FOURTH ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 43, Art. 4]

Whether Scandal Is a Mortal Sin?

Objection 1: It would seem that scandal is a mortal sin. For every

sin that is contrary to charity is a mortal sin, as stated above (Q.

24, A. 12; Q. 35, A. 3). But scandal is contrary to charity, as

stated above (AA. 2, 3). Therefore scandal is a mortal sin.

Obj. 2: Further, no sin, save mortal sin, deserves the punishment of

eternal damnation. But scandal deserves the punishment of eternal

damnation, according to Matt. 18:6: "He that shall scandalize one of

these little ones, that believe in Me, it were better for him that a

mill-stone should be hanged about his neck, and that he should be

drowned in the depth of the sea." For, as Jerome says on this

passage, "it is much better to receive a brief punishment for a

fault, than to await everlasting torments." Therefore scandal is a

mortal sin.

Obj. 3: Further, every sin committed against God is a mortal sin,

because mortal sin alone turns man away from God. Now scandal is a

sin against God, for the Apostle says (1 Cor. 8:12): "When you wound

the weak conscience of the brethren [*Vulg.: 'When you sin thus

against the brethren and wound their weak conscience'], you sin

against Christ." Therefore scandal is always a mortal sin.

_On the contrary,_ It may be a venial sin to lead a person into

venial sin: and yet this would be to give scandal. Therefore scandal

may be a venial sin.

_I answer that,_ As stated above (A. 1), scandal denotes a stumbling

whereby a person is disposed to a spiritual downfall. Consequently

passive scandal may sometimes be a venial sin, when it consists in a

stumbling and nothing more; for instance, when a person is disturbed

by a movement of venial sin occasioned by another's inordinate word

or deed: while sometimes it is a mortal sin, when the stumbling

results in a downfall, for instance, when a person goes so far as to

commit a mortal sin through another's inordinate word or deed.

Active scandal, if it be accidental, may sometimes be a venial sin;

for instance, when, through a slight indiscretion, a person either

commits a venial sin, or does something that is not a sin in itself,

but has some appearance of evil. On the other hand, it is sometimes a

mortal sin, either because a person commits a mortal sin, or because

he has such contempt for his neighbor's spiritual welfare that he

declines, for the sake of procuring it, to forego doing what he

wishes to do. But in the case of active direct scandal, as when a

person intends to lead another into sin, if he intends to lead him

into mortal sin, his own sin will be mortal; and in like manner if he

intends by committing a mortal sin himself, to lead another into

venial sin; whereas if he intends, by committing a venial sin, to

lead another into venial sin, there will be a venial sin of scandal.

And this suffices for the Replies to the Objections.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 295 / 1128 题