SECOND ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 9, Art. 2]

Whether the Gift of Knowledge Is About Divine Things?

Objection 1: It would seem that the gift of knowledge is about Divine

things. For Augustine says (De Trin. xiv, 1) that "knowledge begets,

nourishes and strengthens faith." Now faith is about Divine things,

because its object is the First Truth, as stated above (Q. 1, A. 1).

Therefore the gift of knowledge also is about Divine things.

Obj. 2: Further, the gift of knowledge is more excellent than

acquired knowledge. But there is an acquired knowledge about Divine

things, for instance, the science of metaphysics. Much more therefore

is the gift of knowledge about Divine things.

Obj. 3: Further, according to Rom. 1:20, "the invisible things of God

. . . are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are

made." If therefore there is knowledge about created things, it seems

that there is also knowledge of Divine things.

_On the contrary,_ Augustine says (De Trin. xiv, 1): "The knowledge

of Divine things may be properly called wisdom, and the knowledge of

human affairs may properly receive the name of knowledge."

_I answer that,_ A sure judgment about a thing is formed chiefly from

its cause, and so the order of judgments should be according to the

order of causes. For just as the first cause is the cause of the

second, so ought the judgment about the second cause to be formed

through the first cause: nor is it possible to judge of the first

cause through any other cause; wherefore the judgment which is formed

through the first cause, is the first and most perfect judgment.

Now in those things where we find something most perfect, the common

name of the genus is appropriated for those things which fall short

of the most perfect, and some special name is adapted to the most

perfect thing, as is the case in Logic. For in the genus of

convertible terms, that which signifies "what a thing is," is given

the special name of "definition," but the convertible terms which

fall short of this, retain the common name, and are called "proper"

terms.

Accordingly, since the word knowledge implies certitude of judgment

as stated above (A. 1), if this certitude of the judgment is derived

from the highest cause, the knowledge has a special name, which is

wisdom: for a wise man in any branch of knowledge is one who knows

the highest cause of that kind of knowledge, and is able to judge of

all matters by that cause: and a wise man "absolutely," is one who

knows the cause which is absolutely highest, namely God. Hence the

knowledge of Divine things is called "wisdom," while the knowledge

of human things is called "knowledge," this being the common name

denoting certitude of judgment, and appropriated to the judgment

which is formed through second causes. Accordingly, if we take

knowledge in this way, it is a distinct gift from the gift of wisdom,

so that the gift of knowledge is only about human or created things.

Reply Obj. 1: Although matters of faith are Divine and eternal, yet

faith itself is something temporal in the mind of the believer. Hence

to know what one ought to believe, belongs to the gift of knowledge,

but to know in themselves the very things we believe, by a kind of

union with them, belongs to the gift of wisdom. Therefore the gift of

wisdom corresponds more to charity which unites man's mind to God.

Reply Obj. 2: This argument takes knowledge in the generic

acceptation of the term: it is not thus that knowledge is a special

gift, but according as it is restricted to judgments formed through

created things.

Reply Obj. 3: As stated above (Q. 1, A. 1), every cognitive habit

regards formally the mean through which things are known, and

materially, the things that are known through the mean. And since

that which is formal, is of most account, it follows that those

sciences which draw conclusions about physical matter from

mathematical principles, are reckoned rather among the mathematical

sciences, though, as to their matter they have more in common with

physical sciences: and for this reason it is stated in _Phys._ ii, 2

that they are more akin to physics. Accordingly, since man knows God

through His creatures, this seems to pertain to "knowledge," to which

it belongs formally, rather than to "wisdom," to which it belongs

materially: and, conversely, when we judge of creatures according to

Divine things, this pertains to "wisdom" rather than to "knowledge."

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 69 / 1128 题