FOURTH ARTICLE [I, Q. 104, Art. 4]

Whether Anything Is Annihilated?

Objection 1: It would seem that something is annihilated. For the end

corresponds to the beginning. But in the beginning there was nothing

but God. Therefore all things must tend to this end, that there shall

be nothing but God. Therefore creatures will be reduced to nothing.

Obj. 2: Further, every creature has a finite power. But no finite

power extends to the infinite. Wherefore the Philosopher proves (Phys.

viii, 10) that, "a finite power cannot move in infinite time."

Therefore a creature cannot last for an infinite duration; and so at

some time it will be reduced to nothing.

Obj. 3: Further, forms and accidents have no matter as part of

themselves. But at some time they cease to exist. Therefore they are

reduced to nothing.

_On the contrary,_ It is written (Eccles. 3:14): "I have learned that

all the works that God hath made continue for ever."

_I answer that,_ Some of those things which God does in creatures

occur in accordance with the natural course of things; others happen

miraculously, and not in accordance with the natural order, as will

be explained (Q. 105, A. 6). Now whatever God wills to do according

to the natural order of things may be observed from their nature; but

those things which occur miraculously, are ordered for the

manifestation of grace, according to the Apostle, "To each one is

given the manifestation of the Spirit, unto profit" (1 Cor. 12:7);

and subsequently he mentions, among others, the working of miracles.

Now the nature of creatures shows that none of them is annihilated.

For, either they are immaterial, and therefore have no potentiality

to non-existence; or they are material, and then they continue to

exist, at least in matter, which is incorruptible, since it is the

subject of generation and corruption. Moreover, the annihilation of

things does not pertain to the manifestation of grace; since rather

the power and goodness of God are manifested by the preservation of

things in existence. Wherefore we must conclude by denying absolutely

that anything at all will be annihilated.

Reply Obj. 1: That things are brought into existence from a state of

non-existence, clearly shows the power of Him Who made them; but that

they should be reduced to nothing would hinder that manifestation,

since the power of God is conspicuously shown in His preserving all

things in existence, according to the Apostle: "Upholding all things

by the word of His power" (Heb. 1:3).

Reply Obj. 2: A creature's potentiality to existence is merely

receptive; the active power belongs to God Himself, from Whom

existence is derived. Wherefore the infinite duration of things is a

consequence of the infinity of the Divine power. To some things,

however, is given a determinate power of duration for a certain time,

so far as they may be hindered by some contrary agent from receiving

the influx of existence which comes from Him Whom finite power cannot

resist, for an infinite, but only for a fixed time. So things which

have no contrary, although they have a finite power, continue to

exist for ever.

Reply Obj. 3: Forms and accidents are not complete beings, since they

do not subsist: but each one of them is something "of a being"; for

it is called a being, because something is by it. Yet so far as their

mode of existence is concerned, they are not entirely reduced to

nothingness; not that any part of them survives, but that they remain

in the potentiality of the matter, or of the subject.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part I (Prima Pars) From the Complete American Edition · 第 635 / 722 题