THIRD ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 1, Art. 3]

Whether Anything False Can Come Under Faith?

Objection 1: It would seem that something false can come under faith.

For faith is condivided with hope and charity. Now something false can

come under hope, since many hope to have eternal life, who will not

obtain it. The same may be said of charity, for many are loved as

being good, who, nevertheless, are not good. Therefore something false

can be the object of faith.

Obj. 2: Further, Abraham believed that Christ would be born,

according to John 8:56: "Abraham your father rejoiced that he might

see My day: he saw it, and was glad." But after the time of Abraham,

God might not have taken flesh, for it was merely because He willed

that He did, so that what Abraham believed about Christ would have

been false. Therefore the object of faith can be something false.

Obj. 3: Further, the ancients believed in the future birth of Christ,

and many continued so to believe, until they heard the preaching of

the Gospel. Now, when once Christ was born, even before He began to

preach, it was false that Christ was yet to be born. Therefore

something false can come under faith.

Obj. 4: Further, it is a matter of faith, that one should believe

that the true Body of Christ is contained in the Sacrament of the

altar. But it might happen that the bread was not rightly

consecrated, and that there was not Christ's true Body there, but

only bread. Therefore something false can come under faith.

_On the contrary,_ No virtue that perfects the intellect is related

to the false, considered as the evil of the intellect, as the

Philosopher declares (Ethic. vi, 2). Now faith is a virtue that

perfects the intellect, as we shall show further on (Q. 4, AA. 2, 5).

Therefore nothing false can come under it.

_I answer that,_ Nothing comes under any power, habit or act, except by

means of the formal aspect of the object: thus color cannot be seen

except by means of light, and a conclusion cannot be known save

through the mean of demonstration. Now it has been stated (A. 1)

that the formal aspect of the object of faith is the First Truth; so

that nothing can come under faith, save in so far as it stands under

the First Truth, under which nothing false can stand, as neither can

non-being stand under being, nor evil under goodness. It follows

therefore that nothing false can come under faith.

Reply Obj. 1: Since the true is the good of the intellect, but not of

the appetitive power, it follows that all virtues which perfect the

intellect, exclude the false altogether, because it belongs to the

nature of a virtue to bear relation to the good alone. On the other

hand those virtues which perfect the appetitive faculty, do not

entirely exclude the false, for it is possible to act in accordance

with justice or temperance, while having a false opinion about what

one is doing. Therefore, as faith perfects the intellect, whereas

hope and charity perfect the appetitive part, the comparison between

them fails.

Nevertheless neither can anything false come under hope, for a man

hopes to obtain eternal life, not by his own power (since this would

be an act of presumption), but with the help of grace; and if he

perseveres therein he will obtain eternal life surely and infallibly.

In like manner it belongs to charity to love God, wherever He may be;

so that it matters not to charity, whether God be in the individual

whom we love for God's sake.

Reply Obj. 2: That "God would not take flesh," considered in itself

was possible even after Abraham's time, but in so far as it stands in

God's foreknowledge, it has a certain necessity of infallibility, as

explained in the First Part (Q. 14, AA. 13, 15): and it is thus that

it comes under faith. Hence in so far as it comes under faith, it

cannot be false.

Reply Obj. 3: After Christ's birth, to believe in Him, was to believe

in Christ's birth at some time or other. The fixing of the time,

wherein some were deceived was not due to their faith, but to a human

conjecture. For it is possible for a believer to have a false opinion

through a human conjecture, but it is quite impossible for a false

opinion to be the outcome of faith.

Reply Obj. 4: The faith of the believer is not directed to such and

such accidents of bread, but to the fact that the true body of Christ

is under the appearances of sensible bread, when it is rightly

consecrated. Hence if it be not rightly consecrated, it does not

follow that anything false comes under faith.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 16 / 1128 题