The Schoolboy and the Homeboy

In practice what happens is that parents notice that boys brought up at

home become mollycoddles, or prigs, or duffers, unable to take care of

themselves. They see that boys should learn to rough it a little and

to mix with children of their own age. This is natural enough. When you

have preached at and punished a boy until he is a moral cripple, you

are as much hampered by him as by a physical cripple; and as you do not

intend to have him on your hands all your life, and are generally rather

impatient for the day when he will earn his own living and leave you to

attend to yourself, you sooner or later begin to talk to him about the

need for self-reliance, learning to think, and so forth, with the result

that your victim, bewildered by your inconsistency, concludes that there

is no use trying to please you, and falls into an attitude of sulky

resentment. Which is an additional inducement to pack him off to school.

In school, he finds himself in a dual world, under two dispensations.

There is the world of the boys, where the point of honor is to be

untameable, always ready to fight, ruthless in taking the conceit out of

anyone who ventures to give himself airs of superior knowledge or taste,

and generally to take Lucifer for one's model. And there is the world of

the masters, the world of discipline, submission, diligence, obedience,

and continual and shameless assumption of moral and intellectual

authority. Thus the schoolboy hears both sides, and is so far better

off than the homebred boy who hears only one. But the two sides are

not fairly presented. They are presented as good and evil, as vice and

virtue, as villainy and heroism. The boy feels mean and cowardly when

he obeys, and selfish and rascally when he disobeys. He looses his moral

courage just as he comes to hate books and languages. In the end, John

Ruskin, tied so close to his mother's apron-string that he did not

escape even when he went to Oxford, and John Stuart Mill, whose father

ought to have been prosecuted for laying his son's childhood waste with

lessons, were superior, as products of training, to our schoolboys. They

were very conspicuously superior in moral courage; and though they did

not distinguish themselves at cricket and football, they had quite as

much physical hardihood as any civilized man needs. But it is to be

observed that Ruskin's parents were wise people who gave John a full

share in their own life, and put up with his presence both at home and

abroad when they must sometimes have been very weary of him; and Mill,

as it happens, was deliberately educated to challenge all the most

sacred institutions of his country. The households they were brought

up in were no more average households than a Montessori school is an

average school.

Treatise on Parents and Children · 第 38 / 65 题