FIFTH ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 184, Art. 5]

Whether Religious and Prelates Are in the State of Perfection?

Objection 1: It would seem that prelates and religious are not in the

state of perfection. For the state of perfection differs from the

state of the beginners and the proficient. Now no class of men is

specially assigned to the state of the proficient or of the

beginners. Therefore it would seem that neither should any class of

men be assigned to the state of perfection.

Obj. 2: Further, the outward state should answer to the inward, else

one is guilty of lying, "which consists not only in false words, but

also in deceitful deeds," according to Ambrose in one of his sermons

(xxx de Tempore). Now there are many prelates and religious who have

not the inward perfection of charity. Therefore, if all religious and

prelates are in the state of perfection, it would follow that all of

them that are not perfect are in mortal sin, as deceivers and liars.

Obj. 3: Further, as stated above (A. 1), perfection is measured

according to charity. Now the most perfect charity would seem to be

in the martyrs, according to John 15:13, "Greater love than this no

man hath, that a man lay down his life for his friends": and a gloss

on Heb. 12:4, "For you have not yet resisted unto blood," says: "In

this life no love is more perfect than that to which the holy martyrs

attained, who strove against sin even unto blood." Therefore it would

seem that the state of perfection should be ascribed to the martyrs

rather than to religious and bishops.

_On the contrary,_ Dionysius (Eccl. Hier. v) ascribes perfection to

bishops as being perfecters, and (Eccl. Hier. vi) to religious (whom

he calls monks or _therapeutai_, i.e. servants of God) as being

perfected.

_I answer that,_ As stated above (A. 4), there is required for the

state of perfection a perpetual obligation to things pertaining to

perfection, together with a certain solemnity. Now both these

conditions are competent to religious and bishops. For religious bind

themselves by vow to refrain from worldly affairs, which they might

lawfully use, in order more freely to give themselves to God, wherein

consists the perfection of the present life. Hence Dionysius says

(Eccl. Hier. vi), speaking of religious: "Some call them

_therapeutai_," i.e. servants, "on account of their rendering pure

service and homage to God; others call them _monachoi_" [*i.e.

solitaries; whence the English word 'monk'], "on account of the

indivisible and single-minded life which by their being wrapped in,"

i.e. contemplating, "indivisible things, unites them in a Godlike

union and a perfection beloved of God" [*Cf. Q. 180, A. 6]. Moreover,

the obligation in both cases is undertaken with a certain solemnity

of profession and consecration; wherefore Dionysius adds (Eccl. Hier.

vi): "Hence the holy legislation in bestowing perfect grace on them

accords them a hallowing invocation."

In like manner bishops bind themselves to things pertaining to

perfection when they take up the pastoral duty, to which it belongs

that a shepherd "lay down his life for his sheep," according to John

10:15. Wherefore the Apostle says (1 Tim. 6:12): "Thou . . . hast

confessed a good confession before many witnesses," that is to say,

"when he was ordained," as a gloss says on this passage. Again, a

certain solemnity of consecration is employed together with the

aforesaid profession, according to 2 Tim. 1:6: "Stir up the grace of

God which is in thee by the imposition of my hands," which the gloss

ascribes to the grace of the episcopate. And Dionysius says (Eccl.

Hier. v) that "when the high priest," i.e. the bishop, "is ordained,

he receives on his head the most holy imposition of the sacred

oracles, whereby it is signified that he is a participator in the

whole and entire hierarchical power, and that not only is he the

enlightener in all things pertaining to his holy discourses and

actions, but that he also confers this on others."

Reply Obj. 1: Beginning and increase are sought not for their own

sake, but for the sake of perfection; hence it is only to the state

of perfection that some are admitted under certain obligations and

with solemnity.

Reply Obj. 2: Those who enter the state of perfection do not profess

to be perfect, but to tend to perfection. Hence the Apostle says

(Phil. 3:12): "Not as though I had already attained, or were already

perfect; but I follow after, if I may by any means apprehend": and

afterwards (Phil. 3:15): "Let us therefore as many as are perfect, be

thus minded." Hence a man who takes up the state of perfection is not

guilty of lying or deceit through not being perfect, but through

withdrawing his mind from the intention of reaching perfection.

Reply Obj. 3: Martyrdom is the most perfect act of charity. But an

act of perfection does not suffice to make the state of perfection,

as stated above (A. 4).

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 1078 / 1128 题