CHAPTER II--THE REACTION AGAINST EGYPT

_The XIXth dynasty: Harmhabî--The Hittite empire in Syria and in Asia

Minor--Seti I. and Ramses II.--The people of the sea: Minephtah and the

Israelite Exodus._

While none of these ephemeral Pharaohs left behind them a, either

legitimate or illegitimate, son there was no lack of princesses, any of

which, having on her accession to the throne to choose a consort after

her own heart, might thus become the founder of a new dynasty. By such a

chance alliance Harmhabî, who was himself descended from Thûtmosis III.,

was raised to the kingly office.* His mother, Mûtnozmît, was of the

royal line, and one of the most beautiful statues in the Gîzeh Museum

probably represents her. The body is mutilated, but the head is charming

in its intelligent and animated expression, in its full eyes and

somewhat large, but finely modelled, mouth. The material of the statue

is a finegrained limestone, and its milky whiteness tends to soften the

malign character of her look and smile. It is possible that Mûtnozmît

was the daughter of Amenôthes III. by his marriage with one of

his sisters: it was from her, at any rate, and not from his

great-grandfather, that Harmhabî derived his indisputable claims to

royalty.**

* A fragment of an inscription at Karnak calls Thûtmosis

III. “the father of his fathers.” Champollion called him

Hornemnob, Rosellini, Hôr-hemheb, Hôr-em-hbai, and both

identified him with the Hôros of Manetho, hence the custom

among Egyptologists for a long time to designate him by the

name Horus. Dévéria was the first to show that the name

corresponded with the Armais of the lists of Manetho, and,

in fact, Armais is the Greek transcription of the group

Harmhabî in the bilingual texts of the Ptolemaic period.

** Mûtnozmît was at first considered the daughter and

successor of Harmhabî, or his wife. Birch showed that the

monuments did not confirm these hypotheses, and he was

inclined to think that she was Harmhabî’s mother. As far as

I can see for the present, it is the only solution which

agrees with the evidence on the principal monument which has

made known her existence.

He was born, probably, in the last years of Amenôthes, when Tîi was the

exclusive favourite of the sovereign; but it was alleged later on, when

Harmhabî had emerged from obscurity, that Amon, destining him for the

throne, had condescended to become his father by Mûtnozmît--a customary

procedure with the god when his race on earth threatened to become

debased.* It was he who had rocked the newly born infant to sleep, and,

while Harsiesis was strengthening his limbs with protective amulets, had

spread over the child’s skin the freshness and brilliance which are the

peculiar privilege of the immortals. While still in the nursery, the

great and the insignificant alike prostrated themselves before Harmhabî,

making him liberal offerings. Every one recognised in him, even when

still a lad and incapable of reflection, the carriage and complexion

of a god, and Horus of Cynopolis was accustomed to follow his steps,

knowing that the time of his advancement was near. After having called

the attention of the Egyptians to Harmhabî, Amon was anxious, in fact,

to hasten the coming of the day when he might confer upon him supreme

rank, and for this purpose inclined the heart of the reigning Pharaoh

towards him. Aï proclaimed him his heir over the whole land.**

* All that we know of the youth of Harmhabî is contained in

the texts on a group preserved in the Turin Museum, and

pointed out by Champollion, translated and published

subsequently by Birch and by Brugsch. The first lines of the

inscription seem to me to contain an account of the union of

Amon with the queen, analogous to those at Deîr el-Baharî

treating of the birth of Hâtshopsîtû, and to those at Luxor

bearing upon Amenôthes III. (cf. vol. iv. pp. 342, 343; and

p. 51 of the present volume), and to prove for certain that

Harmhabî’s mother was a princess of the royal line by right.

** The king is not named in the inscription. It cannot have

been Amenôthes IV., for an individual of the importance of

Harmhabî, living alongside this king, would at least have

had a tomb begun for him at. Tel el-Amarna. We may hesitate

between Aï and Tûtankhamon; but the inscription seems to say

definitely that Harmhabî succeeded directly to the king

under whom he had held important offices for many years, and

this compels us to fix upon Aï, who, as we have said at p.

108, et seq., of the present volume, was, to all

appearances, the last of the so-called heretical sovereigns.

He never gave cause for any dissatisfaction when called to court, and

when he was asked questions by the monarch he replied always in fit

terms, in such words as were calculated to produce serenity, and thus

gained for himself a reputation as the incarnation of wisdom, all his

plans and intentions appearing to have been conceived by Thot the

Ibis himself. For many years he held a place of confidence with the

sovereign. The nobles, from the moment he appeared at the gate of the

palace, bowed their backs before him; the barbaric chiefs from the north

or south stretched out their arms as soon as they approached him, and

gave him the adoration they would bestow upon a god. His favourite

residence was Memphis, his preference for it arising from his having

possibly been born there, or from its having been assigned to him for

his abode. Here he constructed for himself a magnificent tomb, the

bas-reliefs of which exhibit him as already king, with the sceptre in

his hand and the uraaus on his brow, while the adjoining cartouche does

not as yet contain his name.*

* This part of the account is based upon, a study of a

certain number of texts and representations all coming from

Harmhabî’s tomb at Saqqârah, and now scattered among the

various museums--at Gîzeh, Leyden, London, and Alexandria.

Birch was the first to assign those monuments to the Pharaoh

Harmhabî, supposing at the same time that he had been

dethroned by Ramses I., and had lived at Memphis in an

intermediate position between that of a prince and that of a

private individual; this opinion was adopted by Ed. Meyer,

rejected by Wiedemann and by myself. After full examination,

I think the Harmhabî of the tomb at Saqqârah and the Pharaoh

Harmhabî are one and the same person; Harmhabî, sufficiently

high placed to warrant his wearing the uraius, but not high

enough to have his name inscribed in a cartouche, must have

had his tomb constructed at Saqqârah, as Aï and possibly

Ramses I. had theirs built for them at Tel el-Amarna.

He was the mighty of the mighty, the great among the great, the general

of generals, the messenger who ran to convey orders to the people of

Asia and Ethiopia, the indispensable companion in council or on the

field of battle,* at the time when Horus of Cynopolis resolved to

seat him upon his eternal throne. Aï no longer occupied it. Horus took

Harmhabî with him to Thebes, escorted him thither amid expressions of

general joy, and led him to Amon in order that the god might bestow upon

him the right to reign. The reception took place in the temple of

Luxor, which served as a kind of private chapel for the descendants of

Amenôthes. Amon rejoiced to see Harmhabî, the heir of the two worlds;

he took him with him to the royal palace, introduced him into the

apartments of his august daughter, Mûtnozmît; then, after she had

recognised her child and had pressed him to her bosom, all the gods

broke out into acclamations, and their cries ascended up to heaven.**

* The fragments of the tomb preserved at Leyden show him

leading to the Pharaoh Asiatics and Ethiopians, burthened

with tribute. The expressions and titles given above are

borrowed from the fragments at Gîzeh.

** Owing to a gap, the text cannot be accurately translated

at this point. The reading can be made out that Amon “betook

himself to the palace, placing the prince before him, as far

as the sanctuary of his (Amon’s) daughter, the very

august...; she poured water on his hands, she embraced the

beauties (of the prince), she placed herself before him.” It

will be seen that the name of the daughter of Amon is

wanting, and Birch thought that a terrestrial princess whom

Harmhabî had married was in question, Miifcnozmît, according

to Brugsch. If the reference is not to a goddess, who along

with Amon took part in the ceremonies, but to Mûtnozmît, we

must come to the conclusion that she, as heir and queen by

birth, must have ceded her rights by some ritual to her son

before he could be crowned.

“Behold, Amon arrives with his son before him, at the palace, in order

to put upon his head the diadem, and to prolong the length of his life!

We install him, therefore, in his office, we give to him the insignia of

Eâ, we pray Amon for him whom he has brought as our protector: may he as

king have the festivals of Eâ and the years of Horus; may he accomplish

his good pleasure in Thebes, in Heliopolis, in Memphis, and may he

add to the veneration with which these cities are invested.” And

they immediately decided that the new Pharaoh should be called

Horus-sturdy-bull, mighty in wise projects, lord of the Vulture and of

the very marvellous Urseus in Thebes, the conquering Horus who takes

pleasure in the truth, and who maintains the two lands, the lord of the

south and north, Sozir Khopîrûrî chosen of Eâ, the offspring of the Sun,

Harmhabî Mîamûn, giver of life. The _cortege_ came afterwards to the

palace, the king walking before Amon: there the god embraced his son,

placed the diadems upon his head, delivered to him the rule of the whole

world, over foreign populations as well as those of Egypt, inasmuch as

he possessed this power as the sovereign of the universe.

This is the customary subject of the records of enthronement. Pharaoh is

the son of a god, chosen by his father, from among all those who might

have a claim to it, to occupy for a time the throne of Horus; and as he

became king only by a divine decree, he had publicly to express, at the

moment of his elevation, his debt of gratitude to, and his boundless

respect for, the deity, who had made him what he was. In this case,

however, the protocol embodied something more than the traditional

formality, and its hackneyed phrases borrowed a special meaning from the

circumstances of the moment. Amon, who had been insulted and proscribed

by Khûniatonû, had not fully recovered his prestige under the rule of

the immediate successors of his enemy.

[Illustration: 123.jpg THE FIRST PYLON OF HARMHABÎ AT KARNAK]

Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from a photograph taken by Beato.

They had restored to him his privileges and his worship, they had become

reconciled to him, and avowed themselves his faithful ones, but all this

was as much an act of political necessity as a matter of religion:

they still continued to tolerate, if not to favour, the rival doctrinal

system, and the temple of the hateful Disk still dishonoured by its

vicinity the sanctuary of Karnak. Harmhabî, on the other hand, was

devoted to Amon, who had moulded him in embryo, and had trained him from

his birth to worship none but him. Harmhabî’s triumph marked the end

of the evil days, and inaugurated a new era, in which Amon saw

himself again master of Thebes and of the world. Immediately after his

enthronement Harmhabî rivalled the first Amen-ôthes in his zeal for the

interests of his divine father: he overturned the obelisks of Atonû and

the building before which they stood; then, that no trace of them might

remain, he worked up the stones into the masonry of two pylons, which he

set up upon the site, to the south of the gates of Thûtmosis III. They

remained concealed in the new fabric for centuries, but in the year

27 B.C. a great earthquake brought them abruptly to light. We find

everywhere among the ruins, at the foot of the dislocated gates, or at

the bases of the headless colossal figures, heaps of blocks detached

from the structure, on which can be made out remnants of prayers

addressed to the Disk, scenes of worship, and cartouches of Amenôfches

IV., Aï, and Tûtankhamon. The work begun by Harmhabî at Thebes

was continued with unabated zeal through the length of the whole

river-valley. “He restored the sanctuaries from the marshes of Athû even

to Nubia; he repaired their sculptures so that they were better than

before, not to speak of the fine things he did in them, rejoicing the

eyes of Râ. That which he had found injured he put into its original

condition, erecting a hundred statues, carefully formed of valuable

stone, for every one which was lacking. He inspected the ruined towns of

the gods in the land, and made them such as they had been in the time

of the first Ennead, and he allotted to them estates and offerings

for every day, as well as a set of sacred vessels entirely of gold and

silver; he settled priests in them, bookmen, carefully chosen soldiers,

and assigned to them fields, cattle, all the necessary material to

make prayers to Râ every morning.” These measures were inspired by

consideration for the ancient deities; but he added to them others,

which tended to secure the welfare of the people and the stability of

the government. Up to this time the officials and the Egyptian soldiers

had displayed a tendency to oppress the fellahîn, without taking into

consideration the injury to the treasury occasioned by their rapacity.

Constant supervision was the only means of restraining them, for even

the best-served Pharaohs, Thûtmosis, and Amenôthes III. themselves, were

obliged to have frequent recourse to the rigour of the law to keep the

scandalous depredations of the officials within bounds.*

* Harmhabî refers to the edicts of Thûtmosis III.

The religious disputes of the preceding years, in enfeebling the

authority of the central power, had given a free hand to these

oppressors. The scribes and tax-collectors were accustomed to exact

contributions for the public service from the ships, whether laden or

not, of those who were in a small way of business, and once they had

laid their hands upon them, they did not readily let them go. The poor

fellow falling into their clutches lost his cargo, and he was at his

wits’ end to know how to deliver at the royal storehouses the various

wares with which he calculated to pay his taxes. No sooner had the

Court arrived at some place than the servants scoured the neighbourhood,

confiscating the land produce, and seizing upon slaves, under pretence

that they were acting for the king, while they had only their personal

ends in view. Soldiers appropriated all the hides of animals with the

object, doubtless, of making from them leather jackets and helmets, or

of duplicating their shields, with the result that when the treasury

made its claim for leather, none was to be found. It was hardly

possible, moreover, to bring the culprits to justice, for the chief men

of the towns and villages, the prophets, and all those who ought to

have looked after the interests of the taxpayer, took money from the

criminals for protecting them from justice, and compelled the innocent

victims also to purchase their protection. Harmhabî, who was continually

looking for opportunities to put down injustice and to punish deceit,

at length decided to pro-mulgate a very severe edict against the

magistrates and the double-dealing officials: any of them who was found

to have neglected his duty was to have his nose cut off, and was to

be sent into perpetual exile to Zalu, on the eastern frontier. His

commands, faithfully carried out, soon produced a salutary effect, and

as he would on no account relax the severity of the sentence, exactions

were no longer heard of, to the advantage of the revenue of the State.

On the last day of each month the gates of his palace were open to every

one.

[Illustration: 127.jpg AMENOTHES IV. FROM A FRAGMENT USED AGAIN BY

HARMHABI]

Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from a sketch by Prisse d’Avennes.

Any one on giving his name to the guard could enter the court of honour,

where he would find food in abundance to satisfy his hunger while he was

awaiting an audience. The king all the while was seated in the sight

of all at the tribune, whence he would throw among his faithful friends

necklaces and bracelets of gold: he inquired into complaints one after

another, heard every case, announced his judgments in brief words, and

dismissed his subjects, who went away proud and happy at having had

their affairs dealt with by the sovereign himself.*

* All these details are taken from a stele discovered in

1882. The text is so mutilated that it is impossible to give

a literal rendering of it in all its parts, but the sense is

sufficiently clear to warrant our rilling up the whole with

considerable certainty.

The portraits of Harmhabî which have come down to us give us the

impression of a character at once energetic and agreeable. The most

beautiful of these is little more than a fragment broken off a

black granite statue. Its mournful expression is not pleasing to the

spectator, and at the first view alienates his sympathy. The face, which

is still youthful, breathes an air of melancholy, an expression which

is somewhat rare among the Pharaohs of the best period: the thin and

straight nose is well set on the face, the elongated eyes have somewhat

heavy lids; the large, fleshy lips, slightly contracted at the corners

of the mouth, are cut with a sharpness that gives them singular vigour,

and the firm and finely modelled chin loses little of its form from the

false beard depending from it. Every detail is treated with such freedom

that one would think the sculptor must have had some soft material to

work upon, rather than a rock almost hard enough to defy the chisel;

the command over it is so complete that the difficulty of the work is

forgotten in the perfection of the result. The dreamy expression of his

face, however, did not prevent Harmhabî from displaying beyond Egypt, as

within it, singular activity.

[Illustration: 128.jpg HARMHABI]

Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from a Autograph by Emil Brugsch-Bey.

Although Egypt had never given up its claims to dominion over the whole

river-valley, as far as the plains of Sennar, yet since the time of

Amenôthes III. no sovereign had condescended, it would I appear, to

conduct in person the expeditions directed against the tribes of! the

Upper Nile. Harmhabî was anxious to revive the custom which imposed

upon the Pharaohs the obligation to make their first essay in arms in

Ethiopia, as Horus, son of Isis, had done of yore, and he seized the

pretext of the occurrence of certain raids there to lead a body of

troops himself into the heart of the negro country.

[Illustration: 129.jpg THE VAULTED PASSAGE OF THE ROCK-TOMB AT GEBEL

SILSILEH]

Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from a photograph by Insinger.

He had just ordered at this time the construction of the two southern

pylons at Karnak, and there was great activity in the quarries of

Silsileh. A commemorative chapel also was in course of excavation here

in the sandstone rock, and he had dedicated it to his father, Amon-Ba of

Thebes, coupling with him the local divinities, Hapî the Nile, and Sobkû

the patron of Ombos. The sanctuary is excavated somewhat deeply into

the hillside, and the dark rooms within it are decorated with the usual

scenes of worship, but the vaulted approach to them displays upon its

western wall the victory of the king. We see here a figure receiving

from Amon the assurance of a long and happy life, and another letting

fly his arrows at a host of fleeing enemies; Ethiopians raise their

heads to him in suppliant gesture; soldiers march past with their

captives; above one of the doors we see twelve military leaders marching

and carrying the king aloft upon their shoulders, while a group of

priests and nobles salute him, offering incense.*

* The significance of the monument was pointed out first by

Champollion. The series of races conquered was represented

at Karnak on the internal face of one of the pylons built by

Harmhabi; it appears to have been “usurped” by Ramses II.

At this period Egyptian ships were ploughing the Red Sea, and their

captains were renewing official relations with Pûanît. Somali chiefs

were paying visits to the palace, as in the time of Thûtmosis III. The

wars of Amon had, in fact, begun again. The god, having suffered neglect

for half a century, had a greater need than ever of gold and silver

to fill his coffers; he required masons for his buildings, slaves and

cattle for his farms, perfumed essences and incense for his daily rites.

His resources had gradually become exhausted, and his treasury would

soon be empty if he did not employ the usual means to replenish it. He

incited Harmhabi to proceed against the countries from which, in olden

times he had enriched himself--to the south in the first place, and

then, having decreed victory there, and having naturally taken for

himself the greater part of the spoils, he turned his attention to Asia.

[Illustration: 131.jpg THE TRIUMPH OP HARMHABÎ IN THE SANCTUARY OF GEBEL

SILSILEH]

Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from a photograph by Daniel Heron.

The black spots are due to the torches of the fellahîn of

the neighbourhood who have visited the rock tomb in bygone

years.

In the latter campaign the Egyptian troops took once more the route

through Coele-Syria, and if the expedition experienced here more

difficulties than on the banks of the Upper Nile, it was, nevertheless,

brought to an equally triumphant conclusion. Those of their adversaries

who had offered an obstinate resistance were transported into other

lands, and the rebel cities were either razed to the ground or given to

the flames: the inhabitants having taken refuge in the mountains, where

they were in danger of perishing from hunger, made supplications for

peace, which was granted to them on the usual conditions of doing homage

and paying tribute.*

* These details are taken from the fragment of an

inscription now in the museum at Vienna; Bergmann, and also

Erman, think that we have in this text the indication of an

immigration into Egypt of a tribe of the Monâtiu.

We do not exactly know how far he penetrated into the country; the

list of the towns and nations over which he boasts of having triumphed

contains, along with names unknown to us, some already famous or soon to

become so--Arvad, Pibukhu, the Khâti, and possibly Alasia. The Haui-Nibu

themselves must have felt the effects of the campaign, for several of

their chiefs associated, doubtless, with the Phoenicians, presented

themselves before the Pharaoh at Thebes. Egypt was maintaining,

therefore, its ascendency, or at least appearing to maintain it in

those regions where the kings of the XVIIIth dynasty had ruled after

the campaigns of Thûtmosis I., Thûtmosis III., and Amenothes II. Its

influence, nevertheless, was not so undisputed as in former days; not

that the Egyptian soldiers were less valiant, but owing to the fact

that another power had risen up alongside them whose armies were strong

enough to encounter them on the field of battle and to obtain a victory

over them.

Beyond Naharaim, in the deep recesses of the Amanus and Taurus, there

had lived, for no one knows how many centuries, the rude and warlike

tribes of the Khâti, related not so, much to the Semites of the Syrian

plain as to the populations of doubtful race and language who occupied

the upper basins of the Halys and Euphrates.* The Chaldæan conquest

had barely touched them; the Egyptian campaign had not more effect, and

Thûtmosis III. himself, after having crossed their frontiers and sacked

several of their towns, made no serious pretence to reckon them among

his subjects. Their chiefs were accustomed, like their neighbours, to

use, for correspondence with other countries, the cuneiform mode of

writing; they had among them, therefore, for this purpose, a host of

scribes, interpreters, and official registrars of events, such as we

find to have accompanied the sovereigns of Assyria and Babylon.**

These chiefs were accustomed to send from time to time a present to the

Pharaoh, which the latter was pleased to regard as a tribute,*** or

they would offer, perhaps, one of their daughters in marriage to the

king at Thebes, and after the marriage show themselves anxious to

maintain good faith with their son-in-law.

* Halévy asserts that the Khâti were Semites, and bases his

assertion on materials of the Assyrian period. Thés Khâti,

absorbed in Syria by the Semites, with whom they were

blended, appear to have been by origin a non-Semitic people.

** A letter from the King of the Khâti to the Pharaoh

Amenothes IV. is written in cuneiform writing and in a

Semitic language. It has been thought that other documents,

drawn up in a non-Semitic language and coming from Mitanni

and Arzapi, contain a dialect of the Hittite speech or that

language itself. A “writer of books,” attached to the person

of the Hittite King Khatusaru, is named amongst the dead

found on the field of battle at Qodshû.

*** It is thus perhaps we must understand the mention of

tribute from the Khâti in the _Annals of Thûtmosis III._, 1.

26, in the year XXXIII., also in the year XL. One of the Tel

el-Amarna letters refers to presents of this kind, which the

King of Khâti addresses to Amenôthes IV. to celebrate his

enthronement, and to ask him to maintain with himself the

traditional good relations of their two families.

They had, moreover, commercial relations with Egypt, and furnished it

with cattle, chariots, and those splendid Cappadocian horses whose breed

was celebrated down to the Greek period.* They were already, indeed,

people of consideration; their territory was so extensive that the

contemporaries of Thutmosis III. called them the Greater Khâti; and the

epithet “vile,” which the chancellors of the Pharaohs added to their

name, only shows by its virulence the impression which they had produced

upon the mind of their adversaries.**

* The horses of the Khâti were called _abarî_, strong,

vigorous, as also their bulls. The King of Alasia, while

offering to Amenôthes III. a profitable speculation, advises

him to have nothing to do with the King of the Khâti or with

the King of Sangar, and thus furnishes proof that the

Egyptians held constant commercial relations with the Khâti.

** M. de Rougé suggested that Khâti “the Little” was the

name of the Hittites of Hebron. The expression, “Khâti the

Great,” has been compared with that of Khanirabbat, “Khani

the Great,” which in the Assyrian texts would seem to

designate a part of Cappadocia, in which the province of

Miliddi occurs, and the identification of the two has found

an ardent defender in W. Max Millier. Until further light is

thrown upon it, the most probable reading of the word is not

Khani-_ra_bat, but Khani-_gal_bat. The name Khani-Galbat is

possibly preserved in Julbat, which the Arab geographers

applied in the Middle Ages to a province situated in Lesser

Armenia.

Their type of face distinguishes them clearly from the nations

conterminous with them on the south. The Egyptian draughtsmen

represented them as squat and short in stature, though vigorous,

strong-limbed, and with broad and full shoulders in youth, but as

inclined frequently to obesity in old age. The head is long and heavy,

the forehead flattened, the chin moderate in size, the nose prominent,

the eyebrows and cheeks projecting, the eyes small, oblique, and

deep-set, the mouth fleshy, and usually framed in by two deep wrinkles;

the flesh colour is a yellowish or reddish white, but clearer than that

of the Phoenicians or the Amurru.

[Illustration: 135.jpg THREE HEADS OF HITTITE SOLDIERS]

Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from a photograph by Insinger.

Their ordinary costume consisted, sometimes of a shirt with short

sleeves, sometimes of a sort of loin-cloth, more or less ample according

to the rank of the individual wearing it, and bound round the waist by

a belt. To these they added a scanty mantle, red or blue, fringed like

that of the Chaldæans, which they passed over the left shoulder and

brought back under the right, so as to leave the latter exposed. They

wore shoes with thick soles, turning up distinctly at the toes,* and

they encased their hands in gloves, reaching halfway up the arm.

* This characteristic is found on the majority of the

monuments which the peoples of Asia Minor have left to us,

and it is one of the most striking indications of the

northern origin of the Khâti. The Egyptian artists and

modern draughtsmen have often neglected it, and the majority

of them have represented the Khâti without shoes.

They shaved off both moustache and beard, but gave free growth to their

hair, which they divided into two or three locks, and allowed to

fall upon their backs and breasts. The king’s head-dress, which was

distinctive of royalty, was a tall pointed hat, resembling to some

extent the white crown of the Pharaohs. The dress of the people, taken

all together, was of better and thicker material than that of the

Syrians or Egyptians. The mountains and elevated plateaus which they

inhabited were subject to extraordinary vicissitudes of heat and cold.

If the summer burnt up everything, the winter reigned here with an

extreme rigour, and dragged on for months: clothing and footgear had

to be seen to, if the snow and the icy winds of December were to be

resisted. The character of their towns, and the domestic life of their

nobles and the common people, can only be guessed at. Some, at least,

of the peasants must have sheltered themselves in villages half

underground, similar to those which are still to be found in this

region. The town-folk and the nobles had adopted for the most part the

Chaldæan or Egyptian manners and customs in use among the Semites of

Syria. As to their religion, they reverenced a number of secondary

deities who had their abode in the tempest, in the clouds, the sea, the

rivers, the springs, the mountains, and the forests. Above this crowd

there were several sovereign divinities of the thunder or the air,

sun-gods and moon-gods, of which the chief was called Khâti, and was

considered to be the father of the nation. They ascribed to all their

deities a warlike and savage character. The Egyptians pictured some of

them as a kind of Râ,* others as representing Sit, or rather Sûtkhû,

that patron of the Hyksôs which was identified by them with Sit: every

town had its tutelary heroes, of whom they were accustomed to speak as

if of its Sûtkhû--Sûtkhû of Paliqa, Sûtkhû of Khissapa, Sûtkhû of Sarsu,

Sûtkhû of Salpina. The goddesses in their eyes also became Astartés, and

this one fact suggests that these deities were, like their Phoenician

and Canaanite sisters, of a double nature--in one aspect chaste, fierce,

and warlike, and in another lascivious and pacific. One god was called

Mauru, another Targu, others Qaui and Khepa.**

* The Cilician inscriptions of the Græco-Roman period reveal

the existence in this region of a god, Rho, Rhos. Did this

god exist among the Khâti, and did the similarity of the

pronunciation of it to that of the god Râ suggest to the

Egyptians the existence of a similar god among these people,

or did they simply translate into their language the name of

the Hittite god representing the sun?

** The names Mauru and Qaui are deduced from the forms

Maurusaru and Qauisaru, which were borne by the Khâti: Qaui

was probably the eponymous hero of the Qui people, as Khâti

was of the Khâti. Tarku and Tisubu appear to me to be

contained in the names Targanunasa, Targazatas, and

Tartisubu; Tisubu is probably the Têssupas mentioned in the

letter from Dushratta written in Mitannian, and identical

with the Tushupu of another letter from the same king, and

in a despatch from Tarkondaraush. Targu, Targa, Targanu,

resemble the god Tarkhu, which is known to us from the

proper names of these regions preserved in attributes

covered by each of these divine names, and as to the forms

with which they were invested.

[Illustration: 138.jpg A HITTITE KING.]

Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from a picture in Lepsius.

Khatusaru, King of the Khâti, who was for thirty years a

contemporary of Ramses II.

Tishubu, the Rammân of the Assyrians, was doubtless lord of the tempest

and of the atmosphere; Shausbe answered to Shala and to Ishtar the queen

of love;* but we are frequently in ignorance as to the Assyrian and

Greek inscriptions. Kheba, Khepa, Khîpa, is said to be a denomination

of Rammân; we find it in the names of the princesses Tadu-khîpa,

Gilu-khîpa, Puu-khîpa.

The majority of them, both male and female, were of gigantic stature,

and were arrayed in the vesture of earthly kings and queens: they

brandished their arms, displayed the insignia of their authority, such

as a flower or bunch of grapes, and while receiving the offerings of

the people were seated on a chair before an altar, or stood each on

the animal representing him--such as a lion, a stag, or wild goat. The

temples of their towns have disappeared, but they could never have been,

it would seem, either-large or magnificent: the favourite places of

worship were the tops of mountains, in the vicinity of springs, or the

depths of mysterious grottoes, where the deity revealed himself to his

priests, and received the faithful at the solemn festivals celebrated

several times a year.*

* The association of Tushupu, Tessupas, Tisubu, with Rammânu

is made out from an Assyrian tablet published by Bezold: it

was reserved for Say ce and Jensen to determine the nature

of the god. Shausbe has been identified with Ishtar or Shala

by Jensen.

We know as little about their political organisation as about their

religion.* We may believe, however, that it was feudal in character, and

that every clan had its hereditary chief and its proper gods: the

clans collectively rendered obedience to a common king, whose effective

authority depended upon his character and age.**

* The religious cities and the festivals of the Greek epoch

are described by Strabo; these festivals were very ancient,

and their institution, if not the method of celebrating

them, may go back to the time of the Hittite empire.

** The description of the battle of Qodshû in the time of

Ramses II. shows us the King of the Khâti surrounded by his

vassals. The evidence of the existence of a similar feudal

organisation from the time of the XVIIIth dynasty is

furnished by a letter of Dushratta, King of Mitanni, where

he relates to Amenôthes IV. the revolt of his brother

Artassumara, and speaks of the help which one of the

neighbouring chiefs, Pirkhi, and all the Khâti had given to

the rebel.

The various contingents which the sovereign could collect together and

lead would, if he were an incapable general, be of little avail against

the well-officered and veteran troops of Egypt. Still they were not to

be despised, and contained the elements of an excellent army, superior

both in quality and quantity to any which Syria had ever been able

to put into the field. The infantry consisted of a limited number of

archers or slingers. They had usually neither shield nor cuirass, but

merely, in the way of protective armour, a padded head-dress, ornamented

with a tuft. The bulk of the army carried short lances and broad-bladed

choppers, or more generally, short thin-handled swords with flat

two-edged blades, very broad at the base and terminating in a point.

[Illustration: 140.jpg A HITTITE CHARIOT WITH ITS THREE OCCUPANTS]

Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from Champollion.

Their mode of attack was in close phalanxes, whose shock must have

been hard to bear, for the soldiers forming them were in part at least

recruited from among the strong and hardy mountaineers of the Taurus.

The chariotry comprised the nobles and the _élite_ of the army, but it

was differently constituted from that of the Egyptians, and employed

other tactics.

The Hittite chariots were heavier, and the framework, instead of being a

mere skeleton, was pannelled on the sides, the contour at the top being

sometimes quite square, at other times rudely curved. It was bound

together in the front by two disks of metal, and strengthened by strips

of copper or bronze, which were sometimes plated with silver or gold.

There were no quiver-cases as in Egyptian chariots, for the Hittite

charioteers rarely resorted to the bow and arrow. The occupants of

a chariot were three in number--the driver; the shield-bearer, whose

office it was to protect his companions by means of a shield, sometimes

of a round form, with a segment taken out on each side, and sometimes

square; and finally, the warrior, with his sword and lance. The Hittite

princes whom fortune had brought into relations with Thûtmosîs III. and

Amenôthes II. were not able to avail themselves properly of the latent

forces around them. It was owing probably to the feebleness of their

character or to the turbulence of their barons that we must ascribe the

poor part they played in the revolutions of the Eastern world at this

time. The establishment of a strong military power on their southern

frontier was certain, moreover, to be anything but pleasing to them; if

they preferred not to risk everything by entering into a great struggle

with the invaders, they could, without compromising themselves too

much, harass them with sudden attacks, and intrigue in an underhand way

against them to their own profit. Pharaoh’s generals were accustomed

to punish, one after the other, these bands of invading tribes, and the

sculptors duly recorded their names on a pylon at Thebes among those

of the conquered nations, but these disasters had little effect in

restraining the Hittites. They continued, in spite of them, to march

southward, and the letters from the Egyptian governors record their

progress year after year. They had a hand in all the plots which were

being hatched among the Syrians, and all the disaffected who wished

to be free from foreign oppression--such as Abdashirti and his son

Azîru--addressed themselves to them for help in the way of chariots and

men.*

* Azîru defends himself in one of his letters against the

accusation of having received four messengers from the King

of the Khâti, while he refused to receive those from Egypt.

The complicity of Aziru with the Khâti is denounced in an

appeal from the inhabitants of Tunipa. In a mutilated

letter, an unknown person calls attention to the

negotiations which a petty-Syrian prince had entered into

with the King of the Khâti.

Even inthe time of Amenôfches III. they had endeavoured to reap profit

from the discords of Mitanni, and had asserted their supremacy over it.

Dushratta, however, was able to defeat one of their chiefs. Repulsed on

this side, they fell back upon that part of Naharaim lying between the

Euphrates and Orontes, and made themselves masters of one town after

another in spite of the despairing appeals of the conquered to the

Theban king. From the accession of Khûniatonû, they set to work to annex

the countries of Nukhassi, Nîi, Tunipa, and Zinzauru: they looked with

covetous eyes upon Phoenicia, and were already menacing Coele-Syria. The

religious confusion in Egypt under Tûtankhamon and Aî left them a free

field for their ambitions, and when Harmhabî ventured to cross to the

east of the isthmus, he found them definitely installed in the region

stretching from the Mediterranean and the Lebanon to the Euphrates.

Their then reigning prince, Sapalulu, appeared to have been the founder

of a new dynasty: he united the forces of the country in a solid body,

and was within a little of making a single state out of all Northern

Syria.*

* Sapalulu has the same name as that wo meet with later on in the

country of Patin, in the time of Salmanasar III., viz. Sapalulme. It is

known to us only from a treaty with the Khâti, which makes him coeval

with Ramses I.: it was with him probably that Harmhabî had to deal

in his Syrian campaigns. The limit of his empire towards the south is

gathered in a measure from what we know of the wars of Seti I. with the

Khâti.

All Naharaim had submitted to him: Zahi, Alasia, and the Amurru had

passed under his government from that of the Pharaohs; Carchemish,

Tunipa, Nîi, Hamath, figured among his royal cities, and Qodshû was the

defence of his southern frontier. His progress towards the east was

not less considerable. Mitanni, Arzapi, and the principalities of the

Euphrates as far as the Balikh, possibly even to the Khabur,* paid him

homage: beyond this, Assyria and Chaldæa barred his way. Here, as on

his other frontiers, fortune brought him face to face with the most

formidable powers of the Asiatic world.

* The text of the poem of Pentaûîrît mentions, among the

countries confederate with the Khâti, all Naharaim; that is

to say, the country on either side of the Euphrates,

embracing Mitanni and the principalities named in the Amarna

correspondence, and in addition some provinces whose sites

have not yet been discovered, but which may be placed

without much risk of error to the north of the Taurus.

The latter prince was obliged to capture Qodshû, and to conquer the

people of the Lebanon. Had he sufficient forces at his disposal to

triumph over them, or only enough to hold his ground? Both hypotheses

could have been answered in the affirmative if each one of these great

powers, confiding in its own resources, had attacked him separately.

The Amorites, the people of Zahi, Alasia, and Naharaim, together with

recruits from Hittite tribes, would then have put him in a position

to resist, and even to carry off victory with a high hand in the final

struggle. But an alliance between Assyria or Babylon and Thebes was

always possible. There had been such things before, in the time of

Thut-mosis IV. and in that of Amenôthes III., but they were lukewarm

agreements, and their effect was not much to boast of, for the two

parties to the covenant had then no common enemy to deal with, and their

mutual interests were not, therefore, bound up with their united action.

The circumstances were very different now. The rapid growth of a nascent

kingdom, the restless spirit of its people, its trespasses on domains in

which the older powers had been accustomed to hold the upper hand,--did

not all this tend to transform the convention, more commercial than

military, with which up to this time they had been content, into an

offensive and defensive treaty? If they decided to act in concert, how

could Sapalulu or his successors, seeing that he was obliged to defend

himself on two frontiers at the same moment, muster sufficient resources

to withstand the double assault? The Hittites, as we know them more

especially from the hieroglyphic inscriptions, might be regarded as the

lords only of Northern Syria, and their power be measured merely by the

extent of territory which they occupied to the south of the Taurus and

on the two banks of the Middle Euphrates. But this does not by any means

represent the real facts. This was but the half of their empire; the

rest extended to the westward and northward, beyond the mountains into

that region, known afterwards as Asia Minor, in which Egyptian tradition

had from ancient times confused some twenty nations under the common

vague epithet of Haûî-nîbû. Official language still employed it as a

convenient and comprehensive term, but the voyages of the Phoenicians

and the travels of the “Royal Messengers,” as well as, probably, the

maritime commerce of the merchants of the Delta, had taught the scribes

for more than a century and a half to make distinctions among these

nations which they had previously summed up in one. The Lufeu* were to

be found there, as well as the Danauna,** the Shardana,*** and others

besides, who lay behind one another on the coast. Of the second line of

populations behind the region of the coast tribes, we have up to

the present no means of knowing anything with certainty. Asia Minor,

furthermore, is divided into two regions, so distinctly separated by

nature as well as by races that one would be almost inclined to regard

them as two countries foreign to each other.

* The Luku, Luka, are mentioned in the Amarna correspondence

under the form Lukki as pirates and highway robbers. The

identity of these people with the Lycians I hold as well

established.

** The Danauna are mentioned along with the Luku in the

Amarna correspondence. The termination, _-auna, -ana_ of

this word appears to be the ending in -aon found in Asiatic

names like Lykaôn by the side of Lykos, Kataôn by the side

of Kêtis and Kat-patuka; while the form of the name Danaos

is preserved in Greek legend, Danaôn is found only on

Oriental monuments. The Danauna came “from their islands,”

that is to say, from the coasts of Asia Minor, or from

Greece, the term not being pressed too literally, as the

Egyptians were inclined to call all distant lands situated

to the north beyond the Mediterranean Sea “islands.”

*** E. de Rougé and Chabas were inclined to identify the

Shardana with the Sardes and the island of Sardinia. Unger

made them out to be the Khartanoi of Libya, and was followed

by Brugsch. W. Max Müller revived the hypotheses of De Rougé

and Chabas, and saw in them bands from the Italian island. I

am still persuaded, as I was twenty-five years ago, that

they were Asiatics--the Mæonian tribe which gave its name

to Sardis. The Serdani or Shardana are mentioned as serving

in the Egyptian Army in the Tel el-Amarna tablets.

In its centre it consists of a well-defined undulating plain, having a

gentle slope towards the Black Sea, and of the shape of a kind of convex

trapezium, clearly bounded towards the north by the highlands of Pontus,

and on the south by the tortuous chain of the Taurus. A line of low

hills fringes the country on the west, from the Olympus of Mysia to the

Taurus of Pisidia. Towards the east it is bounded by broken chains of

mountains of unequal height, to which the name Anti-Taurus is not very

appropriately applied. An immense volcanic cone, Mount Argseus, looks

down from a height of some 13,000 feet over the wide isthmus which

connects the country with the lands of the Euphrates. This volcano

is now extinct, but it still preserved in old days something of its

languishing energy, throwing out flames at intervals above the sacred

forests which clothed its slopes. The rivers having their sources in the

region just described, have not all succeeded in piercing the obstacles

which separate them from the sea, but the Pyramus and the Sarus find

their way into the Mediterranean and the Iris, Halys and Sangarios into

the Euxine. The others flow into the lowlands, forming meres, marshes,

and lakes of fluctuating extent. The largest of these lakes, called

Tatta, is salt, and its superficial extent varies with the season. In

brief, the plateau of this region is nothing but an extension of the

highlands of Central Asia, and has the same vegetation, fauna, and

climate, the same extremes of temperature, the same aridity, and the

same wretched and poverty-stricken character as the latter. The maritime

portions are of an entirely different aspect.

[Illustration: 146.jpg Map]

The western coast which stretches into the Ægean is furrowed by deep

valleys, opening out as they reach the sea, and the rivers--the Caicus,

the Hermos, the Cayster, and Meander--which flow through them are

effective makers of soil, bringing down with them, as they do, a

continual supply of alluvium, which, deposited at their mouths, causes

the land to encroach there upon the sea. The littoral is penetrated here

and there by deep creeks, and is fringed with beautiful islands--Lesbos,

Chios, Samos, Cos, Rhodes--of which the majority are near enough to the

continent to act as defences of the seaboard, and to guard the mouths of

the rivers, while they are far enough away to be secure from the effects

of any violent disturbances which might arise in the mainland. The

Cyclades, distributed in two lines, are scattered, as it were, at hazard

between Asia and Europe, like great blocks which have fallen around the

piers of a broken bridge. The passage from one to the other is an easy

matter, and owing to them, the sea rather serves to bring together the

two continents than to divide them. Two groups of heights, imperfectly

connected with the central plateau, tower above the Ægean slope--wooded

Ida on the north, veiled in cloud, rich in the flocks and herds upon

its sides, and in the metals within its bosom; and on the south, the

volcanic bastions of Lycia, where tradition was wont to place the

fire-breathing Chimaera. A rocky and irregularly broken coast stretches

to the west of Lycia, in a line almost parallel with the Taurus, through

which, at intervals, torrents leaping from the heights make their way

into the sea. At the extreme eastern point of the coast, almost at the

angle where the Cilician littoral meets that of Syria, the Pyramus and

the Sarus have brought down between them sufficient material to form an

alluvial plain, which the classical geographers designated by the name

of the Level Cilicia, to distinguish it from the rough region of the

interior, Gilicia Trachea.

The populations dwelling in this peninsula belong to very varied races.

On the south and south-west certain Semites had found an abode--the

mysterious inhabitants of Solyma, and especially the Phoenicians in

their scattered trading-stations. On the north-east, beside the Khâti,

distributed throughout the valleys of the Anti-Taurus, between

the Euphrates and Mount Argseus, there were tribes allied to the

Khâti*--possibly at this time the Tabal and the Mushkâ--and, on the

shores of the Black Sea, those workers in metal, which, following the

Greeks, we may call, for want of a better designation, the Chalybes.

* A certain number of these tribes or of their towns are to

be found in the list contained in the treaty of Ramses II.

with the Khâti.

We are at a loss to know the distribution of tribes in the centre and

in the north-west, but the Bosphorus and the Hellespont, we may rest

assured, never formed an ethnographical frontier. The continents on

either side of them appear at this point to form the banks of a river,

or the two slopes of a single valley, whose bottom lies buried beneath

the waters. The barbarians of the Balkans had forced their way across at

several points. Dardanians were to be encountered in the neighbourhood

of Mount Ida, as well as on the banks of the Axios, from early times,

and the Kebrenes of Macedonia had colonised a district of the Troad near

Ilion, while the great nation of the Mysians had issued, like them,

from the European populations of the Hebrus and the Strymon. The hero

Dardanos, according to legend, had at first founded, under the auspices

of the Idasan Zeus, the town of Dardania; and afterwards a portion

of his progeny followed the course of the Scamander, and entrenched

themselves upon a precipitous hill, from the top of which they could

look far and wide over the plain and sea. The most ancient Ilion, at

first a village, abandoned on more than one occasion in the course of

centuries, was rebuilt and transformed, earlier than the XVth century

before Christ, into an important citadel, the capital of a warlike

and prosperous kingdom. The ruins on the spot prove the existence of

a primitive civilization analogous to that of the islands of the

Archipelago before the arrival of the Phoenician navigators. We find

that among both, at the outset, flint and bone, clay, baked and unbaked,

formed the only materials for their utensils and furniture; metals were

afterwards introduced, and we can trace their progressive employment

to the gradual exclusion of the older implements. These ancient Trojans

used copper, and we encounter only rarely a kind of bronze, in which the

proportion of tin was too slight to give the requisite hardness to the

alloy, and we find still fewer examples of iron and lead. They were

fairly adroit workers in silver, electrum, and especially in gold. The

amulets, cups, necklaces, and jewellery discovered in their tombs or in

the ruins of their houses, are sometimes of a not ungraceful form. Their

pottery was made by hand, and was not painted or varnished, but they

often gave to it a fine lustre by means of a stone-polisher. Other

peoples of uncertain origin, but who had attained a civilization as

advanced as that of the Trojans, were the Maeonians, the Leleges, and

the Carians who had their abode to the south of Troy and of the Mysians.

The Maeonians held sway in the fertile valleys of the Hermos, Cayster,

and Maaander. They were divided into several branches, such as the

Lydians, the Tyrseni, the Torrhebi, and the Shardana, but their most

ancient traditions looked back with pride to a flourishing state to

which, as they alleged, they had all belonged long ago on the slopes of

Mount Sipylos, between the valley of the Hermos and the Gulf of Smyrna.

The traditional capital of this kingdom was Magnesia, the most ancient

of cities, the residence of Tantalus, the father of Niobe and the

Pelopidae. The Leleges rise up before us from many points at the same

time, but always connected with the most ancient memories of Greece and

Asia. The majority of the strongholds on the Trojan coast belonged to

them--such as Antandros and Gargara--and Pedasos on the Satniois boasted

of having been one of their colonies, while several other towns of the

same name, but very distant from each other, enable us to form some idea

of the extent of their migrations.*

* According to the scholiast on Nicander, the word “Pedasos”

signified “mountain,” probably in the language of the

Leleges. We know up to the present of four Pedasi, or

Pedasa: the first in Messenia, which later on took the name

of Methône; the second in the Troad, on the banks of the

Satniois; the third in the neighbourhood of Cyzicus; and the

fourth in Caria.

In the time of Strabo, ruined tombs and deserted sites of cities were

shown in Caria which the natives regarded as Lelegia--that is, abode

of the Leleges. The Carians were dominant in the southern angle of the

peninsula and in the Ægean Islands; and the Lycians lay next them on the

east, and were sometimes confounded with them. One of the most powerful

tribes of the Carians, the Tremilse, were in the eyes of the Greeks

hardly to be separated from the mountainous district which they knew

as Lycia proper; while other tribes extended as far as the Halys. A

district of the Troad, to the south of Mount Ida, was called Lycia, and

there was a Lycaonia on both sides of the Middle Taurus; while Attica

had its Lycia, and Crete its Lycians. These three nations--the Lycians,

Carians, and Leleges--were so entangled together from their origin, that

no one would venture now to trace the lines of demarcation between

them, and we are often obliged to apply to them collectively what can be

appropriately ascribed to only one.

How far the Hittite power extended in the first years of its expansion

we have now hardly the means of knowing. It would appear that it

took within its scope, on the south-west, the Cilician plain, and the

undulating region bordering on it--that of Qodi: the prince of the

latter district, if not his vassal, was at least the colleague of the

King of the Khâti, and he acted in concert with him in peace as well as

in war.*

* The country of Qidi, Qadi, Qodi, has been connected by

Chabas with Galilee, and Brugsch adopted the identification.

W. Max Müller identified it with Phoenicia. I think the

name served to designate the Cilician coast and plain from

the mouth of the Orontes, and the country which was known in

the Græco-Roman period by the name Kêtis and Kataonia.

It embraced also the upper basin of the Pyramos and its affluents, as

well as the regions situated between the Euphrates and the Halys, but

its frontier in this direction was continually fluctuating, and our

researches fail to follow it. It is somewhat probable that it extended

considerably towards the west and north-west in the direction of the

Ægean Sea. The forests and escarpments of Lycaonia, and the desolate

steppes of the central plateau, have always presented a barrier

difficult to surmount by any invader from the east. If the Khâti at that

period attacked it in front, or by a flank movement, the assault must

rather have been of the nature of a hurried reconnaissance, or of a

raid, than of a methodically conducted campaign.*

* The idea of a Hittite empire extending over almost all

Asia Minor was advanced by Sayce.

They must have preferred to obtain possession of the valleys of the

Thermodon and the Iris, which were rich in mineral wealth, and from

which they could have secured an inexhaustible revenue. The extraction

and working of metals in this region had attracted thither from time

immemorial merchants from neighbouring and distant countries--at first

from the south to supply the needs of Syria, Chaldæa, and Egypt, then

from the west for the necessities of the countries on the Ægean. The

roads, which, starting from the archipelago on the one hand, or the

Euphrates on the other, met at this point, fell naturally into one, and

thus formed a continuous route, along which the caravans of commerce, as

well as warlike expeditions, might henceforward pass. Starting from the

cultivated regions of Mæonia, the road proceeded up the valley of the

Hermos from west to east; then, scaling the heights of the central

plateau and taking a direction more and more to the north-east, it

reached the fords of the Halys. Crossing this river twice--for the first

time at a point about two-thirds the length of its course, and for

the second at a short distance from its source--it made an abrupt turn

towards the Taurus, and joined, at Melitene, the routes leading to the

Upper Tigris, to Nisibis, to Singara, and to Old Assur, and connecting

further down beyond the mountainous region, under the walls of

Carchemish, with the roads which led to the Nile and to the river-side

cities on the Persian Gulf.*

* The very early existence of this road, which partly

coincides with the royal route of the Persian Achemenids,

was proved by Kiepert.

There were other and shorter routes, if we think only of the number of

miles, from the Hermos in Pisidia or Lycaonia, across the central

steppe and through the Cilician Gates, to the meeting of the ways at

Carchemish; but they led through wretched regions, without industries,

almost without tillage, and inhospitable alike to man and beast, and

they were ventured on only by those who aimed at trafficking among the

populations who lived in their neighbourhood. The Khâti, from the time

even when they were enclosed among the fastnesses of the Taurus, had

within their control the most important section of the great land route

which served to maintain regular relations between the ancient kingdoms

of the east and the rising states of the Ægean, and whosoever would pass

through their country had to pay them toll. The conquest of Naharaim, in

giving them control of a new section, placed almost at their discretion

the whole traffic between Chaldæa and Egypt. From the time of Thûtmosis

III. caravans employed in this traffic accomplished the greater part

of their journey in territories depending upon Babylon, Assyria, or

Memphis, and enjoyed thus a relative security; the terror of the Pharaoh

protected the travellers even when they were no longer in his domains,

and he saved them from the flagrant exactions made upon them by princes

who called themselves his brothers, or were actually his vassals. But

the time had now come when merchants had to encounter, between Qodshu

and the banks of the Khabur, a sovereign owing no allegiance to any one,

and who would tolerate no foreign interference in his territory. From

the outbreak of hostilities with the Khâti, Egypt could communicate

with the cities of the Lower Euphrates only by the Wadys of the Arabian

Desert, which were always dangerous and difficult for large convoys; and

its commercial relations with Chaldæa were practically brought thus to a

standstill, and, as a consequence, the manufactures which fed this trade

being reduced to a limited production, the fiscal receipts arising from

it experienced a sensible diminution. When peace was restored, matters

fell again into their old groove, with certain reservations to the Khâti

of some common privileges: Egypt, which had formerly possessed these to

her own advantage, now bore the burden of them, and the indirect tribute

which she paid in this manner to her rivals furnished them with arms

to fight her in case she should endeavour to free herself from the

imposition. All the semi-barbaric peoples of the peninsula of Asia Minor

were of an adventurous and warlike temperament. They were always willing

to set out on an expedition, under the leadership of some chief of noble

family or renowned for valour; sometimes by sea in their light craft,

which would bring them unexpectedly to the nearest point of the Syrian

coast, sometimes by land in companies of foot-soldiers and charioteers.

They were frequently fortunate enough to secure plenty of booty, and

return with it to their homes safe and sound; but as frequently they

would meet with reverses by falling into some ambuscade: in such a case

their conqueror would not put them to the sword or sell them as slaves,

but would promptly incorporate them into his army, thus making his

captives into his soldiers. The King of the Khâti was able to make use

of them without difficulty, for his empire was conterminous on the

west and north with some of their native lands, and he had often whole

regiments of them in his army--Mysians, Lycians, people of Augarît,* of

Ilion,** and of Pedasos.***

* The country of Augarît, Ugarît, is mentioned on several

occasions in the Tel el-Amarna correspondence. The name has

been wrongly associated with Caria; it has been placed by W.

Max Miiller well within Naharaim, to the east of the

Orontes, between Khalybôn (Aleppo) and Apamoea, the writer

confusing it with Akaiti, named in the campaign of Amenôthes

II. I am not sure about the site, but its association in the

Amarna letters with Gugu and Khanigalbat inclines me to

place it beyond the northern slopes of the Taurus, possibly

on the banks of the Halys or of the Upper Euphrates.

** The name of this people was read Eiûna by Champollion,

who identified it with the Ionians; this reading and

identification were adopted by Lenormant and by W. Max

Müller. Chabas hesitates between Eiûna and Maiûna, Ionia and

Moonia and Brugsch read it Malunna. The reading Iriûna,

Iliûna, seems to me the only possible one, and the

identification with Ilion as well.

*** Owing to its association with the Dardanians, Mysians,

and Ilion, I think it answers to the Pedasos on the Satniois

near Troy.

The revenue of the provinces taken from Egypt, and the products of his

tolls, furnished him with abundance of means for obtaining recruits from

among them.*

All these things contributed to make the power of the Khâti so

considerable, that Harmhabî, when he had once tested it, judged it

prudent not to join issues with them. He concluded with Sapalulu

a treaty of peace and friendship, which, leaving the two powers in

possession respectively of the territory each then occupied, gave legal

sanction to the extension of the sphere of the Khâti at the expense

of Egypt.** Syria continued to consist of two almost equal parts,

stretching from Byblos to the sources of the Jordan and Damascus:

the northern portion, formerly tributary to Egypt, became a Hittite

possession; while the southern, consisting of Phoenicia and Canaan,***

which the Pharaoh had held for a long time with a more effective

authority, and had more fully occupied, was retained for Egypt.

* E. de Rougé and the Egyptologists who followed him thought

at first that the troops designated in the Egyptian texts as

Lycians, Mysians, Dardanians, were the national armies of

these nations, each one commanded by its king, who had

hastened from Asia Minor to succour their ally the King of

the Khâti. I now think that those were bands of adventurers,

consisting of soldiers belonging to these nations, who came

to put themselves at the service of civilized monarchs, as

the Oarians, Ionians, and the Greeks of various cities did

later on: the individuals whom the texts mention as their

princes were not the kings of these nations, but the warrior

chiefs to which each band gave obedience.

** It is not certain that Harmhabî was the Pharaoh with whom

Sapalulu entered into treaty, and it might be insisted with

some reason that Ramses I. was the party to it on the side

of Egypt; but this hypothesis is rendered less probable by

the fact of the extremely short reign of the latter Pharaoh.

I am inclined to think, as W. Max Miiller has supposed, that

the passage in the _Treaty of Ramses II. with the Prince of

the Khâti,_ which speaks of a treaty concluded with

Sapalulu, looks back to the time of Ramses II.’s

predecessor, Harmhabî.

*** This follows from the situation of the two empires, as

indicated in the account of the campaign of Seti I. in his

first year. The king, after having defeated the nomads of

the Arabian desert, passed on without further fighting into

the country of the Amûrrû and the regions of the Lebanon,

which fact seems to imply the submission of Kharû. W. Max

Miiller was the first to* discern clearly this part of the

history of Egyptian conquest; he appears, however, to have

circumscribed somewhat too strictly the dominion of Harmhabî

in assigning Carmel as its limit. The list of the nations of

the north who yielded, or are alleged to have yielded,

submission to Harmhabî, were traced on the first pylon of

this monarch at Karnak, and on its adjoining walls. Among

others, the names of the Khâti and of Arvad are to be read

there.

This could have been but a provisional arrangement: if Thebes had

not altogether renounced the hope of repossessing some day the lost

conquests of Thûtmosis III., the Khâti, drawn by the same instinct which

had urged them to cross their frontiers towards the south, were not

likely to be content with less than the expulsion of the Egyptians

from Syria, and the absorption of the whole country into the Hittite

dominion. Peace was maintained during Harmhabî’s lifetime. We know

nothing of Egyptian affairs during the last years of his reign. His rule

may have come to an end owing to some court intrigue, or he may have had

no male heir to follow him.* Ramses, who succeeded him, did not belong

to the royal line, or was only remotely connected with it.**

* It would appear, from an Ostracon in the British Museum,

that the year XXI. follows after the year VII. of Harmhabî’s

reign; it is possible that the year XXI. may belong to one

of Harmhabî’s successors, Seti I. or Ramses II., for

example.

** The efforts to connect Ramses I. with a family of Semitic

origin, possibly the Shepherd-kings themselves, have not

been successful. Everything goes to prove that the Ramses

family was, and considered itself to be, of Egyptian origin.

Brugsch and Ed. Meyer were inclined to see in Ramses I. a

younger brother of Harmhabî. This hypothesis has nothing

either for Or against it up to the present.

He was already an old man when he ascended the throne, and we ought

perhaps to identify him with one or other of the Ramses who flourished

under the last Pharaohs of the XVIIIth dynasty, perhaps the one who

governed Thebes under Khûniatonû, or another, who began but never

finished his tomb in the hillside above Tel el-Amarna, in the

burying-place of the worshippers of the Disk.

[Illustration: 160.jpg RAMSES I.]

Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from a sketch in Rosellini.

He had held important offices under Harmhabî,* and had obtained in

marriage for his son Seti the hand of Tuîa, who, of all the royal

family, possessed the strongest rights to the crown.**

* This Tel el-Amarna Ramses is, perhaps, identical with the

Theban one: he may have followed his master to his new

capital, and have had a tomb dug for himself there, which he

subsequently abandoned, on the death of Khûniatonû, in order

to return to Thebes with Tûtankhamon and Aï.

** The fact that the marriage was celebrated under the

auspices of Harmhabî, and that, consequently, Ramses must

have occupied an important position at the court of that

prince, is proved by the appearance of Ramses II., son of

Tuîa, as early as the first year of Seti, among the ranks of

the combatants in the war carried on by that prince against

the Tihonû; even granting that he was then ten years old, we

are forced to admit that he must have been born before his

grandfather came to the throne. There is in the Vatican a

statue of Tuîa; other statues have been discovered at San.

Ramses reigned only six or seven years, and associated Seti with himself

in the government from his second year. He undertook a short military

expedition into Ethiopia, and perhaps a raid into Syria; and we find

remains of his monuments in Nubia, at Bohani near Wady Haifa, and at

Thebes, in the temple of Amon.*

* He began the great Hypostyle Hall at Karnak; E. de Rougé

thinks that the idea of building this was first conceived

under the XVIIIth dynasty.

He displayed little activity, his advanced age preventing him from

entering on any serious undertaking: but his accession nevertheless

marks an important date in the history of Egypt. Although Harmhabî was

distantly connected with the line of the Ahmessides, it is difficult

at the present day to know what position to assign him in the Pharaonic

lists: while some regard him as the last of the XVIIIth dynasty, others

prefer to place him at the head of the XIXth. No such hesitation,

however, exists with regard to Ramses I., who was undoubtedly the

founder of a new family. The old familiar names of Thûtmosis and

Amenôthes henceforward disappear from the royal lists, and are replaced

by others, such as Seti, Mînephtah, and, especially, Ramses, which now

figure in them for the first time. The princes who bore these names

showed themselves worthy successors of those who had raised Egypt to the

zenith of her power; like them they were successful on the battle-field,

and like them they devoted the best of the spoil to building innumerable

monuments. No sooner had Seti celebrated his father’s obsequies, than he

assembled his army and set out for war.

It would appear that Southern Syria was then in open revolt. “Word had

been brought to His Majesty: ‘The vile Shaûsû have plotted rebellion;

the chiefs of their tribes, assembled in one place on the confines of

Kharû, have been smitten with blindness and with the spirit of violence;

every one cutteth his neighbour’s throat.” * It was imperative to send

succour to the few tribes who remained faithful, to prevent them from

succumbing to the repeated attacks of the insurgents. Seti crossed the

frontier at Zalu, but instead of pursuing his way along the coast, he

marched due east in order to attack the Shaûsû in the very heart of the

desert. The road ran through wide wadys, tolerably well supplied

with water, and the length of the stages necessarily depended on the

distances between the wells. This route was one frequented in early

times, and its security was ensured by a number of fortresses and

isolated towers built along it, such as “The House of the Lion “--_ta

ait pa maû_--near the pool of the same name, the Migdol of the springs

of Huzîna, the fortress of Uazît, the Tower of the Brave, and the Migdol

of Seti at the pools of Absakaba. The Bedawîn, disconcerted by the

rapidity of this movement, offered no serious resistance. Their flocks

were carried off, their trees cut down, their harvests destroyed, and

they surrendered their strongholds at discretion. Pushing on from

one halting-place to another, the conqueror soon reached Babbîti, and

finally Pakanâna.**

* The pictures of this campaign and the inscriptions which

explain them were engraved by Seti I., on the outside of the

north wall of the great hypostyle hall at Karnak.

** The site of Pakanâna has, with much probability, been

fixed at El-Kenân or Khurbet-Kanâan, to the south of Hebron.

Brugsch had previously taken this name to indicate the

country of Canaan, but Chabas rightly contested this view.

W. Max Millier took up the matter afresh: he perceived that

we have here an allusion to the first town encountered by

Seti I. in the country of Canaan to the south-west of

Raphia, the name of which is not mentioned by the Egyptian

sculptor; it seems to me that this name should be Pakanâna,

and that the town bore the same name as the country.

The latter town occupied a splendid position on the slope of a rocky

hill, close to a small lake, and defended the approaches to the vale

of Hebron. It surrendered at the first attack, and by its fall the

Egyptians became possessed of one of the richest provinces in the

southern part of Kharû. This result having been achieved, Seti took

the caravan road to his left, on the further side of Gaza, and pushed

forward at full speed towards the Hittite frontier.

[Illustration: 163.jpg THE RETURN OF THE NORTH WALL OF THE HYPOSTYLE

HALL AT KARNAK, WHERE SETI I. REPRESENTS SOME EPISODES IN HIS FIRST

CAMPAIGN]

Drawn by Boudier, from a photograph, by Émil Brugsch-Bey.

It was probably unprotected by any troops, and the Hittite king was

absent in some other part of his empire. Seti pillaged the Amurru,

seized Ianuâmu and Qodshû by a sudden attack, marched in an oblique

direction towards the Mediterranean, forcing the inhabitants of the

Lebanon to cut timber from their mountains for the additions which he

was premeditating in the temple of the Theban Amon, and finally returned

by the coast road, receiving, as he passed through their territory, the

homage of the Phoenicians. His entry into Egypt was celebrated by solemn

festivities. The nobles, priests, and princes of both south and north

hastened to meet him at the bridge of Zalû, and welcomed, with their

chants, both the king and the troops of captives whom he was bringing

back for the service of his father Amon at Karnak. The delight of his

subjects was but natural, since for many years the Egyptians bad not

witnessed such a triumph, and they no doubt believed that the prosperous

era of Thûtmosis III. was about to return, and that the wealth of

Naharaim would once more flow into Thebes as of old. Their illusion

was short-lived, for this initial victory was followed by no other.

Maurusaru, King of the Khâti, and subsequently his son Mautallu,

withstood the Pharaoh with such resolution that he was forced to treat

with them. A new alliance was concluded on the same conditions as the

old one, and the boundaries of the two kingdoms remained the same as

under Harmhabî, a proof that neither sovereign had gained any advantage

over his rival. Hence the campaign did not in any way restore Egyptian

supremacy, as had been hoped at the moment; it merely served to

strengthen her authority in those provinces which the Khâti had failed

to take from Egypt. The Phoenicians of Tyre and Sidon had too many

commercial interests on the banks of the Nile to dream of breaking

the slender tie which held them to the Pharaoh, since independence,

or submission to another sovereign, might have ruined their trade. The

Kharû and the Bedawîn, vanquished wherever they had ventured to oppose

the Pharaoh’s troops, were less than ever capable of throwing off the

Egyptian yoke. Syria fell back into its former state. The local princes

once more resumed their intrigues and quarrels, varied at intervals by

appeals to their suzerain for justice or succour. The “Royal Messengers”

appeared from time to time with their escorts of archers and chariots

to claim tribute, levy taxes, to make peace between quarrelsome vassals,

or, if the case required it, to supersede some insubordinate chief by a

governor of undoubted loyalty; in fine, the entire administration of the

empire was a continuation of that of the preceding century. The peoples

of Kûsh meanwhile had remained quiet during the campaign in Syria, and

on the western frontier the Tihonû had suffered so severe a defeat that

they were not likely to recover from it for some time.* The bands of

pirates, Shardana and others, who infested the Delta, were hunted down,

and the prisoners taken from among them were incorporated into the royal

guard.**

* This war is represented at Karnak, and Ramses II. figures

there among the children of Seti I.

** We gather this from passages in the inscriptions from the

year V. onwards, in which Ramses II. boasts that he has a

number of Shardana prisoners in his guard; Rouge was,

perhaps, mistaken in magnifying these piratical raids into a

war of invasion.

[Illustration: 166.jpg REPRESENTATION OF SETI I. VANQUISHING THE LIBYANS

AND ASIATICS ON THE WALLS, KARNAK]

Drawn by Boudier, from a photograph by Ernil Brugsch-Bey.

Seti, however, does not appear to have had a confirmed taste for war.

He showed energy when occasion required it, and he knew how to lead his

soldiers, as the expedition of his first year amply proved; but when the

necessity was over, he remained on the defensive, and made no further

attempt at conquest. By his own choice he was “the jackal who prowls

about the country to protect it,” rather than “the wizard lion marauding

abroad by hidden paths,” * and Egypt enjoyed a profound peace in

consequence of his ceaseless vigilance.

* These phrases are taken direct from the inscriptions of

Seti I.

A peaceful policy of this kind did not, of course, produce the amount

of spoil and the endless relays of captives which had enabled his

predecessors to raise temples and live in great luxury without

overburdening their subjects with taxes. Seti was, therefore, the more

anxious to do all in his power to develop the internal wealth of the

country. The mining colonies of the Sinaitic Peninsula had never ceased

working since operations had been resumed there under Hâtshopsîtû and

Thûtmosis III., but the output had lessened during the troubles under

the heretic kings. Seti sent inspectors thither, and endeavoured to

stimulate the workmen to their former activity, but apparently with no

great success. We are not able to ascertain if he continued the revival

of trade with Pûanît inaugurated by Harmhabî; but at any rate he

concentrated his attention on the regions bordering the Red Sea and the

gold-mines which they contained. Those of Btbaï, which had been worked

as early as the XIIth dynasty, did not yield as much as they had done

formerly; not that they were exhausted, but owing to the lack of water

in their neighbourhood and along the routes leading to them, they were

nearly deserted. It was well known that they contained great wealth,

but operations could not be carried on, as the workmen were in danger

of dying of thirst. Seti despatched engineers to the spot to explore the

surrounding wadys, to clear the ancient cisterns or cut others, and

to establish victualling stations at regular intervals for the use of

merchants supplying the gangs of miners with commodities. These stations

generally consisted of square or rectangular enclosures, built of

stones without mortar, and capable of resisting a prolonged attack. The

entrance was by a narrow doorway of stone slabs, and in the interior

were a few huts and one or two reservoirs for catching rain or storing

the water of neighbouring springs. Sometimes a chapel was built close at

hand, consecrated to the divinities of the desert, or to their compeers,

Mînû of Coptos, Horus, Maut, or Isis. One of these, founded by Seti,

still exists near the modern town of Redesieh, at the entrance to one of

the valleys which furrow this gold region.

[Illustration: 168.jpg A FORTIFIED STATION ON THE ROUTE BETWEEN THE NILE

AND THE RED SEA.

Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from a photograph by M. de Bock

It is built against, and partly excavated in, a wall of rock, the

face of which has been roughly squared, and it is entered through a

four-columned portico, giving access to two dark chambers, whose walls

are covered with scenes of adoration and a lengthy inscription. In this

latter the sovereign relates how, in the IXth year of his reign, he

was moved to inspect the roads of the desert; he completed the work in

honour of Amon-Râ, of Phtah of Memphis, and of Harmakhis, and he states

that travellers were at a loss to express their gratitude and thanks for

what he had done. “They repeated from mouth to mouth: ‘May Amon give him

an endless existence, and may he prolong for him the length of eternity!

O ye gods of fountains, attribute to him your life, for he has rendered

back to us accessible roads, and he has opened that which was closed to

us. Henceforth we can take our way in peace, and reach our destination

alive; now that the difficult paths are open and the road has become

good, gold can be brought back, as our lord and master has commanded.’”

Plans were drawn on papyrus of the configuration of the district, of the

beds of precious metal, and of the position of the stations.

[Illustration: 169.jpg THE TEMPLE OF SETI I. AT REDESIEH]

Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from a photograph by Golénischeff.

One of these plans has come down to us, in which the districts are

coloured bright red, the mountains dull ochre, the roads dotted

over with footmarks to show the direction to be taken, while the

superscriptions give the local names, and inform us that the map

represents the Bukhni mountain and a fortress and stele of Seti. The

whole thing is executed in a rough and naive manner, with an almost

childish minuteness which provokes a smile; we should, however, not

despise it, for it is the oldest map in the world.

[Illustration: 170.jpg FRAGMENT OF THE MAP OF THE GOLD-MINES]

Facsimile by Faucher-Gudin of coloured chalk-drawing by Chabas.

The gold extracted from these regions, together with that brought

from Ethiopia, and, better still, the regular payment of taxes and

custom-house duties, went to make up for the lack of foreign spoil all

the more opportunely, for, although the sovereign did not share the

military enthusiasm of Thûtmosis III., he had inherited from him the

passion for expensive temple-building.

[Illustration: 171.jpg THE THREE STANDING COLUMNS OF THE TEMPLE OF

SESEBI]

Drawn by Boudier, from a photograph by Insinger.

He did not neglect Nubia in this respect, but repaired several of

the monuments at which the XVIIIth dynasty had worked--among others,

Kalabsheh, Dakkeh, and Amada, besides founding a temple at Sesebi, of

which three columns are still standing.*

* In Lepsius’s time there were still four columns standing;

Insinger shows us only three.

The outline of these columns is not graceful, and the decoration of them

is very poor, for art degenerated rapidly in these distant provinces of

the empire, and only succeeded in maintaining its vigour and spirit in

the immediate neighbourhood of the Pharaoh, as at Abydos, Memphis, and

above all at Thebes. Seti’s predecessor Ramses, desirous of obliterating

all traces of the misfortunes lately brought about by the changes

effected by the heretic kings, had contemplated building at Karnak,

in front of the pylon of Amenôthes III., an enormous hall for the

ceremonies connected with the cult of Amon, where the immense numbers of

priests and worshippers at festival times could be accommodated without

inconvenience. It devolved on Seti to carry out what had been merely an

ambitious dream of his father’s.*

* The great hypostyle hall was cleared and the columns were

strengthened in the winter of 1895-6, as far, at least, as

it was possible to carry out the work of restoration without

imperilling the stability of the whole.

We long to know who was the architect possessed of such confidence in

his powers that he ventured to design, and was able to carry out, this

almost superhuman undertaking. His name would be held up to almost

universal admiration beside those of the greatest masters that we are

familiar with, for no one in Greece or Italy has left us any work which

surpasses it, or which with such simple means could produce a similar

impression of boldness and immensity. It is almost impossible to convey

by words to those who have not seen it, the impression which it makes on

the spectator. Failing description, the dimensions speak for themselves.

The hall measures one hundred and sixty-two feet in length, by three

hundred and twenty-five in breadth. A row of twelve columns, the largest

ever placed inside a building, runs up the centre, having capitals in

the form of inverted bells.

[Illustration: 173 AN AVENUE OF ONE OF THE AISLES OF THE HYPOSTYLE HALL

AT KARNAK]

Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from a photograph by Beato.

One hundred and twenty-two columns with lotiform capitals fill

the aisles, in rows of nine each. The roof of the central bay is

seventy-four feet above the ground, and the cornice of the two towers

rises sixty-three feet higher. The building was dimly lighted from the

roof of the central colonnade by means of stone gratings, through

which the air and the sun’s rays entered sparingly. The daylight, as it

penetrated into the hall, was rendered more and more obscure by the rows

of columns; indeed, at the further end a perpetual twilight must have

reigned, pierced by narrow shafts of light falling from the ventilation

holes which were placed at intervals in the roof.

[Illustration: 174.jpg THE GRATINGS OF THE CENTRAL COLONNADE IN THE

HYPOSTYLE HALL AT KARNAK]

Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from a photograph by Beato. In the

background, on the right, may be seen a column which for

several centuries has been retained in a half-fallen

position by the weight of its architrave.

The whole building now lies open to the sky, and the sunshine which

floods it, pitilessly reveals the mutilations which it has suffered in

the course of ages; but the general effect, though less mysterious, is

none the less overwhelming. It is the only monument in which the first

_coup d’oil_ surpasses the expectations of the spectator instead of

disappointing him. The size is immense, and we realise its immensity the

more fully as we search our memory in vain to find anything with which

to compare it. Seti may have entertained the project of building a

_replica_ of this hall in Southern Thebes. Amenôthes III. had left his

temple at Luxor unfinished. The sanctuary and its surrounding buildings

were used for purposes of worship, but the court of the customary pylon

was wanting, and merely a thin wall concealed the mysteries from the

sight of the vulgar. Seti resolved to extend the building in a northerly

direction, without interfering with the thin screen which had satisfied

his predecessors. Starting from the entrance in this wall, he planned an

avenue of giant columns rivalling those of Karnak, which he destined to

become the central colonnade of a hypostyle hall as vast as that of

the sister temple. Either money or time was lacking to carry out his

intention. He died before the aisles on either side were even begun. At

Abydos, however, he was more successful. We do not know the reason

of Seti’s particular affection for this town; it is possible that his

family held some fief there, or it may be that he desired to show the

peculiar estimation in which he held its local god, and intended, by the

homage that he lavished on him, to cause the fact to be forgotten that

he bore the name of Sit the accursed.

[Illustration: 176.jpg ONE OF THE COLONNADES OF THE HYPOSTYLE HALL IN

THE TEMPLE OF SETI I. AT ABYDOS]

Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from a photograph by Beato.

The king selected a favourable site for his temple to the south of the

town, on the slope of a sandhill bordering the canal, and he marked

out in the hardened soil a ground plan of considerable originality. The

building was approached through two pylons, the remains of which are now

hidden under the houses of Aarabat el-Madfuneh.

[Illustration: 176b.jpg THE FACADE OF THE TEMPLE OF SETI]

A fairly large courtyard, bordered by two crumbling walls, lies between

the second pylon and the temple façade, which was composed of a portico

resting on square pillars. Passing between these, we reach two halls

supported by-columns of graceful outline, beyond which are eight chapels

arranged in a line, side by side, in front of two chambers built in

to the hillside, and destined for the reception of Osiris. The holy

of holies in ordinary temples is surrounded by chambers of lesser

importance, but here it is concealed behind them. The building-material

mainly employed here was the white limestone of Tûrah, but of a most

beautiful quality, which lent itself to the execution of bas-reliefs

of great delicacy, perhaps the finest in ancient Egypt. The artists who

carved and painted them belonged to the Theban school, and while their

subjects betray a remarkable similarity to those of the monuments

dedicated by Amenôthes III., the execution surpasses them in freedom and

perfection of modelling; we can, in fact, trace in them the influence of

the artists who furnished the drawings for the scenes at Tel el-Amarna.

They have represented the gods and goddesses with the same type

of profile as that of the king--a type of face of much purity and

gentleness, with its aquiline nose, its decided mouth, almond-shaped

eyes, and melancholy smile. When the decoration of the temple was

completed, Seti regarded the building as too small for its divine

inmate, and accordingly added to it a new wing, which he built along

the whole length of the southern wall; but he was unable to finish

it completely. Several parts of it are lined with religious

representations, but in others the subjects have been merely sketched

out in black ink with corrections in red, while elsewhere the walls

are bare, except for a few inscriptions, scribbled over them after an

interval of twenty centuries by the monks who turned the temple chambers

into a convent. This new wing was connected with the second hypostyle

hall of the original building by a passage, on one of the walls of which

is a list of seventy-five royal names, representing the ancestors of the

sovereign traced back to Mini. The whole temple must be regarded as a

vast funerary chapel, and no one who has studied the religion of Egypt

can entertain a doubt as to its purpose. Abydos was the place where the

dead assembled before passing into the other world. It was here, at the

mouth of the “Cleft,” that they received the provisions and offerings

of their relatives and friends who remained on this earth. As the dead

flocked hither from all quarters of the world, they collected round the

tomb of Osiris, and there waited till the moment came to embark on the

Boat of the Sun. Seti did not wish his soul to associate with those of

the common crowd of his vassals, and prepared this temple for himself,

as a separate resting-place, close to the mouth of Hades. After having

dwelt within it for a short time subsequent to his funeral, his soul

could repair thither whenever it desired, certain of always finding

within it the incense and the nourishment of which it stood in need.

Thebes possessed this king’s actual tomb. The chapel was at Qurnah, a

little to the north of the group of pyramids in which the Pharaohs of

the XIth dynasty lay side by side with those of the XIIIth and XVIIth.

Ramses had begun to build it, and Seti continued the work, dedicating

it to the cult of his father and of himself. Its pylon has altogether

disappeared, but the façade with lotus-bud columns is nearly perfect,

together with several of the chambers in front of the sanctuary. The

decoration is as carefully carried out and the execution as delicate as

that in the work at Abydos; we are tempted to believe from one or two

examples of it that the same hands have worked at both buildings.

[Illustration: 181.jpg THE TEMPLE OF QURNAH]

Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from a photograph by Beato.

The rock-cut tomb is some distance away up in the mountain, but not

in the same ravine as that in which Amenôthes III., Aï, and probably

Tûtankhamon and Harmhabî, are buried.*

* There are, in fact, close to those of Aï and Amenôthes

III., three other tombs, two at least of which have been

decorated with paintings, now completely obliterated, and

which may have served as the burying-places of Tûtankhamon

and Harmhabî: the earlier Egyptologists believed them to

have been dug by the first kings of the XVIIIth dynasty.

There then existed, behind the rock amphitheatre of Deîr el-Baharî, a

kind of enclosed basin, which could be reached from the plain only by

dangerous paths above the temple of Hâtshopsîtû. This basin is divided

into two parts, one of which runs in a south-easterly direction,

while the other trends to the south-west, and is subdivided into minor

branches. To the east rises a barren peak, the outline of which is not

unlike that of the step-pyramid of Saqqâra, reproduced on a colossal

scale. No spot could be more appropriate to serve as a cemetery for a

family of kings. The difficulty of reaching it and of conveying thither

the heavy accessories and of providing for the endless processions of

the Pharaonic funerals, prevented any attempt being made to cut tombs

in it during the Ancient and Middle Empires. About the beginning of the

XIXth dynasty, however, some engineers, in search of suitable burial

sites, at length noticed that this basin was only separated from the

wady issuing to the north of Qurnah by a rocky barrier barely five

hundred cubits in width. This presented no formidable obstacle to such

skilful engineers as the Egyptians. They cut a trench into the living

rock some fifty or sixty cubits in depth, at the bottom of which they

tunnelled a narrow passage giving access to the valley.*

* French scholars recognised from the beginning of this

century that the passage in question had been made by human

agency. I attribute the execution of this work to Ramses I.,

as I believe Harmhabî to have been buried in the eastern

valley, near Amenôthes III.

It is not known whether this herculean work was accomplished during the

reign of Harnhabî or in that of Ramses I. The latter was the first of

the Pharaohs to honour the spot by his presence. His tomb is simple,

almost coarse in its workmanship, and comprises a gentle inclined

passage, a vault and a sarcophagus of rough stone. That of Seti, on the

contrary, is a veritable palace, extending to a distance of 325 feet

into the mountain-side. It is entered by a wide and lofty door, which

opens on to a staircase of twenty-seven steps, leading to an inclined

corridor; other staircases of shallow steps follow with their landings;

then come successively a hypostyle hall, and, at the extreme end, a

vaulted chamber, all of which are decorated with mysterious scenes

and covered with inscriptions. This is, however, but the first storey,

containing the antechambers of the dead, but not their living-rooms. A

passage and steps, concealed under a slab to the left of the hall, lead

to the real vault, which held the mummy and its funerary furniture.

As we penetrate further and further by the light of torches into this

subterranean abode, we see that the walls are covered with pictures and

formulae, setting forth the voyages of the soul through the twelve hours

of the night, its trials, its judgment, its reception by the departed,

and its apotheosis--all depicted on the rock with the same perfection

as that which characterises the bas-reliefs on the finest slabs of Tûrah

stone at Qurnah and Abydos. A gallery leading out of the last of

these chambers extends a few feet further and then stops abruptly; the

engineers had contemplated the excavation of a third storey to the tomb,

when the death of their master obliged them to suspend their task.

The king’s sarcophagus consists of a block of alabaster, hollowed

out, polished, and carved with figures and hieroglyphs, with all the

minuteness which we associate with the cutting of a gem.

[Illustration: 184.jpg ONE OF THE PILLARS OF THE TOMB OF SETI I.]

Drawn by Boudier, from a photograph by Insinger, taken in

1884.

It contained a wooden coffin, shaped to the human figure and painted

white, the features picked out in black, and enamel eyes inserted in

a mounting of bronze. The mummy is that of a thin elderly man, well

preserved; the face was covered by a mask made of linen smeared with

pitch, but when this was raised by means of a chisel, the fine kingly

head was exposed to view. It was a masterpiece of the art of the

embalmer, and the expression of the face was that of one who had only

a few hours previously breathed his last. Death had slightly drawn

the nostrils and contracted the lips, the pressure of the bandages had

flattened the nose a little, and the skin was darkened by the pitch; but

a calm and gentle smile still played over the mouth, and the half-opened

eyelids allowed a glimpse to be seen from under their lashes of an

apparently moist and glistening line,--the reflection from the white

porcelain eyes let in to the orbit at the time of burial.

Seti had had several children by his wife Tuîa, and the eldest had

already reached manhood when his father ascended the throne, for he had

accompanied him on his Syrian campaign. The young prince died, however,

soon after his return, and his right to the crown devolved on his

younger brother, who, like his grandfather, bore the name of Ramses.

The prince was still very young,* but Seti did not on that account delay

enthroning with great pomp this son who had a better right to the throne

than himself.

* The history of the youth and the accession of Ramses II.

is known to us from the narrative given by himself in the

temple of Seti I. at Abydos. The bulk of the narrative is

confirmed by the evidence of the Kubân inscription,

especially as to the extreme youth of Ramses at the time

when he was first associated with the crown.

“From the time that I was in the egg,” Ramses writes later on, “the

great ones sniffed the earth before me; when I attained to the rank of

eldest son and heir upon the throne of Sibû, I dealt with affairs, I

commanded as chief the foot-soldiers and the chariots. My father having

appeared before the people, when I was but a very little boy in his

arms, said to me: ‘I shall have him crowned king, that I may see him

in all his splendour while I am still on this earth!’ The nobles of the

court having drawn near to place the pschent upon my head: ‘Place the

diadem upon his forehead!’ said he.” As Ramses increased in years,

Seti delighted to confer upon him, one after the other, the principal

attributes of power; “while he was still upon this earth, regulating

everything in the land, defending its frontiers, and watching over the

welfare of its inhabitants, he cried: ‘Let him reign!’ because of the

love he had for me.” Seti also chose for him wives, beautiful “as are

those of his palace,” and he gave him in marriage his sisters Nofrîtari

II. Mîmût and Isîtnofrît, who, like Ramses himself, had claims to the

throne. Ramses was allowed to attend the State councils at the age

of ten; he commanded armies, and he administered justice under the

direction of his father and his viziers. Seti, however, although making

use of his son’s youth and activity, did not in any sense retire in his

favour; if he permitted Ramses to adopt the insignia of royalty--the

cartouches, the pschent, the bulbous-shaped helmet, and the various

sceptres--he still remained to the day of his death the principal State

official, and he reckoned all the years of this dual sovereignty as

those of his sole reign.*

* Brugsoh is wrong in reckoning the reign of Ramses II. from

the time of his association in the crown; the great

inscription of Abydos, which has been translated by Brugsch

himself, dates events which immediately followed the death

of Seti I. as belonging to the first year of Ramses II.

Ramses repulsed the incursions of the Tihonû, and put to the sword

such of their hordes as had ventured to invade Egyptian territory.

He exercised the functions of viceroy of Ethiopia, and had on several

occasions to chastise the pillaging negroes. We see him at Beît-Wally

and at Abu Simbel charging them in his chariot: in vain they flee in

confusion before him; their flight, however swift, cannot save them from

captivity and destruction.

[Illustration: 187.jpg RAMSES II. PUTS THE NEGROES TO FLIGHT]

Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from a photograph by Insinger.

He was engaged in Ethiopia when the death of Seti recalled him to

Thebes.*

* We do not know how long Seti I. reigned; the last date is

that of his IXth year at Redesieh and at Aswan, and that of

the year XXVII. sometimes attributed to him belongs to one

of the later Ramessides. I had at first supposed his reign

to have been a long one, merely on the evidence afforded by

Manetho’s lists, but the presence of Ramses II. as a

stripling, in the campaign of Seti’s 1st year, forces us to

limit its duration to fifteen or twenty years at most,

possibly to only twelve or fifteen.

He at once returned to the capital, celebrated the king’s funeral

obsequies with suitable pomp, and after keeping the festival of Amon,

set out for the north in order to make his authority felt in that part

of his domains. He stopped on his way at Abydos to give the necessary

orders for completing the decoration of the principal chambers of the

resting-place built by his father, and chose a site some 320 feet to

the north-west of it for a similar Memnonium for himself. He granted

cultivated fields and meadows in the Thinite name for the maintenance

of these two mausolea, founded a college of priests and soothsayers in

connexion with them, for which he provided endowments, and also assigned

them considerable fiefs in all parts of the valley of the Nile. The

Delta next occupied his attention. The increasing importance of the

Syrian provinces in the eyes of Egypt, the growth of the Hittite

monarchy, and the migrations of the peoples of the Mediterranean,

had obliged the last princes of the preceding dynasty to reside more

frequently at Memphis than Amenôthes I. or Thûtmosis III. had done.

Amenôthes III. had set to work to restore certain cities which had been

abandoned since the days of the Shepherds, and Bubastis, Athribis, and

perhaps Tanis, had, thanks to his efforts, revived from their decayed

condition. The Pharaohs, indeed, felt that at Thebes they were too far

removed from the battle-fields of Asia; distance made it difficult for

them to counteract the intrigues in which their vassals in Kharû and the

lords of Naharaim were perpetually implicated, and a revolt which might

have been easily anticipated or crushed had they been advised of

it within a few days, gained time to increase and extend during the

interval occupied by the couriers in travelling to and from the capital.

Ramses felt the importance of possessing a town close to the Isthmus

where he could reside in security, and he therefore built close to Zalû,

in a fertile and healthy locality, a stronghold to which he gave his own

name,* and of which the poets of the time have left us an enthusiastic

description. “It extends,” they say, “between Zahi and Egypt--and is

filled with provisions and victuals.--It resembles Hermonthis,--it is

strong like Memphis,--and the sun rises--and sets in it--so that men

quit their villages and establish themselves in its territory.”--“The

dwellers on the coasts bring conger eels and fish in homage,--they

pay it the tribute of their marshes.--The inhabitants don their festal

garments every day,--perfumed oil is on their heads and new wigs;--they

stand at their doors, their hands full of bunches of flowers,--green

branches from the village of Pihâthor,--garlands of Pahûrû,--on the day

when Pharaoh makes his entry.--Joy then reigns and spreads, and nothing

can stay it,--O Usirmarî-sotpûnirî, thou who art Montû in the two

lands,--Ramses-Mîamûn, the god.” The town acted as an advance post,

from whence the king could keep watch against all intriguing

adversaries,--whether on the banks of the Orontes or the coast of the

Mediterranean.

* An allusion to the foundation of this residence occurs in

an inscription at Abu Simbel, dated in his XXVth year.

Nothing appeared for the moment to threaten the peace of the empire.

The Asiatic vassals had raised no disturbance on hearing of the king’s

accession, and Mautallu continued to observe the conditions of

the treaty which he had signed with Seti. Two military expeditions

undertaken beyond the isthmus in the IInd and IVth years of the new

sovereign were accomplished almost without fighting. He repressed by the

way the marauding Shaûsû, and on reaching the Nahr el-Kelb, which then

formed the northern frontier of his empire, he inscribed at the turn

of the road, on the rocks which overhang the mouth of the river, two

triumphal stelæ in which he related his successes.* Towards the end

of his IVth year a rebellion broke out among the Khâti, which caused a

rupture of relations between the two kingdoms and led to some irregular

fighting. Khâtusaru, a younger brother of Maurusaru, murdered the latter

and made himself king in his stead.** It is not certain whether the

Egyptians took up arms against him, or whether he judged it wise to

oppose them in order to divert the attention of his subjects from his

crime.

* The stelæ are all in a very bad condition; in the last of

them the date is no longer legible.

** In the _Treaty of Harrises II. with the Prince of Khâti_,

the writer is content to use a discreet euphemism, and

states that Mautallu succumbed “to his destiny.” The name of

the Prince of the Khâti is found later on under the form

Khatusharu, in that of a chief defeated by Tiglath-pileser

I. in the country of Kummukh, though this name has generally

been read Khatukhi.

At all events, he convoked his Syrian vassals and collected his

mercenaries; the whole of Naharaim, Khalupu, Carchemish, and Arvad sent

their quota, while bands of Dardanians, Mysians, Trojans, and Lycians,

together with the people of Pedasos and Girgasha,* furnished further

contingents, drawn from an area extending from the most distant coasts

of the Mediterranean to the mountains of Cilicia. Ramses, informed of

the enemy’s movement by his generals and the governors of places on the

frontier, resolved to anticipate the attack. He assembled an army almost

as incongruous in its component elements as that of his adversary:

besides Egyptians of unmixed race, divided into four corps bearing

the names of Amon, Phtah, Harmakhis and Sûtkhû, it contained Ethiopian

auxiliaries, Libyans, Mazaiu, and Shardana.**

* The name of this nation is written Karkisha, Kalkisha, or

Kashkisha, by one of those changes of _sh_ into _r-l_ which

occur so frequently in Assyro-Chaldæan before a dental; the

two different spellings seem to show that the writers of the

inscriptions bearing on this war had before them a list of

the allies of Khâtusaru, written in cuneiform characters. If

we may identify the nation with the Kashki or Kashku of the

Assyrian texts, the ancestors of the people of Colchis of

classical times, the termination _-isha_ of the Egyptian

word would be the inflexion _-ash_ or _-ush_ of the Eastern-

Asiatic tongues which we find in so many race-names, e.g.

Adaush, Saradaush, Ammaush. Rouge and Brugsch identified

them with the Girgashites of the Bible. Brugsch, adopting

the spelling Kashki, endeavoured to connect them with

Casiotis; later on he identified them with the people of

Gergis in Troas. Ramsay recognises in them the Kisldsos of

Cilicia.

** In the account of the campaign the Shardana only are

mentioned; but we learn from a list in the _Anastasi Papyrus

I_, that the army of Ramses II. included, in ordinary

circumstances, in addition to the Shardana, a contingent of

Mashauasha, Kahaka, and other Libyan and negro mercenaries.

When preparations were completed, the force crossed the canal at Zalû,

on the 9th of Payni in his Vth year, marched rapidly across Canaan till

they reached the valley of the Litâny, along which they took their way,

and then followed up that of the Orontes. They encamped for a few days

at Shabtuna, to the south-west of Qodshû,* in the midst of the Amorite

country, sending out scouts and endeavouring to discover the position of

the enemy, of whose movements they possessed but vague information.

* Shabtuna had been placed on the Nahr es-Sebta, on the site

now occupied by Kalaat el-Hosn, a conjecture approved by

Mariette; it was more probably a town situated in the plain,

to the south of Bahr el-Kades, a little to the south-west of

Tell Keby Mindoh which represents Qodshû, and close to some

forests which at that time covered the slopes of Lebanon,

and, extending as they did to the bottom of the valley,

concealed the position of the Khâti from the Egyptians.

Khâtusaru lay concealed in the wooded valleys of the Lebanon; he was

kept well posted by his spies, and only waited an opportunity to take

the field; as an occasion did not immediately present itself, he had

recourse to a ruse with which the generals of the time were familiar.

Ramses, at length uneasy at not falling in with the enemy, advanced to

the south of Shabtuna, where he endeavoured to obtain information from

two Bedawîn. “Our brethren,” said they, “who are the chiefs of

the tribes united under the vile Prince of Khâti, send us to give

information to your Majesty: We desire to serve the Pharaoh. We are

deserting the vile Prince of the Khâti; he is close to Khalupu (Aleppo),

to the north of the city of Tunipa, whither he has rapidly retired from

fear of the Pharaoh.” This story had every appearance of probability;

and the distance--Khalupu was at least forty leagues away--explained why

the reconnoitring parties of the Egyptians had not fallen in with any of

the enemy. The Pharaoh, with this information, could not decide whether

to lay siege to Qodshû and wait until the Hittites were forced to

succour the town, or to push on towards the Euphrates and there seek the

engagement which his adversary seemed anxious to avoid.

[Illustration: 193.jpg THE SHARDANA GUARD OF RAMSES II.]

Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from a photograph by Insinger.

He chose the latter of the two alternatives. He sent forward the legions

of Anion, Phrâ, Phtah, and Sutkhu, which constituted the main body of

his troops, and prepared to follow them with his household chariotry. At

the very moment when this division was being effected, the Hittites, who

had been represented by the spies as being far distant, were secretly

massing their forces to the north-east of Qodshu, ready to make an

attack upon the Pharaoh’s flank as soon as he should set out on his

march towards Khalupu. The enemy had considerable forces at their

disposal, and on the day of the engagement they placed 18,000 to 20,000

picked soldiers in the field.* Besides a well-disciplined infantry, they

possessed 2500 to 3000 chariots, containing, as was the Asiatic custom,

three men in each.**

* An army corps is reckoned as containing 9000 men on the

wall scenes at Luxor, and 8000 at the Eamesseum; the 3000

chariots were manned by 9000 men. In allowing four to five

thousand men for the rest of the soldiers engaged, we are

not likely to be far wrong, and shall thus obtain the modest

total mentioned in the text, contrary to the opinion current

among historians.

* The mercenaries are included in these figures, as is shown

by the reckoning of the Lycian, Dardanian, and Pedasian

chiefs who were in command of the chariots during the

charges against Ramses II.

The Egyptian camp was not entirely broken up, when the scouts brought

in two spies whom they had seized--Asiatics in long blue robes arranged

diagonally over one shoulder, leaving the other bare. The king, who was

seated on his throne delivering his final commands, ordered them to

be beaten till the truth should be extracted from them. They at last

confessed that they had been despatched to watch the departure of the

Egyptians, and admitted that the enemy was concealed in ambush behind

the town. Ramses hastily called a council of war and laid the situation

before his generals, not without severely reprimanding them for the

bad organisation of the intelligence department. The officers excused

themselves as best they could, and threw the blame on the provincial

governors, who had not been able to discover what was going on. The king

cut short these useless recriminations, sent swift messengers to recall

the divisions which had started early that morning, and gave orders

that all those remaining in camp should hold themselves in readiness to

attack. The council were still deliberating when news was brought that

the Hittites were in sight.

[Illustration: 195.jpg TWO HITTITE SPIES BEATEN BY THE EGYPTIAN

SOLDIERS]

Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from the picture in the temple at

Abu Simbel.

Their first onslaught was so violent that they threw down one side of

the camp wall, and penetrated into the enclosure. Ramses charged them at

the head of his household troops. Eight times he engaged the chariotry

which threatened to surround him, and each time he broke their ranks.

Once he found himself alone with Manna, his shield-bearer, in the midst

of a knot of warriors who were bent on his destruction, and he escaped

solely by his coolness and bravery. The tame lion which accompanied him

on his expeditions did terrible work by his side, and felled many an

Asiatic with his teeth and claws.*

* The lion is represented and named in the battle-scenes at

Abu Simbel, at Dorr, and at Luxor, where we see it in camp

on the eve of the battle, with its two front paws tied, and

its keeper threatening it.

[Illustration: 196.jpg THE EGYPTIAN CAMP AND THE COUNCIL OF WAR ON THE

MORNING OF THE BATTLE OF QODSHÛ]

Drawn by Boudier, from a photograph by Beato of the west

front of the Eamesseum.

The soldiers, fired by the king’s example, stood their ground resolutely

during the long hours of the afternoon; at length, as night was drawing

on, the legions of Phrâ and Sûtkhû, who had hastily retraced their

steps, arrived on the scene of action. A large body of Khâfci, who were

hemmed in in that part of the camp which they had taken in the morning,

were at once killed or made prisoners, not a man of them escaping.

Khâtusaru, disconcerted by this sudden reinforcement of the enemy, beat

a retreat, and nightfall suspended the struggle. It was recommenced at

dawn the following morning with unabated fury, and terminated in the

rout of the confederates. Garbatusa, the shield-bearer of the Hittite

prince, the generals in command of his infantry and chariotry, and

Khalupsaru, the “writer of books,” fell during the action. The chariots,

driven back to the Orontes, rushed into the river in the hope of fording

it, but in so doing many lives were lost. Mazraîma, the Prince of

Khâti’s brother, reached the opposite bank in safety, but the Chief of

Tonisa was drowned, and the lord of Khalupu was dragged out of the water

more dead than alive, and had to be held head downwards to disgorge the

water he had swallowed before he could be restored to consciousness.

[Illustration: 198.jpg THE GARRISON OF QODSHÛ ISSUING FORTH TO HELP THE

PRINCE OF KHÂTI.]

Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from a photograph by Bénédite.

History of Egypt, Chaldæa, Syria, Babylonia, and Assyria, Volume 5 (of 12) · 第 4 / 7 章