FOURTH ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 129, Art. 4]

Whether Magnanimity Is a Special Virtue?

Objection 1: It seems that magnanimity is not a special virtue. For

no special virtue is operative in every virtue. But the Philosopher

states (Ethic. iv, 3) that "whatever is great in each virtue belongs

to the magnanimous." Therefore magnanimity is not a special virtue.

Obj. 2: Further, the acts of different virtues are not ascribed to

any special virtue. But the acts of different virtues are ascribed to

the magnanimous man. For it is stated in _Ethic._ iv, 3 that "it

belongs to the magnanimous not to avoid reproof" (which is an act of

prudence), "nor to act unjustly" (which is an act of justice), "that

he is ready to do favors" (which is an act of charity), "that he

gives his services readily" (which is an act of liberality), that "he

is truthful" (which is an act of truthfulness), and that "he is not

given to complaining" (which is an act of patience). Therefore

magnanimity is not a special virtue.

Obj. 3: Further, every virtue is a special ornament of the soul,

according to the saying of Isa. 61:10, "He hath clothed me with the

garments of salvation," and afterwards he adds, "and as a bride

adorned with her jewels." But magnanimity is the ornament of all the

virtues, as stated in _Ethic._ iv. Therefore magnanimity is a general

virtue.

_On the contrary,_ The Philosopher (Ethic. ii, 7) distinguishes it

from the other virtues.

_I answer that,_ As stated above (Q. 123, A. 2), it belongs to a

special virtue to establish the mode of reason in a determinate

matter. Now magnanimity establishes the mode of reason in a

determinate matter, namely honors, as stated above (AA. 1, 2): and

honor, considered in itself, is a special good, and accordingly

magnanimity considered in itself is a special virtue.

Since, however, honor is the reward of every virtue, as stated above

(Q. 103, A. 1, ad 2), it follows that by reason of its matter it

regards all the virtues.

Reply Obj. 1: Magnanimity is not about any kind of honor, but great

honor. Now, as honor is due to virtue, so great honor is due to a

great deed of virtue. Hence it is that the magnanimous is intent on

doing great deeds in every virtue, in so far, to wit, as he tends to

what is worthy of great honors.

Reply Obj. 2: Since the magnanimous tends to great things, it follows

that he tends chiefly to things that involve a certain excellence,

and shuns those that imply defect. Now it savors of excellence that a

man is beneficent, generous and grateful. Wherefore he shows himself

ready to perform actions of this kind, but not as acts of the other

virtues. On the other hand, it is a proof of defect, that a man

thinks so much of certain external goods or evils, that for their

sake he abandons and gives up justice or any virtue whatever. Again,

all concealment of the truth indicates a defect, since it seems to be

the outcome of fear. Also that a man be given to complaining denotes

a defect, because by so doing the mind seems to give way to external

evils. Wherefore these and like things the magnanimous man avoids

under a special aspect, inasmuch as they are contrary to his

excellence or greatness.

Reply Obj. 3: Every virtue derives from its species a certain luster

or adornment which is proper to each virtue: but further adornment

results from the very greatness of a virtuous deed, through

magnanimity which makes all virtues greater as stated in _Ethic._

iv, 3.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 796 / 1128 题