SECOND ARTICLE [I, Q. 33, Art. 2]

Whether This Name "Father" Is Properly the Name of a Divine Person?

Objection 1: It would seem that this name "Father" is not properly

the name of a divine person. For the name "Father" signifies

relation. Moreover "person" is an individual substance. Therefore

this name "Father" is not properly a name signifying a Person.

Obj. 2: Further, a begetter is more common than father; for every

father begets; but it is not so conversely. But a more common term is

more properly applied to God, as stated above (Q. 13, A. 11).

Therefore the more proper name of the divine person is begetter and

genitor than Father.

Obj. 3: Further, a metaphorical term cannot be the proper name of

anyone. But the word is by us metaphorically called begotten, or

offspring; and consequently, he of whom is the word, is

metaphorically called father. Therefore the principle of the Word in

God is not properly called Father.

Obj. 4: Further, everything which is said properly of God, is said of

God first before creatures. But generation appears to apply to

creatures before God; because generation seems to be truer when the

one who proceeds is distinct from the one whence it proceeds, not

only by relation but also by essence. Therefore the name "Father"

taken from generation does not seem to be the proper name of any

divine person.

_On the contrary,_ It is said (Ps. 88:27): "He shall cry out to me:

Thou art my Father."

_I answer that,_ The proper name of any person signifies that whereby

the person is distinguished from all other persons. For as body and

soul belong to the nature of man, so to the concept of this particular

man belong this particular soul and this particular body; and by these

is this particular man distinguished from all other men. Now it is

paternity which distinguishes the person of the Father from all other

persons. Hence this name "Father," whereby paternity is signified, is

the proper name of the person of the Father.

Reply Obj. 1: Among us relation is not a subsisting person. So this

name "father" among us does not signify a person, but the relation of

a person. In God, however, it is not so, as some wrongly thought; for

in God the relation signified by the name "Father" is a subsisting

person. Hence, as above explained (Q. 29, A. 4), this name "person"

in God signifies a relation subsisting in the divine nature.

Reply Obj. 2: According to the Philosopher (De Anima ii, text 49), a

thing is denominated chiefly by its perfection, and by its end. Now

generation signifies something in process of being made, whereas

paternity signifies the complement of generation; and therefore the

name "Father" is more expressive as regards the divine person than

genitor or begettor.

Reply Obj. 3: In human nature the word is not a subsistence, and

hence is not properly called begotten or son. But the divine Word is

something subsistent in the divine nature; and hence He is properly

and not metaphorically called Son, and His principle is called Father.

Reply Obj. 4: The terms "generation" and "paternity" like the other

terms properly applied to God, are said of God before creatures as

regards the thing signified, but not as regards the mode of

signification. Hence also the Apostle says, "I bend my knee to the

Father of my Lord Jesus Christ, from whom all paternity in heaven and

on earth is named" (Eph. 3:14). This is explained thus. It is

manifest that generation receives its species from the term which is

the form of the thing generated; and the nearer it is to the form of

the generator, the truer and more perfect is the generation; as

univocal generation is more perfect than non-univocal, for it belongs

to the essence of a generator to generate what is like itself in

form. Hence the very fact that in the divine generation the form of

the Begetter and Begotten is numerically the same, whereas in

creatures it is not numerically, but only specifically, the same,

shows that generation, and consequently paternity, is applied to God

before creatures. Hence the very fact that in God a distinction

exists of the Begotten from the Begetter as regards relation only,

belongs to the truth of the divine generation and paternity.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part I (Prima Pars) From the Complete American Edition · 第 239 / 722 题