CAULKING AND LEAKAGE.

Up to August, 1907, the joints between the segments of the cast-iron

lining were caulked with iron filings and sal ammoniac, mixed in the

proportion of 400 to 1 by weight. With the air pressure balancing the

hydrostatic head near the tunnel axis, it was difficult to make the

rust-joint caulking tight below the axis against the opposing water

pressure; this form of caulking was also injured in many places by

water dripping from service pipes attached to the tunnel lining. A few

trials of lead wire caulked cold gave such satisfactory results that it

was adopted as a substitute. Pneumatic hammers were used successfully on

the lead caulking, but were only used to a small extent on the rust

borings, which were mostly hand caulked. Immediately before placing the

concrete lining, all leaks, whether in the rust borings or lead, were

repaired with lead, and the remainder of the groove was filled with 1 to

1 Portland cement mortar, leaving the joints absolutely water-tight at

that time. The subsequent development of small seepages through the

concrete would seem to indicate that the repair work should have been

carried on far enough in advance of the concreting to permit the

detection of secondary leaks which might develop slowly. The average

labor cost chargeable against the caulking was 12 cents per lin. ft., to

which should be added 21.8 cents for "top charges."

Unfortunately, it was necessary to place the greater part of the

concrete lining in the river tunnels during the summer months when the

temperature at the point of work frequently exceeded 85 deg.; and the

temperature of the concrete while setting was much higher. This abnormal

heat, due to chemical action in the cement, soon passed away, and, with

the approach of winter, the contraction of the concrete resulted in

transverse cracks. By the middle of the winter these had developed quite

uniformly at the ends of each 30-ft. section of concrete arch as placed,

and frequently finer cracks showed at about the center of each 30-ft.

section.

While the temperature of the concrete was falling, a like change was

taking place in the cast-iron lining, with resulting contraction. The

lining had been erected in compressed air, the temperature of which

averaged about 70 deg. in winter and higher in summer. Compressed air having

been taken off in the summer of 1908, the tunnels then acquired the

lower temperature of the surrounding earth, slowly falling until

mid-winter. The contraction of the concrete, firmly bedded around the

flanges of the iron, and showing cracks at fairly uniform intervals,

probably localized the small corresponding movements of the iron near

the concrete cracks, and resulted in a loosening of the caulking at

these points. With the advent of cold weather, damp spots appeared in

numerous places on the concrete, and small seepages showed through quite

regularly at the temperature cracks, in some cases developing

sufficiently to be called leaks. Only a few, however, were measurable in

amount.

Early in January small brass plugs were firmly set on opposite sides of

a large number of cracks, and caliper readings and air temperature

observations were taken regularly throughout the winter and spring. The

widths of the cracks and the amount of leakage at them increased with

each drop in temperature and decreased as the temperature rose again,

but until spring the width of the cracks did not return to the same

point with each return of temperature.

The leakage was similar in all four tunnels, but was largest in amount

in Tunnel _D_, where, at the beginning of February, the ordinary flow

was about 0.0097 cu. ft. per sec., equivalent to 0.00000347 cu. ft. per

sec. per lin. ft. of tunnel. Of this amount 0.0065 cu. ft. per sec.

could be accounted for at eight of the cracks showing measurable

leakage, leaving 0.0032 cu. ft. per sec. or 0.00000081 cu. ft. per sec.

per lin. ft. of tunnel to be accounted for as general seepage

distributed over the whole length.

It was not feasible to stop every leak in the tunnel, most of which were

indicated simply by damp spots on the concrete; a rather simple method

was devised, however, for stopping the leaks at the eight or ten places

in each tunnel where water dripped from the arch or flowed down the face

of the concrete. The worst leak in any tunnel flowed about 0.0023 cu.

ft. per sec. To stop these leaks, rows of 1-in. holes, at about 4-in.

centers, were drilled with jap drills through the concrete to the flange

of the iron. These rows were from 3 to 18 ft. long, extending 1 ft. or

more beyond the limits of the leak. The bottoms of the holes were

directly on the caulking groove and the pounding of the drill usually

drove the caulking back, so that the leak became dry or nearly so after

the holes were drilled. If left alone the leaks would gradually break

out again in a few hours or a few days and flow more water than before.

They were allowed to do this, however, in only a few cases as

experiments. After the holes were drilled, the bottom 4 in. next the

flange was filled with soft neat cement mortar. Immediately on top of

this was placed two plugs of neat cement about 2-1/2 in. long, which

were 5 or 6 hours old and rather hard. Each was tamped in with a round

caulking tool of the size of the hole driven with a sledge hammer. On

top of this were driven in the same way two more plugs of neat cement of

the same size, which were hard set. These broke up under the blows of

the hammer, and caulked the hole tight. When finished, the tamping tool

would ring as though it was in solid rock. Great pressure was exerted on

the plastic mortar in the bottom of the hole, which resulted in the

re-caulking of the joint of the iron. No further measurable leakage

developed in the repaired cracks, during a period of four months, and

the total leakage has been reduced to about 0.002 cu. ft. per sec. in

each tunnel, an average of 0.00000051 cu. ft. per sec. per lin. ft.

Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, vol. LXVIII, Sept. 1910 The New York Tunnel Extension of the Pennsylvania Railroad. The East River Tunnels. Paper No. 1159 · 第 32 / 35 题