.

Before this it had been little more than a deserted ruin: he cleared

out the _débris_, brought a population to the place; rebuilt the temple,

enlarging it by aisles which extended its area threefold; and here he

enthroned, along with the local divinities, a triad, in which Amonrâ and

Sûtkhû sat side by side with his own deified “double.” The ruined

walls, the overturned stelæ, the obelisks recumbent in the dust, and

the statues of his usurped predecessors, all bear his name. His colossal

figure of statuary sandstone, in a sitting attitude like that at the

Eamesseum, projected from the chief court, and seemed to look down upon

the confused ruin of his works.*

* The fragments of the colossus were employed in the Græco-

Roman period as building material, and used in the masonry

of a boundary wall.

We do not know how many wives he had in his harem, but one of the lists

of his children which has come down to us enumerates, although mutilated

at the end, one hundred and eleven sons, while of his daughters we know

of fifty-five.*

* The list of Abydos enumerates thirty-three of his sons and

thirty-two of his daughters, that of Wady-Sebua one hundred

and eleven of his sons and fifty-one of his daughters; both

lists are mutilated. The remaining lists for the most part

record only some of the children living at the time they

were drawn up, at Derr, at the Eamesseum, and at Abu Simbel.

The majority of these were the offspring of mere concubines or foreign

princesses, and possessed but a secondary rank in comparison with

himself; but by his union with his sisters Nofrîtari Marîtmût and

Isîtnofrît, he had at least half a dozen sons and daughters who might

aspire to the throne. Death robbed him of several of these before

an opportunity was open to them to succeed him, and among them

Amenhikhopshûf, Amenhiunamif, and Ramses, who had distinguished

themselves in the campaign against the Khâti; and some of his

daughters--Bitanîti, Marîtamon, Nibîttaûi--by becoming his wives lost

their right to the throne. About the XXXth year of his reign, when he

was close upon sixty, he began to think of an associate, and his choice

rested on the eldest surviving son of his queen Isîtnofrît, who was

called Khâmoîsît. This prince was born before the succession of his

father, and had exhibited distinguished bravery under the walls of

Qodshu and at Ascalon. When he was still very young he had been invested

with the office of high priest of the Memphite Phtah, and thus had

secured to him the revenues of the possessions of the god, which were

the largest in all Egypt after those of the Theban Anion. He had a great

reputation for his knowledge of abstruse theological questions and of

the science of magic--a later age attributing to him the composition of

several books on magic giving directions for the invocation of spirits

belonging to this world and the world beyond. He became the hero also of

fantastic romances, in which it was related of him how, in consequence

of his having stolen from the mummy of an old wizard the books of

Thot, he became the victim of possession by a sort of lascivious and

sanguinary ghoul. Ramses relieved himself of the cares of state by

handing over to Khâmoîsîfc the government of the country, without,

however, conferring upon him the titles and insignia of royalty. The

chief concern of Khâmoîsît was to secure the scrupulous observance

of the divine laws. He celebrated at Silsilis the festivals of the

inundation; he presided at the commemoration of his father’s apotheosis,

and at the funeral rites of the Apis who died in the XXXth year of the

king’s reign. Before his time each sacred bull had its separate tomb

in a quarter of the Memphite Necropolis known to the Greeks as the

Serapeion. The tomb was a small cone-roofed building erected on a square

base, and containing only one chamber. Khâmoîsît substituted for this a

rock-tomb similar to those used by ordinary individuals. He had a tunnel

cut in the solid rock to a depth of about a hundred yards, and on either

side of this a chamber was prepared for each Apis on its death, the

masons closing up the wall after the installation of the mummy. His

regency had lasted for nearly a quarter of a century, when, the burden

of government becoming too much for him, he was succeeded in the LVth

year of Ramses by his younger brother Mînephtah, who was like himself

a son of Isîtnofrît.* Mînephtah acted, during the first twelve years of

his rule, for his father, who, having now almost attained the age of

a hundred, passed peacefully away at Thebes in the LXVIII year of his

reign, full of days and sated with glory.** He became the subject of

legend almost before he had closed his eyes upon the world.

* Mînephtah was in the order of birth the thirteenth son of

Ramses II.

** A passage on a stele of Ramses IV. formally attributes to

him a reign of sixty-seven years. I procured at Koptos a

stele of his year LXVI.

[Illustration: 245.jpg THE CHAPEL OF THE APIS OF AMEKÔTHES III.]

Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from a sketch by Mariette.

He had obtained brilliant successes during his life, and the scenes

describing them were depicted in scores of places. Popular fancy

believed everything which he had related of himself, and added to

this all that it knew of other kings, thus making him the Pharaoh of

Pharaohs--the embodiment of all preceding monarchs. Legend preferred to

recall him by the name Sesûsû, Sesûstûrî--a designation which had been

applied to him by his contemporaries, and he thus became better known to

moderns as Sesostris than by his proper name Ramses Mîamûn.*

* This designation, which is met with at Medinet-Habu and in

the Anmtasi Papyrus I., was shown by E. de Rougé to refer to

Ramses II.; the various readings Sesû, Sesûsû, Sesûstûrî,

explain the different forms Sesosis, Sesoosis, Sesostris.

Wiedemann saw in this name the mention of a king of the

XVIIIth dynasty not yet classified.

According to tradition, he was at first sent to Ethiopia with a fleet

of four hundred ships, by which he succeeded in conquering the coasts

of the Red Sea as far as the Indus. In later times several stelæ in the

cinnamon country were ascribed to him. He is credited after this with

having led into the east a great army, with which he conquered Syria,

Media, Persia, Bactriana, and India as far as the ocean; and with having

on his return journey through the deserts of Scythia reached the Don

[Tanais], where, on the shore of the Masotic Sea, he left a number of

his soldiers, whose descendants afterwards peopled Colchis. It was

even alleged that he had ventured into Europe, but that the lack of

provisions and the inclemency of the climate had prevented him from

advancing further than Thrace.

[Illustration: 246.jpg STATUE OF KHAMOISIT]

Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from a statue in the British Museum.

He returned to Egypt after an absence of nine years, and after

having set up on his homeward journey statues and stelæ everywhere in

commemoration of his victories. Herodotus asserts that he himself had

seen several of these monuments in his travels in Syria and Ionia. Some

of these are of genuine Egyptian manufacture, and are to be attributed

to our Ramses; they are to be found near Tyre, and on the banks of the

Nahr el-Kelb, where they mark the frontier to which his empire extended

in this direction. Others have but little resemblance to Egyptian

monuments, and were really the work of the Asiatic peoples among whom

they were found. The two figures referred to long ago by Herodotus,

which have been discovered near Ninfi between Sardis and Smyrna, are

instances of the latter.

[Illustration: 247.jpg STELE OF THE NAHR EL-KELB]

Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from a photograph.

The shoes of the figures are turned up at the toe, and the head-dress

has more resemblance to the high hats of the people of Asia Minor

than to the double crown of Egypt, while the lower garment is striped

horizontally in place of vertically. The inscription, moreover, is in an

Asiatic form of writing, and has nothing Egyptian about it. Ramses

II. in his youth was the handsomest man of his time. He was tall and

straight; his figure was well moulded--the shoulders broad, the arms

full and vigorous, the legs muscular; the face was oval, with a firm and

smiling mouth, a thin aquiline nose, and large open eyes.

[Illustration: 248.jpg THE BAS-BELIEF OF NINFI]

Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from a photograph.

[Illustration: 249.jpg THE COFFIN AND MUMMY OF RAMSES II]

Drawn by Boudier, from a photograph taken from the mummy

itself, by Emil Brugsch-Bey.

There may be seen below the cartouche the lines of the official report

of inspection written during the XXIst dynasty. Old age and death did

not succeed in marring the face sufficiently to disfigure it. The coffin

containing his body is not the same as that in which his children placed

him on the day of his obsequies; it is another substituted for it by one

of the Ramessides, and the mask upon it has but a distant resemblance

to the face of the victorious Pharaoh. The mummy is thin, much shrunken,

and light; the bones are brittle, and the muscles atrophied, as one

would expect in the case of a man who had attained the age of a hundred;

but the figure is still tall and of perfect proportions.*

* Even after the coalescence of the vertebrae and the shrinkage produced

by mummification, the body of Ramses II. still measures over 5 feet 8

inches.

The head, which is bald on the top, is somewhat long, and small in

relation to the bulk of the body; there is but little hair on the

forehead, but at the back of the head it is thick, and in smooth stiff

locks, still preserving its white colour beneath the yellow balsams

of his last toilet. The forehead is low, the supra-orbital ridges

accentuated, the eyebrows thick, the eyes small and set close to the

nose, the temples hollow, the cheek-bones prominent; the ears, finely

moulded, stand out from the head, and are pierced, like those of a

woman, for the usual ornaments pendant from the lobe. A strong jaw and

square chin, together, with a large thick-lipped mouth, which reveals

through the black paste within it a few much-worn but sound teeth, make

up the features of the mummied king. His moustache and beard, which were

closely shaven in his lifetime, had grown somewhat in his last sickness

or after his death; the coarse and thick hairs in them, white like those

of the head and eyebrows, attain a length of two or three millimetres.

The skin shows an ochreous yellow colour under the black bituminous

plaster. The mask of the mummy, in fact, gives a fair idea of that of

the living king; the somewhat unintelligent expression, slightly brutish

perhaps, but haughty and firm of purpose, displays itself with an air

of royal majesty beneath the sombre materials used by the embalmer.

The disappearance of the old hero did not produce many changes in the

position of affairs in Egypt: Mînephtah from this time forth possessed

as Pharaoh the power which he had previously wielded as regent. He was

now no longer young. Born somewhere about the beginning of the reign of

Ramses II., he was now sixty, possibly seventy, years old; thus an old

man succeeded another old man at a moment when Egypt must have needed

more than ever an active and vigorous ruler. The danger to the country

did not on this occasion rise from the side of Asia, for the relations

of the Pharaoh with his Kharu subjects continued friendly, and, during a

famine which desolated Syria,* he sent wheat to his Hittite allies.

* A document preserved in the _Anastasi Papyrus III._ shows

how regular the relations with Syria had become. It is the

journal of a custom-house officer, or of a scribe placed at

one of the frontier posts, who notes from day to day the

letters, messengers, officers, and troops which passed from

the 15th to the 25th of Pachons, in the IIIrd year of the

reign.

The nations, however, to the north and east, in Libya and in the

Mediterranean islands, had for some time past been in a restless

condition, which boded little good to the empires of the old world. The

Tirnihû, some of them tributaries from the XIIth, and others from the

first years of the XVIIIth dynasty, had always been troublesome, but

never really dangerous neighbours. From time to time it was necessary

to send light troops against them, who, sailing along the coast or

following the caravan routes, would enter their territory, force them

from their retreats, destroy their palm groves, carry off their cattle,

and place garrisons in the principal oases--even in Sîwah itself.

For more than a century, however, it would seem that more active and

numerically stronger populations had entered upon the stage. A current

of invasion, having its origin in the region of the Atlas, or possibly

even in Europe, was setting towards the Nile, forcing before it the

scattered tribes of the Sudan. Who were these invaders? Were they

connected with the race which had planted its dolmens over the plains of

the Maghreb? Whatever the answer to this question may be, we know that

a certain number of Berber tribes*--the Labû and Mashaûasha--who had

occupied a middle position between Egypt and the people behind them,

and who had only irregular communications with the Nile valley, were now

pushed to the front and forced to descend upon it.**

* The nationality of these tribes is evidenced by the names

of their chiefs, which recall exactly those of the

Numidians--Massyla, Massinissa, Massiva.

** The Labû, Laûbû, Lobû, are mentioned for the first time

under Ramses II.; these are the Libyans of classical

geographers. The Mashaûasha answer to the Maxycs of

Herodotus; they furnished mercenaries to the armies of

Ramses II.

They were men tall of stature and large of limb, with fair skins, light

hair, and blue eyes; everything, in fact, indicating their northern

origin. They took pleasure in tattooing the skin, just as the Tuaregs

and Kabyles are now accustomed to do, and some, if not all, of them

practised circumcision, like a portion of the Egyptians and Semites. In

the arrangement of the hair, a curl fell upon the shoulder, while the

remainder was arranged in small frizzled locks. Their chiefs and braves

wore on their heads two flowering plumes. A loin-cloth, a wild-beast’s

skin thrown over the back, a mantle, or rather a covering of woollen

or dyed cloth, fringed and ornamented with many-coloured needlework,

falling from the left shoulder with no attachment in front, so as to

leave the body unimpeded in walking,--these constituted the ordinary

costume of the people. Their arms were similar to those of the

Egyptians, consisting of the lance, the mace, the iron or copper dagger,

the boomerang, the bow and arrow, and the sling.

[Illustration: 253.jpg A LIBYAN]

Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from a photograph.

They also employed horses and chariots. Their bravery made them a foe

not to be despised, in spite of their ignorance of tactics and their

want of discipline. When they were afterwards formed into regiments and

conducted by experienced generals, they became the best auxiliary troops

which Egypt could boast of. The Labû from this time forward were the

most energetic of the tribes, and their chiefs prided themselves upon

possessing the leadership over all the other clans in this region of the

world.*

* This was the case in the wars of Mînephtah and Ramses

III., in which the Labû and their kings took the command of

the confederate armies assembled against Egypt.

The Labû might very well have gained the mastery over the other

inhabitants of the desert at this period, who had become enfeebled

by the frequent defeats which they had sustained at the hands of the

Egyptians. At the moment when Mînephtah ascended the throne, their king,

Mâraîû, son of Didi, ruled over the immense territory lying between the

Fayûm and the two Syrtes: the Timihu, the Kahaka, and the Mashaûasha

rendered him the same obedience as his own people. A revolution had

thus occurred in Africa similar to that which had taken place a century

previously in Naharaim, when Sapalulu founded the Hittite empire. A

great kingdom rose into being where no state capable of disturbing

Egyptian control had existed before. The danger was serious. The

Hittites, separated from the Nile by the whole breadth of Kharu, could

not directly threaten any of the Egyptian cities; but the Libyans, lords

of the desert, were in contact with the Delta, and could in a few days

fall upon any point in the valley they chose. Mînephtah, therefore,

hastened to resist the assault of the westerns, as his father had

formerly done that of the easterns, and, strange as it may seem, he

found among the troops of his new enemies some of the adversaries with

whom the Egyptians had fought under the walls of Qodshû sixty years

before. The Shardana, Lycians, and others, having left the coasts of the

Delta and the Phoenician seaports owing to the vigilant watch kept by

the Egyptians over their waters, had betaken themselves to the Libyan

littoral, where they met with a favourable reception. Whether they had

settled in some places, and formed there those colonies of which a Greek

tradition of a recent age speaks, we cannot say. They certainly followed

the occupation of mercenary soldiers, and many of them hired out their

services to the native princes, while others were enrolled among the

troops of the King of the Khâti or of the Pharaoh himself. Mâraîû

brought with him Achæans, Shardana, Tûrsha, Shagalasha,* and Lycians

in considerable numbers when he resolved to begin the strife.** This was

not one of those conventional little wars which aimed at nothing further

than the imposition of the payment of a tribute upon the conquered, or

the conquest of one of their provinces. Mâraîû had nothing less in view

than the transport of his whole people into the Nile valley, to settle

permanently there as the Hyksôs had done before him.

* The Shakalasha, Shagalasha, identified with the Sicilians

by E. de Rougé, were a people of Asia Minor whose position

there is approximately indicated by the site of the town

Sagalassos, named after them.

** The _Inscription of Mînephtah_ distinguishes the Libyans

of Mâraîû from “the people of the Sea.”

He set out on his march towards the end of the IVth year of the

Pharaoh’s reign, or the beginning of his Vth, surrounded by the elite

of his troops, “the first choice from among all the soldiers and all the

heroes in each land.” The announcement of their approach spread terror

among the Egyptians. The peace which they had enjoyed for fifty years

had cooled their warlike ardour, and the machinery of their military

organisation had become somewhat rusty. The standing army had almost

melted away; the regiments of archers and charioteers were no longer

effective, and the neglected fortresses were not strong enough to

protect the frontier. As a consequence, the oases of Farafrah and of the

Natron lakes fell into the hands of the enemy at the first attack, and

the eastern provinces of the Delta became the possession of the invader

before any steps could be taken for their defence. Memphis, which

realised the imminent danger, broke out into open murmurs against the

negligent rulers who had given no heed to the country’s ramparts, and

had allowed the garrisons of its fortresses to dwindle away. Fortunately

Syria remained quiet. The Khâti, in return for the aid afforded them

by Mînephtah during the famine, observed a friendly attitude, and

the Pharaoh was thus enabled to withdraw the troops from his Asiatic

provinces. He could with perfect security take the necessary measures

for ensuring “Heliopolis, the city of Tûmû,” against surprise, “for

arming Memphis, the citadel of Phtah-Tonen, and for restoring all things

which were in disorder: he fortified Pibalîsît, in the neighbourhood of

the Shakana canal, on a branch of that of Heliopolis,” and he rapidly

concentrated his forces behind these quickly organised lines.*

* Chabas would identify Pibalîsît with Bubastis; I agree

with Brugsch in placing it at Belbeîs.

Mâraîû, however, continued to advance; in the early months of the summer

he had crossed the Canopic branch of the Nile, and was now about to

encamp not far from the town of Pirici. When the king heard of this “he

became furious against them as a lion that fascinates its victim; he

called his officers together and addressed them: ‘I am about to make you

hear the words of your master, and to teach you this: I am the sovereign

shepherd who feeds you; I pass my days in seeking out that which is

useful for you: I am your father; is there among you a father like me

who makes his children live? You are trembling like geese, you do not

know what is good to do: no one gives an answer to the enemy, and

our desolated land is abandoned to the incursions of all nations. The

barbarians harass the frontier, rebels violate it every day, every one

robs it, enemies devastate our seaports, they penetrate into the fields

of Egypt; if there is an arm of a river they halt there, they stay for

days, for months; they come as numerous as reptiles, and no one is able

to sweep them back, these wretches who love death and hate life, whose

hearts meditate the consummation of our ruin. Behold, they arrive with

their chief; they pass their time on the land which they attack in

filling their stomachs every day; this is the reason why they come to

the land of Egypt, to seek their sustenance, and their intention is to

install themselves there; mine is to catch them like fish upon their

bellies. Their chief is a dog, a poor devil, a madman; he shall never

sit down again in his place.’” He then announced that on the 14th of

Epiphi he would himself conduct the troops against the enemy.

These were brave words, but we may fancy the figure that this king of

more than sixty years of age would have presented in a chariot in the

middle of the fray, and his competence to lead an effective charge

against the enemy. On the other hand, his absence in such a critical

position of affairs would have endangered the _morale_ of his soldiers

and possibly compromised the issue of the battle. A dream settled the

whole question.*

* Ed. Meyer sees in this nothing but a customary rhetorical

expression, and thinks that the god spoke in order to

encourage the king to defend himself vigorously.

While Mînephtah was asleep one night, he saw a gigantic figure of Phtah

standing before him, and forbidding him to advance. “‘Stay,’ cried

the god to him, while handing him the curved khopesh: ‘put away

discouragement from thee!’ His Majesty said to him: ‘But what am I to do

then?’ And Phtah answered him: ‘Despatch thy infantry, and send before

it numerous chariots to the confines of the territory of Piriû.’”**

* This name was read Pa-ari by E. de Rougé, Pa-ali by Lauth,

and was transcribed Pa-ari-shop by Brugsch, who identified

with Prosopitis. The orthography of the text at Athribis

shows that we ought to read Piri, Pirû, Piriû; possibly the

name is identical with that of larû which is mentioned in

the Pyramid-texts.

The Pharaoh obeyed the command, and did not stir from his position.

Mâraîû had, in the mean time, arranged his attack for the 1st of Epiphi,

at the rising of the sun: it did not take place, however, until the 3rd.

“The archers of His Majesty made havoc of the barbarians for six

hours; they were cut off by the edge of the sword.” When Mâraîû saw

the carnage, “he was afraid, his heart failed him; he betook himself

to flight as fast as his feet could bear him to save his life, so

successfully that his bow and arrows remained behind him in his

precipitation, as well as everything else he had upon him.” His

treasure, his arms, his wife, together with the cattle which he had

brought with him for his use, became the prey of the conqueror; “he tore

out the feathers from his head-dress, and took flight with such of those

wretched Libyans as escaped the massacre, but the officers who had the

care of His Majesty’s team of horses followed in their steps” and put

most of them to the sword. Mâraîû succeeded, however, in escaping in the

darkness, and regained his own country without water or provisions, and

almost without escort. The conquering troops returned to the camp laden

with booty, and driving before them asses carrying, as bloody tokens of

victory, quantities of hands and phalli cut from the dead bodies of the

slain. The bodies of six generals and of 6359 Libyan soldiers were found

upon the field of battle, together with 222 Shagalasha, 724 Tursha, and

some hundreds of Shardana and Achæans: several thousands of prisoners

passed in procession before the Pharaoh, and were distributed among such

of his soldiers as had distinguished themselves. These numbers show the

gravity of the danger from which Egypt had escaped: the announcement

of the victory filled the country with enthusiasm, all the more sincere

because of the reality of the panic which had preceded it. The fellahîn,

intoxicated with joy, addressed each other: “‘Come, and let us go a long

distance on the road, for there is now no fear in the hearts of

men.’The fortified posts may at last be left; the citadels are now open;

messengers stand at the foot of the walls and wait in the shade for the

guard to awake after their siesta, to give them entrance. The military

police sleep on their accustomed rounds, and the people of the marshes

once more drive their herds to pasture without fear of raids, for there

are no longer marauders near at hand to cross the river; the cry of the

sentinels is heard no more in the night: ‘Halt, thou that comest, thou

that comest under a name which is not thine own--sheer off!’ and men no

longer exclaim on the following morning: ‘Such or such a thing has been

stolen;’ but the towns fall once more into their usual daily routine,

and he who works in the hope of the harvest, will nourish himself upon

that which he shall have reaped.” The return from Memphis to Thebes was

a triumphal march.

[Illustration: 260.jpg STATUE OF MÎNEPHTAH]

Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from a photograph by Dévéria.

“He is very strong, Binrî Mînephtah,” sang the court poets, “very

wise are his projects--his words have as beneficial effect as those of

Thot--everything which he does is completed to the end.--When he is like

a guide at the head of his armies--his voice penetrates the fortress

walls.--Very friendly to those who bow their backs--before Mîamun--his

valiant soldiers spare him who humbles himself--before his courage

and before his strength;--they fall upon the Libyans--they consume the

Syrian;--the Shardana whom thou hast brought back by thy

sword--make prisoners of their own tribes.--Very happy thy return to

Thebes--victorious! Thy chariot is drawn by hand--the conquered chiefs

march backwards before thee--whilst thou leadest them to thy venerable

father--Amon, husband of his mother.” And the poets amuse themselves

with summoning Mâraîû to appear in Egypt, pursued as he was by his own

people and obliged to hide himself from them. “He is nothing any longer

but a beaten man, and has become a proverb among the Labû, and his

chiefs repeat to themselves: ‘Nothing of the kind has occurred since the

time of Râ.’ The old men say each one to his children: ‘Misfortune

to the Labû! it is all over with them! No one can any longer pass

peacefully across the country; but the power of going out of our

land has been taken from us in a single day, and the Tihonu have been

withered up in a single year; Sûtkhû has ceased to be their chief, and

he devastates their “duars;” there is nothing left but to conceal one’s

self, and one feels nowhere secure except in a fortress.’” The news of

the victory was carried throughout Asia, and served to discourage the

tendencies to revolt which were beginning to make themselves manifest

there. “The chiefs gave there their salutations of peace, and none among

the nomads raised his head after the crushing defeat of the Libyans;

Khâti is at peace, Canaan is a prisoner as far as the disaffected are

concerned, the inhabitant of Ascalon is led away, Gezer is carried into

captivity, Ianuâmîm is brought to nothing, the Israîlû are destroyed and

have no longer seed, Kharu is like a widow of the land of Egypt.” *

* This passage is taken from a stele discovered by Petrie in

1896, on the site of the Amenophium at Thebes. The mention

of the Israîlû immediately calls to mind the place-names

Yushaph-îlu, Yakob-îlu, on lists of Thûtmosis III. which

have been compared with the names Jacob and Joseph.

Mînephtah ought to have followed up his opportunity to the end, but he

had no such intention, and his inaction gave Mâraîû time to breathe.

Perhaps the effort which he had made had exhausted his resources,

perhaps old age prevented him from prosecuting his success; he was

content, in any case, to station bodies of pickets on the frontier,

and to fortify a few new positions to the east of the Delta. The Libyan

kingdom was now in the same position as that in which the Hittite had

been after the campaign of Seti I.: its power had been checked for the

moment, but it remained intact on the Egyptian frontier, awaiting its

opportunity.

Mînephtah lived for some time after this memorable year* and the number

of monuments which belong to this period show that he reigned in peace.

We can see that he carried out works in the same places as his father

before him; at Tanis as well as Thebes, in Nubia as well as in the

Delta. He worked the sandstone quarries for his building materials,

and continued the custom of celebrating the feasts of the inundation at

Silsileh. One at least of the stelae which he set up on the occasion of

these feasts is really a chapel, with its architraves and columns, and

still, excites the admiration of the traveller on account both of its

form and of its picturesque appearance.

* The last known year of his reign is the year VIII. The

lists of Manetho assign to him a reign of from twenty to

forty years; Brugsch makes it out to have been thirty-four

years, from 1300 to 1266 B.C., which is evidently too much,

but we may attribute to him without risk of serious error a

reign of about twenty years.

The last years of his life were troubled by the intrigues of princes who

aspired to the throne, and by the ambition of the ministers to whom he

was obliged to delegate his authority.

[Illustration: 263.jpg THE CHAPELS OF RAMSES II. AND MINEPHTAH AT

SISILEH]

Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from a photograph by Beato.

One of the latter, a man of Semite origin, named Ben-Azana, of

Zor-bisana, who had assumed the appellation of his first patron,

ramsesûpirnirî, appears to have acted for him as regent. Mînephtah

was succeeded, apparently, by one of his sons, called Seti, after his

great-grandfather.* Seti II. had doubtless reached middle age at the

time of his accession, but his portraits represent him, nevertheless,

with the face and figure of a young man.** The expression in these is

gentle, refined, haughty, and somewhat melancholic. MU It is the type

of Seti I. and Ramses II., but enfeebled and, as it were, saddened. An

inscription of his second year attributes to him victories in Asia,***

but others of the same period indicate the existence of disturbances

similar to those which had troubled the last years of his father.

* E. de Rougé introduced Amenmeses and Siphtah between

Mînephtah and Seti II., and I had up to the present followed

his example; I have come back to the position of Chabas,

making Seti II. the immediate successor of Mînephtah, which

is also the view of Brugsch, Wiedemann, and Ed. Meyer. The

succession as it is now given does not seem to me to be free

from difficulties; the solution generally adopted has only

the merit of being preferable to that of E. de Rougé, which

I previously supported.

** The last date known of his reign is the year II. which is

found at Silsilis; Chabas was, nevertheless, of the opinion

that he reigned a considerable time.

*** The expressions employed in this document do not vary

much from the usual protocol of all kings of this period.

The triumphal chant of Seti II. preserved in the _Anastasi

Papyrus IV_. is a copy of the triumphal chant of Mînephtah,

which is in the same Papyrus.

[Illustration: 264.jpg STATUE OF SETI II.]

Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from a photograph.

These were occasioned by a certain Aiari, who was high priest of Phtah,

and who had usurped titles belonged ordinarily to the Pharaoh or his

eldest son, in the house of Sibû, “heir and hereditary prince of the two

lands.” Seti died, it would seem, without having had time to finish his

tomb. We do not know whether he left any legitimate children, but two

sovereigns succeeded him who were not directly connected with him, but

were probably the grandsons of the Amenmesis and the Siphtah, whom we

meet with among the children of Ramses. The first of these was also

called Amenmesis,* and he held sway for several years over the whole of

Egypt, and over its foreign possessions.

* Graffiti of this sovereign have been found at the second

cataract. Certain expressions have induced E. de Rougé to

believe that he, as well as Siphtah, came originally from

Khibît in the Aphroditopolite nome. This was an allusion, as

Chabas had seen, to the myth of Horus, similar to that

relating to Thûtmosis III., and which we more usually meet

with in the cases of those kings who were not marked out

from their birth onwards for the throne.

[Illustration: 265.jpg SETI II.]

Drawn by Boudier, from a photograph by Émil Brugsch-Bey.

The second, who was named Siphtah-Mînephtah, ascended “the throne of his

father” thanks to the devotion of his minister Baî,* but in a greater

degree to his marriage with a certain princess called Tausirît. He

maintained himself in this position for at least six years, during which

he made an expedition into Ethiopia, and received in audience at

Thebes messengers from all foreign nations. He kept up so zealously the

appearance of universal dominion, that to judge from his inscriptions

he must have been the equal of the most powerful of his predecessors at

Thebes.

Egypt, nevertheless, was proceeding at a quick pace towards its

downfall. No sooner had this monarch disappeared than it began to break

up.** There were no doubt many claimants for the crown, but none of them

succeeded in disposing of the claims of his rivals, and anarchy reigned

supreme from one end of the Nile valley to the other. The land of Qîmît

began to drift away, and the people within it had no longer a sovereign,

and this, too, for many years, until other times came; for “the land of

Qîmît was in the hands of the princes ruling over the nomes, and they

put each other to death, both great and small.

* Baî has left two inscriptions behind him, one at Silsilis

and the other at Sehêl, and the titles he assumes on both

monuments show the position he occupied at the Theban court

during the reign of Siphtah-Mînephtah. Chabas thought that

Baî had succeeded in maintaining his rights to the crown

against the claims of Amenmesis.

** The little that we know about this period of anarchy has

been obtained from the _Harris Papyrus_.

Other times came afterwards, during years of nothingness, in which

Arisu, a Syrian,* was chief among them, and the whole country paid

tribute before him; every one plotted with his neighbour to steal the

goods of others, and it was the same with regard to the gods as with

regard to men, offerings were no longer made in the temples.”

* The name of this individual was deciphered by Chabas;

Lauth, and after him Krall, were inclined to read it as Ket,

Ketesh, in order to identify it with the Ketes of Diodorus

Siculus. A form of the name Arisai in the Bible may be its

original, or that of Arish which is found in Phoenician,

especially Punic, inscriptions.

This was in truth the revenge of the feudal system upon Pharaoh. The

barons, kept in check by Ahmosis and Amenôthes I., restricted by the

successors of these sovereigns to the position of simple officers of the

king, profited by the general laxity to recover as many as possible of

their ancient privileges. For half a century and more, fortune had given

them as masters only aged princes, not capable of maintaining continuous

vigilance and firmness. The invasions of the peoples of the sea, the

rivalry of the claimants to the throne, and the intrigues of ministers

had, one after the other, served to break the bonds which fettered them,

and in one generation they were able to regain that liberty of action

of which they had been deprived for centuries. To this state of

things Egypt had been drifting from the earliest times. Unity could be

maintained only by a continuous effort, and once this became relaxed,

the ties which bound the whole country together were soon broken. There

was another danger threatening the country beside that arising from

the weakening of the hands of the sovereign, and the turbulence of the

barons. For some three centuries the Theban Pharaohs were accustomed to

bring into the country after each victorious campaign many thousands of

captives. The number of foreigners around them had, therefore, increased

in a striking manner. The majority of these strangers either died

without issue, or their posterity became assimilated to the indigenous

inhabitants. In many places, however, they had accumulated in such

proportions that they were able to retain among themselves the

remembrance of their origin, their religion, and their customs, and with

these the natural desire to leave the country of their exile for their

former fatherland. As long as a strict watch was kept over them they

remained peaceful subjects, but as soon as this vigilance was relaxed

rebellion was likely to break out, especially amongst those who worked

in the quarries. Traditions of the Greek period contain certain romantic

episodes in the history of these captives. Some Babylonian prisoners

brought back by Sesostris, these traditions tell us, unable to endure

any longer the fatiguing work to which they were condemned, broke out

into open revolt.

[Illustration: 268.jpg AMENMESIS]

Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, after a picture in Rosellini.

They made themselves masters of a position almost opposite Memphis, and

commanding the river, and held their ground there with such obstinacy

that it was found necessary to give up to them the province which they

occupied: they built here a town, which they afterwards called Babylon.

A similar legend attributes the building of the neighbouring village of

Troîû to captives from Troy.*

The scattered barbarian tribes of the Delta, whether Hebrews or the

remnant of the ïïyksôs, had endured there a miserable lot ever since the

accession of the Ramessides. The rebuilding of the cities which had

been destroyed there during the wars with the Hyksôs had restricted the

extent of territory on which they could pasture their herds. Ramses II.

treated them as slaves of the treasury,** and the Hebrews were not long

under his rule before they began to look back with regret on the time of

the monarchs “who knew Joseph.” **

* The name Babylon comes probably from _Banbonu, Barbonu,

Babonu_--a term which, under the form _Hât-Banbonu,_ served

to designate a quarter of Heliopolis, or rather a suburban

village of that city. Troja was, as we have seen, the

ancient city of Troîû, now Tûrah, celebrated for its

quarries of fine limestone. The narratives collected by the

historians whom Diodorus consulted were products of the

Saite period, and intended to explain to Greeks the

existence on Egyptian territory of names recalling those of

Babylon in Chaldæa and of Homeric Troy.

** A very ancient tradition identifies Ramses II. with the

Pharaoh “who knew not Joseph” (_Exod._ i. 8). Recent

excavations showing that the great works in the east of the

Delta began under this king, or under Seti II. at the

earliest, confirm in a general way the accuracy of the

traditional view: I have, therefore, accepted it in part,

and placed the Exodus after the death of Ramses II. Other

authorities place it further back, and Lieblein in 1863 was

inclined to put it under Amenôthes III.

The Egyptians set over them taskmasters to afflict them with their

burdens. And they built for Pharaoh treasure cities, Pithom and Raamses.

But the more they afflicted them, the more they multiplied and grew.

And they were “grieved because of the children of Israel.” * A secondary

version of the same narrative gives a more detailed account of their

condition: “They made their lives bitter with hard bondage, in mortar

and in brick, and in all manner of service in the field.” ** The

unfortunate slaves awaited only an opportunity to escape from the

cruelty of their persecutors.

* _Exod_. i. 11, 12. Excavations made by Naville have

brought to light near Tel el-Maskhutah the ruins of one of

the towns which the Hebrews of the Alexandrine period

identified with the cities constructed by their ancestors in

Egypt: the town excavated by Naville is Pitûmû, and

consequently the Pithom of the Biblical account, and at the

same time also the Succoth of Exod. xii. 37, xiii. 20, the

first station of the Bnê-Israel after leaving Ramses.

** _Exod,_ i. 13, 14.

The national traditions of the Hebrews inform us that the king, in

displeasure at seeing them increase so mightily notwithstanding his

repression, commanded the midwives to strangle henceforward their male

children at their birth. A woman of the house of Levi, after having

concealed her infant for three months, put him in an ark of bulrushes

and consigned him to the Nile, at a place where the daughter of Pharaoh

was accustomed to bathe. The princess on perceiving the child had

compassion on him, adopted him, called him Moses--saved from the

waters--and had him instructed in all the knowledge of the Egyptians.

Moses had already attained forty years of age, when he one day

encountered an Egyptian smiting a Hebrew, and slew him in his anger,

shortly afterwards fleeing into the land of Midian. Here he found an

asylum, and Jethro the priest gave him one of his daughters in marriage.

After forty years of exile, God, appearing to him in a burning bush,

sent him to deliver His people. The old Pharaoh was dead, but Moses and

his brother Aaron betook themselves to the court of the new Pharaoh, and

demanded from him permission for the Hebrews to sacrifice in the desert

of Arabia. They obtained it, as we know, only after the infliction

of the ten plagues, and after the firstborn of the Egyptians had been

stricken.* The emigrants started from Ramses; as they were pursued by a

body of troops, the Sea parted its waters to give them passage over the

dry ground, and closing up afterwards on the Egyptian hosts, overwhelmed

them to a man. Thereupon Moses and the children of Israel sang this song

unto Jahveh, saying: “Jahveh is my strength and song--and He has become

my salvation.--This is my God, and I will praise Him,--my father’s God,

and I will exalt Him.--The Lord is a man of war,--and Jahveh is His

name.--Pharaoh’s chariots and his hosts hath He cast into the sea,

--and his chosen captains are sunk in the sea of weeds.--The deeps cover

them--they went down into the depths like a stone.... The enemy said: ‘I

will pursue, I will overtake--I will divide the spoil--my lust shall

be satiated upon them--I will draw my sword--my hand shall destroy

them.’--Thou didst blow with Thy wind--the sea covered them--they sank

as lead in the mighty waters.” **

* _Exod._ ii.-xiii. I have limited myself here to a summary

of the Biblical narrative, without entering into a criticism

of the text, which I leave to others.

** _Exod._ xv. 1-10 (R.V.)

From this narrative we see that the Hebrews, or at least those of them

who dwelt in the Delta, made their escape from their oppressors, and

took refuge in the solitudes of Arabia. According to the opinion of

accredited historians, this Exodus took place in the reign of Mînephtah,

and the evidence of the triumphal inscription, lately discovered by

Prof. Petrie, seems to confirm this view, in relating that the people of

Israîlû were destroyed, and had no longer a seed. The context indicates

pretty clearly that these ill-treated Israîlû were then somewhere south

of Syria, possibly in the neighbourhood of Ascalon and Glezer. If it is

the Biblical Israelites who are here mentioned for the first time on an

Egyptian monument, one might suppose that they had just quitted the land

of slavery to begin their wanderings through the desert. Although the

peoples of the sea and the Libyans did not succeed in reaching their

settlements in the land of Goshen, the Israelites must have profited

both by the disorder into which the Egyptians were thrown by the

invaders, and by the consequent withdrawal to Memphis of the troops

previously stationed on the east of the Delta, to break away from their

servitude and cross the frontier. If, on the other hand, the Israîlû of

Mînephtah are regarded as a tribe still dwelling among the mountains of

Canaan, while the greater part of the race had emigrated to the banks

of the Nile, there is no need to seek long after Mînephtah for a date

suiting the circumstances of the Exodus. The years following the reign

of Seti II. offer favourable conditions for such a dangerous enterprise:

the break-up of the monarchy, the discords of the barons, the revolts

among the captives, and the supremacy of a Semite over the other chiefs,

must have minimised the risk. We can readily understand how, in the

midst of national disorders, a tribe of foreigners weary of its lot

might escape from its settlements and betake itself towards Asia without

meeting with strenous opposition from the Pharaoh, who would naturally

be too much preoccupied with his own pressing necessities to trouble

himself much over the escape of a band of serfs.

Having crossed the Red Sea, the Israelites pursued their course to

the north-east on the usual road leading into Syria, and then turning

towards the south, at length arrived at Sinai. It was a moment when

the nations of Asia were stirring. To proceed straight to Canaan by

the beaten track would have been to run the risk of encountering their

moving hordes, or of jostling against the Egyptian troops, who still

garrisoned the strongholds of the She-phelah. The fugitives had,

therefore, to shun the great military roads if they were to avoid coming

into murderous conflict with the barbarians, or running into the teeth

of Pharaoh’s pursuing army. The desert offered an appropriate asylum to

people of nomadic inclinations like themselves; they betook themselves

to it as if by instinct, and spent there a wandering life for several

generations.*

* This explanation of the wanderings of the Israelites has

been doubted by most historians: it has a cogency, once we

admit the reality of the sojourn in Egypt and the Exodus.

The traditions collected in their sacred books described at length their

marches and their halting-places, the great sufferings they endured, and

the striking miracles which God performed on their behalf.*

* The itinerary of the Hebrew people through the desert

contains a very small number of names which were not

actually in use. They represent possibly either the stations

at which the caravans of the merchants put up, or the

localities where the Bedawin and their herds were accustomed

to sojourn. The majority of them cannot be identified, but

enough can still be made out to give us a general idea of

the march of the emigrants.

Moses conducted them through all these experiences, continually troubled

by their murmurings and seditions, but always ready to help them out of

the difficulties into which they were led, on every occasion, by their

want of faith. He taught them, under God’s direction, how to correct the

bitterness of brackish waters by applying to them the wood of a certain

tree.* When they began to look back with regret to the “flesh-pots

of Egypt” and the abundance of food there, another signal miracle was

performed for them. “At even the quails came up and covered the camp,

and in the morning the dew lay round about the host; and when the dew

that lay was gone up, behold, upon the face of the wilderness there lay

a small round thing, as small as the hoar frost on the ground. And when

the children of Israel saw it, they said one to another, ‘What is it?

‘for they wist not what it was. And Moses said unto them, ‘It is the

bread which the Lord hath given you to eat.’”**

* _Exod._ xv. 23-25. The station Marah, “the bitter waters,”

is identified by modern tradition with Ain Howarah. There is

a similar way of rendering waters potable still in use among

the Bedawin of these regions.

** _Exod._ xvi. 13-15.

“And the house of Israel called the name thereof ‘manna: ‘and it was

like coriander seed, white; and the taste of it was like wafers made

with honey.” * “And the children of Israel did eat the manna forty years,

until they came to a land inhabited; they did eat the manna until they

came unto the borders of the land of Canaan.” ** Further on, at Eephidim,

the water failed: Moses struck the rocks at Horeb, and a spring gushed

out.*** The Amalekites, in the meantime, began to oppose their

passage; and one might naturally doubt the power of a rabble of slaves,

unaccustomed to war, to break through such an obstacle. Joshua was made

their general, “and Moses, Aaron, and Hur went up to the top of the

hill: and it came to pass, when Moses held up his hand, that Israel

prevailed, and when he let down his hand, Amalek prevailed. But

Moses’ hands were heavy; and they took a stone, and put it under him, and

he sat thereon; and Aaron and Hur stayed up his hands, the one on the

one side, and the other on the other side, and his hands were steady

until the going down of the sun. And Joshua discomfited Amalek and his

people with the edge of the sword.” ****

* _Exod._ xvi. 31. Prom early times the manna of the Hebrews

had been identified with the mann-es-sama, “the gift of

heaven,” of the Arabs, which exudes in small quantities from

the leaves of the tamarisk after being pricked by insects:

the question, however, is still under discussion whether

another species of vegetable manna may not be meant.

** _Exod._ xvi. 35.

*** _Exod._ xvii. 1-7. There is a general agreement as to

the identification of Rephidim with the Wady Peîrân, the

village of Pharan of the Græco-Roman geographers.

**** Exod. xvii. 8-13.

Three months after the departure of the Israelites from Egypt they

encamped at the foot of Sinai, and “the Lord called unto Moses out of

the mountain, saying, ‘Thus shalt thou say to the house of Jacob, and

tell the children of Israel: Ye have seen what I did unto the Egyptians,

and how I bare you on eagles’ wings, and brought you unto Myself. Now

therefore, if ye will obey My voice indeed, and keep My covenant, then

ye shall be a peculiar treasure unto Me from among all peoples: for all

the earth is Mine: and ye shall be unto Me a kingdom of priests, and an

holy nation.’ The people answered together and said, ‘All that the Lord

hath spoken we will do.’ And the Lord said unto Moses, ‘Lo, I come unto

thee in a thick cloud, that the people may hear when I speak with thee,

and may also believe thee for ever.’” “On the third day, when it was

morning, there were thunders and lightnings, and a thick cloud upon the

mount, and the voice of a trumpet exceeding loud; and all the people

that were in the camp trembled. And Moses brought forth the people

out of the camp to meet God; and they stood at the nether part of the

mountain. And Mount Sinai was altogether on smoke, because the Lord

descended upon it in fire: and the smoke thereof ascended as the smoke

of a furnace, and the whole mount quaked greatly. And when the voice of

the trumpet waxed louder and louder, Moses spake, and God answered him

by a voice.” *

* _Exod._ xix. 3-6, 9, 16-19.

Then followed the giving of the supreme law, the conditions of the

covenant which the Lord Himself deigned to promulgate directly to His

people. It was engraved on two tables of stone, and contained, in ten

concise statements, the commandments which the Creator of the Universe

imposed upon the people of His choice.

“I. I am Jahveh, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt. Thou shalt

have none other gods before Me.

II. Thou shalt not make unto thee a graven image, etc.

III. Thou shalt not take the name of Jahveh thy God in vain.

IV. Remember the sabbath day to keep it holy.

V. Honour thy father and thy mother.

VI. Thou shalt do no murder.

VII. Thou shalt not commit adultery.

VIII. Thou shalt not steal.

IX. Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour.

X. Thou shalt not covet.” *

* We have two forms of the Decalogue--one in _Exod._ xx. 2-

17, and the other in _Deut._ v. 6-18.

“And all the people saw the thunderings, and the lightnings, and the

voice of the trumpet, and the mountain smoking: and when the people saw

it, they trembled, and stood afar off. And they said unto Moses, ‘Speak

thou with us, and we will hear: but let not God speak with us, lest

we die.’”* God gave His commandments to Moses in instalments as the

circumstances required them: on one occasion the rites of sacrifice,

the details of the sacerdotal vestments, the mode of consecrating the

priests, the composition of the oil and the incense for the altar; later

on, the observance of the three annual festivals, and the orders as to

absolute rest on the seventh day, as to the distinctions between clean

and unclean animals, as to drink, as to the purification of women, and

lawful and unlawful marriages.**

* _Exod._ xx. 18, 19.

** This legislation and the history of the circumstances on

which it was promulgated are contained in four of the books

of the Pentateuch, viz. _Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and

Deuteronomy_. Any one of the numerous text-books published

in Germany will be found to contain an analysis of these

books, and the prevalent opinions as to the date of the

documents which it [the Hexateuch] contains. I confine

myself here and afterwards only to such results as may fitly

be used in a general history.

The people waited from week to week until Jahveh had completed the

revelation of His commands, and in their impatience broke the new law

more than once. On one occasion, when “Moses delayed to come out of the

mount,” they believed themselves abandoned by heaven, and obliged Aaron,

the high priest, to make for them a golden calf, before which they

offered burnt offerings. The sojourn of the people at the foot of Sinai

lasted eleven months. At the end of this period they set out once more

on their slow marches to the Promised Land, guided during the day by

a cloud, and during the night by a pillar of fire, which moved before

them. This is a general summary of what we find in the sacred writings.

The Israelites, when they set out from Egypt, were not yet a nation.

They were but a confused horde, flying with their herds from their

pursuers; with no resources, badly armed, and unfit to sustain the

attack of regular troops. After leaving Sinai, they wandered for some

time among the solitudes of Arabia Petraea in search of some uninhabited

country where they could fix their tents, and at length settled on

the borders of Idumaea, in the mountainous region surrounding

Kadesh-Barnea.* Kadesh had from ancient times a reputation for sanctity

among the Bedawin of the neighbourhood: it rejoiced in the possession

of a wonderful well--the Well of Judgment--to which visits were made

for the purpose of worship, and for obtaining the “judgment” of God. The

country is a poor one, arid and burnt up, but it contains wells which

never fail, and wadys suitable for the culture of wheat and for the

rearing of cattle. The tribe which became possessed of a region in

which there was a perennial supply of water was fortunate indeed, and

a fragment of the psalmody of Israel at the time of their sojourn here

still echoes in a measure the transports of joy which the people gave

way to at the discovery of a new spring: “Spring up, O well; sing ye

unto it: the well which the princes digged, which the nobles of the

people delved with the sceptre and with their staves.” **

* The site of Kadesh-Barnea appears to have been fixed with

certainty at Ain-Qadis by C. Trumbull.

** _Numb._ xxi. 17, 18. The context makes it certain that

this song was sung at Beer, beyond the Arnon, in the land of

Moab. It has long been recognised that it had a special

reference, and that it refers to an incident in the

wanderings of the people through the desert.

The wanderers took possession of this region after some successful

brushes with the enemy, and settled there, without being further

troubled by their neighbours or by their former masters. The Egyptians,

indeed, absorbed in their civil discords, or in wars with foreign

nations, soon forgot their escaped slaves, and never troubled themselves

for centuries over what had become of the poor wretches, until in the

reign of the Ptolemies, when they had learned from the Bible something

of the people of God, they began to seek in their own annals for traces

of their sojourn in Egypt and of their departure from the country. A

new version of the Exodus was the result, in which Hebrew tradition was

clumsily blended with the materials of a semi-historical romance, of

which Amenôthes III. was the hero. His minister and namesake, Amenôthes,

son of Hâpû, left ineffaceable impressions on the minds of the

inhabitants of Thebes: he not only erected the colossal figures in the

Amenophium, but he constructed the chapel at Deîr el-Medineh, which was

afterwards restored in Ptolemaic times, and where he continued to be

worshipped as long as the Egyptian religion lasted. Profound knowledge

of the mysteries of magic were attributed to him, as in later times to

Prince Khâmoîsît, son of Ramses II. On this subject he wrote certain

works which maintained their reputation for more than a thousand years

after his death,* and all that was known about him marked him out for

the important part he came to play in those romantic stories so popular

among the Egyptians.

* One of these books, which is mentioned in several

religious texts, is preserved in the _Louvre Papyrus_.

The Pharaoh in whose good graces he lived had a desire, we are informed,

to behold the gods, after the example of his ancestor Horus. The son of

Hâpû, or Pa-Apis, informed him that he could not succeed in his design

until he had expelled from the country all the lepers and unclean

persons who contaminated it. Acting on this information, he brought

together all those who suffered from physical defects, and confined

them, to the number of eighty thousand, in the quarries of Tûrah. There

were priests among them, and the gods became wrathful at the treatment

to which their servants were exposed; the soothsayer, therefore, fearing

the divine anger, predicted that certain people would shortly arise who,

forming an alliance with the Unclean, would, together with them, hold

sway in Egypt for thirteen years. He then committed suicide, but the

king nevertheless had compassion on the outcasts, and granted to them,

for their exclusive use, the town of Avaris, which had been deserted

since the time of Ahmosis. The outcasts formed themselves into a nation

under the rule of a Heliopolitan priest called Osarsyph, or Moses,

who gave them laws, mobilised them, and joined his forces with the

descendants of the Shepherds at Jerusalem. The Pharaoh Amenôphis, taken

by surprise at this revolt, and remembering the words of his minister

Amenôthes, took flight into Ethiopia. The shepherds, in league with the

Unclean, burned the towns, sacked the temples, and broke in pieces the

statues of the gods: they forced the Egyptian priests to slaughter even

their sacred animals, to cut them up and cook them for their foes, who

ate them derisively in their accustomed feasts. Amenôphis returned from

Ethiopia, together with his son Ramses, at the end of thirteen years,

defeated the enemy, driving them back into Syria, where the remainder of

them became later on the Jewish nation.*

* A list of the Pharaohs after Aï, as far as it is possible

to make them out, is here given:

[Illustration: 281.jpg Table]

This is but a romance, in which a very little history is mingled with a

great deal of fable: the scribes as well as the people were acquainted

with the fact that Egypt had been in danger of dissolution at the time

when the Hebrews left the banks of the Nile, but they were ignorant

of the details, of the precise date and of the name of the reigning

Pharaoh. A certain similarity in sound suggested to them the idea

of assimilating the prince whom the Chroniclers called Menepthes or

Amenepthes with Amen-ôthes, i.e. Amenophis III.; and they gave to the

Pharaoh of the XIXth dynasty the minister who had served under a king of

the XVIIIth: they metamorphosed at the same time the Hebrews into lepers

allied with the Shepherds. From this strange combination there resulted

a narrative which at once fell in with the tastes of the lovers of the

marvellous, and was a sufficient substitute for the truth which had

long since been forgotten. As in the case of the Egyptians of the Greek

period, we can see only through a fog what took place after the deaths

of Mînephtah and Seti II. We know only for certain that the chiefs of

the nomes were in perpetual strife with each other, and that a foreign

power was dominant in the country as in the time of Apôphis. The days of

the empire would have Harmhabî himself belonged to the XVIIIth dynasty,

for he modelled the form of his cartouches on those of the Ahmesside

Pharaohs: the XIXth dynasty began only, in all probability, with Ramses

I., but the course of the history has compelled me to separate Harmhabî

from his predecessors. Not knowing the length of the reigns, we cannot

determine the total duration of the dynasty: we shall not, however, be

far wrong in assigning to it a length of 130 years or thereabouts, i.e.

from 1350 to somewhere near 1220 B.C. been numbered if a deliverer had

not promptly made his appearance. The direct line of Ramses II. was

extinct, but his innumerable sons by innumerable concubines had left a

posterity out of which some at least might have the requisite ability

and zeal, if not to save the empire, at least to lengthen its duration,

and once more give to Thebes days of glorious prosperity. Egypt had set

out some five centuries before this for the conquest of the world, and

fortune had at first smiled upon her enterprise. Thûtmosis I., Thûtmosis

III., and the several Pharaohs bearing the name of Amenôthes had marched

with their armies from the upper waters of the Nile to the banks of the

Euphrates, and no power had been able to withstand them. New nations,

however, soon rose up to oppose her, and the Hittites in Asia and the

Libyans of the Sudan together curbed her ambition. Neither the triumphs

of Ramses II. nor the victory of Mînephtah had been able to restore her

prestige, or the lands of which her rivals had robbed her beyond her

ancient frontier. Now her own territory itself was threatened, and her

own well-being was in question; she was compelled to consider, not

how to rule other tribes, great or small, but how to keep her own

possessions intact and independent: in short, her very existence was at

stake.

History of Egypt, Chaldæa, Syria, Babylonia, and Assyria, Volume 5 (of 12) · 第 5 / 7 章