THIRD ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 19, Art. 3]

Whether Worldly Fear Is Always Evil?

Objection 1: It would seem that worldly fear is not always evil.

Because regard for men seems to be a kind of human fear. Now some are

blamed for having no regard for man, for instance, the unjust judge

of whom we read (Luke 18:2) that he "feared not God, nor regarded

man." Therefore it seems that worldly fear is not always evil.

Obj. 2: Further, worldly fear seems to have reference to the

punishments inflicted by the secular power. Now such like punishments

incite us to good actions, according to Rom. 13:3, "Wilt thou not be

afraid of the power? Do that which is good, and thou shalt have

praise from the same." Therefore worldly fear is not always evil.

Obj. 3: Further, it seems that what is in us naturally, is not evil,

since our natural gifts are from God. Now it is natural to man to

fear detriment to his body, and loss of his worldly goods, whereby

the present life is supported. Therefore it seems that worldly fear

is not always evil.

_On the contrary,_ Our Lord said (Matt. 10:28): "Fear ye not them

that kill the body," thus forbidding worldly fear. Now nothing but

what is evil is forbidden by God. Therefore worldly fear is evil.

_I answer that,_ As shown above (I-II, Q. 1, A. 3; I-II, Q. 18, A. 1;

I-II, Q. 54, A. 2) moral acts and habits take their name and species

from their objects. Now the proper object of the appetite's movement

is the final good: so that, in consequence, every appetitive movement

is both specified and named from its proper end. For if anyone were

to describe covetousness as love of work because men work on account

of covetousness, this description would be incorrect, since the

covetous man seeks work not as end but as a means: the end that he

seeks is wealth, wherefore covetousness is rightly described as the

desire or the love of wealth, and this is evil. Accordingly worldly

love is, properly speaking, the love whereby a man trusts in the

world as his end, so that worldly love is always evil. Now fear is

born of love, since man fears the loss of what he loves, as Augustine

states (Qq. lxxxiii, qu. 33). Now worldly fear is that which arises

from worldly love as from an evil root, for which reason worldly fear

is always evil.

Reply Obj. 1: One may have regard for men in two ways. First in so

far as there is in them something divine, for instance, the good of

grace or of virtue, or at least of the natural image of God: and in

this way those are blamed who have no regard for man. Secondly, one

may have regard for men as being in opposition to God, and thus it is

praiseworthy to have no regard for men, according as we read of Elias

or Eliseus (Ecclus. 48:13): "In his days he feared not the prince."

Reply Obj. 2: When the secular power inflicts punishment in order to

withdraw men from sin, it is acting as God's minister, according to

Rom. 13:4, "For he is God's minister, an avenger to execute wrath

upon him that doth evil." To fear the secular power in this way is

part, not of worldly fear, but of servile or initial fear.

Reply Obj. 3: It is natural for man to shrink from detriment to his

own body and loss of worldly goods, but to forsake justice on that

account is contrary to natural reason. Hence the Philosopher says

(Ethic. iii, 1) that there are certain things, viz. sinful deeds,

which no fear should drive us to do, since to do such things is worse

than to suffer any punishment whatever.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 127 / 1128 题