FIRST ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 146, Art. 1]

Whether Abstinence Is a Virtue?

Objection 1: It seems that abstinence is not a virtue. For the

Apostle says (1 Cor. 4:20): "The kingdom of God is not in speech but

in power (_virtute_)." Now the kingdom of God does not consist in

abstinence, for the Apostle says (Rom. 14:17): "The kingdom of God is

not meat and drink," where a gloss [*Cf. St. Augustine, QQ. Evang.

ii, qu. 11] observes that "justice consists neither in abstaining nor

in eating." Therefore abstinence is not a virtue.

Obj. 2: Further, Augustine says (Confess. x, 11) addressing himself

to God: "This hast Thou taught me, that I should set myself to take

food as physic." Now it belongs not to virtue, but to the medical art

to regulate medicine. Therefore, in like manner, to regulate one's

food, which belongs to abstinence, is an act not of virtue but of art.

Obj. 3: Further, every virtue "observes the mean," as stated in

_Ethic._ ii, 6, 7. But abstinence seemingly inclines not to the mean

but to deficiency, since it denotes retrenchment. Therefore

abstinence is not a virtue.

Obj. 4: Further, no virtue excludes another virtue. But abstinence

excludes patience: for Gregory says (Pastor. iii, 19) that

"impatience not unfrequently dislodges the abstainer's mind from its

peaceful seclusion." Likewise he says (Pastor. iii, 19) that

"sometimes the sin of pride pierces the thoughts of the abstainer,"

so that abstinence excludes humility. Therefore abstinence is not a

virtue.

_On the contrary,_ It is written (2 Pet. 1:5, 6): "Join with your

faith virtue, and with virtue knowledge, and with knowledge

abstinence"; where abstinence is numbered among other virtues.

Therefore abstinence is a virtue.

_I answer that,_ Abstinence by its very name denotes retrenchment of

food. Hence the term abstinence may be taken in two ways. First, as

denoting retrenchment of food absolutely, and in this way it

signifies neither a virtue nor a virtuous act, but something

indifferent. Secondly, it may be taken as regulated by reason, and

then it signifies either a virtuous habit or a virtuous act. This is

the meaning of Peter's words quoted above, where he says that we

ought "to join abstinence with knowledge," namely that in abstaining

from food a man should act with due regard for those among whom he

lives, for his own person, and for the requirements of health.

Reply Obj. 1: The use of and abstinence from food, considered in

themselves, do not pertain to the kingdom of God, since the Apostle

says (1 Cor. 8:8): "Meat doth not commend us to God. For neither, if

we eat not [*Vulg.: 'Neither if we eat . . . nor if we eat not'],

shall we have the less, nor if we eat, shall we have the more," i.e.

spiritually. Nevertheless they both belong to the kingdom of God, in

so far as they are done reasonably through faith and love of God.

Reply Obj. 2: The regulation of food, in the point of quantity and

quality, belongs to the art of medicine as regards the health of the

body: but in the point of internal affections with regard to the good

of reason, it belongs to abstinence. Hence Augustine says (QQ. Evang.

ii, qu. 11): "It makes no difference whatever to virtue what or how

much food a man takes, so long as he does it with due regard for the

people among whom he lives, for his own person, and for the

requirements of his health: but it matters how readily and

uncomplainingly he does without food when bound by duty or necessity

to abstain."

Reply Obj. 3: It belongs to temperance to bridle the pleasures which

are too alluring to the soul, just as it belongs to fortitude to

strengthen the soul against fears that deter it from the good of

reason. Wherefore, just as fortitude is commended on account of a

certain excess, from which all the parts of fortitude take their

name, so temperance is commended for a kind of deficiency, from which

all its parts are denominated. Hence abstinence, since it is a part

of temperance, is named from deficiency, and yet it observes the

mean, in so far as it is in accord with right reason.

Reply Obj. 4: Those vices result from abstinence in so far as it is

not in accord with right reason. For right reason makes one abstain

as one ought, i.e. with gladness of heart, and for the due end, i.e.

for God's glory and not one's own.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 872 / 1128 题