SIXTH ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 17, Art. 6]

Whether Hope Is Distinct from the Other Theological Virtues?

Objection 1: It would seem that hope is not distinct from the other

theological virtues. For habits are distinguished by their objects,

as stated above (I-II, Q. 54, A. 2). Now the object of hope is the

same as of the other theological virtues. Therefore hope is not

distinct from the other theological virtues.

Obj. 2: Further, in the symbol of faith, whereby we make profession

of faith, we say: "I expect the resurrection of the dead and the life

of the world to come." Now expectation of future happiness belongs to

hope, as stated above (A. 5). Therefore hope is not distinct from

faith.

Obj. 3: Further, by hope man tends to God. But this belongs properly

to charity. Therefore hope is not distinct from charity.

_On the contrary,_ There cannot be number without distinction. Now

hope is numbered with the other theological virtues: for Gregory says

(Moral. i, 16) that the three virtues are faith, hope, and charity.

Therefore hope is distinct from the theological virtues.

_I answer that,_ A virtue is said to be theological from having God

for the object to which it adheres. Now one may adhere to a thing in

two ways: first, for its own sake; secondly, because something else

is attained thereby. Accordingly charity makes us adhere to God for

His own sake, uniting our minds to God by the emotion of love.

On the other hand, hope and faith make man adhere to God as to a

principle wherefrom certain things accrue to us. Now we derive from

God both knowledge of truth and the attainment of perfect goodness.

Accordingly faith makes us adhere to God, as the source whence we

derive the knowledge of truth, since we believe that what God tells

us is true: while hope makes us adhere to God, as the source whence

we derive perfect goodness, i.e. in so far as, by hope, we trust to

the Divine assistance for obtaining happiness.

Reply Obj. 1: God is the object of these virtues under different

aspects, as stated above: and a different aspect of the object

suffices for the distinction of habits, as stated above (I-II, Q. 54,

A. 2).

Reply Obj. 2: Expectation is mentioned in the symbol of faith, not as

though it were the proper act of faith, but because the act of hope

presupposes the act of faith, as we shall state further on (A. 7).

Hence an act of faith is expressed in the act of hope.

Reply Obj. 3: Hope makes us tend to God, as to a good to be obtained

finally, and as to a helper strong to assist: whereas charity,

properly speaking, makes us tend to God, by uniting our affections to

Him, so that we live, not for ourselves, but for God.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 116 / 1128 题