FOURTH ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 19, Art. 4]

Whether Servile Fear Is Good?

Objection 1: It would seem that servile fear is not good. For if the

use of a thing is evil, the thing itself is evil. Now the use of

servile fear is evil, for according to a gloss on Rom. 8:15, "if a man

do anything through fear, although the deed be good, it is not well

done." Therefore servile fear is not good.

Obj. 2: Further, no good grows from a sinful root. Now servile fear

grows from a sinful root, because when commenting on Job 3:11, "Why

did I not die in the womb?" Gregory says (Moral. iv, 25): "When a man

dreads the punishment which confronts him for his sin and no longer

loves the friendship of God which he has lost, his fear is born of

pride, not of humility." Therefore servile fear is evil.

Obj. 3: Further, just as mercenary love is opposed to the love of

charity, so is servile fear, apparently, opposed to chaste fear. But

mercenary love is always evil. Therefore servile fear is also.

_On the contrary,_ Nothing evil is from the Holy Ghost. But servile fear

is from the Holy Ghost, since a gloss on Rom. 8:15, "You have not

received the spirit of bondage," etc. says: "It is the one same spirit

that bestows two fears, viz. servile and chaste fear." Therefore

servile fear is not evil.

_I answer that,_ It is owing to its servility that servile fear may be

evil. For servitude is opposed to freedom. Since, then, "what is free

is cause of itself" (Metaph. i, 2), a slave is one who does not act as

cause of his own action, but as though moved from without. Now whoever

does a thing through love, does it of himself so to speak, because it

is by his own inclination that he is moved to act: so that it is

contrary to the very notion of servility that one should act from

love. Consequently servile fear as such is contrary to charity: so

that if servility were essential to fear, servile fear would be evil

simply, even as adultery is evil simply, because that which makes it

contrary to charity belongs to its very species.

This servility, however, does not belong to the species of servile

fear, even as neither does lifelessness to the species of lifeless

faith. For the species of a moral habit or act is taken from the

object. Now the object of servile fear is punishment, and it is by

accident that, either the good to which the punishment is contrary,

is loved as the last end, and that consequently the punishment is

feared as the greatest evil, which is the case with one who is devoid

of charity, or that the punishment is directed to God as its end, and

that, consequently, it is not feared as the greatest evil, which is

the case with one who has charity. For the species of a habit is not

destroyed through its object or end being directed to a further end.

Consequently servile fear is substantially good, but is servility is

evil.

Reply Obj. 1: This saying of Augustine is to be applied to a man who

does something through servile fear as such, so that he loves not

justice, and fears nothing but the punishment.

Reply Obj. 2: Servile fear as to its substance is not born of pride,

but its servility is, inasmuch as man is unwilling, by love, to

subject his affections to the yoke of justice.

Reply Obj. 3: Mercenary love is that whereby God is loved for the

sake of worldly goods, and this is, of itself, contrary to charity,

so that mercenary love is always evil. But servile fear, as to its

substance, implies merely fear of punishment, whether or not this be

feared as the principal evil.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 128 / 1128 题