XI.

_Madam,_

I sent you word in my last, that your _Author's_ opinion is, _That

Children are not endued with Reason at all, until they have attained

to the use of Speech,_ in the same Chapter[1] he speaks to the same

purpose thus: _Reason is not as Sense and Memory born with us, nor

gotten by experience onely, as Prudence is, but attained by industry._

To which I reply onely this, That it might as well be said, a

Child when new born hath not flesh and blood, because by taking in

nourishment or food, the Child grows to have more flesh and blood; or,

that a Child is not born with two legs, because he cannot go, or with

two arms and hands, because he cannot help himself; or that he is not

born with a tongue, because he cannot speak: For although Reason doth

not move in a Child as in a Man, in Infancy as in Youth, in Youth as in

Age, yet that doth not prove that Children are without Reason, because

they cannot run and prate: I grant, some other Creatures appear to

have more Knowledg when new born then others; as for example, a young

Foal has more knowledg than a young Child, because a Child cannot run

and play; besides a Foal knows his own Dam, and can tell where to

take his food, as to run and suck his Dam, when as an Infant cannot

do so, nor all beasts, though most of them can, but yet this doth not

prove, that a Child hath no reason at all; Neither can I perceive

that man is a Monopoler of all Reason, or Animals of all Sense, but

that Sense and Reason are in other Creatures as well as in Man and

Animals; for example, Drugs, as Vegetables and Minerals, although they

cannot slice, pound or infuse, as man can, yet they can work upon man

more subtilly, wisely, and as sensibly either by purging, vomiting,

spitting, or any other way, as man by mincing, pounding and infusing

them, and Vegetables will as wisely nourish Men, as Men can nourish

Vegetables; Also some Vegetables are as malicious and mischievous to

Man, as Man is to one another, witness Hemlock, Nightshade, and many

more; and a little Poppy will as soon, nay sooner cause a Man to sleep,

though silently, then a Nurse a Child with singing and rocking; But

because they do not act in such manner or way as Man, Man judgeth them

to be without sense and reason; and because they do not prate and

talk as Man, Man believes they have not so much wit as he hath; and

because they cannot run and go, Man thinks they are not industrious;

the like for Infants concerning Reason. But certainly, it is not local

motion or speech that makes sense and reason, but sense and reason

makes them; neither is sense and reason bound onely to the actions of

Man, but it is free to the actions, forms, figures and proprieties of

all Creatures; for if none but Man had reason, and none but Animals

sense, the World could not be so exact, and so well in order as it

is: but Nature is wiser then Man with all his Arts, for these are

onely produced through the variety of Natures actions, and disputes

through the superfluous varieties of Mans follies or ignorances, not

knowing Natures powerful life and knowledg: But I wonder, _Madam_, your

_Author_ says in this place, _That Reason is not born with Man_, when

as in another place,[2] he says, _That every man brought Philosophy,

that is Natural reason with him into the World_; Which how it agree, I

will leave to others to judg, and to him to reconcile it, remaining in

the meantime,

Madam,

_Your Constant Friend_

_and Faithful Servant._

[1] _Ch._ 4.

[2] In his _Elements of Philosophy, part._ 1. _c._ 1. _art._ 1.

Philosophical Letters: or, modest Reflections upon some Opinions in Natural Philosophy · 第 19 / 169 题