FIRST ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 19, Art. 1]

Whether God Can Be Feared?

Objection 1: It would seem that God cannot be feared. For the object

of fear is a future evil, as stated above (I-II, Q. 41, AA. 2, 3).

But God is free of all evil, since He is goodness itself. Therefore

God cannot be feared.

Obj. 2: Further, fear is opposed to hope. Now we hope in God.

Therefore we cannot fear Him at the same time.

Obj. 3: Further, as the Philosopher states (Rhet. ii, 5), "we fear

those things whence evil comes to us." But evil comes to us, not from

God, but from ourselves, according to Osee 13:9: "Destruction is thy

own, O Israel: thy help is . . . in Me." Therefore God is not to be

feared.

_On the contrary,_ It is written (Jer. 10:7): "Who shall not fear

Thee, O King of nations?" and (Malachi 1:6): "If I be a master, where

is My fear?"

_I answer that,_ Just as hope has two objects, one of which is the

future good itself, that one expects to obtain, while the other is

someone's help, through whom one expects to obtain what one hopes

for, so, too, fear may have two objects, one of which is the very

evil which a man shrinks from, while the other is that from which the

evil may come. Accordingly, in the first way God, Who is goodness

itself, cannot be an object of fear; but He can be an object of fear

in the second way, in so far as there may come to us some evil either

from Him or in relation to Him.

From Him there comes the evil of punishment, but this is evil not

absolutely but relatively, and, absolutely speaking, is a good.

Because, since a thing is said to be good through being ordered to an

end, while evil implies lack of this order, that which excludes the

order to the last end is altogether evil, and such is the evil of

fault. On the other hand the evil of punishment is indeed an evil, in

so far as it is the privation of some particular good, yet absolutely

speaking, it is a good, in so far as it is ordained to the last end.

In relation to God the evil of fault can come to us, if we be

separated from Him: and in this way God can and ought to be feared.

Reply Obj. 1: This objection considers the object of fear as being

the evil which a man shuns.

Reply Obj. 2: In God, we may consider both His justice, in respect of

which He punishes those who sin, and His mercy, in respect of which

He sets us free: in us the consideration of His justice gives rise to

fear, but the consideration of His mercy gives rise to hope, so that,

accordingly, God is the object of both hope and fear, but under

different aspects.

Reply Obj. 3: The evil of fault is not from God as its author but

from us, in for far as we forsake God: while the evil of punishment

is from God as its author, in so far as it has character of a good,

since it is something just, through being inflicted on us justly;

although originally this is due to the demerit of sin: thus it is

written (Wis. 1:13, 16): "God made not death . . . but the wicked

with works and words have called it to them."

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 125 / 1128 题