“On July 4th, however, 1823,--the 4th year of George IV. Chapter

50,--the Royal Assent was given to ‘_An Act for the Rebuilding of

London Bridge, and for the improving and making suitable approaches

thereto_;’ which is printed in ‘_A Collection of the Public General

Statutes_,’ London, 1823, folio, pages 478-536. It commenced by

noticing the title of the Corporation of London to be Conservator of

the Thames, and its right to the Bridge-House Estates for the benefit

of London Bridge; and after referring to the Acts for its improvement

and removing the Water-works, the evils of the present building, and

the expedience of a new one, it then proceeded to give the following

powers, to remain in force for 10 years. To take down, and sell the

old Bridge; either leaving it till the completion of the new one, or

erecting a temporary structure before removing it: to build a new

edifice of Granite, either on the present site, or within 180 feet

Westward, with convenient approaches, according to the designs of

John Rennie, Esq., with any alterations, being, with the Engineer and

Contractor, previously approved by the Lords of the Treasury; the new

building standing in the parishes where its abutments are placed, and

marking the extent of any jurisdiction instead of the old one: to

embank the River in a straight line, from the centre of the abutments

of the present Bridge, to the distance of 180 feet West, and 110,

East; to raise and lower, new pave, alter, or stop up, streets, &c.

in the approaches; and close them during the execution of the Act, to

the distance of 300 yards from the present edifice; to land materials

free of duty, and to occupy places for storing them, also within 300

feet; to take down houses, &c. beside those entered in the schedule,

upon recompense being previously made; to occupy the burial-ground

of St. Magnus’ Church, providing another; to set back houses on the

Western side of Grace-Church Street, Fish-Street Hill, and High-Street,

Southwark, between Lombard-Street and St. Margaret’s-Hill; to sell,

or grant leases of, ground not wanted, and apply the produce to the

purposes of the Act; to receive from the Lords of the Treasury the

sum of £150,000; additional funds being raised on credit of the

Bridge-House Estates by mortgages, annuities, bonds, &c.; to set apart

the yearly sum of £12,000 from the Bridge-House rents, for payment

of existing charges, and expenses; and to form a sinking-fund for

redeeming the monies borrowed; the residue of the rents being deposited

with the Chamberlain, for paying of interest, &c.; the expenses of

the Act, designs, &c. being discharged from other sums belonging to

the Bridge-House Estates. It was also provided, that the Corporation

should be answerable for the misuse of these funds, a yearly statement

of accounts being laid before Parliament; though it is not to be

liable for failure of the rents, &c. on which money is borrowed, for

damage occasioned by removal of the Bridge, nor for the work being left

unfinished, by the funds proving insufficient. The Act closed with

powers for appointing Committees, with Clerks, &c., to execute it,

saving interested persons; and with the usual clauses for lighting,

watching, making compensation for tithes, &c. &c. The schedule of

houses to be taken down contained the particulars of 43 buildings on

the City side, and of 109 in Southwark.

“It being determined to retain the old edifice till the completion

of its successor, the site of the new Bridge was fixed at about 100

feet Westward of the present, St. Saviour’s Church standing above it;

though the perfect plan of its approaches can scarcely yet be traced.

The first Pile of the work was driven near the Southern end of the

old Bridge, opposite the Arch called the Second Lock from the Surrey

shore, at the East end of the Coffer-dam, of which it formed a part,

on Monday, March 15th, 1824. About the same time, too, the whole of

the open spaces between the ballustrades on the Western parapet of

the present edifice, were closely boarded up; as well as those square

recesses, open at the top, which would have allowed spectators to

climb upon the cornice. The houses and other buildings abutting on

London Bridge on the Western side of the Borough High-Street, were

also rapidly sold, and some parts only of the lower fronts allowed to

remain.

“It might have been expected that, in excavating the new foundations,

several interesting antiquities would be discovered, illustrative of

London history, and of the ancient Bridge in particular; though, if

we consider the impetuous rush of the River at this place, it is not

surprising that but few articles of value have been yet brought up. The

most numerous have been, defaced brass and copper coins of Augustus,

Vespasian, and later Roman Emperors; Venetian Tokens; Nuremburg

Counters; and a few Tradesmen’s Tokens, very perfect; though I have

seen none of persons dwelling on the Bridge itself. There have also

been found, an old red earthen pitcher, or bottle, nearly perfect;

various rings and buckles of wrought and engraved brass, and silver;

some very ancient iron keys, and silver spoons; the remains of a

dagger which had once been engraven and gilt, and an iron spear-head,

engraven on the shaft; most of which are in the possession of Robert

Finch Newman, Esq., the Bridge-House Comptroller; whilst in the City

Library, at Guildhall, are some ancient carved stones with dates,

found in taking down the Arches of the old Bridge. There has also been

discovered a particularly fine bronze lamp, representing a head of

Bacchus, wreathed with ivy; standing upon the neck, which is made flat,

and on its forehead a circular lid, raised by the two curling horns,

whilst a handle is attached to the back of the head. This beautiful

antique is in very excellent preservation. One of the most interesting

reliques, however, which I have yet seen, is a small SILVER EFFIGY OF

HARPOCRATES,

[Illustration]

which was presented to the British Museum, by Messrs. Rundell, Bridge,

and Rundell, of Ludgate-Hill, November 12th, 1825; and is preserved in

the Hamilton Room, No. xii. of the Gallery of Antiquities, Case, No.

11, under the care of Mr. J. T. Smith. The figure is about 2-1/2 inches

in height, and one in breadth, and represents the son of Osiris as a

winged boy, with his finger pointing to his mouth, as God of Silence;

the horns, emblematical of his mother Isis, on his head; and at his

feet his other attributes, of a dog, a tortoise, an owl, and a serpent

twined round a staff; by the number of which we may guess the figure to

have been made in Greece, after the time of Alexander the Great. The

style of sculpture is firm and massive; and on the back is a strong

rivet, through which pass a large ring and a very delicate chain of

pure gold, crossing like four belts in front; it being probably of that

class of figures which Winckelmann states to have been worn as amulets,

or the attributes of Priests.

“To proceed, however, with New London Bridge, I should state, that, Mr.

Rennie, senior, having died in 1821, the works have been principally

superintended by his son, Mr. John Rennie; and that the builders,

who have contracted to erect it, are Mr. William Jolliffe, and Sir

Edward Banks; the original amount of whose contract was £426,000, and

£30,000 for making alterations in the present structure; the whole to

be completed in six years, from March 2nd, 1824: which contract is

now increased to £506,000, by the addition of £8,000 for a new set of

centering for the 4th Arch; and of £42,000 granted by the Treasury

in 1825, for making the Bridge 6 feet wider; namely, 2 feet in each

foot-path, and 2 feet in the carriage-way. The exterior of the edifice

will be of three sorts of Granite; the Eastern side being of purple

Aberdeen; the Western, of the light-grey Devonshire Haytor; and the

Arch-stones of both, united with the red-brown of Peterhead: the

heartings of the Piers being of hard Brambley-Fall, Derby, and Whitby

stone. These materials are roughly shaped at the quarries; and after

being carefully wrought at the Isle of Dogs, are finally dressed and

fitted to their places, at the Bridge. The Pier-foundations are formed

of piles, chiefly beech, pointed with iron, and driven about 20 feet

into the blue clay of the River, about 4 feet apart; having two rows

of sills, each averaging about a foot square, and filled in with large

blocks of stone, upon which is laid a six-inch beech planking, bearing

the first course of masonry. The proposed form of the Bridge is a very

flat segment, the rise not being more than 7 feet; and it is to consist

of 5 elliptical Arches, having plain rectangular buttresses, standing

upon plinths, and cutwaters; with two straight flights of stairs, 22

feet wide, at each end. That on the Western side, at the City end,

will, however, cut so deeply into Fishmongers’ Hall, that it is to be

taken down, the Corporation paying £20,000 to the Company. My narrative

is now so near a termination, that I have to add only a few notices

concerning the Bridge-Officers, and a more particular and exact account

of the measurements of the new edifice than has yet been recorded.

Which dimensions, from high-water line, are as follow:--

Feet. Feet. Inches.

“Centre Arch of the New London Bridge, _Span_ 150 _Rise_ 29 6

Piers to ditto, 24 Feet.

Second and Fourth Arches ---- 140 ---- 27 6

Piers to ditto, 22 Feet.

Land Arches ---- 130 ---- 24 6

Abutments at the base, 73 Feet.

Total width of water-way, 690 feet; Length of the Bridge including

the Abutments, 928 feet; Length within the Abutments, 782 feet;

Width of the Bridge from outside to outside of the Parapet, 56

feet; Width of the Carriage-way, 36 feet, and of each Footpath, 9

feet; and the total height of the Bridge on the Eastern side, from

low-water, 60 feet.

“All which particulars, however, are much better illustrated by A

GROUND-PLAN AND ELEVATION OF THE NEW LONDON BRIDGE.

[Illustration]

“The Officers of old London Bridge, and its estates, are, firstly,

Two Masters, or Wardens, who receive and pay all accounts of the

Bridge-House, oversee its concerns, watchmen, labourers, &c., summon

and attend the Auditors, and Committees, and meet the Corporation on

Midsummer and Michaelmas days. The yearly salary of the senior is £250,

and a house; and that of the junior, £200, with £86 for house-rent

and taxes: their incomes being further increased by some trifling

official fees. The Comptroller of the Works and Revenues of London

Bridge receives a salary of £300, with other emoluments; and attends

all Committees, keeping their journals, and preparing their reports,

leases, contracts, and all other documents; he has also the custody of

the records, &c., and, being a solicitor, conducts all the Bridge-House

law-proceedings. The Clerk of the Works is occupied as a general

Architectural Surveyor, attending Committees, arbitrations, &c., and

making surveys, valuations, designs, and estimates. He superintends

all new buildings and alterations on the Bridge-House lands, inspects

the covenants and dilapidations of the tenants; as well as the time

and bills of the trades-men, and the Bridge-House stores, of all

which he makes reports to the Committee: his yearly salary is £500.

The Assistant Clerk at the Bridge-House resides in the upper part of

that building, with a salary of £200; assisting the Bridge-Masters in

keeping and copying their accounts. The Superintendent of the Works

at London Bridge overlooks and directs the repairs, the measuring

and examination of the articles, and certifies their quantities, &c.,

his yearly salary being £100. The Bridge-House Carpenter is foreman

of those works, with a residence and £200 per annum; he keeps the

workmen’s accounts, and receives and portions out building stores;

he also sets up marks on the Bridge-House estates, and repairs

such water-stairs as they support. The Bridge-House Messenger is

employed in summoning and attending the Auditors and Committees; in

delivering notices to the tenants, and in various other duties at

the Bridge-House, his salary being 36 shillings per week. To these

officers is added a Collector of Rents of Tenants at Will in St.

George’s Fields, who resides in a house belonging to the estate, and

is paid by a commission of 5 per cent. The manner of letting premises

pertaining to the Bridge-House, is, on the expiration of a lease, to

have them viewed by the Committee and Surveyor; when, if the Committee

and tenant agree, it is so stated to the Common Council; and, if

not, the premises are put up to auction. Finally, the Committee of

Bridge-House Estates is composed of a certain number of Aldermen, and

a Commoner from each Ward; but no payments exceeding £100 are made

without the sanction of the Common Council, a brief statement of the

accounts being annually laid before the Court, a copy of which is sent

to every member. The accounts and vouchers are then examined by four

Auditors, annually elected by the Livery, to whom a report is made; the

documents being sworn to by the Bridge-Masters; and these statements,

fairly transcribed on vellum, are deposited, one copy in the Chamber of

London, and another in the Muniment-Room at the Bridge-House. And now,

having observed, that these particulars were given in evidence before

a Select Committee of the House of Commons, in April 1821, and are

printed much more at large in the tract of ‘_Reports and Evidences_,’

pages 72, 73, 135-138, here I conclude with a parting libation, and

many thanks for your long-tried attention.”

Such, then, were Mr. Barnaby Postern’s historical notices of old London

Bridge; in which the reader may perceive, that he evinced a fair

proportion of antiquarian learning, and rather a large share of reading

and memory. When he had arrived at this period, however, as I thought

that my own information would enable me to add some curious modern

particulars to his narrative, I addressed him with, “My best thanks

are due to you, worthy Sir, for your interesting CHRONICLES OF LONDON

BRIDGE; for, although you have sometimes been prosy enough to have

wearied a dozen Dutchmen, yet, by my patience and your perseverance,

the story is safely brought down to the present day. You have steered

it, slowly enough, certainly, but surely, through all the intricate

navigation of the Record Rolls, and have carefully avoided several of

those rocks of error, upon which so many former historians have been

wrecked. And since the narrative has now reached the building of a

New London Bridge, pray allow me, so long your grateful hearer, to

relate the ceremony of Laying the First Stone thereof, from my own

observation, sketches, and memoranda.”

“My very hearty thanks are your’s for that most excellent proposal, Mr.

Geoffrey,” said the old Antiquary; “for I am now too far declined into

the vale of years, to describe modern ceremonials and festivities with

the spirit of a younger Citizen: whilst you are ‘not clean past your

youth;’ having yet only ‘some smack of age, some relish of the saltness

of time in you;’ therefore the story, good Mr. Barbican, the story.”

“You shall have it, Sir,” replied I; “you shall have it, and with all

the skill I can; though, after your highly-finished ancient historical

pictures, my modern delineations can appear only faint and imperfect.

“The Coffer-Dam, in which the ceremony of Laying the First Stone took

place, was erected opposite to the Southern Arch called the Fourth

Lock, and was constructed of three rows of piles, planks, and earth,

substantially secured by timbers of great strength and thickness; and

when the day for performing it was fixed, it was officially announced

by the following notice:--

“‘LONDON BRIDGE. MANSION HOUSE, 23rd May, 1825. The Committee

for Rebuilding the New London Bridge having appointed Wednesday,

the 15th day of June next, for Laying the First Stone of the New

Bridge, Notice is hereby given, that the Foot and Carriage-way

over the present Bridge will be stopped on that day, from Eleven

o’clock in the Forenoon until Four o’clock in the Afternoon.

‘By Order of the Right Honourable the LORD MAYOR.

‘FRANCIS HOBLER.

‘N.B. Southwark Bridge will be open free of Toll during the above

hours.’

“As the intervening space passed away, the preparations for the

ceremonial proceeded on a scale of equal celerity and magnitude. A

Steam Engine, with a high funnel, was erected against the City side

of the Coffer-Dam, for exhausting it of water, an entrance to which

was made through a covered stone recess of the old Bridge, on the

Northern side of the Dam. The rude and intricate walling of piles

and other erections now began to assume a more regular appearance; a

platform and flight of steps connected them with the parapet of the

old edifice; a broad raised passage surrounded the area in the centre,

and the whole was covered with an awning, above which rose numerous

lofty flag-staves. These, then, were the earlier preparations for

this splendid water-festival; and now let us proceed to recount the

wonders of the day itself. A finer and more freshly-breathing air was

certainly never abroad, than that which cooled the atmosphere and blew

out the gaily-coloured flags around old London Bridge, on the morning

of Wednesday, the 15th of June. At a very early hour, the workmen

began erecting the barriers, which were double, and at a considerable

distance apart. Across the whole space of Fish-Street Hill, from Upper

and Lower Thames Street, and again at Tooley Street, there stretched

wide wooden railings, having a moveable bar at each pavement, with an

opening wide enough for one person only; whilst the centre of the

Street was divided with posts and bars, allowing carriages to pass

between them also, but in single lines. Within these, at each end of

the Bridge, was erected a strong screen of rough planks, about fourteen

feet high, having four gates, answering to the former foot-paths

and carriage-ways. So long as the barriers continued open, the old

Bridge was crowded with gazers; who were especially collected opposite

that part of the parapet which was to form the grand entrance to the

Coffer-Dam; while on the roofs of the houses, and other buildings in

the vicinity, were platforms of seats, and awnings preparing, which

were afterwards crowded with spectators; as well as the Monument,

St. Magnus’ Church, the towers of St. Mary Overies’, and St. Olave,

Fishmongers’ Hall, and the Patent-Shot works. Many scaffolds were also

erected for the purpose of letting, the prices varying from 2_s._ 6_d._

to 15_s._ each, according to their accommodations; and the following

is a specimen of their announcements. ‘Seats to be let for viewing the

Procession, No. 2, Bridge Foot, for Laying the First Stone of the New

Bridge. Tickets 7_s._ and 5_s._ each:’ though more moderate exhibitions

were set forth in the words, ‘A full view of the whole works, Admission

6_d._’ Another bill of entertainment, also issued on that morning,

stated, that ‘This Evening, Wednesday, June 15th, the Monument will be

superbly illuminated with Portable Gas, in commemoration of Laying the

First Stone of the New London Bridge, by the Right Honourable the Lord

Mayor. Admittance Sixpence each, at Nine o’clock.’ And in the evening

a lamp was accordingly placed at each of the loop-holes of the column,

to give the idea of its being wreathed with flame, whilst two other

series were placed on the edges of the gallery; though the wind seldom

permitted the whole of the gas to remain lighted at the same instant.

“Long before the time appointed for the closing of old London Bridge,

the River and buildings around it were fully occupied with visitors;

the vessels were decorated with flags; and crowded pleasure-boats,

some carrying bands of music, floated round the Coffer-Dam. At eleven

o’clock, the Bridge was begun to be cleared, and that of Southwark

opened, for the first and only time, toll free. The various entries

were guarded by constables, who ascertained that every person was

provided with a ticket; and before noon, this famous passage across the

Thames had so completely changed its character, that the very striking

contrast to its usual appearance must have been seen to be appreciated.

The building of the New London Bridge having been entrusted to the

following Committee, the ceremonies of this day were also placed under

the same direction; the Members being distinguished by painted wands,

surmounted by the Arms of London and Southwark. These were,--

“THE LORD MAYOR, all the Aldermen, and Jonathan Crocker, Chairman

of the Sub Bridge-House Committee; Robert Fisher, of the Ward of

_Aldersgate within_; John Lorkin, of _Aldersgate without_; Samuel

Favell, of _Aldgate_; Henry Hughes, of _Bassishaw_; William Austin,

of _Billingsgate_; James Davies, and Sir William Rawlins, of

_Bishopsgate_; William Mathie, of _Bread Street_; John Locke, of

_Bridge_; Richard Webb Jupp, of _Broad Street_; Thomas Carr, of

_Candlewick_; Robert Slade, of _Castle Baynard_; Charles Bleaden,

of _Cheap_; Josiah Griffiths, of _Coleman Street_; Charles William

Hick, of _Cordwainers_; Spencer Perry Adderley, of _Cornhill_; Hugh

Herron, of _Cripplegate within_; Richard Lambert Jones, of _Cripplegate

without_; James Ebenezer Saunders, of _Dowgate_; Josiah Daw, and Adam

Oldham, of _Farringdon within_; William John Reeves, and James Webb

Southgate, of _Farringdon without_; Joseph Carter, of _Langbourn_;

Thomas Price, of _Lime Street_; Robert Carter, of _Portsoken_; William

Routh, of _Queenhithe_; Peter Skipper, of _Tower_; Thomas Conway, of

_Vintry_; and William Richardson, of _Walbrook_.

“The Tickets of admission to the Coffer-Dam were also issued by these

gentlemen, and were, of course, in great request; but their number

being limited, and the general arrangements peculiarly excellent, there

was ample accommodation for even a more numerous company. The Tickets

themselves--and how will they not be valued by the curious collectors

of a future day?--were elegantly engraven, and printed on stout cards,

measuring about five inches by eight: they consisted of an oblong

elevation of the New Bridge, looking down the River, ‘_Perkins_, _St.

Mary Axe_, _Sculpsit_,’ having beneath it the following words:

‘ADMIT THE BEARER

TO WITNESS THE CEREMONY OF LAYING

THE FIRST STONE

OF THE

NEW LONDON BRIDGE,

ON WEDNESDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF JUNE, 1825.

Seal of the

City Arms.

(_Signed_) HENRY WOODTHORPE, JUNR.

_Clerk of the Committee._

N.B.--_The Access is from the Present Bridge,

and the time of Admission will be

between the hours of Twelve and Two._

No. 837.’

These, however, admitted only to the galleries of the Coffer-Dam,

the lowest floor being reserved for the bearers of a second Ticket,

printed in letter-press, on a pale pink card, of an ordinary size, and

containing the following words.

‘NEW LONDON BRIDGE.

--------------------

ADMIT THE BEARER

TO THE

PLATFORM SEATS,

ON PRODUCING THE TICKET OF ADMISSION

WITH THIS CARD.’

“The general passage was along the outer gallery, but the latter

admissions were conducted down a staircase, lined with crimson,

opposite to the principal entrance. Both these Tickets, however,

were required to be _shewn_ only, being intended for preservation as

memorials, and they were admitted at each end of the Bridge. Having

passed the barriers, the visitors proceeded to the GRAND ENTRANCE TO

THE COFFER-DAM,

[Illustration]

which was formed by removing part of the stone parapet of the

Bridge, adjoining the fourth recess from the Southwark end, on the

Western side; the break being most expeditiously made just as the

Bridge was cleared. It was then that the extreme elegance of this

entrance became perfectly visible. Several steps, covered with crimson

cloth, led up to a kind of tent formed of flags, gathered in festoons,

with roses of the same, and surmounted by a white flag bearing a red

cross, and having the Union in the first quarter, the Sword of St. Paul

in the second, and the Saltire of Southwark in the fourth. The roof

of this entrance was also formed of two immense red ensigns, charged

with the Union in their quarters; the sides were elegantly divided

into arches, richly festooned and entwined with flags; and, on the

left-hand of the entrance, at the edge of the pavement, was erected a

board, which stated, that ‘All Carriages, not in the Procession, are,

on setting down the company, to pass on into Southwark, and return from

Southwark to take up.’ Round the whole of the Dam itself was a broad

stage; which formed a most delightful promenade, secured from the heat

of the sun by the tent above, whilst the air, light, and prospect,

might be enjoyed through the Arches. THE WESTERN END OF THE COFFER-DAM

[Illustration]

terminated in a circular form, and presented a peculiarly beautiful

object from the water; whence a series of substantial ladders led to

the platform: over which floated the Union Jack, and a St. George’s

Ensign. THE SOUTHERN EXTERIOR OF THE COFFER-DAM

[Illustration]

formed, however, its most magnificent prospect; especially when seen

from a point of sufficient elevation to comprise the whole extent of

its splendid and capacious amphitheatre. The nearest objects were

the thick and irregular walls of discoloured piles standing in the

water, from which all boats were kept off by persons stationed for the

purpose; and on the interior row was the outer gallery of the tent,

with its decorated arches. The awning above was raised on a little

forest of scaffold-poles, which would have appeared of unusual strength

any where but by the side of the huge blocks of timber immediately

beneath them: and, over the whole, the breeze unfolded to the sun the

several banners. In the centre waved the Royal Standard of England;

at the Western top of the tent was the flag of the Navy Board; at the

opposite point that of the Admiralty; and above these a rope extended

the whole length of the building, decorated with about five-and-twenty

signal-colours, furnished, like all the others, from the Royal

Dock-Yard at Woolwich.

Chronicles of London Bridge · 第 38 / 42 段