SECOND ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 19, Art. 2]

Whether Fear Is Fittingly Divided into Filial, Initial, Servile and

Worldly Fear?

Objection 1: It would seem that fear is unfittingly divided into

filial, initial, servile and worldly fear. For Damascene says (De

Fide Orth. ii, 15) that there are six kinds of fear, viz. "laziness,

shamefacedness," etc. of which we have treated above (I-II, Q. 41, A.

4), and which are not mentioned in the division in question.

Therefore this division of fear seems unfitting.

Obj. 2: Further, each of these fears is either good or evil. But

there is a fear, viz. natural fear, which is neither morally good,

since it is in the demons, according to James 2:19, "The devils . . .

believe and tremble," nor evil, since it is in Christ, according to

Mk. 14:33, Jesus "began to fear and be heavy." Therefore the

aforesaid division of fear is insufficient.

Obj. 3: Further, the relation of son to father differs from that of

wife to husband, and this again from that of servant to master. Now

filial fear, which is that of the son in comparison with his father,

is distinct from servile fear, which is that of the servant in

comparison with his master. Therefore chaste fear, which seems to be

that of the wife in comparison with her husband, ought to be

distinguished from all these other fears.

Obj. 4: Further, even as servile fear fears punishment, so do initial

and worldly fear. Therefore no distinction should be made between

them.

Obj. 5: Further, even as concupiscence is about some good, so is fear

about some evil. Now "concupiscence of the eyes," which is the desire

for things of this world, is distinct from "concupiscence of the

flesh," which is the desire for one's own pleasure. Therefore

"worldly fear," whereby one fears to lose external goods, is distinct

from "human fear," whereby one fears harm to one's own person.

On the contrary stands the authority of the Master (Sent. iii, D, 34).

_I answer that,_ We are speaking of fear now, in so far as it makes

us turn, so to speak, to God or away from Him. For, since the object

of fear is an evil, sometimes, on account of the evils he fears, man

withdraws from God, and this is called human fear; while sometimes,

on account of the evils he fears, he turns to God and adheres to Him.

This latter evil is twofold, viz. evil of punishment, and evil of

fault.

Accordingly if a man turn to God and adhere to Him, through fear of

punishment, it will be servile fear; but if it be on account of fear

of committing a fault, it will be filial fear, for it becomes a child

to fear offending its father. If, however, it be on account of both,

it will be initial fear, which is between both these fears. As to

whether it is possible to fear the evil of fault, the question has

been treated above (I-II, Q. 42, A. 3) when we were considering the

passion of fear.

Reply Obj. 1: Damascene divides fear as a passion of the soul:

whereas this division of fear is taken from its relation to God, as

explained above.

Reply Obj. 2: Moral good consists chiefly in turning to God, while

moral evil consists chiefly in turning away from Him: wherefore all

the fears mentioned above imply either moral evil or moral good. Now

natural fear is presupposed to moral good and evil, and so it is not

numbered among these kinds of fear.

Reply Obj. 3: The relation of servant to master is based on the power

which the master exercises over the servant; whereas, on the

contrary, the relation of a son to his father or of a wife to her

husband is based on the son's affection towards his father to whom he

submits himself, or on the wife's affection towards her husband to

whom she binds herself in the union of love. Hence filial and chaste

fear amount to the same, because by the love of charity God becomes

our Father, according to Rom. 8:15, "You have received the spirit of

adoption of sons, whereby we cry: Abba (Father)"; and by this same

charity He is called our spouse, according to 2 Cor. 11:2, "I have

espoused you to one husband, that I may present you as a chaste

virgin to Christ": whereas servile fear has no connection with these,

since it does not include charity in its definition.

Reply Obj. 4: These three fears regard punishment but in different

ways. For worldly or human fear regards a punishment which turns man

away from God, and which God's enemies sometimes inflict or threaten:

whereas servile and initial fear regard a punishment whereby men are

drawn to God, and which is inflicted or threatened by God. Servile

fear regards this punishment chiefly, while initial fear regards it

secondarily.

Reply Obj. 5: It amounts to the same whether man turns away from God

through fear of losing his worldly goods, or through fear of

forfeiting the well-being of his body, since external goods belong to

the body. Hence both these fears are reckoned as one here, although

they fear different evils, even as they correspond to the desire of

different goods. This diversity causes a specific diversity of sins,

all of which alike however lead man away from God.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 126 / 1128 题