CHAPTER VI

SPENT LOVES

I am going to see dear and affectionate friends. The train would take

me to them, that droll little _chemin de fer de ceinture_, and it

seems a pity to miss the Gare St. Lazare, its Sunday morning tumult of

Parisians starting with their mistresses and their wives for a

favourite suburb. I never run up these wide stairways leading to the

great wide galleries full of bookstalls (charming yellow notes), and

pierced with little _guichets_ painted round with blue, without

experiencing a sensation of happy lightness--a light-headedness that I

associate with the month of May in Paris. But the tramway that passes

through the Place de la Concorde goes as far as Passy, and though I

love the droll little _chemin de fer de ceinture_ I love this

tramway better. It speeds along the quays between the Seine and the

garden of the Champs Elysées, through miles of chestnut bloom, the

roadway chequered with shadows of chestnut leaves; the branches meet

overhead, and in a faint delirium of the senses I catch at a bloom,

cherish it for a moment, and cast it away. The plucky little

steamboats are making for the landing-places, stemming the current. I

love this sprightly little river better than the melancholy Thames,

along whose banks saturnine immoralities flourish like bulrushes!

Behold the white architecture, the pillars, the balustraded steps, the

domes in the blue air, the monumented swards! Paris, like all pagan

cities, is full of statues. A little later we roll past gardens,

gaiety is in the air.... And then the streets of Passy begin to

appear, mean streets, like London streets. I like them not; but the

railway station is compensation; the little railway station like a

house of cards under toy trees, and the train steaming out into the

fanciful country. The bright wood along which it speeds is like the

season's millinery.

It is pleasant to notice everything in Paris, the flymen asleep on

their box-seats, the little horses dozing beneath the chestnut trees,

the bloused workmen leaning over a green-painted table in an arbour,

drinking wine at sixteen sous the litre, the villas of Auteuil, rich

woodwork, rich iron railings, and the summer hush about villas

engarlanded. Auteuil is so French, its symbolism enchants me. Auteuil

is like a flower, its petals opening out to the kiss of the air, its

roots feeling for way among the rich earth. Ah, the land of France,

its vineyards and orchards, its earthly life! Thoughts come unbidden,

my thoughts sing together, and I hardly knowing what they are singing.

My thoughts are singing like the sun; do not ask me their meaning;

they mean as much and as little as the sun that I am part of--the

sun of France that I shall enjoy for thirty days. May takes me to dear

and affectionate friends who await me at Auteuil, and June takes me

away from them. There is the villa! And there amid the engarlanding

trees my friend, dressed in pale yellow, sits in front of his easel.

How the sunlight plays through the foliage, leaping through the rich,

long grass; and amid the rhododendrons in bloom sits a little girl of

four, his model, her frock and cap impossibly white under the great,

gaudy greenery.

Year after year the same affectionate welcome, the same spontaneous

welcome in this garden of rhododendrons and chestnut bloom. I would

linger in the garden, but I may not, for breakfast is ready _et il

ne faut pas faire manquer la messe à Madame. La messe_! How gentle

the word is, much gentler than our word, mass, and it shocks us hardly

at all to see an old lady going away in her carriage _pour entendre

la messe_. Religion purged of faith is a pleasant, almost a pretty

thing. Some fruits are better dried than fresh; religion is such a

one, and religion, when nothing is left of it but the pleasant,

familiar habit, may be defended, for were it not for our habits life

would be unrecorded, it would be all on the flat, as we would say if

we were talking about a picture without perspective. Our habits are

our stories, and tell whence we have come and how we came to be what

we are. This is quite a pretty reflection, but there is no time to

think the matter out--here is the doctor! He lifts his skull-cap, and

how beautiful is the gesture; his dignity is the dignity that only

goodness gives; and his goodness is a pure gift, existing independent

of formula, a thing in itself, like Manet's painting. It was Degas who

said, "A man whose profile no one ever saw," and the aphorism reminds

us of the beautiful goodness that floats over his face, a light from

Paradise. But why from Paradise? Paradise is an ugly ecclesiastical

invention, and angels are an ugly Hebrew invention. It is unpardonable

to think of angels in Auteuil; an angel is a prig compared to the dear

doctor, and an angel has wings. Well, so had this admirable chicken, a

bird that was grown for the use of the table, produced like a

vegetable. A dear bird that was never allowed to run about and weary

itself as our helpless English chicken is; it lived to get fat without

acquiring any useless knowledge or desire of life; it became a capon

in tender years, and then a pipe was introduced into its mouth and it

was fed by machinery until it could hardly walk, until it could only

stagger to its bed, and there it lay in happy digestion until the hour

came for it to be crammed again. So did it grow up without knowledge

or sensation or feeling of life, moving gradually, peacefully towards

its predestined end--a delicious repast! What better end, what greater

glory than to be a fat chicken? The carcasses of sheep that hang in

butchers' shops are beginning to horrify the conscience of Europe. To

cut a sheep's throat is an offensive act, but to clip out a bird's

tongue with a long pair of scissors made for the purpose is genteel.

It is true that it beats its wings for a few moments, but we must not

allow ourselves to be disturbed by a mere flutter of feathers. Man is

merciful, and saved it from life. It grew like an asparagus! And

talking of asparagus, here are some from Argenteuil thick as umbrellas

and so succulent! A word about the wine. French red wines in England

always seem to taste like ink, but in France they taste of the sun.

Melons are better in June--that one comes, no doubt, from Algeria. It

is, however, the kind I like best, the rich, red melon that one eats

only in France; a thing of the moment, unrememberable; but the chicken

will never be forgotten; twenty years hence I shall be talking of a

chicken, that in becoming a fat chicken acquired twenty years of

immortality--which of us will acquire as many?

As we rise from table the doctor calls me into his studio: for he

would give me an excellent cigar before he bids me good-bye, and

having lighted it I follow my friend to the studio at the end of the

garden, to that airy drawing-room which he has furnished in pale

yellow and dark blue. On the walls are examples of the great modern

masters--Manet and Monet. That view of a plain by Monet--is it not

facile? It flows like a Japanese water-colour: the low horizon

evaporating in the low light, the spire of the town visible in the

haze. And look at the celebrated "Leçon de Danse" by Degas--that

dancer descending the spiral staircase, only her legs are visible, the

staircase cutting the picture in twain. On the right is the dancing

class and the dancing master; something has gone wrong, and he holds

out his hands in entreaty; a group of dancers are seated on chairs in

the foreground, and their mothers are covering their shoulders with

shawls--good mothers anxious for their daughters' welfare, for their

advancement in life.

This picture betrays a mind curious, inquisitive and mordant; and that

plaid shawl is as unexpected as an adjective of Flaubert's. A portrait

by Manet hangs close by, large, permanent and mysterious as nature.

Degas is more intellectual, but how little is intellect compared with

a gift like Manet's! Yesterday I was in the Louvre, and when wearied

with examination and debate--I had gone there on a special errand--I

turned into the Salle Carrée for relaxation, and there wandered about,

waiting to be attracted. Long ago the Mona Liza was my adventure, and

I remember how Titian's "Entombment" enchanted me; another year I

delighted in the smooth impartiality of a Terbourg interior; but this

year Rembrandt's portrait of his wife held me at gaze. The face tells

of her woman's life, her woman's weakness, and she seems conscious of

the burden of her sex, and of the burden of her own special lot--she

is Rembrandt's wife, a servant, a satellite, a watcher. The emotion

that this picture awakens is an almost physical emotion. It gets at

you like music, like a sudden breath of perfume. When I approach, her

eyes fade into brown shadow, but when I withdraw they begin telling

her story. The mouth is no more than a little shadow, but what wistful

tenderness there is in it! and the colour of the face is white,

faintly tinted with bitumen, and in the cheeks some rose madder comes

through the yellow. She wears a fur jacket, but the fur was no trouble

to Rembrandt; he did not strive for realism. It is fur, that is

sufficient. Grey pearls hang in her ears, there is a brooch upon her

breast, and a hand at the bottom of the picture passing out of the

frame, and that hand reminds one, as the chin does, of the old story

that God took a little clay and made man out of it. That chin and that

hand and arm are moulded without display of knowledge, as Nature

moulds. The picture seems as if it had been breathed upon the canvas.

Did not a great poet once say that God breathed into Adam? and here it

is even so.

The other pictures seem dry, insignificant; the Mona Liza, celebrated

in literature, hanging a few feet away, seems factitious when compared

with this portrait; I have heard that tedious smile excused on the

ground that she is smiling at the nonsense she hears talked about her;

that hesitating smile which held my youth in tether has come to seem

but a grimace; and the pale mountains no more mysterious than a globe

or map seen from a little distance. The Mona Liza is a sort of riddle,

an acrostic, a poetical decoction, a ballade, a rondel, a villanelle

or ballade with double burden, a sestina, that is what it is like, a

sestina or chant royal. The Mona Liza, being literature in intention

rather than painting, has drawn round her many poets. We must forgive

her many mediocre verses for the sake of one incomparable prose

passage. She has passed out of that mysterious misuse of oil paint,

that arid glazing of _terre verte_, and has come into her

possession of eternal life, into the immortality of Pater's prose.

Degas is wilting already; year after year he will wither, until one

day some great prose writer will arise and transfer his spirit into

its proper medium--literature. The Mona Liza and the "Leçon de Danse"

are intellectual pictures; they were painted with the brains rather

than with the temperaments; and what is any intellect compared with a

gift like Manet's! Leonardo made roads; Degas makes witticisms.

Yesterday I heard one that delighted me far more than any road would,

for I have given up bicycling. Somebody was saying he did not like

Daumier, and Degas preserved silence for a long while. "If you were to

show Raphael," he said at last, "a Daumier, he would admire it, he

would take off his hat; but if you were to show him a Cabanel he would

say with a sigh 'That is my fault!'"

My reverie is broken by the piano; my friend is playing, and it is

pleasant to listen to music in this airy studio. But there are women I

must see, women whom I see every time I go to Paris, and too much time

has been spent in the studio--I must go.

But where shall I go? My thoughts strike through the little streets of

Passy, measuring the distance between Passy and the Arc de Triomphe.

For a moment I think that I might sit under the trees and watch the

people returning from the races. Were she not dead I might stop at her

little house in the fortifications among the lilac trees. There is her

portrait by Manet on the wall, the very toque she used to wear. How

wonderful the touch is; the beads--how well they are rendered! And

while thinking of the extraordinary handicraft I remember his studio,

and the tall fair woman like a tea-rose coming into it: Mary Laurant!

The daughter of a peasant, and the mistress of all the great

men--perhaps I should have said of all the distinguished men. I used

to call her _toute la lyre_.

The last time I saw her we talked about Manet. She said that every

year she took the first lilac to lay upon his grave. Is there one of

her many lovers who brings flowers to her grave? What was so

rememberable about her was her pleasure in life, and her desire to get

all the pleasure, and her consciousness of her desire to enjoy every

moment of her life. Evans, the great dentist, settled two thousand a

year upon her, and how angry he was one night on meeting Manet on the

staircase! In order to rid herself of her lover she invited him to

dinner, intending to plead a sick headache after dinner.... She must

go and lie down. But as soon as her guest was gone she took off the

_peignoir_ which hid her ball dress and signed to Manet, who was

waiting at the street corner, with her handkerchief. But as they went

downstairs together whom should they meet but the dentist _qui a

oublié ses carnets_. And he was so disappointed at meeting his

beautiful but deceitful mistress that he didn't visit her again for

three or four days. His anger mattered very little to Mary. Someone

else settled two thousand a year more upon her; and having four

thousand a year or thereabouts, she dedicated herself to the love and

conversation of those who wrote books and music and painted pictures.

We humans are more complicated than animals, and we love through the

imagination, at least the imagination stimulates the senses, acting as

a sort of adjuvant. The barmaid falls in love with No. 1 because he

wipes a glass better than No. 2, and Mary fell in love with Coppée on

account of his sonnet "Le Lys," and she grew indifferent when he wrote

poems like "La Nourrice" or "Le petit épicier de Montrouge qui cassait

le sucre avec mélancolie." And it was at this time when their love

story was at wane that I became a competitor. But one day Madame

Albazi came to Manet's studio, a splendid creature in a carriage drawn

by Russian horses from the Steppes, so she said; but who can tell

whether a horse comes from the Steppes or from the horse-dealers? Nor

does it matter when the lady is extraordinarily attractive, when she

inspires the thought--a mistress for Attila! That is not exactly how

Manet saw her: but she looks like that in his pastel. In it she holds

a tortoiseshell fan widespread across her bosom, and it was on one of

the sticks of the fan that he signed his name. A great painter always

knows where to sign his pictures, and he never signs twice in the same

place. The merit of these Russians is that they never leave one in

doubt. She could not sit that day, she was going to the Bois, and

asked me and a young man who happened to be in Manet's studio at the

time to go there with her, and we went there drawn by the Russian

horses, the young man and I wondering all the while which was going to

be the countess's lover; we played hard for her; but that day I was

wiser than he; I let him talk and recite poetry and jingle out all the

aphorisms that he had been collecting for years, feeling his

witticisms were in vain, for she was dark as a raven and I was as gold

as a sunflower. It was at the corner of the Rue Pontière that we got

rid of him. Some days afterwards she sat to Manet. The pastel now

hangs in the room of a friend of mine; I bought it for him.

The picture of a woman one knows is never so agreeable a companion as

the picture of a woman one has never seen. One's memory and the

painter's vision are in conflict, and I like to think better of the

long delicate nose, and the sparkling eyes, and a mouth like red

fruit. The pastel once belonged to me; it used to hang in my rooms;

for with that grace of mind which never left him, Manet said one day,

"I always promised you a picture," and searching among the pastels

that lined the wall he turned to me saying, "Now I think that this

comes to you by right." When I left Paris hurriedly, and left my

things to be sold, the countess came to the sale and bought her

picture, and then she sold it years afterwards to a picture-dealer,

tempted by the price that Manet's pictures were fetching. Hearing that

it was for sale, I bought it, as I have said, for a friend. And now I

have told the whole story, forgetting nothing except that it was years

afterwards, when I had written "Les Confessions d'un jeune Anglais" in

the _Revue Indépendante_, that Mary Laurant asked me--oh! she was

very enterprising; she sent the editor of the _Revue_ to me; an

appointment was made. She was wonderful in the garden. She said the

moment I arrived, "Now, my dear ----, you must go," and we walked

about, I listening to her aphorisms. Mary was beautiful, but she liked

one to love her for her wit, to admire her wit; and when I asked her

why she did not leave Evans, the great dentist, she said, "That would

be a base thing to do. I content myself by deceiving him," and

then--this confidence seemed to have a particular significance--"I am

not a woman," she said, "that is made love to in a garden." Her garden

was a nook at the fortifications, hidden among lilac bushes. She

wished to show me her house, and we talked for a long time in her

boudoir. But I knew she was Mallarmé's mistress at the time, so

nothing came of this _caprice littéraire_.

My thoughts run upon women, and why not? On what would you have them

run? on copper mines? Woman is the legitimate subject of all men's

thoughts. We pretend to be interested in other things. In the

smoking-rooms I have listened to men talking about hunting, and I have

said to myself, "Your interest is a pretence: of what woman are you

thinking?" We forget women for a little while when we are thinking

about art, but only for a while. The legitimate occupation of man's

mind is woman; and listening to my friend who is playing music--music

I do not care to hear, Brahms--I fall to thinking which of the women I

have known in years past would interest me most to visit.

In the spring weather the walk from Passy to the Champs Elysées would

be pleasant and not too far; I like to see the swards and the poplars

and the villas, the tall iron railings, and the flower vases hidden in

bouquets of trees. These things are Paris; the mind of the country,

that mind which comes out of a long past, and which may be defined as

a sort of ancestral beauty and energy is manifested everywhere in

Paris; and a more beautiful day for seeing the tall, white houses and

the villas and the trees and the swards can hardly be imagined. I

should be interested in all these things, but my real interest would

be in one little hillside, a line of houses, eight or nine, close by

the Arc de Triomphe, the most ordinary in the avenue. She liked the

ordinary, and I have often wondered what was the link of association?

Was it no more than her blonde hair drawn up from the neck, her

fragrant skin, or her perverse subtle senses? It was something more,

but you must not ask me to explain further. I like to remember the

rustle of a flowered dress she wore as she moved, drifting like a

perfume, passing from her frivolous bedroom into the drawing-room. A

room without taste, stiff and middle-class, notwithstanding the crowns

placed over the tall portraits. I see a picture of two children; but

she is the fairer, and in her pale eyes and thinly-curved lips there

is a mixture of yearning and restlessness. As the child was, so is the

woman, and Georgette has lived to paper one entire wall of her bedroom

with trophies won in the battlefields of ardently danced cotillons.

The other child is of a stricter nature, and even in the picture her

slightly darkened ringlets are less wanton than her sister's. Her eyes

are more pensive, and any one could have predicted children for one

and cotillon favours for the other.

We often sat on her bedroom balcony reading, talking, or watching the

sky growing pale beyond Mount Valerian, the shadow drifting and

defining and shaping the hill. In hours like the present, dreaming in

a studio, we remember those who deceived us, those who made us suffer,

and in these hours faces, fragments of faces, rise out of a past, the

line of a bent neck, the whiteness of a hand, and the eyes. I remember

her eyes; one day in an orchard, in the lush and luxuriance of June,

her husband was walking in front with a friend, and I was pleading.

"Well," she said, raising her eyes, "you can kiss me now." But her

husband was in front, and he was a thick-set man, and there was a

stream, and I foresaw a struggle--and an unpleasant one: confess and

be done with it!--I didn't dare to kiss her, and I don't think she

ever forgave me that lack of courage. All this is twenty years ago,

and is it not silly to spend the afternoon thinking of such rubbish?

But it is of such rubbish that our lives are made. Shall I go to her

now and see her in her decadence? Grey hair has not begun to appear

yet in the blonde, it will never turn grey, but she was shrivelling a

little the last time I saw her. And next year she will be older. At

her age a year counts for double. Others are more worthy of a visit.

If I do not go to her this year, shall I go next?

In imagination I go past her house, thinking of a man she used to talk

about, "the man she left her 'ome for"; that is how the London street

girl would word it. He had been the centre of a disgraceful scandal in

his old age, a sordid but characteristic end for the Don Juan of the

nineteenth century. Perhaps she loved the big, bearded man whose

photograph she had once shown me. He killed himself for not having

enough money to live as he wished to live. That was her explanation. I

think there was some blackmail; she had to pay some money to the dead

man's relations for letters. These sensual American women are like

orchids, and who would hesitate between an orchid and a rose? It was

twenty years ago since she turned round on me in the gloom of her

brougham unexpectedly, and it was as if some sensual spirit had come

out of a world of perfume and lace.

* * * * *

In imagination I have descended the Champs Elysées, and have crossed

the Place de la Concorde, and the Seine is flowing past just as it

flowed when the workmen were building Notre Dame, just as it will flow

a thousand years hence. A thousand years hence men will stand watching

its current, thinking of little blonde women, and the shudder they can

send through the flesh; they can, but not twenty years afterwards. The

Reverend Donne has it that certain ghosts do not raise the hair but

the flesh; mine do no more than to set me thinking that rivers were

not created to bear ships to the sea, but to set our memories flowing.

Full many a time have I crossed the Pont Neuf on my way to see another

woman--an American! The time comes when desire wilts and dies, but the

sexual interest never dies, and we take pleasure in thinking in middle

life of those we enjoyed in youth. She, of whom I am thinking, lives

far away in the Latin Quarter, in an ill-paven street. How it used to

throw my carriage from side to side! I have been there so often that I

know all the shops, and where the shops end, and there is a

whitewashed wall opposite her house; the street bends there. The

_concierge_ is the same, a little thicker, a little heavier; she

always used to have a baby in her arms, now there are no more babies;

her children, I suppose, have grown up and have gone away. There used

to be a darkness at the foot of the stairs, and I used to slip on

those stairs, so great was my haste; the very tinkle of the bell I

remember, and the trepidation with which I waited.

Her rooms looked as if they had never been sat in; even the studio was

formal, and the richly-bound volumes on the tables looked as if they

had never been opened. She only kept one servant, a little, redheaded

girl, and seeing this girl back again after an absence of many years,

I spoke to Lizzie of the old days. Lizzie told me her servant's story.

She had gone away to be married, and after ten years of misfortune she

had returned to her old mistress, this demure, discreet and sly New

Englander, who concealed a fierce sensuality under a homely

appearance. Lizzie must have had many lovers, but I knew nothing of

her except her sensuality, for she had to let me into that secret.

She was a religious woman, a devout Protestant, and thinking of her my

thoughts are carried across the sea, and I am in the National Gallery

looking at Van Eyke's picture, studying the grave sensuality of the

man's face--he speaks with uplifted hand like one in a pulpit, and the

gesture and expression tell us as plainly as if we heard him that he

is admonishing his wife (he is given to admonition), informing her

that her condition--her new pregnancy--is an act of the Divine Will.

She listens, but how curiously! with a sort of partial comprehension

afloat upon her face, more of the guinea-pig than of the rabbit type.

The twain are sharply differentiated, and one of the objects of the

painter seems to have been to show us how far one human being may be

removed from another. The husband is painfully clear to himself, the

wife is happily unconscious of herself. Now everything in the picture

suggests order; the man's face tells a mind the same from day to day,

from year to year, the same passions, the same prayers; his apparel,

the wide-brimmed hat, the cloak falling in long straight folds, the

peaked shoon, are an habitual part of him. We see little of the room,

but every one remembers the chandelier hanging from the ceiling

reflected in the mirror opposite. These reflections have lasted for

three hundred years; they are the same to-day as the day they were

painted, and so is the man; he lives again, he is a type that Nature

never wearies of reproducing, for I suppose he is essential to life.

This sober Flemish interior expresses my mistress's character almost

as well as her own apartment used to do. I always experienced a chill,

a sense of formality, when the door was opened, and while I stood

waiting for her in the prim drawing-room. Every chair was in its

appointed place, large, gilt-edged, illustrated books lay upon the

tables.... There was not much light in her rooms; heavy curtains clung

about the windows, and tapestries covered the walls. In the passage

there were oak chests, and you can imagine, reader, this woman waiting

for me by an oak table, a little ashamed of her thoughts, but unable

to overcome them. Once I heard her playing the piano, and it struck me

as an affectation. As I let my thoughts run back things forgotten

emerge; here comes one of her gowns! a dark-green gown, the very same

olive green as the man's cloak. She wore her hair short like a boy's,

and though it ran all over her head in little curls, it did not

detract at all from the New England type, the woman in whose speech

Biblical phraseology still lingers. Lizzie was a miraculous survival

of the Puritans who crossed the Atlantic in the _Mayflower_ and

settled in New England. Paris had not changed her. She was _le grave

Puritan du tableau_. The reader will notice that I write _le

grave Puritan_, for of his submissive, childlike wife there was

nothing in Lizzie except her sex. As her instinct was in conflict with

her ideals, her manner was studied, and she affected a certain

cheerfulness which she dared not allow to subside. She never

relinquished her soul, never fell into confidence, so in a sense we

always remained strangers, for it is when lovers tell their illusions

and lonelinesses that they know each other, the fiercest spasm tells

us little, and it is forgotten, whereas the moment when a woman sighs

and breaks into a simple confidence is remembered years afterwards,

and brings her before us though she be underground or a thousand miles

away. These intimacies she had not, but there was something true and

real in her, something which I cannot find words to express to-day;

she was a clever woman, that was it, and that is why I pay her the

homage of an annual visit. These courteous visits began twenty years

ago; they are not always pleasant, yet I endure them. Our conversation

is often laboured, there are awkward and painful pauses, and during

these pauses we sit looking at each other, thinking no doubt of the

changes that time has wrought. One of her chief charms was her

figure--one of the prettiest I have ever seen--and she still retains a

good deal of its grace. But she shows her age in her hands; they have

thickened at the joints, and they were such beautiful hands. Last year

she spoke of herself as an old woman, and the remark seemed to me

disgraceful and useless, for no man cares to hear a woman whom he has

loved call herself old; why call attention to one's age, especially

when one does not look it? and last year she looked astonishingly

young for fifty-five; that was her age, she said. She asked me my age;

the question was unpleasant, and before I was aware of it I had told

her a lie, and I hate those who force me to tell lies. The interview

grew painful, and to bring it to a close she asked me if I would care

to see her husband.

We found the old man alone in his studio, looking at an engraving

under the light of the lamp, much more like a picture than any of his

paintings. She asked him if he remembered me, and he got up muttering

something, and to help him I mentioned that I had been one of his

pupils. The dear old man said of course he remembered, and that he

would like to show me his pictures, but Lizzie said--I suppose it was

nervousness that made her say it, but it was a strangely tactless

remark--"I don't think, dear, that Mr. ---- cares for your pictures."

However celebrated one may be, it is always mortifying to hear that

some one, however humble the person may be, does not care for one's

art. But I saved the situation, and I think my remarks were judicious

and witty. It is not always that one thinks of the right words at the

right moment, but it would be hard to improve on the admonition that

she did me a wrong, that, like every one who liked art, I had changed

my opinion many times, but after many wanderings had come back to the

truth, and in order to deceive the old man I spoke of Ingres. I had

never failed in that love, and how could I love Ingres without loving

him? The contrary was the truth, but the old man's answer was very

sweet. Forgetful of his own high position, he answered, "We may both

like Ingres, but it is not probable that we like the same Ingres." I

said I did not know any Ingres I did not admire, and asked him which

he admired, and we had a pleasant conversation about the Apotheosis of

Homer, and the pictures in the Musée de Montauban. Then the old man

said, "I must show Mr. ---- my pictures." No doubt he had been

thinking of them all through the conversation about the Musée de

Montauban. "I must show you my Virgin," and he explained that the face

of the Infant Jesus was not yet finished.

It was wonderful to see this old man, who must have been nearly

eighty, taking the same interest in his pictures as he took fifty

years ago. Some stupid reader will think, perchance, that it mattered

that I had once loved his wife. But how could such a thing matter?

Think for a moment, dear reader, for all readers are dear, even the

stupidest, and you will see that you are still entangled in

conventions and prejudices. Perhaps, dear reader, you think she and I

should have dropped on our knees and confessed. Had we done so, he

would have thought us two rude people, and nothing more.

What will happen to her when he dies? Will she return to Boston? Shall

I ever see her again? Last year I vowed that I would not, and I think

it would please her as well if I stayed away.... And she is right, for

so long as I am not by her she is with me. But in the same room, amid

the familiar furniture, we are divided by the insuperable past, and to

retain her I must send her away. The idea is an amusing one; I think I

have read it somewhere, it seems to me like something I have read. Did

I ever read of a man who sent his mistress away so that his possession

might be more complete? Whether I did or didn't matters little, the

idea is true to me to-day--in order to possess her I must never see

her again. A pretty adventure it would be, nevertheless, to spend a

week paying visits to those whom I loved about that time; and I can

imagine a sort of Beau Brummel of the emotions going every year to

Paris to spend a day with each of his mistresses.

There were others about that time. There was Madame ----. The name is

in itself beautiful, characteristically French, and it takes me back

to the middle centuries, to the middle of France. I always imagined

that tall woman, who thought so quickly and spoke so sincerely,

dealing out her soul rapidly, as one might cards, must have been born

near Tours. She was so French that she must have come from the very

heart of France; she was French as the wine of France; as Balzac, who

also came from Tours; and her voice, and her thoughts, and her words

transported one; by her side one was really in France; and, as her

lover, one lived through every circumstance of a French love story.

She lived in what is called in Paris an hotel; it had its own

_concierge_, and it was nice to hear the man say, "Oui, monsieur,

Madame la Marquise est chez elle," to walk across a courtyard and wait

in a boudoir stretched with blue silk, to sit under a Louis XVI. rock

crystal chandelier. She said one day, "I'm afraid you're thinking of

me a great deal," and she leaned her hands on the back of the chair,

making it easy for me to take them. She said her hands had not done

any kitchen work for five hundred years, and at the time that seemed a

very witty thing to say. The drawing-room opened onto a conservatory

twenty feet high; it nearly filled the garden, and the marquise used

to receive her visitors there. I do not remember who was the

marquise's lover when the last fête was given, nor what play was

acted; only that the ordinary guests lingered over their light

refreshments, scenting the supper, and that to get rid of them we had

to bid the marquise ostentatiously goodnight. Creeping round by the

back of the house, we gained the bedrooms by the servants' staircase,

and hid there until the ordinary guests in decency could delay no

longer. As soon as the last one was gone the stage was removed, and

the supper tables were laid out. Shall I ever forget the moment when

the glass roof of the conservatory began to turn blue, and the

shrilling of awakening sparrows! How haggard we all were, but we

remained till eight in the morning. That fête was paid for with the

last remnant of the poor marquise's fortune. Afterwards she was very

poor, and Suzanne, her daughter, went on the stage and discovered a

certain talent for acting which has been her fortune to this day. I

will go to the Vaudeville to-night to see her; we might arrange to go

together to see her mother's grave. To visit the grave, and to strew

azaleas upon it, would be a pretty piece of sentimental mockery. But

for my adventure there should be seven visits; Madame ---- would make

a fourth; I hear that she is losing her sight, and lives in a chateau

about fifty miles from Paris, a chateau built in the time of Louis

XIII., with high-pitched roofs and many shutters, and formal gardens

with balustrades and fish-ponds, yes _et des charmilles--charmilles_--what

is that in English?--avenues of clipped limes. To walk in an avenue

of clipped limes with a woman who is nearly blind, and talk to her of the

past, would be indeed an adventure far "beyond the range of formal man's

emotion."

Madame ---- interrupted our love story. She would be another--that

would be five--and I shall think of two more during dinner. But now I

must be moving on; the day has ended; Paris is defining itself upon a

straw-coloured sky. I must go, the day is done; and hearing the last

notes trickle out--somebody has been playing the prelude to

"Tristan"--I say: "Another pretty day passed, a day of meditation on

art and women--and what else is there to meditate about? To-morrow

will happily be the same as to-day, and to-morrow I shall again

meditate on art and women, and the day after I shall be occupied with

what I once heard dear old M'Cormac, Bishop of Galway, describe in his

sermon as 'the degrading passion of "loave."'"

Memoirs of My Dead Life · 第 6 / 14 章