FIFTH ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 123, Art. 5]

Whether Fortitude Is Properly About Dangers of Death in Battle?

Objection 1: It seems that fortitude is not properly about dangers of

death in battle. For martyrs above all are commended for their

fortitude. But martyrs are not commended in connection with battle.

Therefore fortitude is not properly about dangers of death in battle.

Obj. 2: Further, Ambrose says (De Offic. i) that "fortitude is

applicable both to warlike and to civil matters": and Tully (De

Offic. i), under the heading, "That it pertains to fortitude to excel

in battle rather than in civil life," says: "Although not a few think

that the business of war is of greater importance than the affairs of

civil life, this opinion must be qualified: and if we wish to judge

the matter truly, there are many things in civil life that are more

important and more glorious than those connected with war." Now

greater fortitude is about greater things. Therefore fortitude is not

properly concerned with death in battle.

Obj. 3: Further, war is directed to the preservation of a country's

temporal peace: for Augustine says (De Civ. Dei xix) that "wars are

waged in order to insure peace." Now it does not seem that one ought

to expose oneself to the danger of death for the temporal peace of

one's country, since this same peace is the occasion of much license

in morals. Therefore it seems that the virtue of fortitude is not

about the danger of death in battle.

_On the contrary,_ The Philosopher says (Ethic. iii) that fortitude

is chiefly about death in battle.

_I answer that,_ As stated above (A. 4), fortitude strengthens a

man's mind against the greatest danger, which is that of death. Now

fortitude is a virtue; and it is essential to virtue ever to tend to

good; wherefore it is in order to pursue some good that man does not

fly from the danger of death. But the dangers of death arising out of

sickness, storms at sea, attacks from robbers, and the like, do not

seem to come on a man through his pursuing some good. On the other

hand, the dangers of death which occur in battle come to man directly

on account of some good, because, to wit, he is defending the common

good by a just fight. Now a just fight is of two kinds. First, there

is the general combat, for instance, of those who fight in battle;

secondly, there is the private combat, as when a judge or even

private individual does not refrain from giving a just judgment

through fear of the impending sword, or any other danger though it

threaten death. Hence it belongs to fortitude to strengthen the mind

against dangers of death, not only such as arise in a general battle,

but also such as occur in singular combat, which may be called by the

general name of battle. Accordingly it must be granted that fortitude

is properly about dangers of death occurring in battle.

Moreover, a brave man behaves well in face of danger of any other

kind of death; especially since man may be in danger of any kind of

death on account of virtue: thus may a man not fail to attend on a

sick friend through fear of deadly infection, or not refuse to

undertake a journey with some godly object in view through fear of

shipwreck or robbers.

Reply Obj. 1: Martyrs face the fight that is waged against their own

person, and this for the sake of the sovereign good which is God;

wherefore their fortitude is praised above all. Nor is it outside the

genus of fortitude that regards warlike actions, for which reason

they are said to have been valiant in battle. [*Office of Martyrs,

ex. Heb. xi. 34.]

Reply Obj. 2: Personal and civil business is differentiated from the

business of war that regards general wars. However, personal and

civil affairs admit of dangers of death arising out of certain

conflicts which are private wars, and so with regard to these also

there may be fortitude properly so called.

Reply Obj. 3: The peace of the state is good in itself, nor does it

become evil because certain persons make evil use of it. For there

are many others who make good use of it; and many evils prevented by

it, such as murders and sacrileges, are much greater than those which

are occasioned by it, and which belong chiefly to the sins of the

flesh.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 764 / 1128 题