The Franco-Polish intrigue was only too manifest this May in Warsaw's

streets. Ascension and the centenary of the death of Napoleon were on

the same day. It was made into Napoleon Day and was a great festival.

One of the principal squares had its name changed to Place Napoleon.

There was a public Mass for the repose of Napoleon's soul. A statue of

Napoleon was unveiled. There were military processions and the fêting

of the French military mission, special honours for General du Moriez,

who brought "_les precieuses reliques de Napoleon_" to Poland, and of

General Niessel, and of M. de Panalieu, France's Minister

Plenipotentiary in Poland. The street crowds stopped the cars and

lifted the Frenchman on to their shoulders and carried them to plaudits

and joy-shrieks and brass bands. It was amusing to see a diminutive

French officer with grey head and beard, sprawling thus on a moving

couch of Polish hands whilst he waved his hat and was pelted from all

hands with cowslips and lilac. "_Vive la France_! _Vive la France_!"

Polish Cossacks with white pennants on their lances come trotting

through and break the crowds, and then come artillerymen and their

guns, and then French diplomatic personalities protected by mounted

guards with flashing sabres. The surging populace intervenes, and

sways, and gives, and closes again. Here comes a great banner on which

is embroidered the ominous white vulture of risen Poland, the ghostly

bird that has sojourned a hundred years in the death kingdoms, and on

the reverse side of the banner is depicted the Madonna and Child. The

crowd becomes instantly bareheaded, and the Germans in it wisely take

off their hats, too. Polish patriots follow, dressed in white and

bearing aloft notice-boards wreathed in coloured cloths; on the

notice-boards are watchwords: "We will not give up our Silesia," on

others maps of the integral Poland showing the province of "Szlazk" in

red. Specimens of insurrectionaries follow these sign-bearers, and

they are dressed-up peasants and miners carrying scythes on poles; more

crowds, more cheers! The Polish Press leaps its headlines in jingoism.

Street politicians with bells bawl declamations across the many-headed.

Windows open on third-floors, and clouds of political leaflets are

scattered to the wind.

The same demonstrations with the same banners parade for days. On

Sunday there is a review in front of the Russian Cathedral, and a

French General pins decorations on Polish heroes. Great throngs in the

streets sing the Marseillaise bareheaded. Warsaw breathes in and

breathes out--hot air. Not all the Poles, however, share in this

excitement. There were many in Warsaw who looked on coldly at the

proceedings. "There is a Governmental claque that starts all these

demonstrations" said one of them. "You ought not to be deceived by

that any more than by the new posters on the walls every day.

Bill-stickers are sent out by the Government each night. The people do

not paste up these posters themselves. Most of us are in a desperate

plight trying to earn an honest living. The only way to get rich is to

work in with the administration and share in the spoil."

It is a common opinion that the low value of the mark (over 8,000 to

the pound sterling) is due to the Government printing it _ad libitum_

to meet its private ends. It is a gross scandal that the exchange

value should have so fallen. With such a currency it is doubtful

whether the present constitution of Poland can last. It already

isolates Poland economically from the rest of Europe, and she cannot

import goods even from Germany at such a rate. There is a vast, poor,

seedy, underfed population. Food is comparatively cheap, and the

peasant is evidently being quietly robbed, by giving him only a fifth

of the money-value of his products, but even so a tiny loaf of bread

costs twenty marks. There is butter. There is no sugar (at cafés

there is liquid saccharine and you pass the saccharine bottle from one

to another). An obligatory seventy-five mark dinner of two courses is

served at the restaurants, but the mass of the people live on bread and

sausage.

There has been a great exodus from the Ghetto to Russia, and Warsaw can

no longer be said to be a predominantly Jewish city. The dignified

Semite in his black gaberdine and low-crowned hat is now only an

occasional figure on the Jerozolimska and Nowy Swiat. And the poor

Jews of the slums are not multitudinous as they were. On the main

street various trans-Atlantic shipping companies have opened offices

and offer to book emigrants right through to the United States. These

offices from morning till evening are crammed with people trying to get

away from Poland. Here may be found, in addition to the local

population, a certain number of people from Soviet Russia who have

bribed the Polish officials and are trying to get to the land of

opportunity as Poles. The United States, however, looks very coldly on

these would-be citizens, be they Poles or Russians or Ukrainians or

Letts or Lithuanians, or any other nationality of these suspected parts

of Europe. The number of visas granted is now being cut down to a

three per cent of previous emigration basis.

An interesting diversion from politics was provided by a visit to the

Polish Theatre, where Shakespeare's "Kuplec Wenecki" was being

performed. The main interest was naturally in Shylock. The Polish

actors made very attractive Italian _signors_. Portia was a

full-bosomed Polish beauty, who, with a male voice, made a fine effect

as Doctor of Law. The Prince of Morocco and Shylock were, however,

ethnographical studies. The Moor roared and barked and cut about in

the air with his scimitar, and made the ladies scream and the audience

laugh. Shylock was deliciously over-studied. The daily life of Warsaw

was added to the grandeur of a rich Oriental merchant. Shylock's

cleverness and intellectual assurance were obscured by funniosities

such as a sing-song Potash-and-Perlmutter speech breaking into gabble,

finger-counting, and beard-stroking, lying flat in the street and

howling. But the audience appreciated this highly, and clapped only

Shylock.

It was otherwise an old-fashioned performance. The Polish stage seems

not to have developed very much. Polish literature has, however,

increased considerably, and there are many shops well stocked with new

Polish books. You seldom see a foreign book in a shop window. Russian

books seem almost entirely to have disappeared. Owing to the exchange

situation French and English books cost enormous numbers of marks.

A remarkable feature of the city's architecture today is the Russian

Cathedral, with its slate-coloured domes divested of gold and divested

of crosses, a mighty white stone building in the pride of place in the

city. Who is responsible for the damage it would be difficult to say.

Probably both Poles and Germans had something to do with it. The

Kolokolnaya is blown up. The walls of the cathedral stream externally

with pitch. Many of the frescoes inside have been damaged and the gold

ornaments taken away. It is a grand Orthodox interior, breathing the

spirit of Russia from every wall. It was regarded rather as a

calculated affront to Poland in the old days--as the Russian population

in Warsaw was not large. Now, however, a Roman Catholic altar has been

erected, chairs have been brought in. There is a holy-water basin at

the main entrance, an organ sounds forth from the choir's gallery, and

a Polish priest drones the Latin liturgy. Multitudes of Poles flock in

on Sunday morning, smiling, untroubled, unselfconscious; bowing,

kneeling on one knee, piously crossing themselves in Latin style. If

there are Russians in the congregation they make no sign. But what

they must be feeling!

The appropriation of the cathedral is, no doubt, justified. But there

is something in the coolness of it, in the hate of it and lack of tact

which breeds the opposite of Christian charity in human hearts. The

Slavs have much to learn. By the stealing of trains, the purloining of

cathedrals, and false pretensions to their neighbours' lands, the Poles

are showing that there is yet national tragedy ahead for them. They

will be deceived by some nations and slaughtered by others. What have

we raised her from the dead for--but to live again, to live and let

live. All have rejoiced in the risen Poland, even the old destroyers

of Poland--Germany, Russia, and Austria, all rejoiced until they

realized the nature of the phantom. The beautiful white eagle that

leapt from the tomb is a more sinister bird to-day, blood-ravenous, and

scanning far horizons.

EXTRA LEAVES

(iv) _On Nationality and an Armistice Baby_

The personal idea of nationality suffered some heavy blows in the war

and even heavier ones in the peace which followed. A mature Austrian

suddenly becomes a Czech, a Hungarian who knows only Magyar becomes a

Roumanian, a self-conscious Prussian is written into a Pole, and their

hearts are supposed to respond to new loyalties. The famous lines:

"Breathes there a man with soul so dead" have now a comical effect when

recited in some parts of Europe. Men are saying such absurd things as

"I am a German Czecho-Slovak," "I am a Polish Austrian Jew," "I am a

Russian Armenian Greek." A relief from the imbroglio of nationalism

might be found in the name of European with a higher loyalty to Europe

as a whole, but few have reached that stage of knowledge and feeling.

Asked at Ellis Island what his nationality was a gloomy gentleman from

Upper Silesia recently answered, "Plebiscite." And have there not been

many babies born whose nationality has remained long in doubt, pending

plebiscites and decisions of the Supreme Council? The plight of the

plebiscite baby is, however, eclipsed by that of the Armistice one.

The following true story was told me by H.M. Consul at Munich. He had

to decide the point at issue, or at least to take a decision upon it.

The difficulty was that of stating the nationality of a child born on a

ship at the time of the Armistice. The ship was a German one which had

been captured by the British. It had a British crew, but it was

bringing refugees from Murmansk, the Arctic port of Russia, to Reval on

the Baltic. It was flying the Neutrality flag. The ship, however, was

wrecked off the coast of Norway and was towed by a Danish boat into the

harbour of Stavanger. None of the refugees were allowed ashore but the

baby was born in the ship whilst it lay in the harbour. The parents

were Russian, but an attempt was made to get the British Consul at

Stavanger to register it as British. He refused. The English law is

that the flag decides nationality and in this case the flag was neutral.

A neutral baby has, therefore, appeared on the scene. It is a case for

the League of Nations to decide, We can only hope they will find it

possible to give it the status of a "good European."

LETTERS OF TRAVEL

XI. FROM MUNICH

The first day in Munich was marked by police inspection in bed. The

police come early to the hotels so as to catch people before they have

got up and gone out. The only people who are immune are Bavarians. If

you are a foreigner, even if you are a German from another part of

Germany--a Saxon, a Prussian, a Westphalian, it is all the same, you

must present yourself at the police-station and obtain permission to

reside in Munich. This means some hours in a stuffy room. You must

write a request for the permission in German and bring it some hours

later and answer the usual set of questions and be charged 150 marks.

I said I had not come to Germany to study the police system, and so by

dint of perseverance cut through half the formalities and the waiting

time and got away. An official wrote the request and even signed it

for me himself. Nowhere is red-tape more absurd than when it is being

wound by a defeated nation after a great war.

Bavaria is encouraged to think of herself as a separate country.

French policy foreshadows an independent State of Southern Catholics.

With that in view a French minister plenipotentiary has been sent to

Munich, and we British have just followed the French suit by appointing

our diplomatic representative also. Bavaria is not supposed to enter

into foreign relationships except through the Reich. To this Bavaria

has remained loyal. She has stood by the Reich even when the Reich has

protested an inability to control her. The appointment of the French

plenipotentiary was, therefore, taken as a calculated provocation and

the minister was accorded a very hostile greeting in the Press. This

annoyed him much, and he put it down, not to the general unpopularity

of French policy, but to the secret intrigue of the British who, as it

happens, are unusually intimate with Munich editors. The rivalry of

English and French in diplomatic action is as marked here as it is in

other capitals of Europe. Here, also, the natural antipathy which

French chauvinism arouses locally is thought to be aggravated by

British Intrigue. Our diplomats are given credit for being much more

active than they are.

As I have already intimated, France favours a mergence of Austria and

Bavaria in one State as a solution of Austria's economic problem.

Bavaria would like Austria to be added to Germany as a whole. It would

give the Catholic party a stronger voice in the Reich. But Bavaria has

up till now steadfastly refused to sacrifice the advantages of

belonging to the German confederation. British policy is not averse

from Austria joining Germany, but no active steps have been taken to

facilitate such an amalgamation. The treaty of Versailles practically

inhibits it, and Britain remains passively loyal to that inhibition.

The time may come when the French rivalry may enkindle our people to

action, but it will be because the questions at issue are not brought

forward into the light of ordinary publicity and discussed openly and

frankly. Secret diplomacy among allies means secret quarreling. Open

diplomacy, when _both_ sides are open, is much more conducive to

lasting loyalty and friendship.

I met in Munich several influential Bavarians, thanks to the

hospitality and keenness of our Consul-General there, Mr. Smallbones.

There was no ill-feeling of any kind towards English people, and,

indeed, I met with no insult or cold treatment either from the working

class or upper classes in Bavaria--only some surprise as at a rare

visitor. For there are extremely few English people there now. The

famous picture-galleries are still powerless to attract the American

art pilgrim, though that is due more to the difficulty of obtaining

permission to reside than to lack of interest in the collections.

Possibly next year the police may relent. The food shortage is not so

menacing. Moreover, the village of Ober-Ammergau proposes once more to

have its religious fête and stage the "Life of Christ." "Whether we

can have the play depends almost entirely on the Americans," say the

villagers. "The money of visitors alone makes the performance possible

to-day." There is talk, however, of an American film corporation

financing the "Passion-Spiel" if exclusive cinema rights can be

obtained. The war made a dire defeat of village talent, however.

Several sure to have been billed for sacred parts were killed or

crippled. Other prospective saints who served the Fatherland and came

through whole are letting their beards grow now. If the difficulties

are overcome and the play is performed, the sound of English will be no

longer unfamiliar in Bavaria's capital.

Before this possibly Munich will have been for a few weeks Europe's

storm-centre. The storm which broke in Budapest and then broke in

Poland and Silesia will surely break again in Munich. For it is there,

perhaps, that the destiny of Austria will be decided. For Bavaria is

the centre of the intrigue for the unification of Austria and Germany.

Concurrently the French are intriguing for their plan of an independent

Bavaria.

I was at pains to inquire the general opinion of educated people and

there seemed to be no separatism in Bavaria, no sentiment of the kind,

and there was apparently no Roman Catholic propaganda in favour of

Bavarian separatism. It is curious that whilst Slav States are ravaged

by all sorts of local Sinn-Feinism, the for-ourselves-alone-ism of

Slovaks, Croats, Montenegrins, Little Russians, and so forth, the

instinct of all the constituent Germanic nations is to stand together.

Teutonic solidarity is giving witness of itself in these days.

The grievances of the Tyrol were very strongly stated at a Munich

dinner-party, a Bavarian count averring that that part of the Tyrol

which had fallen to the dole of Italy was too strongly affiliated to

the part which remained in Austria. It was recognized, however, that

Italy was now friendly to Germany, and that no good part was likely to

be achieved by doing anything to alienate Italian sympathy. The

French, however, begin to count on some Italian support when the

Austro-German idea is put to the test. The experimental plebiscite

taken in the Tyrol was said to have been arranged from Munich. Its

astonishing success from a German point of view at once encouraged the

intrigue.

There was not much alarm on the subject of the "sanctions" which France

threatened to apply. The Bavarian is too lethargic, slow, and

easy-going to be readily frightened--in temperament he has little in

common with the high-spirited, nervous Prussian. Bavarians spoke of

Germany and Germany's war-debt with an aloofness as of neutrals. It

did not trouble them deeply. They were sceptical as to France's

ability to collect a huge indemnity. The fifty per cent tax they

regarded as an absurdity. "It is possible to ruin Germany, but it is

not possible to enslave her," was the common opinion.

"But in the event of the complete ruin of the rest of Germany, would it

not be to the advantage of Bavaria to accept the idea of a separate

State?" I argued.

"If France deprived Germany of coal by occupying the Ruhr basin and by

allowing the Poles to hold Upper Silesia, Bavaria would have to look

out for herself and make what arrangements she could," I was told. But

it was an unwilling admission.

In the French scheme of things that is when Bavaria's moment comes. At

one stage this May it seemed as if that moment were near, but now that

Germany has accepted the alternative plans of payment of reparations,

and the British Prime Minister has intervened on her behalf to stop the

Polish annexation, the moment does not seem so near. But a great

effort will doubtless yet be made to detach Bavaria from the rest.

Meanwhile, Bavaria took advantage of the intrigue to keep a territorial

army of a kind undemobilized. The reich could demobilize it at will,

but allows itself to appear helpless through Bavaria's independence.

The situation was not helped by the arrival of a young British

staff-officer, who said that the British Government sympathized with

Bavaria, believing that she needed what troops she had to keep off

Bolshevism. Eventually the pressure in Germany became so great that

Bavaria gave a verbal promise to disarm--though to what extent that

promise will be carried out must remain doubtful. Her militia is some

protection for herself in case of a political conspiracy such as that

of Korfanty in Silesia, but is no menace to any other neighbouring

power.

Bavaria affects to be in deadly, daily fear of Bolshevism. "Under the

shadow of the sanctions, Communism was developing strongly," said one.

Speaking of the Russians, "Perhaps we shall all come to it," said

another.

A rich Munich Jew, a cinema merchant, wanted to adopt a Vienna orphan.

He wrote to Vienna for a Jewish male child, well-authenticated as an

orphan; he did not want the parents to come and sponge on him in later

years. The child was brought to Munich. Presently application was

made to the police for an extra milk ration on account of the boy.

Then the police discovered the new arrival. "What!" said they, "living

here without a permit! Application for permission to reside must be

made at once."

Application was made and permission was refused. The reason given was

that the housing shortage in Munich was too great. But some one was at

pains to find out the real reason. It was that the boy was a Jew, and

who could say--in twenty years, educated in the best institutions of

Munich--he might become a Trotsky or a Bela Kun or Bavarian Eisner.

"But why not a Disraeli?" said some one who listened to the story.

Permission was eventually granted.

One attempt has been made to seize Munich for the proletariat, and the

comfortable Bavarian realized that whilst he has a never-failing

stomach for good brown beer he has no stomach for revolution. The

great city is a monument of bourgeois enterprise. Business is more

than politics, and social conviviality than either.

S---- drove me out to the valley of the Iser, "Iser rolling rapidly."

We went to Grunewald, we passed Ludendorf's villa, curious credulous

Ludendorf, who took Winston Churchill at his word when the later penned

his appeal to Germany in the "Evening News" to save Europe by fighting

the Bolsheviks, and prepared a plan whereby the German army was

reconstituted in the strength at which in 1918 it was dissolved. We

surveyed from the hurrying car a fine park-like country, rich and calm,

and sensibly remote from Europe's centre. It was a lovely springtide,

and new hope fallaciously decked Southern Germany, as if all trouble

were over and all had been forgiven. We walked, too, in the gardens of

the Nymphenburg Palace where the mad king used to play. We visited the

State Theatre, where Wagnerian opera still holds the patient ear, and

there we heard, not Wagner, but Shakespeare's "Lear," done in a

jog-trot, uninspired, later-Victorian style. One felt as if the

theatre had slept for thirty years and then, awakening, had resumed in

the same style as before. It is often said reproachfully in Germany

that Queen Victoria would never have made the late war, and that

Victorian England was much nearer to Germany. It was nearer to the

Germany of Queen Victoria's time. That is quite true.

England has gone on and become more European; her passion for

individual freedom and self-expression has steadily developed, whilst

Germany has remained submissively under the yoke of authority and

discipline. Germany, with all her learning and her industry, her

unstinted application, and her good parts, has become dull. There was

an enormous amount of dulness, genuine uninspired dulness, in the

Germans in the war. You can identify it now when you visit Germany in

peace.

LETTERS OF TRAVEL

XII. FROM BERLIN (I)

Old men and war-cripples as porters at the station, dirty streets

encumbered by hawkers and their wares, strings of pitiful beggars

shaking their hands and exposing mortified limbs--can this be Berlin,

Berlin the prim, the orderly, the clean? Something has happened here

in seven years, some sort of psychological change has been wrought in

the mind of a people. Here, as in some Slav countries, there are laws

and they are not kept, regulations and they are not observed. Unshaven

men and ill-washed women on the streets, and dowdy, hatless girls with

dirty hair crowding into cheap cinema theatres! A city that had no

slums and no poor in 1914 now becoming a slum _en bloc_. And the

litter on the roadways! You will not find its like in Warsaw. You

must seek comparisons in the Bowery of New York or that part of the

City of Westminster called Soho. The horse has come back to Berlin to

make up for loss of motors, and needs more scavengers to follow him

than the modern municipality can afford.

Not that Berlin has broken down in any way. It is the same great hive

of industrialism. Everyone is employed. More are employed than

before. The leisured class is smaller. All the workshops and

factories and offices are full. The shops display as many wares.

There is evidence of an enormous overflowing productivity. Cheap lines

of goods are run out in hawkers' barrows and auctioned on the pavement,

measures of cloth for suits, overcoats, soaps, stationery. Trams,

'buses, railways all are used to the last seat and standing-room. And

the working people are thinking about their work and their wages and

their homes and their beer--and not about the peace treaty and the

latest move of France for their destruction.

It is sad to see the broken-down old fellows as porters at the

railway-stations, panting with heavy trunks, and the same type among

gangs of navvies repairing the roads. They ought to be seated at home

with pipe and newspaper and easy slippers instead of earning a living

still as a drudge. It is a convention to give your bag to a porter at

a station, and in Germany you usually give it to a man much older and

weaker than yourself, and you are moved to help him to carry it as in

his infirmity he struggles along. What a contrast to the stalwart

porters of Prague, or Rome, or Brussels. Poor wights! It is they who

are paying for the war. Sightless soldiers led by little children come

selling you sticking-plaster in the restaurants. Germany is too poor

to care for them. It is they who are paying for the war. The drab,

many-headed middle class of Berlin with its poverty-stricken

breakfast-table, the old black bread of the war and no sugar and paper

table-cloths; the women going about the streets with great bundles on

their backs; the people making their 1918 clothes still do--they are

paying somewhat. You see Hugo Stinnes and his like with a suite of

rooms at the "Adlon," or driving luxuriously along the Unter den

Linden, the Kaiser way, without the dignity of a Kaiser. They are not

paying very much.

Europe—whither bound? (Quo vadis Europa?) · 第 8 / 13 段