THIRD ARTICLE [I, Q. 104, Art. 3]

Whether God Can Annihilate Anything?

Objection 1: It would seem that God cannot annihilate anything. For

Augustine says (QQ. 83, qu. 21) that "God is not the cause of anything

tending to non-existence." But He would be such a cause if He were to

annihilate anything. Therefore He cannot annihilate anything.

Obj. 2: Further, by His goodness God is the cause why things exist,

since, as Augustine says (De Doctr. Christ. i, 32): "Because God is

good, we exist." But God cannot cease to be good. Therefore He cannot

cause things to cease to exist; which would be the case were He to

annihilate anything.

Obj. 3: Further, if God were to annihilate anything it would be by

His action. But this cannot be; because the term of every action is

existence. Hence even the action of a corrupting cause has its term

in something generated; for when one thing is generated another

undergoes corruption. Therefore God cannot annihilate anything.

_On the contrary,_ It is written (Jer. 10:24): "Correct me, O Lord,

but yet with judgment; and not in Thy fury, lest Thou bring me to

nothing."

_I answer that,_ Some have held that God, in giving existence to

creatures, acted from natural necessity. Were this true, God could

not annihilate anything, since His nature cannot change. But, as we

have said above (Q. 19, A. 4), such an opinion is entirely false, and

absolutely contrary to the Catholic faith, which confesses that God

created things of His own free-will, according to Ps. 134:6:

"Whatsoever the Lord pleased, He hath done." Therefore that God gives

existence to a creature depends on His will; nor does He preserve

things in existence otherwise than by continually pouring out

existence into them, as we have said. Therefore, just as before

things existed, God was free not to give them existence, and not to

make them; so after they are made, He is free not to continue their

existence; and thus they would cease to exist; and this would be to

annihilate them.

Reply Obj. 1: Non-existence has no direct cause; for nothing is a

cause except inasmuch as it has existence, and a being essentially as

such is a cause of something existing. Therefore God cannot cause a

thing to tend to non-existence, whereas a creature has this tendency

of itself, since it is produced from nothing. But indirectly God can

be the cause of things being reduced to non-existence, by withdrawing

His action therefrom.

Reply Obj. 2: God's goodness is the cause of things, not as though by

natural necessity, because the Divine goodness does not depend on

creatures; but by His free-will. Wherefore, as without prejudice to

His goodness, He might not have produced things into existence, so,

without prejudice to His goodness, He might not preserve things in

existence.

Reply Obj. 3: If God were to annihilate anything, this would not

imply an action on God's part; but a mere cessation of His action.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part I (Prima Pars) From the Complete American Edition · 第 634 / 722 题