SEVENTH ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 186, Art. 7]

Whether It Is Right to Say That Religious Perfection Consists in

These Three Vows?

Objection 1: It would seem that it is not right to say that religious

perfection consists in these three vows. For the perfection of life

consists of inward rather than of outward acts, according to Rom.

14:17, "The Kingdom of God is not meat and drink, but justice and

peace and joy in the Holy Ghost." Now the religious vow binds a man

to things belonging to perfection. Therefore vows of inward actions,

such as contemplation, love of God and our neighbor, and so forth,

should pertain to the religious state, rather than the vows of

poverty, continence, and obedience which refer to outward actions.

Obj. 2: Further, the three aforesaid come under the religious vow, in

so far as they belong to the practice of tending to perfection. But

there are many other things that religious practice, such as

abstinence, watchings, and the like. Therefore it would seem that

these three vows are incorrectly described as pertaining to the state

of perfection.

Obj. 3: Further, by the vow of obedience a man is bound to do

according to his superior's command whatever pertains to the practice

of perfection. Therefore the vow of obedience suffices without the

two other vows.

Obj. 4: Further, external goods comprise not only riches but also

honors. Therefore, if religious, by the vow of poverty, renounce

earthly riches, there should be another vow whereby they may despise

worldly honors.

_On the contrary,_ It is stated (Extra, de Statu Monach., cap. Cum ad

monasterium) that "the keeping of chastity and the renouncing of

property are affixed to the monastic rule."

_I answer that,_ The religious state may be considered in three ways.

First, as being a practice of tending to the perfection of charity:

secondly, as quieting the human mind from outward solicitude,

according to 1 Cor. 7:32: "I would have you to be without

solicitude": thirdly, as a holocaust whereby a man offers himself and

his possessions wholly to God; and in corresponding manner the

religious state is constituted by these three vows.

First, as regards the practice of perfection a man is required to

remove from himself whatever may hinder his affections from tending

wholly to God, for it is in this that the perfection of charity

consists. Such hindrances are of three kinds. First, the attachment

to external goods, which is removed by the vow of poverty; secondly,

the concupiscence of sensible pleasures, chief among which are

venereal pleasures, and these are removed by the vow of continence;

thirdly, the inordinateness of the human will, and this is removed by

the vow of obedience. In like manner the disquiet of worldly

solicitude is aroused in man in reference especially to three things.

First, as regards the dispensing of external things, and this

solicitude is removed from man by the vow of poverty; secondly, as

regards the control of wife and children, which is cut away by the

vow of continence; thirdly, as regards the disposal of one's own

actions, which is eliminated by the vow of obedience, whereby a man

commits himself to the disposal of another.

Again, "a holocaust is the offering to God of all that one has,"

according to Gregory (Hom. xx in Ezech.). Now man has a threefold

good, according to the Philosopher (Ethic. i, 8). First, the good of

external things, which he wholly offers to God by the vow of

voluntary poverty: secondly, the good of his own body, and this good

he offers to God especially by the vow of continence, whereby he

renounces the greatest bodily pleasures. The third is the good of the

soul, which man wholly offers to God by the vow of obedience, whereby

he offers God his own will by which he makes use of all the powers

and habits of the soul. Therefore the religious state is fittingly

constituted by the three vows.

Reply Obj. 1: As stated above (A. 1), the end whereunto the religious

vow is directed is the perfection of charity, since all the interior

acts of virtue belong to charity as to their mother, according to 1

Cor. 13:4, "Charity is patient, is kind," etc. Hence the interior

acts of virtue, for instance humility, patience, and so forth, do not

come under the religious vow, but this is directed to them as its end.

Reply Obj. 2: All other religious observances are directed to the

three aforesaid principal vows; for if any of them are ordained for

the purpose of procuring a livelihood, such as labor, questing, and

so on, they are to be referred to poverty; for the safeguarding of

which religious seek a livelihood by these means. Other observances

whereby the body is chastised, such as watching, fasting, and the

like, are directly ordained for the observance of the vow of

continence. And such religious observances as regard human actions

whereby a man is directed to the end of religion, namely the love of

God and his neighbor (such as reading, prayer, visiting the sick, and

the like), are comprised under the vow of obedience that applies to

the will, which directs its actions to the end according to the

ordering of another person. The distinction of habit belongs to all

three vows, as a sign of being bound by them: wherefore the religious

habit is given or blessed at the time of profession.

Reply Obj. 3: By obedience a man offers to God his will, to which

though all human affairs are subject, yet some are subject to it

alone in a special manner, namely human actions, since passions

belong also to the sensitive appetite. Wherefore in order to restrain

the passions of carnal pleasures and of external objects of appetite,

which hinder the perfection of life, there was need for the vows of

continence and poverty; but for the ordering of one's own actions

accordingly as the state of perfection requires, there was need for

the vow of obedience.

Reply Obj. 4: As the Philosopher says (Ethic. iv, 3), strictly and

truly speaking honor is not due save to virtue. Since, however,

external goods serve instrumentally for certain acts of virtue, the

consequence is that a certain honor is given to their excellence

especially by the common people who acknowledge none but outward

excellence. Therefore since religious tend to the perfection of

virtue it becomes them not to renounce the honor which God and all

holy men accord to virtue, according to Ps. 138:17, "But to me Thy

friends, O God, are made exceedingly honorable." On the other hand,

they renounce the honor that is given to outward excellence, by the

very fact that they withdraw from a worldly life: hence no special

vow is needed for this.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 1098 / 1128 题