PROGRESS TOWARDS HIM IS WAKENING TO TRUE REALITY.

11. The first Principle is infinite because He is one, and nothing in

Him could be limited by anything whatever. Being one, He is not subject

to measure or number. He is limited neither by others nor by Himself,

since He would thus be double. Since He has neither parts nor form,

He has no figure. Not by mortal eyes therefore must you seek to grasp

this principle such as reason conceives of Him. Do not imagine that He

could be seen in the way that would be imagined by a man who believes

that everything is perceived by the senses, and thus annihilate the

principle which is the supreme reality. The things to which the

common people attribute reality do not possess it; for that which has

extension has less reality (than that which has no extension); now the

First is the principle of existence, and is even superior to "being."

You must therefore admit the contrary of that which is asserted by

those commonplace persons; otherwise, you will be deprived of the

divinity. You would resemble such men as in the sacred festivals gorge

themselves with the foods from which one should abstain on approaching

the divinities, and who, regarding this enjoyment as more certain than

the contemplation of the divinity whose festival is being celebrated,

depart without having participated in the mysteries. Indeed as the

divinity does not reveal Himself in these mysteries, these gross men

doubt His existence, because they consider real only what is visible

by the physical eyes. Thus people who would spend their whole life in

slumber would consider as certain and real the things they would see in

their dreams; if they were to be waked and forced to open their eyes,

they would place no credence in the testimony of their eyes, and would

plunge themselves again into their somnolence.

THE GOOD IS SUPERIOR TO THE BEAUTIFUL, AND IS COGNIZED BY THE MIND AS

ITS SENSE.

12. We should not seek to perceive an object otherwise than by the

faculty that is suitable to cognize it. Thus colors are perceived by

the eyes, sounds by the ears, and other qualities by other senses.

Analogy would assign to intelligence its proper function, so that

thinking should not be identified with seeing and hearing. To act

otherwise would be to resemble a man who would try to perceive colors

by the ears, and who would deny the existence of sounds because he

could not see them. We must never forget that men have forgotten the

Principle which from the beginning until this day has excited their

desires and wishes. Indeed all things aspire to the first Principle,

tend thither by a natural necessity, and seem to divine that they

could not exist without Him. The notion of the beautiful is given only

to souls that are awake, and that already possess some knowledge;

at sight of Him they are simultaneously dazed with His sublimity,

and spurred on by love.[270] From His very origin, on the contrary,

the Good excites in us an innate desire; He is present with us even

in sleep; His view never dazes us with stupor, because He is always

with us. Enjoyment of His presence demands neither reminiscence nor

attention, because one is not deprived thereof even in sleep. When the

love of the beautiful overwhelms us, it causes us anxieties, because

the sight of the beautiful makes us desire it. As the love excited

by the beautiful is only secondary, and as it exists only in such

persons as possess already some knowledge, the beautiful evidently

occupies only the second rank. On the contrary, the desire of the Good

is more original, and demands no preliminary knowledge. That surely

demonstrates that the Good is anterior and superior to the beautiful.

Besides, all men are satisfied as soon as they possess the Good; they

consider that they have reached their goal. But not all think that the

beautiful suffices them; they think that the beautiful is beautiful

for itself, rather than for them; as the beauty of an individual is

an advantage only for himself. Last, the greater number of people are

satisfied with seeming beautiful, even if they are not so in reality;

but they are not satisfied with seeming to possess the Good, which

they desire to possess in reality. Indeed, all desire to have that

which occupies the front rank; but they struggle, they engage in

rivalry about the beautiful in the opinion that it is born just as

they are (from development of circumstances). They resemble a person

who would claim equality with another person who holds the first rank

after the king, because both depend from the king; such a person does

not realize that though both are subject to the king, yet there is a

great difference in hierarchical rank between them[271]; the cause of

this error is that both participate in a same principle, that the One

is superior to both of them, and that lastly the Good has no need of

the beautiful, while the beautiful is in need of the Good.[272] The

Good is sweet, calm, and full of delights; we enjoy it at will. On the

contrary, the beautiful strikes the soul with amazement, agitates it,

and mingles pains with pleasures. In spite of ourselves we are thereby

often separated from the Good, like a beloved object separates a son

from the father. The Good is more ancient than the beautiful, not in

time, but in reality; besides, it exerts superior power, because it is

unlimited. That which is inferior to it, possesses only an inferior and

dependent power, instead of having a limitless power (as belongs to

Intelligence, which is inferior to the Good). The Divinity therefore

is master of the power which is inferior to His own; He has no need of

things that are begotten; for it is from Him that all their contents

are derived. Besides, He had no need of begetting; He still is such as

He was before; nothing would have been changed for Him if He had not

begotten; if it had been possible for other things to receive existence

(independently of Himself) He would not have opposed it through

jealousy. It is now no longer possible for anything to be begotten,

for the divinity has begotten all that He could beget. Nor is He the

universality of things, for thus He would stand in need of them. Raised

above all things, He has been able to beget them, and to permit them to

exist for themselves by dominating all.

Plotinos: Complete Works, v. 2 In Chronological Order, Grouped in Four Periods · 第 344 / 381 题