EIGHTH ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 129, Art. 8]

Whether Goods of Fortune Conduce to Magnanimity?

Objection 1: It seems that goods of fortune do not conduce to

magnanimity. For according to Seneca (De Ira i: De vita beata xvi):

"virtue suffices for itself." Now magnanimity takes every virtue

great, as stated above (A. 4, ad 3). Therefore goods of fortune do

not conduce to magnanimity.

Obj. 2: Further, no virtuous man despises what is helpful to him. But

the magnanimous man despises whatever pertains to goods of fortune:

for Tully says (De Offic. i) under the heading: "Magnanimity consists

of two things," that "a great soul is commended for despising

external things." Therefore a magnanimous man is not helped by goods

of fortune.

Obj. 3: Further, Tully adds (De Offic. i) that "it belongs to a great

soul so to bear what seems troublesome, as nowise to depart from his

natural estate, or from the dignity of a wise man." And Aristotle

says (Ethic. iv, 3) that "a magnanimous man does not grieve at

misfortune." Now troubles and misfortunes are opposed to goods of

fortune, for every one grieves at the loss of what is helpful to him.

Therefore external goods of fortune do not conduce to magnanimity.

_On the contrary,_ The Philosopher says (Ethic. iv, 3) that "good

fortune seems to conduce to magnanimity."

_I answer that,_ As stated above (A. 1), magnanimity regards two

things: honor as its matter, and the accomplishment of something

great as its end. Now goods of fortune conduce to both these things.

For since honor is conferred on the virtuous, not only by the wise,

but also by the multitude who hold these goods of fortune in the

highest esteem, the result is that they show greater honor to those

who possess goods of fortune. Likewise goods of fortune are useful

organs or instruments of virtuous deeds: since we can easily

accomplish things by means of riches, power and friends. Hence it is

evident that goods of fortune conduce to magnanimity.

Reply Obj. 1: Virtue is said to be sufficient for itself, because it

can be without even these external goods; yet it needs them in order

to act more expeditiously.

Reply Obj. 2: The magnanimous man despises external goods, inasmuch

as he does not think them so great as to be bound to do anything

unbecoming for their sake. Yet he does not despise them, but that he

esteems them useful for the accomplishment of virtuous deeds.

Reply Obj. 3: If a man does not think much of a thing, he is neither

very joyful at obtaining it, nor very grieved at losing it.

Wherefore, since the magnanimous man does not think much of external

goods, that is goods of fortune, he is neither much uplifted by them

if he has them, nor much cast down by their loss.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 800 / 1128 题