SECOND ARTICLE [I, Q. 73, Art. 2]

Whether God Rested on the Seventh Day from All His Work?

Objection 1: It would seem that God did not rest on the seventh day

from all His work. For it is said (John 5:17), "My Father worketh until

now, and I work." God, then, did not rest on the seventh day from all

His work.

Obj. 2: Further, rest is opposed to movement, or to labor, which

movement causes. But, as God produced His work without movement and

without labor, He cannot be said to have rested on the seventh day

from His work.

Obj. 3: Further, should it be said that God rested on the seventh day

by causing man to rest; against this it may be argued that rest is

set down in contradistinction to His work; now the words "God

created" or "made" this thing or the other cannot be explained to

mean that He made man create or make these things. Therefore the

resting of God cannot be explained as His making man to rest.

_On the contrary,_ It is said (Gen. 2:2): "God rested on the seventh

day from all the work which He had done."

_I answer that,_ Rest is, properly speaking, opposed to movement, and

consequently to the labor that arises from movement. But although

movement, strictly speaking, is a quality of bodies, yet the word is

applied also to spiritual things, and in a twofold sense. On the one

hand, every operation may be called a movement, and thus the Divine

goodness is said to move and go forth to its object, in communicating

itself to that object, as Dionysius says (Div. Nom. ii). On the other

hand, the desire that tends to an object outside itself, is said to

move towards it. Hence rest is taken in two senses, in one sense

meaning a cessation from work, in the other, the satisfying of desire.

Now, in either sense God is said to have rested on the seventh day.

First, because He ceased from creating new creatures on that day, for,

as said above (A. 1, ad 3), He made nothing afterwards that had not

existed previously, in some degree, in the first works; secondly,

because He Himself had no need of the things that He had made, but was

happy in the fruition of Himself. Hence, when all things were made He

is not said to have rested "in" His works, as though needing them for

His own happiness, but to have rested "from" them, as in fact resting

in Himself, as He suffices for Himself and fulfils His own desire. And

even though from all eternity He rested in Himself, yet the rest in

Himself, which He took after He had finished His works, is that rest

which belongs to the seventh day. And this, says Augustine, is the

meaning of God's resting from His works on that day (Gen. ad lit. iv).

Reply Obj. 1: God indeed "worketh until now" by preserving and

providing for the creatures He has made, but not by the making of

new ones.

Reply Obj. 2: Rest is here not opposed to labor or to movement, but

to the production of new creatures, and to the desire tending to an

external object.

Reply Obj. 3: Even as God rests in Himself alone and is happy in the

enjoyment of Himself, so our own sole happiness lies in the enjoyment

of God. Thus, also, He makes us find rest in Himself, both from His

works and our own. It is not, then, unreasonable to say that God

rested in giving rest to us. Still, this explanation must not be set

down as the only one, and the other is the first and principal

explanation.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part I (Prima Pars) From the Complete American Edition · 第 449 / 722 题