I read from the transcript:

“Sauckel: First of all, I should like to point out that this

document is dated 6 March 1941—that is more than one year

before I assumed office.... Since this document, Number 4, has

been submitted to the Tribunal, I must add supplementary

documents to my case which confirm that I automatically

destroyed all such unnecessary directives.... In such a case I

could not have issued orders of this description to any

government office in the Reich.”

Do you remember these depositions given at the session of the 29th of

May the current year?

SAUCKEL: Yes.

THE PRESIDENT: General, I am told that this is an incorrect translation.

It was “revoked” and not “destroyed.” You said “destroyed,” did you not?

GEN. ALEXANDROV: I am reading from the Russian transcript and perhaps

there are certain inaccuracies in it, but I do not object to replacing

“destroy” by “revoke.” The meaning remains the same.

SAUCKEL: May I ask for the context to be repeated? It is not quite

clear.

GEN. ALEXANDROV: No, I do not want to revert to Document EC-68. All I

want is to establish what you said in reply to your defense counsel in

connection with this document. You do not contradict your testimony

which I have just read into the record? Does it correspond to the

statement you made here on the 29th of May?

SAUCKEL: No. But I do not understand what the term “destroyed” has to do

with it.

GEN. ALEXANDROV: We should not read “destroy,” but should use the word

“revoke.”

SAUCKEL: That is possible.

GEN. ALEXANDROV: So you confirm the testimony which I have just read

into the record from the transcript.

Now, tell us, do you remember the living conditions you imposed on the

Ukrainian women and girls from the occupied territories, on those who

had been mobilized for work in German agriculture?

Trial of the Major War Criminals Before the International Military Tribunal, Nuremburg, 14 November 1945-1 October 1946, Volume 15 · 第 86 / 130 题