FOURTH ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 66, Art. 4]

Whether Theft and Robbery Are Sins of Different Species?

Objection 1: It would seem that theft and robbery are not sins of

different species. For theft and robbery differ as "secret" and

"manifest": because theft is taking something secretly, while robbery

is to take something violently and openly. Now in the other kinds of

sins, the secret and the manifest do not differ specifically.

Therefore theft and robbery are not different species of sin.

Obj. 2: Further, moral actions take their species from the end, as

stated above (I-II, Q. 1, A. 3; Q. 18, A. 6). Now theft and robbery

are directed to the same end, viz. the possession of another's

property. Therefore they do not differ specifically.

Obj. 3: Further, just as a thing is taken by force for the sake of

possession, so is a woman taken by force for pleasure: wherefore

Isidore says (Etym. x) that "he who commits a rape is called a

corrupter, and the victim of the rape is said to be corrupted." Now

it is a case of rape whether the woman be carried off publicly or

secretly. Therefore the thing appropriated is said to be taken by

force, whether it be done secretly or publicly. Therefore theft and

robbery do not differ.

_On the contrary,_ The Philosopher (Ethic. v, 2) distinguishes theft

from robbery, and states that theft is done in secret, but that

robbery is done openly.

_I answer that,_ Theft and robbery are vices contrary to justice, in

as much as one man does another an injustice. Now "no man suffers an

injustice willingly," as stated in _Ethic._ v, 9. Wherefore theft and

robbery derive their sinful nature, through the taking being

involuntary on the part of the person from whom something is taken.

Now the involuntary is twofold, namely, through violence and through

ignorance, as stated in _Ethic._ iii, 1. Therefore the sinful aspect

of robbery differs from that of theft: and consequently they differ

specifically.

Reply Obj. 1: In the other kinds of sin the sinful nature is not

derived from something involuntary, as in the sins opposed to

justice: and so where there is a different kind of involuntary, there

is a different species of sin.

Reply Obj. 2: The remote end of robbery and theft is the same. But

this is not enough for identity of species, because there is a

difference of proximate ends, since the robber wishes to take a thing

by his own power, but the thief, by cunning.

Reply Obj. 3: The robbery of a woman cannot be secret on the part of

the woman who is taken: wherefore even if it be secret as regards the

others from whom she is taken, the nature of robbery remains on the

part of the woman to whom violence is done.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 453 / 1128 题