FOURTH ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 136, Art. 4]

Whether Patience Is a Part of Fortitude?

Objection 1: It seems that patience is not a part of fortitude. For a

thing is not part of itself. Now patience is apparently the same as

fortitude: because, as stated above (Q. 123, A. 6), the proper act of

fortitude is to endure; and this belongs also to patience. For it is

stated in the Liber Sententiarum Prosperi [*The quotation is from St.

Gregory, Hom. xxxv in Evang.] that "patience consists in enduring

evils inflicted by others." Therefore patience is not a part of

fortitude.

Obj. 2: Further, fortitude is about fear and daring, as stated above

(Q. 123, A. 3), and thus it is in the irascible. But patience seems

to be about sorrow, and consequently would seem to be in the

concupiscible. Therefore patience is not a part of fortitude but of

temperance.

Obj. 3: Further, the whole cannot be without its part. Therefore if

patience is a part of fortitude, there can be no fortitude without

patience. Yet sometimes a brave man does not endure evils patiently,

but even attacks the person who inflicts the evil. Therefore patience

is not a part of fortitude.

_On the contrary,_ Tully (De Invent. Rhet. ii) reckons it a part of

fortitude.

_I answer that,_ Patience is a quasi-potential part of fortitude,

because it is annexed thereto as secondary to principal virtue. For

it belongs to patience "to suffer with an equal mind the evils

inflicted by others," as Gregory says in a homily (xxxv in Evang.).

Now of those evils that are inflicted by others, foremost and most

difficult to endure are those that are connected with the danger of

death, and about these evils fortitude is concerned. Hence it is

clear that in this matter fortitude has the principal place, and that

it lays claim to that which is principal in this matter. Wherefore

patience is annexed to fortitude as secondary to principal virtue,

for which reason Prosper calls patience brave (Sent. 811).

Reply Obj. 1: It belongs to fortitude to endure, not anything indeed,

but that which is most difficult to endure, namely dangers of death:

whereas it may pertain to patience to endure any kind of evil.

Reply Obj. 2: The act of fortitude consists not only in holding fast

to good against the fear of future dangers, but also in not failing

through sorrow or pain occasioned by things present; and it is in the

latter respect that patience is akin to fortitude. Yet fortitude is

chiefly about fear, which of itself evokes flight which fortitude

avoids; while patience is chiefly about sorrow, for a man is said to

be patient, not because he does not fly, but because he behaves in a

praiseworthy manner by suffering (_patiendo_) things which hurt him

here and now, in such a way as not to be inordinately saddened by

them. Hence fortitude is properly in the irascible, while patience is

in the concupiscible faculty.

Nor does this hinder patience from being a part of fortitude, because

the annexing of virtue to virtue does not regard the subject, but the

matter or the form. Nevertheless patience is not to be reckoned a

part of temperance, although both are in the concupiscible, because

temperance is only about those sorrows that are opposed to pleasures

of touch, such as arise through abstinence from pleasures of food and

sex: whereas patience is chiefly about sorrows inflicted by other

persons. Moreover it belongs to temperance to control these sorrows

besides their contrary pleasures: whereas it belongs to patience that

a man forsake not the good of virtue on account of such like sorrows,

however great they be.

Reply Obj. 3: It may be granted that patience in a certain respect is

an integral part of justice, if we consider the fact that a man may

patiently endure evils pertaining to dangers of death; and it is from

this point of view that the objection argues. Nor is it inconsistent

with patience that a man should, when necessary, rise up against the

man who inflicts evils on him; for Chrysostom [*Homily v. in the Opus

Imperfectum, falsely ascribed to St. John Chrysostom] says on Matt.

4:10, "Begone Satan," that "it is praiseworthy to be patient under

our own wrongs, but to endure God's wrongs patiently is most wicked":

and Augustine says in a letter to Marcellinus (Ep. cxxxviii) that

"the precepts of patience are not opposed to the good of the

commonwealth, since in order to ensure that good we fight against our

enemies." But in so far as patience regards all kinds of evils, it is

annexed to fortitude as secondary to principal virtue.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 828 / 1128 题