CHUROYA LINGUISTIC STOCK.

_Bisaniguas_, on the Rio Guejar.

_Choroyas_, on the Rio Guejar.

_Cofanes_, on the Rio Aguarico.

_Guayues_, on the Rio Caqueta.

_Macos_, on the Rio Aguarico.

Whether the Cofanes here named are those of the Province of Quitu who

murdered the Jesuit missionary, Raphael Ferrer, in 1602, I have not

discovered. Perez describes them as still warlike and seclusive, living

in the terminal hills of the Cordillera, and avoiding traffic with the

tribes of the lower river.[428]

An examination of the vocabulary furnished by Saenz inclines me to think

that the Churoya may be a mongrel dialect, or at least has borrowed

freely from neighboring stocks. I subjoin the principal words from his

short vocabulary, with some comparisons:

Sun, _mshojaint_.

Moon, _juimit_ (_oamito_, Guahiba).

Fire, _hijit_ (_chichi_, = sun, Carib).

Water, _minta_.

Bow, _piranso_ (_paria_, Roucouyenne).

Arrow, _funait_.

Tobacco, _joo_.

Plantain, _parasa_.

Dog, _uilg_.

Tortoise, _ainjachie_.

Wind, _che_.

Skin, _begt_.

The _Piaroas_ are mentioned by Gilii as a branch of the Salivas, but

their language reveals no such connection. They are still found on

both banks of the Orinoco above the confluence of the Vichada and near

the mouth of the Mataveni. They are savage and superstitious, avoiding

contact with the whites; they have had good reason to be extremely

distrustful of the advances of their civilized neighbors. They are much

given to nocturnal ceremonies, and entertain a great respect for the

tapir, who is their reputed ancestor, and also the form which is taken by

the souls of the departed.[429]

The _Puinavis_ dwell on the Inirida, an affluent of the Guaviare.

A tribe, the Guipunabis, is mentioned by Gilii as belonging to the

Maipure (Arawak) stock; but it cannot be the same with the one under

consideration, the language of which appears to be without affinities.

Latham identified them with the _Poignavis_ of the older writers,

and on slight linguistic evidence, believed them connected with the

Banivas.[430] My own comparisons do not justify this opinion.

_8. The Upper Amazonian Basin._

No portion of the linguistic field of South America offers greater

confusion than that of the western Amazonian region. The statements are

so conflicting, and the tribal changes apparently so rapid, that we are

at a loss to bring modern observations into accord with older statements.

Thus, I am entirely unable to accept the linguistic classification of

Hervas, which certainly was based on the best information of his day. As

a matter of comparison I give it.

_List of Languages in the Governments of Maynas and the Marañon (Hervas)._

The American Race A Linguistic Classification and Ethnographic Description of the Native Tribes of North and South America · 第 157 / 215 题