THIRD ARTICLE [I, Q. 64, Art. 3]

Whether There Is Sorrow in the Demons?

Objection 1: It would seem that there is no sorrow in the demons. For

since sorrow and joy are opposites, they cannot be together in the

same subject. But there is joy in the demons: for Augustine writing

against the Maniches (De Gen. Contra Manich. ii, 17) says: "The devil

has power over them who despise God's commandments, and he rejoices

over this sinister power." Therefore there is no sorrow in the demons.

Obj. 2: Further, sorrow is the cause of fear, for those things

cause fear while they are future, which cause sorrow when they are

present. But there is no fear in the demons, according to Job 41:24,

"Who was made to fear no one." Therefore there is no grief in the

demons.

Obj. 3: Further, it is a good thing to be sorry for evil. But the

demons can do no good action. Therefore they cannot be sorry, at least

for the evil of sin; which applies to the worm of conscience.

_On the contrary,_ The demon's sin is greater than man's sin. But man

is punished with sorrow on account of the pleasure taken in sin,

according to Apoc. 18:7, "As much as she hath glorified herself, and

lived in delicacies, so much torment and sorrow give ye to her."

Consequently much more is the devil punished with the grief of sorrow,

because he especially glorified himself.

_I answer that,_ Fear, sorrow, joy, and the like, so far as they are

passions, cannot exist in the demons; for thus they are proper to the

sensitive appetite, which is a power in a corporeal organ. According,

however, as they denote simple acts of the will, they can be in the

demons. And it must be said that there is sorrow in them; because

sorrow, as denoting a simple act of the will, is nothing else than the

resistance of the will to what is, or to what is not. Now it is

evident that the demons would wish many things not to be, which are,

and others to be, which are not: for, out of envy, they would wish

others to be damned, who are saved. Consequently, sorrow must be said

to exist in them: and especially because it is of the very notion of

punishment for it to be repugnant to the will. Moreover, they are

deprived of happiness, which they desire naturally; and their wicked

will is curbed in many respects.

Reply Obj. 1: Joy and sorrow about the same thing are opposites, but

not about different things. Hence there is nothing to hinder a man

from being sorry for one thing, and joyful for another; especially so

far as sorrow and joy imply simple acts of the will; because, not

merely in different things, but even in one and the same thing, there

can be something that we will, and something that we will not.

Reply Obj. 2: As there is sorrow in the demons over present evil, so

also there is fear of future evil. Now when it is said, "He was made

to fear no one," this is to be understood of the fear of God which

restrains from sin. For it is written elsewhere that "the devils

believe and tremble" (James 2:19).

Reply Obj. 3: To be sorry for the evil of sin on account of the sin

bears witness to the goodness of the will, to which the evil of sin

is opposed. But to be sorry for the evil of punishment, or for the

evil of sin on account of the punishment, bears witness to the

goodness of nature, to which the evil of punishment is opposed. Hence

Augustine says (De Civ. Dei xix, 13), that "sorrow for good lost by

punishment, is the witness to a good nature." Consequently, since the

demon has a perverse and obstinate will, he is not sorry for the evil

of sin.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part I (Prima Pars) From the Complete American Edition · 第 416 / 722 题