SECOND ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 146, Art. 1]

Whether Abstinence Is a Special Virtue?

Objection 1: It would seem that abstinence is not a special virtue.

For every virtue is praiseworthy by itself. But abstinence is not

praiseworthy by itself; for Gregory says (Pastor. iii, 19) that "the

virtue of abstinence is praised only on account of the other

virtues." Therefore abstinence is not a special virtue.

Obj. 2: Further, Augustine [*Fulgentius] says (De Fide ad Pet. xlii)

that "the saints abstain from meat and drink, not that any creature

of God is evil, but merely in order to chastise the body." Now this

belongs to chastity, as its very name denotes. Therefore abstinence

is not a special virtue distinct from chastity.

Obj. 3: Further, as man should be content with moderate meat, so

should he be satisfied with moderate clothes, according to 1 Tim.

6:8, "Having food, and wherewith to be covered, with these we should

be [Vulg.: 'are'] content." Now there is no special virtue in being

content with moderate clothes. Neither, therefore, is there in

abstinence which moderates food.

_On the contrary,_ Macrobius [*In Somn. Scip. i, 8] reckons

abstinence as a special part of temperance.

_I answer that,_ As stated above (Q. 136, A. 1; Q. 141, A. 3) moral

virtue maintains the good of reason against the onslaught of the

passions: hence whenever we find a special motive why a passion

departs from the good of reason, there is need of a special virtue.

Now pleasures of the table are of a nature to withdraw man from the

good of reason, both because they are so great, and because food is

necessary to man who needs it for the maintenance of life, which he

desires above all other things. Therefore abstinence is a special

virtue.

Reply Obj. 1: Virtues are of necessity connected together, as stated

above (I-II, Q. 65, A. 1). Wherefore one virtue receives help and

commendation from another, as justice from fortitude. Accordingly in

this way the virtue of abstinence receives commendation on account of

the other virtues.

Reply Obj. 2: The body is chastised by means of abstinence, not only

against the allurements of lust, but also against those of gluttony:

since by abstaining a man gains strength for overcoming the

onslaughts of gluttony, which increase in force the more he yields to

them. Yet abstinence is not prevented from being a special virtue

through being a help to chastity, since one virtue helps another.

Reply Obj. 3: The use of clothing was devised by art, whereas the use

of food is from nature. Hence it is more necessary to have a special

virtue for the moderation of food than for the moderation of clothing.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 873 / 1128 题