And afterwards, in a letter to Mrs. Thrale,--

'Since you cannot guess, I will tell you, that the generous man was

Gerard Hamilton. I returned him a very thankful and respectful

letter[761].'

I applied to Mr. Hamilton, by a common friend, and he has been so

obliging as to let me have Johnson's letter to him upon this occasion,

to adorn my collection.

'To THE RIGHT HONOURABLE WILLIAM GERARD HAMILTON.

'DEAR SIR,

'Your kind enquiries after my affairs, and your generous offers, have

been communicated to me by Dr. Brocklesby. I return thanks with great

sincerity, having lived long enough to know what gratitude is due to

such friendship; and entreat that my refusal may not be imputed to

sullenness or pride. I am, indeed, in no want. Sickness is, by the

generosity of my physicians, of little expence to me. But if any

unexpected exigence should press me, you shall see, dear Sir, how

cheerfully I can be obliged to so much liberality.

'I am, Sir,

Your most obedient

And most humble servant,

SAM. JOHNSON.'

'November, 19, 1783[762].'

I find in this, as in former years, notices of his kind attention to

Mrs. Gardiner[763], who, though in the humble station of a

tallow-chandler upon Snow-hill, was a woman of excellent good sense,

pious, and charitable. She told me, she had been introduced to him by

Mrs. Masters[764], the poetess, whose volumes he revised, and, it is

said, illuminated here and there with a ray of his own genius. Mrs.

Gardiner was very zealous for the support of the Ladies' charity-school,

in the parish of St. Sepulchre. It is confined to females; and, I am

told, it afforded a hint for the story of _Betty Broom_ in _The

Idler_[765]. Johnson this year, I find, obtained for it a sermon from

the late Bishop of St. Asaph, Dr. Shipley, whom he, in one of his

letters to Mrs. Thrale[766], characterises as 'knowing and conversible;'

and whom all who knew his Lordship, even those who differed from him in

politicks, remember with much respect[767].

The Earl of Carlisle having written a tragedy, entitled _The Fathers

Revenge_[768], some of his Lordship's friends applied to Mrs.

Chapone[769] to prevail on Dr. Johnson to read and give his opinion of

it[770], which he accordingly did, in a letter to that lady. Sir Joshua

Reynolds having informed me that this letter was in Lord Carlisle's

possession, though I was not fortunate enough to have the honour of

being known to his Lordship, trusting to the general courtesy of

literature, I wrote to him, requesting the favour of a copy of it, and

to be permitted to insert it in my _Life of Dr. Johnson_. His Lordship

was so good as to comply with my request, and has thus enabled me to

enrich my work with a very fine piece of writing, which displays both

the critical skill and politeness of my illustrious friend; and perhaps

the curiosity which it will excite, may induce the noble and elegant

Authour to gratify the world by the publication[771] of a performance,

of which Dr. Johnson has spoken in such terms.

'To MRS. CHAPONE.

'MADAM,

'By sending the tragedy to me a second time[772], I think that a very

honourable distinction has been shewn me, and I did not delay the

perusal, of which I am now to tell the effect.

'The construction of the play is not completely regular; the stage is

too often vacant, and the scenes are not sufficiently connected. This,

however, would be called by Dryden only a mechanical defect[773]; which

takes away little from the power of the poem, and which is seen rather

than felt.

'A rigid examiner of the diction might, perhaps, wish some words

changed, and some lines more vigorously terminated. But from such petty

imperfections what writer was ever free?

'The general form and force of the dialogue is of more importance. It

seems to want that quickness of reciprocation which characterises the

English drama, and is not always sufficiently fervid or animated.

'Of the sentiments I remember not one that I wished omitted. In the

imagery I cannot forbear to distinguish the comparison of joy succeeding

grief to light rushing on the eye accustomed to darkness. It seems to

have all that can be desired to make it please. It is new, just, and

delightful[774].

'With the characters, either as conceived or preserved, I have no fault

to find; but was much inclined to congratulate a writer, who, in

defiance of prejudice and fashion, made the Archbishop a good man, and

scorned all thoughtless applause, which a vicious churchman would have

brought him.

'The catastrophe is affecting. The Father and Daughter both culpable,

both wretched, and both penitent, divide between them our pity and

our sorrow.

'Thus, Madam, I have performed what I did not willingly undertake, and

could not decently refuse. The noble writer will be pleased to remember,

that sincere criticism ought to raise no resentment, because judgement

is not under the controul of will; but involuntary criticism, as it has

still less of choice, ought to be more remote from possibility

of offence.

'I am, &c.,

'SAM. JOHNSON.'

'November 28, 1783.'

I consulted him on two questions of a very different nature: one,

whether the unconstitutional influence exercised by the Peers of

Scotland in the election of the representatives of the Commons[775], by

means of fictitious qualifications, ought not to be resisted;--the

other, What, in propriety and humanity, should be done with old horses

unable to labour. I gave him some account of my life at Auchinleck: and

expressed my satisfaction that the gentlemen of the county had, at two

publick meetings, elected me their _Praeses_ or Chairman[776].

'To JAMES BOSWELL, ESQ.

'DEAR SIR,

'Like all other men who have great friends, you begin to feel the pangs

of neglected merit; and all the comfort that I can give you is, by

telling you that you have probably more pangs to feel, and more neglect

to suffer. You have, indeed, begun to complain too soon; and I hope I

am the only confidant of your discontent. Your friends have not yet had

leisure to gratify personal kindness; they have hitherto been busy in

strengthening their ministerial interest[777]. If a vacancy happens in

Scotland, give them early intelligence; and as you can serve Government

as powerfully as any of your probable competitors, you may make in some

sort a warrantable claim.

'Of the exaltations and depressions of your mind you delight to talk,

and I hate to hear. Drive all such fancies from you.

'On the day when I received your letter, I think, the foregoing page was

written; to which, one disease or another has hindered me from making

any additions. I am now a little better. But sickness and solitude press

me very heavily. I could bear sickness better, if I were relieved from

solitude[778].

'The present dreadful confusion of the publick[779] ought to make you

wrap yourself up in your hereditary possessions, which, though less than

you may wish, are more than you can want; and in an hour of religious

retirement return thanks to GOD, who has exempted you from any strong

temptation to faction, treachery, plunder[780], and disloyalty.

'As your neighbours distinguish you by such honours as they can bestow,

content yourself with your station, without neglecting your profession.

Your estate and the Courts will find you full employment; and your mind,

well occupied, will be quiet.

'The usurpation of the nobility, for they apparently usurp all the

influence they gain by fraud and misrepresentation, I think it certainly

lawful, perhaps your duty, to resist. What is not their own they have

only by robbery.

'Your question about the horses gives me more perplexity. I know not

well what advice to give you. I can only recommend a rule which you do

not want;--give as little pain as you can. I suppose that we have a

right to their service while their strength lasts; what we can do with

them afterwards I cannot so easily determine. But let us consider.

Nobody denies that man has a right first to milk the cow, and to sheer

the sheep, and then to kill them for his table. May he not, by parity of

reason, first work a horse, and then kill him the easiest way, that he

may have the means of another horse, or food for cows and sheep? Man is

influenced in both cases by different motives of self-interest. He that

rejects the one must reject the other.

'I am, &c.

'SAM. JOHNSON.'

'London, Dec. 24, 1783.'

'A happy and pious Christmas; and many happy years to you, your lady,

and children.'

The late ingenious Mr. Mickle[781], some time before his death, wrote me

a letter concerning Dr. Johnson, in which he mentions,--

'I was upwards of twelve years acquainted with him, was frequently in

his company, always talked with ease to him, and can truly say, that I

never received from him one rough word.'

In this letter he relates his having, while engaged in translating the

_Lusiad_, had a dispute of considerable length with Johnson, who, as

usual, declaimed upon the misery and corruption of a sea life, and used

this expression:--'It had been happy for the world, Sir, if your hero

Gama, Prince Henry of Portugal, and Columbus, had never been born, or

that their schemes had never gone farther than their own imaginations.'

'This sentiment, (says Mr. Mickle,) which is to be found in his

_Introduction to the World displayed_[782], I, in my Dissertation

prefixed to the _Lusiad_, have controverted; and though authours are

said to be bad judges of their own works[783], I am not ashamed to own

to a friend, that that dissertation is my favourite above all that I

ever attempted in prose. Next year, when the Lusiad was published, I

waited on Dr. Johnson, who addressed me with one of his good-humoured

smiles:--"Well, you have remembered our dispute about Prince Henry, and

have cited me too. You have done your part very well indeed: you have

made the best of your argument; but I am not convinced yet."

'Before publishing the _Lusiad_, I sent Mr. Hoole a proof of that part

of the introduction, in which I make mention of Dr. Johnson, yourself,

and other well-wishers to the work, begging it might be shewn to Dr.

Johnson. This was accordingly done; and in place of the simple mention

of him which I had made, he dictated to Mr. Hoole the sentence as it now

stands[784].

'Dr. Johnson told me in 1772, that, about twenty years before that time,

he himself had a design to translate the _Lusiad_, of the merit of which

he spoke highly, but had been prevented by a number of other

engagements.'

Mr. Mickle reminds me in this letter of a conversation, at dinner one

day at Mr. Hoole's with Dr. Johnson, when Mr. Nicol the King's

bookseller and I attempted to controvert the maxim, 'better that ten

guilty should escape, than one innocent person suffer;' and were

answered by Dr. Johnson with great power of reasoning and eloquence. I

am very sorry that I have no record of that day[785]: but I well

recollect my illustrious friend's having ably shewn, that unless civil

institutions insure protection to the innocent, all the confidence which

mankind should have in them would be lost.

I shall here mention what, in strict chronological arrangement, should

have appeared in my account of last year; but may more properly be

introduced here, the controversy having not been closed till this. The

Reverend Mr. Shaw[786], a native of one of the Hebrides, having

entertained doubts of the authenticity of the poems ascribed to Ossian,

divested himself of national bigotry; and having travelled in the

Highlands and Islands of Scotland, and also in Ireland, in order to

furnish himself with materials for a _Gaelick Dictionary_, which he

afterwards compiled[787], was so fully satisfied that Dr. Johnson was in

the right upon the question, that he candidly published a pamphlet,

stating his conviction and the proofs and reasons on which it was

founded. A person at Edinburgh, of the name of Clark, answered this

pamphlet with much zeal, and much abuse of its authour. Johnson took Mr.

Shaw under his protection, and gave him his assistance in writing a

reply, which has been admired by the best judges, and by many been

considered as conclusive. A few paragraphs, which sufficiently mark

their great Authour, shall be selected:--

'My assertions are, for the most part, purely negative: I deny the

existence of Fingal, because in a long and curious peregrination through

the Gaelick regions I have never been able to find it. What I could not

see myself I suspect to be equally invisible to others; and I suspect

with the more reason, as among all those who have seen it no man

can shew it.

'Mr. Clark compares the obstinacy of those who disbelieve the

genuineness of Ossian to a blind man, who should dispute the reality of

colours, and deny that the British troops are cloathed in red. The blind

man's doubt would be rational, if he did not know by experience that

others have a power which he himself wants: but what perspicacity has

Mr. Clark which Nature has withheld from me or the rest of mankind?

'The true state of the parallel must be this. Suppose a man, with eyes

like his neighbours, was told by a boasting corporal, that the troops,

indeed, wore red clothes for their ordinary dress, but that every

soldier had likewise a suit of black velvet, which he put on when the

King reviews them. This he thinks strange, and desires to see the fine

clothes, but finds nobody in forty thousand men that can produce either

coat or waistcoat. One, indeed, has left them in his chest at Port

Mahon; another has always heard that he ought to have velvet clothes

somewhere; and a third has heard somebody say, that soldiers ought to

wear velvet. Can the enquirer be blamed if he goes away believing that a

soldier's red coat is all that he has?

'But the most obdurate incredulity may be shamed or silenced by acts. To

overpower contradictions, let the soldier shew his velvet-coat, and the

Fingalist the original of Ossian[788].

'The difference between us and the blind man is this:--the blind man is

unconvinced, because he cannot see; and we, because though we can see,

we find that nothing can be shown.'

Notwithstanding the complication of disorders under which Johnson now

laboured, he did not resign himself to despondency and discontent, but

with wisdom and spirit endeavoured to console and amuse his mind with as

many innocent enjoyments as he could procure. Sir John Hawkins has

mentioned the cordiality with which he insisted that such of the members

of the old club in Ivy-lane[789] as survived, should meet again and dine

together, which they did, twice at a tavern and once at his house[790]:

and in order to insure himself society in the evening for three days in

the week[791], he instituted a club at the Essex Head, in Essex-street,

then kept by Samuel Greaves, an old servant of Mr. Thrale's.

'To SIR JOSHUA REYNOLDS.

'DEAR SIR,

'It is inconvenient to me to come out, I should else have waited on you

with an account of a little evening Club which we are establishing in

Essex-street, in the Strand, and of which you are desired to be one. It

will be held at the Essex Head, now kept by an old servant of Thrale's.

The company is numerous, and, as you will see by the list,

miscellaneous. The terms are lax, and the expences light. Mr. Barry was

adopted by Dr. Brocklesby, who joined with me in forming the plan. We

meet thrice a week, and he who misses forfeits two-pence[792].

'If you are willing to become a member, draw a line under your name.

Return the list. We meet for the first time on Monday at eight.'

'I am, &c.

'SAM. JOHNSON.'

'Dec. 4, 1783.'

It did not suit Sir Joshua to be one of this Club. But when I mention

only Mr. Daines Barrington, Dr. Brocklesby, Mr. Murphy, Mr. John

Nichols, Mr. Cooke, Mr. Joddrel, Mr. Paradise, Dr. Horsley, Mr.

Windham[793], I shall sufficiently obviate the misrepresentation of it

by Sir John Hawkins, as if it had been a low ale-house association, by

which Johnson was degraded[794]. Johnson himself, like his namesake Old

Ben[795], composed the Rules of his Club[796].

In the end of this year he was seized with a spasmodick asthma of such

violence, that he was confined to the house in great pain, being

sometimes obliged to sit all night in his chair, a recumbent posture

being so hurtful to his respiration, that he could not endure lying in

bed; and there came upon him at the same time that oppressive and fatal

disease, a dropsy. It was a very severe winter, which probably

aggravated his complaints; and the solitude in which Mr. Levett and Mrs.

Williams had left him, rendered his life very gloomy. Mrs.

Desmoulins[797], who still lived, was herself so very ill, that she

could contribute very little to his relief[798]. He, however, had none

of that unsocial shyness which we commonly see in people afflicted with

sickness. He did not hide his head from the world, in solitary

abstraction; he did not deny himself to the visits of his friends and

acquaintances; but at all times, when he was not overcome by sleep, was

ready for conversation as in his best days[799].

'To MRS. LUCY PORTER, IN LICHFIELD.

'DEAR MADAM,

'You may perhaps think me negligent that I have not written to you

again[800] upon the loss of your brother; but condolences and

consolations are such common and such useless things, that the omission

of them is no great crime: and my own diseases occupy my mind, and

engage my care. My nights are miserably restless, and my days,

therefore, are heavy. I try, however, to hold up my head as high as

I can[801].

'I am sorry that your health is impaired; perhaps the spring and the

summer may, in some degree, restore it: but if not, we must submit to

the inconveniences of time, as to the other dispensations of Eternal

Goodness. Pray for me, and write to me, or let Mr. Pearson write

for you.

'I am, &c.

'SAM. JOHNSON.'

'London, Nov. 29, 1783.'

1784: Aetat. 75.--And now I am arrived at the last year of the life of

SAMUEL JOHNSON, a year in which, although passed in severe

indisposition, he nevertheless gave many evidences of the continuance of

those wondrous powers of mind, which raised him so high in the

intellectual world. His conversation and his letters of this year were

in no respect inferiour to those of former years.

The following is a remarkable proof of his being alive to the most

minute curiosities of literature.

'To MR. DILLY, BOOKSELLER, IN THE POULTRY.

'SIR,

'There is in the world a set of books which used to be sold by the

booksellers on the bridge[802], and which I must entreat you to procure

me. They are called _Burton's Books_[803]; the title of one is

_Admirable Curiosities, Rarities, and Wonders in England_. I believe

there are about five or six of them; they seem very proper to allure

backward readers; be so kind as to get them for me, and send me them

with the best printed edition of _Baxter's Call to the Unconverted_.

'I am, &c.

'SAM. JOHNSON.'

'Jan. 6, 1784.'

'To MR. PERKINS.

'DEAR SIR,

'I was very sorry not to see you when you were so kind as to call on me;

but to disappoint friends, and if they are not very good natured, to

disoblige them, is one of the evils of sickness. If you will please to

let me know which of the afternoons in this week I shall be favoured

with another visit by you and Mrs. Perkins, and the young people, I will

take all the measures that I can to be pretty well at that time[804].

'I am, dear Sir,

'Your most humble servant,

'SAM. JOHNSON.'

'Jan. 21, 1784.'

His attention to the Essex-Head Club appears from the following letter

to Mr. Alderman Clark, a gentleman for whom he deservedly entertained a

great regard.

'To RICHARD CLARK, ESQ.

'DEAR SIR,

'You will receive a requisition, according to the rules of the Club, to

be at the house as President of the night. This turn comes once a month,

and the member is obliged to attend, or send another in his place. You

were enrolled in the Club by my invitation, and I ought to introduce

you; but as I am hindered by sickness, Mr. Hoole will very properly

supply my place as introductor, or yours as President. I hope in milder

weather to be a very constant attendant.

'I am, Sir, &c.

'SAM. JOHNSON.'

'Jan. 27, 1784.'

'You ought to be informed that the forfeits began with the year, and

that every night of non-attendance incurs the mulct of three-pence, that

is, nine pence a week.'

On the 8th of January I wrote to him, anxiously inquiring as to his

health, and enclosing my _Letter to the People of Scotland, on the

present state of the nation_[805].

'I trust, (said I,) that you will be liberal enough to make allowance

for my differing from you on two points, (the Middlesex Election, and

the American War[806]) when my general principles of government are

according to your own heart, and when, at a crisis of doubtful event, I

stand forth with honest zeal as an ancient and faithful Briton. My

reason for introducing those two points was, that as my opinions with

regard to them had been declared at the periods when they were least

favourable, I might have the credit of a man who is not a worshipper of

ministerial power.'

'To JAMES BOSWELL, ESQ.

'DEAR SIR,

'I hear of many enquiries which your kindness has disposed you to make

after me[807]. I have long intended you a long letter, which perhaps the

imagination of its length hindered me from beginning. I will, therefore,

content myself with a shorter.

'Having promoted the institution of a new Club in the neighbourhood, at

the house of an old servant of Thrale's, I went thither to meet the

company, and was seized with a spasmodick asthma so violent, that with

difficulty I got to my own house, in which I have been confined eight or

nine weeks, and from which I know not when I shall be able to go even to

church. The asthma, however, is not the worst. A dropsy gains ground

upon me; my legs and thighs are very much swollen with water, which I

should be content if I could keep there, but I am afraid that it will

soon be higher. My nights are very sleepless and very tedious. And yet I

am extremely afraid of dying.

'My physicians try to make me hope, that much of my malady is the effect

of cold, and that some degree at least of recovery is to be expected

from vernal breezes and summer suns[808]. If my life is prolonged to

autumn, I should be glad to try a warmer climate; though how to travel

with a diseased body, without a companion to conduct me, and with very

little money, I do not well see. Ramsay has recovered his limbs in

Italy[809]; and Fielding was sent to Lisbon, where, indeed, he died; but

he was, I believe, past hope when he went. Think for me what I can do.

'I received your pamphlet, and when I write again may perhaps tell you

some opinion about it; but you will forgive a man struggling with

disease his neglect of disputes, politicks, and pamphlets[810]. Let me

have your prayers. My compliments to your lady, and young ones. Ask

your physicians about my case: and desire Sir Alexander Dick[811] to

write me his opinion.

'I am, dear Sir, &c.

'SAM. JOHNSON.'

'Feb. 11, 1784.'

'TO MRS. LUCY PORTER, IN LICHFIELD.

'MY DEAREST LOVE,

'I have been extremely ill of an asthma and dropsy, but received, by the

mercy of GOD, sudden and unexpected relief last Thursday, by the

discharge of twenty pints of water[812]. Whether I shall continue free,

or shall fill again, cannot be told. Pray for me.

'Death, my dear, is very dreadful; let us think nothing worth our care

but how to prepare for it: what we know amiss in ourselves let us make

haste to amend, and put our trust in the mercy of GOD, and the

intercession of our Saviour. I am, dear Madam,

'Your most humble servant,

'SAM. JOHNSON.'

'Feb. 23, 1784.'

Life of Johnson, Volume 4 1780-1784 · 第 65 / 118 题