THIRD ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 34, Art. 3]

Whether hatred of one's neighbor is always a sin?

Objection 1: It would seem that hatred of one's neighbor is not

always a sin. For no sin is commanded or counselled by God, according

to Prov. 8:8: "All My words are just, there is nothing wicked nor

perverse in them." Now, it is written (Luke 14:26): "If any man come

to Me, and hate not his father and mother . . . he cannot be My

disciple." Therefore hatred of one's neighbor is not always a sin.

Obj. 2: Further, nothing wherein we imitate God can be a sin. But it

is in imitation of God that we hate certain people: for it is written

(Rom. 1:30): "Detractors, hateful to God." Therefore it is possible

to hate certain people without committing a sin.

Obj. 3: Further, nothing that is natural is a sin, for sin is a

"wandering away from what is according to nature," according to

Damascene (De Fide Orth. ii, 4, 30; iv, 20). Now it is natural to a

thing to hate whatever is contrary to it, and to aim at its undoing.

Therefore it seems that it is not a sin to hate one's I enemy.

_On the contrary,_ It is written (1 John 2:9): "He that . . . hateth

his brother, is in darkness." Now spiritual darkness is sin.

Therefore there cannot be hatred of one's neighbor without sin.

_I answer that,_ Hatred is opposed to love, as stated above (I-II, Q.

29, A. 2); so that hatred of a thing is evil according as the love of

that thing is good. Now love is due to our neighbor in respect of

what he holds from God, i.e. in respect of nature and grace, but not

in respect of what he has of himself and from the devil, i.e. in

respect of sin and lack of justice.

Consequently it is lawful to hate the sin in one's brother, and

whatever pertains to the defect of Divine justice, but we cannot hate

our brother's nature and grace without sin. Now it is part of our

love for our brother that we hate the fault and the lack of good in

him, since desire for another's good is equivalent to hatred of his

evil. Consequently the hatred of one's brother, if we consider it

simply, is always sinful.

Reply Obj. 1: By the commandment of God (Ex. 20:12) we must honor our

parents--as united to us in nature and kinship. But we must hate them

in so far as they prove an obstacle to our attaining the perfection

of Divine justice.

Reply Obj. 2: God hates the sin which is in the detractor, not his

nature: so that we can hate detractors without committing a sin.

Reply Obj. 3: Men are not opposed to us in respect of the goods which

they have received from God: wherefore, in this respect, we should

love them. But they are opposed to us, in so far as they show

hostility towards us, and this is sinful in them. In this respect we

should hate them, for we should hate in them the fact that they are

hostile to us.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 254 / 1128 题