THIRD ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 161, Art. 3]

Whether One Ought, by Humility, to Subject Oneself to All Men?

Objection 1: It would seem that one ought not, by humility, to

subject oneself to all men. For, as stated above (A. 2, ad 3),

humility consists chiefly in man's subjection to God. Now one ought

not to offer to a man that which is due to God, as is the case with

all acts of religious worship. Therefore, by humility, one ought not

to subject oneself to man.

Obj. 2: Further, Augustine says (De Nat. et Gratia xxxiv): "Humility

should take the part of truth, not of falsehood." Now some men are of

the highest rank, who cannot, without falsehood, subject themselves

to their inferiors. Therefore one ought not, by humility, to subject

oneself to all men.

Obj. 3: Further no one ought to do that which conduces to the

detriment of another's spiritual welfare. But if a man subject

himself to another by humility, this is detrimental to the person to

whom he subjects himself; for the latter might wax proud, or despise

the other. Hence Augustine says in his Rule (Ep. ccxi): "Lest through

excessive humility the superior lose his authority." Therefore a man

ought not, by humility, to subject himself to all.

_On the contrary,_ It is written (Phil. 2:3): "In humility, let each

esteem others better than themselves."

_I answer that,_ We may consider two things in man, namely that which

is God's, and that which is man's. Whatever pertains to defect is

man's: but whatever pertains to man's welfare and perfection is

God's, according to the saying of Osee 13:9, "Destruction is thy own,

O Israel; thy help is only in Me." Now humility, as stated above (A.

1, ad 5; A. 2, ad 3), properly regards the reverence whereby man is

subject to God. Wherefore every man, in respect of that which is his

own, ought to subject himself to every neighbor, in respect of that

which the latter has of God's: but humility does not require a man to

subject what he has of God's to that which may seem to be God's in

another. For those who have a share of God's gifts know that they

have them, according to 1 Cor. 2:12: "That we may know the things

that are given us from God." Wherefore without prejudice to humility

they may set the gifts they have received from God above those that

others appear to have received from Him; thus the Apostle says (Eph.

3:5): "(The mystery of Christ) was not known to the sons of men as it

is now revealed to His holy apostles." In like manner, humility does

not require a man to subject that which he has of his own to that

which his neighbor has of man's: otherwise each one would have to

esteem himself a greater sinner than anyone else: whereas the Apostle

says without prejudice to humility (Gal. 2:15): "We by nature are

Jews, and not of the Gentiles, sinners." Nevertheless a man may

esteem his neighbor to have some good which he lacks himself, or

himself to have some evil which another has not: by reason of which,

he may subject himself to him with humility.

Reply Obj. 1: We must not only revere God in Himself, but also that

which is His in each one, although not with the same measure of

reverence as we revere God. Wherefore we should subject ourselves

with humility to all our neighbors for God's sake, according to 1

Pet. 2:13, "Be ye subject . . . to every human creature for God's

sake"; but to God alone do we owe the worship of latria.

Reply Obj. 2: If we set what our neighbor has of God's above that

which we have of our own, we cannot incur falsehood. Wherefore a

gloss [*St. Augustine, QQ. lxxxiii, qu. 71] on Phil. 2:3, "Esteem

others better than themselves," says: "We must not esteem by

pretending to esteem; but we should in truth think it possible for

another person to have something that is hidden to us and whereby he

is better than we are, although our own good whereby we are

apparently better than he, be not hidden."

Reply Obj. 3: Humility, like other virtues, resides chiefly inwardly

in the soul. Consequently a man, by an inward act of the soul, may

subject himself to another, without giving the other man an occasion

of detriment to his spiritual welfare. This is what Augustine means

in his Rule (Ep. ccxi): "With fear, the superior should prostrate

himself at your feet in the sight of God." On the other hand, due

moderation must be observed in the outward acts of humility even as

of other virtues, lest they conduce to the detriment of others. If,

however, a man does as he ought, and others take therefrom an

occasion of sin, this is not imputed to the man who acts with

humility; since he does not give scandal, although others take it.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 963 / 1128 题