SECOND ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 1, Art. 2]

Whether the Object of Faith Is Something Complex, by Way of a

Proposition?

Objection 1: It would seem that the object of faith is not something

complex by way of a proposition. For the object of faith is the First

Truth, as stated above (A. 1). Now the First Truth is something

simple. Therefore the object of faith is not something complex.

Obj. 2: Further, the exposition of faith is contained in the symbol.

Now the symbol does not contain propositions, but things: for it is

not stated therein that God is almighty, but: "I believe in God . . .

almighty." Therefore the object of faith is not a proposition but a

thing.

Obj. 3: Further, faith is succeeded by vision, according to 1 Cor.

13:12: "We see now through a glass in a dark manner; but then face to

face. Now I know in part; but then I shall know even as I am known."

But the object of the heavenly vision is something simple, for it is

the Divine Essence. Therefore the faith of the wayfarer is also.

_On the contrary,_ Faith is a mean between science and opinion. Now

the mean is in the same genus as the extremes. Since, then, science

and opinion are about propositions, it seems that faith is likewise

about propositions; so that its object is something complex.

_I answer that,_ The thing known is in the knower according to the

mode of the knower. Now the mode proper to the human intellect is to

know the truth by synthesis and analysis, as stated in the First Part

(Q. 85, A. 5). Hence things that are simple in themselves, are known

by the intellect with a certain amount of complexity, just as on the

other hand, the Divine intellect knows, without any complexity,

things that are complex in themselves.

Accordingly the object of faith may be considered in two ways. First,

as regards the thing itself which is believed, and thus the object of

faith is something simple, namely the thing itself about which we

have faith. Secondly, on the part of the believer, and in this

respect the object of faith is something complex by way of a

proposition.

Hence in the past both opinions have been held with a certain amount

of truth.

Reply Obj. 1: This argument considers the object of faith on the part

of the thing believed.

Reply Obj. 2: The symbol mentions the things about which faith is, in

so far as the act of the believer is terminated in them, as is

evident from the manner of speaking about them. Now the act of the

believer does not terminate in a proposition, but in a thing. For as

in science we do not form propositions, except in order to have

knowledge about things through their means, so is it in faith.

Reply Obj. 3: The object of the heavenly vision will be the First

Truth seen in itself, according to 1 John 3:2: "We know that when He

shall appear, we shall be like to Him: because we shall see Him as He

is": hence that vision will not be by way of a proposition but by way

of a simple understanding. On the other hand, by faith, we do not

apprehend the First Truth as it is in itself. Hence the comparison

fails.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 15 / 1128 题