I met Dr. Benes, the Minister for Foreign Affairs, deputy-President in

Masaryk's absence. It was on his initiative that the Little Alliance

of Czecho-Slovakia and Jugo-Slavia was founded, with the support of

Italy and eventually including Roumania. Whilst this was nominally to

prevent the return of the Hapsburgs or the reuniting of Austria and

Hungary, it has also had another function--that of drawing together all

the States deriving territory from the break up of Austria--even

uniting Italy and Serbia, up till recently preoccupied with mortal

enmity over the Dalmatic. It is a great service to unity to have this

group of powers with a common understanding, and will perhaps be more

highly appreciated in the future than it is now.

Dr. Benes is a spare, pinched-faced man of the people, not a typical

Czech in appearance, a nervous type, of probably tireless energy. Not

one of those that "sleep o' nights." He had, however, an agreeable

smile of acquiescence when complimented on his work for unity. "I do

not believe in the war after the war," said he. "All the nations that

composed Austria-Hungary were exasperated, and have been in a bad

mental state greatly aggravated by the war. We want to get rid of the

war-mind. With that in view we are developing a policy which should

make for stability in Central Europe. The most dangerous word used in

propaganda against us in 'Balkanization'--as if to suggest that all

these regions had become unstable and liable to Balkan quarrels. But,

in truth, in three years we have made great progress towards a settled

state of affairs.

"Germany will fall. If she agrees to pay she will fall, and equally if

the sanctions are applied she will fall. She will not go so low as

Austria because she is a much stronger national organism, but her

export trade will be ruined, and the mark will become almost of no

value. The application of the export duty on German goods is not

popular, but we are applying it. It will raise the cost of living, and

be a great inconvenience to many businesses which depend on Germany,

but on the other hand some of our younger industries may be helped by

such a measure of protection----"

Regarding the Little Alliance Dr. Benes was clearly enthusiastic, but

he could not see it developing into a customs-union. "We shall have

treaties regarding tariffs according to our mutual needs." He hoped

the Alliance might develop to take in Poland, but at present Poland was

in a difficult frame of mind, very readily jealous and not generally

benevolent.

The Slavs are vociferous believers in unity. They invented the word

"pan-humanity." It is the most vital idea in Russia. But is it not

strange that the peoples who are the strongest believers in human unity

are the most quarrelsome amongst themselves. The greatest weakness of

the Slav nations lies in national vanity, egoism, and lack of

solidarity. They have not the sense for discipline obtaining among

Latins and Teutons. Perhaps in this respect the Czechs are wiser than

Poles, Russians, and Serbs. But the fact remains that the Slavs do not

readily co-operate, and as nations have little of the modern sense for

"team-work."

Take the case of Poland, Czecho-Slovakia's obstreporous northern

neighbour. Both have been raised from the dead at the same time, and

are brothers in resurrection. Both have great capacity to help one

another. But one finds an almost complete detachment, as if the

frontier line were an ocean.

"We send goods into Poland--and the Polish Government sequesters them,"

say the Czechs. "We load our trains with stuff for them, and then our

trains never come back. Many whole trains have disappeared in Poland,

and we get no satisfaction."

A new type of crime--train-stealing! "No," says Dr. Benes; "we must

wait patiently till it occurs to the Poles that a close brotherly

relationship between the two countries is better than suspicion and

jealousy."

"Why do you not take the step yourself?"

"It would be suspected of having some hidden motive, or we should be

thought to be in terrible need of Poland's help," said Bohemia's

minister.

As regards the interior troubles of Czecho-Slovakia, much is made of

the Slovak separatist movement, and the Germans exploit the supposed

racial animosities of the two Slav tribes. The Slovaks also obtain

some sympathy from our "Save the children" missionaries, who naturally

prefer unspoiled peasants to educated foreigners of any kind. If the

Slovak hates the Czech he hates the Magyar also, but whether he hates

or not he is not very important in Europe, and is bound to find himself

in a subordinate national position. The enmity of the German elements

is more menacing, and it is not to be denied that the new State holds a

million or so people who, by the accident of habitat, have to be called

Czecho-Slovaks, though they are no more Czecho-Slovaks than Lot and his

wife.

I met among others Dr. Isidor Muller, first assistant at the University

of Vienna, but living at Carlovivari (Carlsbad), and naturally enough

unable to speak Czech and unacquainted with Czechs, but written down as

Czecho-Slovak now. Still, it has its advantages. He told me that he

was once being rudely treated by a French officer who took him for a

Boche. The Frenchman was disinclined to shake hands.

"But I am a Czecho-Slovak," said Dr. Muller, inspirationally.

"Oh!" The Frenchman's face lighted up. He extended his hand. "We are

brothers and allies."

Still some German Czecho-Slovaks think they will ultimately overthrow

the new State and get into the saddle again. And they make a solid and

dangerous political bloc. Benes said they were much more amenable than

a year ago, but in the Parliament House--an adapted concert-hall--I saw

all the carpenters at work in a litter of shavings and broken wood.

"The German benches," said the editor of the "Narodni Listi," who was

showing me round the institutions of Prague.

Czecho-Slovakia holds now, besides her natural constituent races, a

considerable number of Russian exiles, and these have their Russian

daily paper at Prague and a number of local Russian enterprises. With

the calming down of Soviet Russia, some of these Russians would

naturally return home, but a few have taken root and will remain. It

is not an uncongenial soil for the average Russian. Then the

Government has agreed to take ten thousand of General Wrangel's

soldiers, and will endeavour to settle them on the land. There are

already too many non-Slavonic elements in Czecho-Slovakia, and Russians

will help to neutralize some of the Magyar and German influences. At

least, such is the hope. As a step in this direction, there has

developed also an important Church movement. A large portion of the

Roman Catholic clergy have split from Rome and founded a Czech National

Church. They have left the Pope, and have in return been

excommunicated. Apparently excommunication has not a great terror,

however. National Catholicism without an infallible Pope is not far

removed from Greek Catholicism and even Anglicanism. Austria and

Hungary are Roman Catholic, but Czecho-Slovakia will remain either

Protestant or National Catholic.

The abandonment of the German language is also a remarkable phenomenon.

The common will is to abandon it. Unfortunately, the Czech language is

of limited use, but there is now a remarkable passion for learning

English, and there are thousands of students at the University classes.

This boom is due to President Wilson. The Russian language is also

extensively known among the ex-soldiers who sojourned so many years as

prisoners or as legionaries in Russia. The French language having lost

much of its value has not so many students. The "Narodni Listi," which

is the principal Czech newspaper in Prague, prints two columns in

French every day for the convenience of foreigners who do not

understand Bohemian. This idea is being extended, and a daily

supplement in English is to be issued soon.

Two evenings spent at the theatre at Prague were curiously in contrast:

one at the German National Theatre, to hear "The Blue Mazurka," by

Lehar, author of "The Merry Widow," and other less entertaining

operettas. The imposing building of the Deutsche Theatre was crammed

with Germans who took pleasure in a characteristic sentimental

operetta. The other evening was at the Czech National Theatre to see a

performance of "Coriolanus," and was more interesting. The Czechs had

great difficulties under the Austro-Hungarian regime in obtaining a

national theatre. The Imperial Government was not anxious to encourage

Czech language and literature, and therefore refused to grant the State

subsidy on which national theatres usually depend. This, however, did

not deter the Czechs. It made them only the more determined to have a

national theatre. It should be remembered that drama has a much

greater national importance in the continental countries of Europe than

it has in England or America. Excitement over such a matter might seem

incredible to Anglo-Saxons, not so to Slavs or to Germans. The

proposed deprivation of the Czechs of a national stage stirred the

people to the depths, and it was not long before men and women were

busy collecting the money to build and sustain a Czech theatre at

Prague. The funds were raised, and the place was built, and the

Bohemian people inscribed over the proscenium the challenging words:

"_Narod Sobe_"--The people for itself.

"Coriolanus" was conceived of rather as a struggle with the

proletariat. Hillar, the producer, has effectually disenchanted the

footlights by putting steps down to the audience in the position of the

prompter's box. The characters frequently make their entrances as it

were from the body of the audience. This is especially striking in the

crowding up of the Roman Bolsheviks on to the stage in the opening

scene--a remarkable piece of life and action. However, though one

naturally thought of the Bolsheviks, there was nothing of the guise of

Lenin or Liebknecht in the appearance of the popular tribunes, who,

together with the rest of the citizens, were reduced to the level of

Dogberry, whilst the noble Coriolanus was perhaps exaggerated in his

nobility and his disdain. Menenius Agrippa was a Balfourian old fellow

who told the story of the Belly and its members well. What a story for

Europe to learn now: it ought to be put in the reading-books of every

tongue.

What struck me about the Czech performance of "Coriolanus" was the

dignity of personality and height of conception which the Slavs bring

to the interpretation of Shakespeare. It was the same in Moscow in the

old days. Hamlet was more interestingly conceived and better performed

than anywhere else in the world.

An interesting play reflecting in itself the world-drama, was lately

produced at Prague under the title "R.U.R.," or "Rasum's Universal

Rabots." A scientist named Dr. Rasum succeeded in inventing a human

automaton, a human being except for the fact that it had no soul and no

power of reproducing itself. They were excellent for use in factories

and in armies, and the firm of Rasum, Ltd., supplied them in hundreds

and thousands to companies and States. Eventually the Rabots, as they

are called, combine and make war against the real people with the

souls, and they destroy Dr. Rasum and his factory, and even the plan

and the secret whereby the Rabots are made. They also destroy the real

people, all but one, and a great sadness comes upon the world as it is

realized that man must die out. At the end of the play, however, a

soul is born in one of the Rabots, and he is touched to love, and so he

obtains the power to reproduce the species, and the human story

recommences. A striking idea for a drama, and capable of arousing much

excitement in Labour's literary circles. I heard that the rights had

been bought for almost every country of Europe. In the drama, as in

music and art, the Slavs are always passing Teuton and Latin, backward

though they may be in other matters.

Enough has been said to register the opinion that the new State of

Bohemia is very promising, and that it is a redeeming case in the

welter of New Europe. As far as Prague is concerned it leaves behind

its provincial recent-past, recovers its ancient-past, and looks

towards a great future. New buildings will arise worthy of a capital,

new administrative offices and a new Parliament House are to be built.

Around the Parliament House it is designed to place the cycle of

Mucha's mystical paintings lately exhibited in New York. These

traverse the whole story of the Slavs, and especially that of the

Czechs, but not, however, omitting the story of Russia, from the

baptism of Vladimir to the emancipation of the serfs. Czecho-Slovakia

will raise the banner of a new Pan-Slavism and Slav unity. The faith

is kindled here that whilst many other nations are going mad,

Czecho-Slovakia may keep her head and be one of those who by her

example and leadership will save Europe from disruption and chaos.

LETTERS OF TRAVEL

X. FROM WARSAW

As at Constantinople, there is great over-crowding. There are three

times as many people on the pavements as on the pavements of Vienna or

Prague. The Marshalkowsky is a-flocking from end to end. Finding a

room for the night is a hard task. You will see a great deal of Warsaw

before you find a room. It is not a bad way to obtain a first

impression. I arrived at one in the afternoon and found a place for

myself only at ten at night. The once luxurious Hotel Bristol was full

to-day, no hope for to-morrow, no, nor for to-morrow week. At the

Royal Hotel a lugubrious porter says "_l'hotel n'existe plus_." The

Victoria, which was the first hotel I ever stayed at in Russia, knew me

no more. At the Metropole a preoccupied clerk said "_Nima_" without

looking up from the news from the Silesian front which was engrossing

him. I went into a terribly shabby and dirty hotel called the

Amerikansky, and hoped they'd say "No," which they certainly did.

Another doubtful establishment with girls on the stairs was also gorged

and replete with visitors. The Y.M.C.A. said they'd enough trouble

finding rooms for their own people. The Hotel de Rome was occupied by

the Red Cross. The Kowiensky was _alles besetst_; the Hotel de Saxe

had not even a hope.

These efforts were naturally punctuated by visits to the Polish "bar"

and café. At these it came as somewhat of a surprise to have tips

refused. I paid for my dinner and added the customary ten per cent.

The waiter drew himself up and waved his hand in deprecation.

"No, no," said he, proudly; "I'm Polish."

"What, no tips now?"

"No."

"That is certainly an improvement," I reflected. In Warsaw, in Russian

days, most waiters fawned disgustingly for tips. But it seems now as

if there were an entirely new population. However, I resumed my quest

of a lodging. At the Imperial Hotel they kindly relieved me of my

knapsack and overcoat, and advised me to come back at eight or nine at

night--there might be a room then. Meanwhile I should continue

seeking. So the Cracowsky was tried, and the Lipsky, once Leipzig, and

the Adlon and the Pretoria, and many another haunt of mice and men.

Then I returned to the Imperial for the second time. No, there was no

room. It had been a lovely day, only too hot, and the evening was

warm. I thought pleasantly of the Saxon Gardens and its seats.

Then Poland revealed itself. "You want a room very badly, don't you?"

said the Imperial Hotel porter. "I'll arrange it for you. But it will

cost you something. You take my card to a certain hotel, which I will

mention to you, hand it to the porter and give him a thousand marks,

and he'll fix you up at once."

So I repaired to the Hotel Vienna, opposite the Vienna station. The

night porter was very pessimistic, wouldn't take the thousand marks.

"Come back in an hour," said he in a loud voice; "if there is a room

then you'll have it; if not, you can't."

I went out to an orchestral "bar" near by and supped. When I came back

the porter asked quietly for the thousand, and gave me the key of

"Number Five." "At your service," said he, demurely.

Warsaw has greatly changed during the time I have known it, from the

days of panic and police-assassinations in 1906, when the miserable

green waggons of open horse-trams woggled along the main ways, and it

seemed a city of endless cobbled stones. Warsaw was being governed by

Russia much as we govern Ireland now, and murders of constabulary

alternated with reprisals in which the innocent suffered more than the

guilty. Strangely enough, the relentless methods of official Russia

succeeded in subduing the revolutionaries, and in a few years was seen

a calm and prosperous condition of affairs which lasted until the

outbreak of the late war. A handsome service of electric trams and a

great new bridge over the Vistula raised Warsaw's level from an

external point of view, and made it something like a modern city. Then

came the war, the German aeroplanes and their bombs, the violent

attacks and the panics, shell-fire, the blowing-up of bridges, wild

exodus of Warsaw people and entry of the Germans. Of the people who

fled into Russia in 1915 few seem to have returned. Their places have

been filled by Poles from German and Austrian Poland. The

German-speaking Pole has displaced the Pole who knew Russian.

The Germans, of course, held the city from the summer of 1915 until the

armistice, and they repaired the bridges and instituted German order in

the city. The miracle of the armistice raised Poland from death, and

now we have Warsaw as capital of a large new State. The maps of Poland

in the streets, Poland as she is plus Poland as she believes she will

be, show a country considerably larger than Germany.

It used to seem rather amusing in the drinking scene in "The Brothers

Karamazof," when the Pole Vrublevsky, in proposing the health of

Russia, inserted the proviso: "To Russia, with the boundaries she had

before 1772." But it is serious matter to-day. For Poland has not

only reached most of the boundaries of 1772 but some of them she has

even transgressed, and still she asks more.

Poland is at enmity with all her neighbours, and by some of them is

hated, loathed, and despised. And as an offset to the surrounding

nations she has one open and rather noisy friendship, and that is with

France. England she considered to be her enemy even before the British

Government stated its view on the question of Silesia. She had decided

to help France, and France had promised to help Poland, and England

stood in the way of all manner of injustice and aggression. It is

pathetic to think now of the work done for Poland by England during the

war: the meetings that were held, the encouragement given to

Padarewski, Dmowski and others, the immense sums subscribed to the

Great Britain to Poland fund, and to the Polish Relief fund. These

latter "charities" printed the woes of Poland in the advertisement

columns of the British press for years, and collected the shillings and

pounds of the benevolent everywhere. But you did not see such work

being done for Poland in France. The Frenchman is more careful of his

franc than the Englishman of his pound. But perhaps it is not easy to

find now the Poles who benefited by British "charity." How much Great

Britain subscribed and how the money was distributed is not generally

known to the Pole. And, in any case, who cares?

The Germans disdain the Poles wordlessly. It is not easy to get a

German to discuss the Polish people. The Russians do not like the

Poles, but they are indulgent towards them and wait the day when Russia

will wipe out insults. "Russia has plenty of time," is the formula.

It must be a little galling to the Russian refugees, of whom General

Wrangel estimates there are 100,000 in Poland, to see every public

notice in the Russian language blued out as if there were no

Russian-speaking people, to see Russian monuments cast down, and

churches despoiled of their golden domes. But they bear it with

equanimity, biding their time. Some, on the other hand, forgive the

Poles because they recognize that Russians would have done the same in

like case. The people of the other neighbouring States are distrustful

or aloof. In a friendship with France, however, Poland would make up

for all other enmities. Marshal Pilsudsky, with the glory of having

defeated the Russians and won a victorious peace, is now pictured with

Napoleon. He is even represented on picture post-cards pinning an

order of merit on the breast of Napoleon--the occasion being the

centenary of Napoleon's death. Pilsudsky is a man of sentiment, and

when he made his important diplomatic journey to Paris last February,

he bore with him a picture of Joan of Arc by Jan Mateiks, in order to

express the gratitude of the Polish people to France. In Pilsudsky's

honour a lesson in Polish geography and history was ordered to be given

in all the schools of France on the 5th of February, 1921.

Prince Sapieha and Marshal Pilsudsky negotiated a secret treaty with

France on that occasion--not with the Allies as a whole, but with

France. As a seasonal fruit of that treaty came the Silesian adventure

supported by France. The disarming of the population in Upper Silesia,

conducted under French auspices, had taken the arms away from the

Germans but left arms with the Poles. Added to that, guns,

machine-guns, rifles, and ammunition, were run over into the plebiscite

area, and a mercenary "insurrectionary" army was raised, partly from

the local Polish population and partly from Poland proper. An army

which the French Government held to be capable of intimidating the

League of Nations garrison of ten thousand fully equipped men, was thus

improvised. The supposition is that interested parties connived at its

improvisation. It could not otherwise have sprung spontaneously into

being. After the first week of the rising, many of the insurgents

began to desert the leader Korfanty on the ground that their wages were

not high enough. Much money had to be spent in the affair. It might

be asked what interest has France to support Poland--is it sentiment?

Many will attribute it to a French quixoticism, which in truth does not

exist. France will be ready to drop Pilsudsky, as she has dropped

Wrangel, when it suits her. But the French programme for Europe

includes the complete dismantling of the German Empire, and by taking

away Upper Silesia from Germany another great victory would be won in

the war after the war. Therefore it has been worth while. And to this

end France proceeds not openly but in the old-fashioned channels of

secret intrigue. The favourite device is the arranging of a _coup_ and

then the presentation of the _fait accompli_, accompanied by a

manipulation of the press. It is almost unnecessary to say in English

that this sort of procedure has greatly damaged international

understanding and good-will.

Europe—whither bound? (Quo vadis Europa?) · 第 7 / 13 段