He shares with him his loves, but not his hates,[102]

and will scorn to bear any part with him in any base and dishonorable

actions, unless, as people sometimes catch blear eyes, he may

chance insensibly to contract some ill habit or other by the very

contagion of familiarity and conversation. Thus they say Plato’s

acquaintance learned his stoop, Aristotle’s his lisp, and Alexander’s

the inclination of his neck and the rapidity of his speech. For

some persons, ere they are aware, get a touch of the humors and

infirmities of those with whom they converse. But now as a true friend

endeavors only to copy the fairest originals, so, on the contrary,

the flatterer, like the chameleon, which puts on all colors but the

innocent white, being unable to reach those strokes of virtue which

are worth his imitation, takes care that no failure or imperfection

escape him. As unskilful painters, when they cannot hit the features

and air of a face, content themselves with the faint resemblance

in a wrinkle, a wart, or a scar, so he takes up with his friend’s

intemperance, superstition, cholericness, severity to his servants,

distrust of his relations and domestics or the like. For, besides

that a natural propensity to evil inclines him always to follow the

worst examples, he imagines his assuming other men’s vices will best

secure him from the suspicion of being disaffected towards them; for

their fidelity is often suspected who seem dissatisfied with faults

and wish a reformation. Which very thing lost Dion in the good opinion

of Dionysius, Samius in Philip’s, Cleomenes in Ptolemy’s, and at last

proved the occasion of their ruin. And therefore the flatterer pretends

not only to the good humor of a companion, but to the faithfulness of

a friend too, and would be thought to have so great a respect for you

that he cannot be disgusted at the very worst of your actions, being

indeed of the same make and constitution with yourself. Hence you shall

have him pretend a share in the most common casualties that befall

another, nay, in complaisance, feign even diseases themselves. In

company of those who are thick of hearing, he is presently half deaf,

and with the dim-sighted can see no more than they do. So the parasites

about Dionysius at an entertainment, to humor his blindness, stumbled

one upon another and jostled the dishes off his table.

But there are others who refine upon the former by a pretended

fellow-suffering in the more private concernments of life, whereby they

wriggle themselves deeper into the affections of those they flatter;

as, if they find a man unhappily married, or distrustful of his

children or domestics, they spare not their own family, but immediately

entertain you with some lamentable story of the hard fortune they have

met with in their children, their wife, their servants, or relations.

For, by the parallel circumstances they pretend to, they seem more

passionately concerned for the misfortunes of their friends, who, as if

they had already received some pawn and assurance of their fidelity,

blab forth those secrets which they cannot afterwards handsomely

retract, and dare not betray the least distrust of their new confidant

for the future. I myself knew a man who turned his wife out of doors

because a gentleman of his acquaintance divorced his, though the latter

lady smelt the intrigue afterwards by the messages the flatterer sent

to his wife after the pretended divorce and the private visits he was

observed to make her. So little did he understand the flatterer who

took these following verses for the description of a crab rather than

his:—

The shapeless thing’s all over paunch and gut:

Who can the monster’s mighty hunger glut?

It crawls on teeth, and with a watchful eye

Does into every secret corner pry.

For this is the true portraiture of those sharpers, who, as Eupolis

speaks, sponge upon their acquaintance for a dinner.

10. But we will reserve these remarks for a more proper place. In

the mean time I must not omit the other artifice observable in his

imitation, which is this: that if at any time he counterfeit the good

qualities of his friend, he immediately yields him the pre-eminence;

whereas there is no competition, no emulation or envy amongst true

friends, but whether they are equally accomplished or not, they bear

the same even unconcerned temper of mind towards each other. But the

flatterer, remembering that he is but to act another’s part, pretends

only to such strokes as fall short of the original, and is willing to

confess himself outdone in any thing but his vices, wherein alone he

claims the precedency to himself; as, if the man he is to wheedle be

difficult and morose, he is quite overrun with choler; if something

superstitious, he is a perfect enthusiast; if a little in love, for

his part he is most desperately smitten. I laughed heartily at such a

passage, says one; But I had like to have died with laughter, says the

other. But now in speaking of any laudable qualities, he inverts his

style; as, I can run fast enough, says he, but you perfectly fly. I can

sit an horse tolerably well, but alas! what’s that to this Hippocentaur

for good horsemanship? I have a tolerable good genius for poetry, and

am none of the worst versifiers of the age;

But thunder is the language of you Gods, not mine.

And thus at the same time he obliges his friend both in approving of

his abilities by his owning of them, and in confessing him incomparable

in his way by himself coming short of his example. These then are the

distinguishing characters of a friend and flatterer, as far as concerns

the counterfeit resemblance betwixt them.

11. But because, as we have before observed, it is common to them both

to please (for a good man is no less taken with the company of his

friends than an ill one is with a flatterer’s), let us discriminate

them here too. And the way will be to have an eye to the end to

which they direct the satisfaction they create, which may be thus

illustrated. Your perfumed oils have a fine odoriferous scent, and so,

it may be, have some medicines too; but with this difference, that

the former are prepared barely for the gratification of the sense,

whilst the other, besides their odor, purge, heal, and fatten. Again,

the colors used by painters are certainly very florid and the mixture

agreeable; and yet so it is in some medicinal compositions too. Wherein

then lies the difference? Why, in the end or use for which they are

designed, the one purely for pleasure the other for profit. In like

manner the civilities of one friend to another, besides the main point

of their honesty and mutual advantage, are always attended with an

overplus of delight and satisfaction. Nay, they can now and then

indulge themselves the liberty of an innocent diversion, a collation,

or a glass of wine, and, believe me, can be as cheerful and jocund as

the best; all which they use only as sauce, to give a relish to the

more serious and weighty concernments of life. To which purpose was

that of the poet,

With pleasing chat they did delight each other;

as likewise this too,

Plutarch's essays and miscellanies, Vol. 2 (of 5) · 第 50 / 147 题