SIXTH ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 186, Art. 6]

Whether It Is Requisite for Religious Perfection That Poverty,

Continence, and Obedience Should Come Under a Vow?

Objection 1: It would seem that it is not requisite for religious

perfection that the three aforesaid, namely poverty, continence, and

obedience, should come under a vow. For the school of perfection is

founded on the principles laid down by our Lord. Now our Lord in

formulating perfection (Matt. 19:21) said: "If thou wilt be perfect,

go, sell all [Vulg.: 'what'] thou hast, and give to the poor,"

without any mention of a vow. Therefore it would seem that a vow is

not necessary for the school of religion.

Obj. 2: Further, a vow is a promise made to God, wherefore (Eccles.

5:3) the wise man after saying: "If thou hast vowed anything to God,

defer not to pay it," adds at once, "for an unfaithful and foolish

promise displeaseth Him." But when a thing is being actually given

there is no need for a promise. Therefore it suffices for religious

perfection that one keep poverty, continence, and obedience without.

vowing them.

Obj. 3: Further, Augustine says (Ad Pollent., de Adult. Conjug. i,

14): "The services we render are more pleasing when we might lawfully

not render them, yet do so out of love." Now it is lawful not to

render a service which we have not vowed, whereas it is unlawful if

we have vowed to render it. Therefore seemingly it is more pleasing

to God to keep poverty, continence, and obedience without a vow.

Therefore a vow is not requisite for religious perfection.

_On the contrary,_ In the Old Law the Nazareans were consecrated by

vow according to Num. 6:2, "When a man or woman shall make a vow to

be sanctified and will consecrate themselves to the Lord," etc. Now

these were a figure of those "who attain the summit of perfection,"

as a gloss [*Cf. Moral. ii] of Gregory states. Therefore a vow is

requisite for religious perfection.

_I answer that,_ It belongs to religious to be in the state of

perfection, as shown above (Q. 174, A. 5). Now the state of

perfection requires an obligation to whatever belongs to perfection:

and this obligation consists in binding oneself to God by means of a

vow. But it is evident from what has been said (AA. 3, 4, 5) that

poverty, continence, and obedience belong to the perfection of the

Christian life. Consequently the religious state requires that one be

bound to these three by vow. Hence Gregory says (Hom. xx in Ezech.):

"When a man vows to God all his possessions, all his life, all his

knowledge, it is a holocaust"; and afterwards he says that this

refers to those who renounce the present world.

Reply Obj. 1: Our Lord declared that it belongs to the perfection of

life that a man follow Him, not anyhow, but in such a way as not to

turn back. Wherefore He says again (Luke 9:62): "No man putting his

hand to the plough, and looking back, is fit for the kingdom of God."

And though some of His disciples went back, yet when our Lord asked

(John 6:68, 69), "Will you also go away?" Peter answered for the

others: "Lord, to whom shall we go?" Hence Augustine says (De

Consensu Ev. ii, 17) that "as Matthew and Mark relate, Peter and

Andrew followed Him after drawing their boats on to the beach, not as

though they purposed to return, but as following Him at His command."

Now this unwavering following of Christ is made fast by a vow:

wherefore a vow is requisite for religious perfection.

Reply Obj. 2: As Gregory says (Moral. ii) religious perfection

requires that a man give "his whole life" to God. But a man cannot

actually give God his whole life, because that life taken as a whole

is not simultaneous but successive. Hence a man cannot give his whole

life to God otherwise than by the obligation of a vow.

Reply Obj. 3: Among other services that we can lawfully give, is our

liberty, which is dearer to man than aught else. Consequently when a

man of his own accord deprives himself by vow of the liberty of

abstaining from things pertaining to God's service, this is most

acceptable to God. Hence Augustine says (Ep. cxxvii ad Paulin. et

Arment.): "Repent not of thy vow; rejoice rather that thou canst no

longer do lawfully, what thou mightest have done lawfully but to thy

own cost. Happy the obligation that compels to better things."

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 1097 / 1128 题