And he,--"How many shall I buy?"

I retired to my study, consulted London, Lindley, and Linnæus,--the

thick Gray, the middling Gray, and the child's Gray,--Worcester's

Dictionary, and Webster's, in both of which you can usually find almost

anything but what should be there,--Johnson's "Dictionary of Gardening,"

and Gardner's "Dictionary of Farming,"--and none of these treatises

mentioned the quantity of potatoes proper for planting a given space of

land. Even the Worcester and Webster failed. I was reduced to tell the

Kelt to ask the huckster of whom he bought. All the treatises went on

the principle--true, but inadequate--that "any fool would know." Any

fool might, probably does,--but I was not a fool.

The next year, having built my house and taken Lois home, the bluebirds

sang spring to us one fine morning, and we went out to plant our

radish-seeds. With fit forethought, the seed had been bought, the ground

manured and raked, the string, the dibble, the woman's trowel, the man's

trowel, the sticks for the seed-papers, and the papers were all there.

Lois was charming, in her sun-bonnet; I looked knowing in my Canadian

oat-straw. We marked out the bed,--as the robins, meadow-larks, and

bluebirds directed. Lois then looked up article "Radish" in the

"Farmer's Dictionary," and we found the lists of "Long White Naples,"

"White Spanish," "Black Spanish," "Long Scarlet," "White Turnip-Root,"

"Purple Turnip," and the rest, for two columns, which we should and

should not plant. All that was nothing to us. We were to plant

radish-seeds, which we had bought, as such, from Mr. Swett. How deep to

plant them, how far apart or how near together, the book was to tell.

But the book only said, "Everybody knows how to plant radishes."

Now this was not true. _We_ did not know.

These two illustrations, as the minister says, are sufficient to show

the character of the deficiency which I am now to supply,--which young

housekeepers of intelligence feel, when they have got their nests ready

and begin to bill and coo in-doors. There are many things which every

fool knows, which people of sense do not know. First among these things

is, "What will you have for dinner?"--a question not to be answered by

detailed answers,--on the principle of the imaginary Barmacide feasts of

the cook-books,--but by the results of deep principles, which underlie,

indeed, the whole superficial strata of civilized life. Did not the army

of the Punjaub perish, as it retreated from Ghizni to Jelalabad, not

because the enemy's lances were strong, but because one day it did not

dine?

I am not going to tell the old story of that "sweet pretty girl" who,

after a week of legs of mutton, ordered a "leg of beef." I sympathize

with her from the bottom of my heart. Her sister will be married

to-morrow. To her I dedicate this paper, that she may know, not what she

shall order,--that is left to her own sweet will, less fettered now that

her life is rounded by her welding it upon its other half than it was

when she wandered in maiden meditation fancy-free,--not, I say, what she

shall order for her dinner and for Leander's, but the principle on which

the order is to be given.

"But, my dear Mr. Carter," says the blushing child, as she reads, "we

have got to be so dreadfully economical!"

Fairest of your sex, there was never one of your sex, since Eve finished

the apple, lest any should be wasted, nor of my sex, since Adam grimly

champed the parings, thinking he was "in for it," who should not be

economical. A just economy is the law of a luxurious life. "Dreadful

economy" is the principle which is now to be unfolded to you.

Economy in itself is one of the most agreeable of luxuries. This I need

not demonstrate. Everybody knows what good fun it is to make a bargain.

Economy becomes dreadful, only when some lightning-flash of truth shows

us that our painful frugality has been really the most lavish waste.

So Lois and I, for nine years, lived without a corkscrew. We would buy

busts and chromoliths with our money instead,--we would go to the White

Mountains, we would maintain an elegant æsthetic hospitality, as they do

in Paris, with the money we should save by doing without a corkscrew. So

I spoiled two sets of kitchen-forks by drawing corks with them, I broke

the necks of legions of bottles for which Mr. Tarr would have credited

me two cents each, and many times damaged, even to the swearing-point,

one of the sweetest tempers in the world,--all that we might economize

on this corkscrew. But one day, at the corner-shop, I saw a corkscrew in

the glass show-case, lying on some pocket-combs and family dye-stuffs. I

asked the price, to learn that it cost seventeen cents. The resolution

of years gave way before the temptation. I bought the corkscrew, and

from that moment my income has equalled my expenses. So you see, my

sweet May-bud, just trembling on the edge of housekeeping, that true

economy consists in buying the right thing at the right time,--if you

only pay for it as you go.

"But, my dear Mr. Carter, I don't know what the right thing is!"

Sweet heart, I knew it. And your husband knows no more than you

do,--although he will pretend to know, that he may look cross when the

bills come in. Read what follows; hide the "Atlantic" before he comes

home; and you will know more than he knows on the most important point

in human life. Vainly, henceforth, will he quote Greek to you, or talk

pompous nonsense about the price of Treasury certificates, if you know

at what price eggs are really cheap, and at what price they are really

dear.

Listen, and remember! Then hide the "Atlantic" away.

When I engaged in the study of Hebrew, which was at that time a

"regular" at college, (for why should I blush to own that I am in my one

hundred and tenth year?) as I toiled through the rules and exceptions in

dear old Stephen Sewall's Hebrew Grammar, I ventured to ask him, one

desperately hot June day, whether he could not tell us, were it only for

curiosity's sake, which rule would come into play in every verse, and

which would be of use only once or twice in the whole Bible. "Ah,

Carter," said the dear old fellow, (he taught his beloved language with

his own book,) "it is all of use,--all!" And so we had to take it all,

and find out as we could which rules would be constant servitors to us,

and which occasional lackeys, hired for special occasions. Just so, dear

Hero, do you stand about your housekeeping. You wall be fretting

yourself to death to economize in each one of one hundred and seven

different articles,--for so many are you and Leander to assimilate and

make your own special phosphate and carbon, as this sweet honey-year of

yours goes on. Of that fret and wear of your sweet temper, child, there

is no use at all. Listen, and you shall learn what are to be the great

constants of your expense,--what Stephen Sewall would have called the

regular verbs transitive of your being, doing, and suffering,--and how

many of the one hundred and seven are only exceptional Lamed Hhes, at

which you can guess or which you can skip, if the great central

movements of your economies go bravely on.

I do not know, of course, whether Leander is fond of coffee, and whether

you drink tea or no. I can only tell you what is in our family, and

assure you that ours is a model family. Such a model is it, that Lois

has just now counted up the one hundred and seven articles for me,--has

shown me that they all together cost us nine hundred and twenty-six

dollars and thirty-two cents in the year 1863, and how much each of them

cost. Now our family consists,--

The Atlantic Monthly, Volume 14, No. 83, September, 1864 A Magazine of Literature, Art, and Politics · 第 29 / 44 题