CHAPTER XI.

Debate in the House of Commons on a Vote of Credit and the Support

of Portugal.--The German War.--Pitt’s Speech.--Colonel

Barré’s Reply to Mr. Pitt.--Lord Bute’s Ambition.--The Duke

of Newcastle’s Resignation.--Fox and the Duke of Devonshire.--

Ingratitude of the Clergy to Newcastle.--Unwise conduct of Lord

Bute.--He is declared First Lord of the Treasury.--Sir Francis

Dashwood, Chancellor of the Exchequer.--His unfitness for that

Office.--His general Character.--His establishment of a Society

of Young Travellers.

May 12th. The House of Commons debated on a vote of credit, and the

support of Portugal. Glover the poet pleaded against Portugal’s

claim to our assistance, from their many infractions of treaties,

from their cramping our trade, and from the impossibilities our

merchants had found of obtaining redress; a complaint that seemed to

bear hard on the late ministry: to which he added reflections on the

extravagance of the German war, which, contrary to the professions

of ministers, had grown from £200,000 to six or seven millions. Pitt

was offended, and corrected Glover, who threw his information on some

nameless merchants, by whom he had been told that their remonstrances

on the difficulties of the Portuguese trade had not been read by

the ministers. Wilkes censured the weakness and irresolution of the

ministry; their abandoning Belleisle, and neglecting to send over the

officers to Germany. It was even said, he affirmed, that they had been

humiliating themselves at the Court of Vienna. Legge more gently, and

Beckford with more rhodomontade, pressed the same accusations. The

latter was for invading Spain by sea; declared that the City suspected

the ministry of wavering, and demanded to have their _old minister_

again. Grenville answered finely, and compared the smallness of the

sum demanded, £300,000, with the expense in Germany. Belleisle had

cost more than what was now asked for Portugal. That Court knew how

we were embarrassed, and asked not more than she knew we could give.

What proof was there of irresolution? was not Martinico conquered? was

not the Havannah likely to follow? or did Beckford think that great

words, blustered in Parliament, constituted resolution? Fluctuating

reports were rather owing to stockjobbers than to fluctuation in the

measures of Government. He affirmed that not one step had been taken at

Vienna derogatory to any of our connections. We had only tried to feel

how they relished the family-compact among the Bourbons. But whether

the resolution was taken to recall our troops from Germany, or at all

events to go on, would it be prudent to declare which was to be the

measure?

Lord George Sackville was liberal in blaming the expense of the German

war, which he compared with that of Queen Anne; _the whole_ of which,

he maintained, except in 1711 and 1712, did not amount to what this

German war had cost alone, though we had then employed more British

and other troops than at present. Queen Anne’s war had never exceeded

eight millions, including garrisons, fleet, &c. The expense of 172,000

men from 1709 to 1711 had not gone beyond what one year had recently

cost in Germany. If there had not been new inventions for expense, we

should not now be ready to beg peace.

Pitt, in a very capital style, took up the cause of Portugal: he did

not stoop to that little hackneyed practice of party, opposing whatever

was the measure of the adversary. He had stood forth for general war,

and for reduction of the House of Bourbon. To advise still larger war

was constancy to the same plan; and it was still safer to advise it,

when he was no longer answerable for the event. To oppose vigorous

steps would have been more truly lending aid to the Court, who wanted

to get clear of the war.

As having been a public minister, he must not, he said, intrench

himself within his present private situation, but speak his opinion.

He should not wait for events, but speak boldly as a counsellor. If

he voted for this measure, it was giving the Crown his advice, as if

he was called to Council. He did think we ought to support Portugal,

both for commercial and political reasons. Portugal is in the immediate

predicament of nearness to us after Ireland and our Colonies. _It

assists, without draining us._ Assistance was a matter of justice due

from us to an oppressed, insulted ally. There had not been such an

infraction of treaties as would release us from the ties of treaties.

Should we sit with folded arms while the two branches of Bourbon, those

proudest of the proud, would exclude us from neutral ports? We must set

Portugal on its legs, not take it on our shoulders. He then expatiated

on the character of Carvalho, the prime minister of Portugal, his

inflexibility to danger, his intrepidity; and drew a picture that

might almost have passed for his own, as he seemed to mean it should.

Would there be danger in this measure? he was a co-operator in it. If

you, as a maritime power, cannot protect Portugal, Genoa will next be

shut against you; and then the ports of Sardinia:--what! ports shut

against the first maritime power in the world! He then turned Glover

into ridicule; said he admired his poetry, but _quanto optimus omnium

poeta, tanto_--he would not, he said, go on. For the sum demanded, it

might easily be raised, or a million more: and he would give the same

opinion, whether the Duke of Newcastle continued minister, or should be

succeeded by Mr. Fox, as was generally said to be the intention. The

only difficulty was to find funds. It had been predicated for three

years that we could not raise more money; therefore it was plain we

could. Lord George should have put into the scale what our enemies had

lost; they had been losing, we acquiring. He hoped we should keep up

our officers and our marine, and not decrease the latter, as we had

done after the last peace. France had last year spent eight millions

in Germany. To outlast an enemy was worth perseverance. But we would

not distinguish between contracting our expenses and contracting our

operations. He paid great compliments to the officers of land and

sea, and pleaded earnestly against relinquishing Germany. It would be

turning loose an hundred and forty thousand French to overrun the Low

Countries and Portugal. If there was any odium from the German war, he

begged it might fall on him; though he had never seen a contractor, yet

he would not disculpate himself by censuring others; and he spoke in

mitigation of the blame thrown on the Treasury, owning he thought some

little might have been saved, but not suspecting them of dishonesty.

Yet, were an inquiry moved, he would second it; he would screen nobody.

After the King of Prussia had been so ill-treated on our account, would

we throw such a power out of our alliance, only to save three or four

hundred thousand pounds? But he thought he had heard the army was not

to be recalled--was transported to find Lord Granby was going to it.

Himself was the only man that agreed with the whole administration,

for he approved both of war in Germany and war in Portugal; and he

was so far from meditating opposition, that he should regard the man

who would revive parties as an enemy to his country. Himself had

contributed to annihilate _party_, but it had not been to pave the way

for _those who only intended to substitute one party to another_.[218]

Should the least cloud arise between London and Berlin, he prayed for

temper and reconciliation. He wished to move that the continuation

of the subsidy to Prussia might be added to the vote of credit; but

it did not become him to move for more than was asked by the King’s

servants: yet he wished the vote of credit had been greater, and knew

the Duke of Newcastle wished so too. He should rejoice to see the

session closed with the grant of a large sum of money, because England

could not well treat but at the head of all her force. Russia had

acceded to Prussia--how much wiser to give money to that monarch now,

when he is in a better situation, than, as you would do, if he were

still more distressed! Nay, that little teazing incident, Sweden, was

removed by dread of the Czar. Sweden is a free nation, _but factions

and a corrupted senate have lowered it from the great figure it made an

hundred years ago_. Act now, continued he, upon a great system, while

it is in your power! A million more would be a pittance to place you at

the head of Europe, and enable you to treat with efficacy and dignity.

Save it not in this last critical year! Give the million to the war

at large, and add three, four, or five hundred thousand pounds more

to Portugal; or avow to the House of Bourbon that you are not able to

treat at the head of your allies.

This speech, so artful, elevated, so much in character, and so

distressful to the Junto that were endeavouring to steal disgrace upon

themselves and their country in the face of the world, by setting up

one war against another, and dividing the attention of the public, till

impotence and mismanagement should render peace welcome,--this speech

did Colonel Barré attempt to answer; and did answer it, only in length.

He was sensible that he had disgusted mankind by his indecent brutality

to so great a statesman: his friends had told him that his invectives,

illiberal as they had been, were reckoned the produce of study; and

that he must shine in cool argument, lest he should be thought a bully

rather than an orator. If they apprehended this, the result of their

lessons was a proof that their apprehensions had not been ill-founded.

Nothing could be more cold and dull than Barré’s reply to Mr. Pitt.

It revenged the latter for the former insult. Calvert,[219] a mad

volunteer, who always spoke what he thought, and sometimes thought

justly, was so struck with Barré’s phlegmatic impropriety, that he

told the House it had put him in mind of a poet, who being at sea in a

tempest, and being missed while all hands were on deck, was found half

asleep in the cabin; and, being asked why he did not assist to save

the ship, replied, he was thinking how to describe the storm?[220] The

money was voted, and nothing more of consequence passed that session in

Parliament.

Both Houses thus complaisant and submissive, there wanted but the

office of prime minister to glut the Favourite’s ambition: and

no wonder that he, who had dared to strike the name of the first

monarch in military glory in Europe from the list of Great Britain’s

pensioners, only to gratify the feminine piques of the backstairs; and

who had ventured successfully to remove Mr. Pitt from the command of

that country which he had saved, restored, exalted;--no wonder such a

Phaëton should drive over a ridiculous old dotard, who had ever been

in everybody’s way, and whose feeble hands were still struggling for

power, when the most he ought to have expected, was, that his flattery

and obsequiousness might have moved charity to leave him an appearance

of credit. It was absurd for him to stay in place; insolent to attempt

to stay there by force, and impudent to pretend to patriotism when

driven out with contempt. Against his will he was preserved from having

a share in the infamy of the ensuing peace.

May 14th, the Duke[221] acquainted the King that he would resign, who

answered coldly, “Then, my Lord, I must fill up your place as well as I

can.” Still Newcastle lingered; and, as he owned afterwards to the Duke

of Cumberland, his friends had laboured to prevent the fatal blow. Lord

Mansfield, he said, had _pleaded_ with Lord Bute for above an hour, and

could not extract from him a wish that the Duke should continue in the

Treasury. Fox asked Lord Mansfield if this was true? He replied, “Not

an hour, for I soon saw it was to no purpose.”

Thus disgraced, and disgracing himself, on the 26th the Duke of

Newcastle resigned: and he, who had begun the world with heading

mobs against the ministers of Queen Anne; who had braved the

Heir-apparent[222] of the new family, and forced himself upon him as

godfather to his son; who had recovered that Prince’s favour, and

preserved power under him at the expense of every minister whom that

Prince preferred; and who had been a victorious rival of another

Prince of Wales;[223] was now buffeted from a fourth Court[224] by a

very suitable competitor, and was reduced in his tottering old age to

have recourse to those mobs and that popularity which had raised him

fifty years before; and as almost the individual crisis was revolved,

with a scandalous treaty and a new prospect of arbitrary power, it

looked as if Newcastle thought himself young again, because the times

of his youth were returned, and he was obliged to act with boys!

Such pains, however, had been taken to disjoint his faction, that

his exit from power was by no means attended with consolatory

circumstances. The Duke of Devonshire would not resign, though he

declared he would seldom or never go to council. Fox had warned him

not to be too hasty in embarking in a party in which Pitt must be a

principal actor; and remembering his Grace how large a share Pitt had

had in planting the Tories at Court, and that, speaking of Legge, Pitt

had said, “I will have no more ear for Whig grievances.” The rest of

Newcastle’s friends were as little disposed to follow him: but that he

might taste the full mortification of being deserted by those whom he

had most obliged, whom he had most courted and most patronized, the

clergy gave the most conspicuous example of ingratitude. For thirty

years Newcastle had had the almost sole disposal of ecclesiastic

preferments, and consequently had raised numbers of men from penury

and the meanest birth to the highest honours and amplest incomes in

their profession. At this very period there were not three bishops

on the bench who did not owe their mitres to him. His first levée

after his fall was attended but by one bishop,[225] Cornwallis of

Lichfield; who being a man of quality, and by his birth entitled to

expect a greater rise, did but reflect the more shame on those who owed

everything to favour, and scarce one of them anything to abilities.

The conduct of Lord Bute was not more wise than that of Newcastle.

Instead of sheltering himself under that old man’s name from whatever

danger there might be in making peace, the Earl was driving together

all those whom he ought to have kept divided, and really seemed jealous

lest himself should not have the whole odium of sacrificing the glories

and conquests of the war; an infatuation that so far excuses him, as he

must have thought he did a service to his country in restoring peace:

but what must his understanding have been if he could think that peace

would be a benefit, let the terms be what they would? He supposed,

too, that Newcastle, having in opposition to Pitt declared for peace,

could not retract, and be against the peace. This was not knowing

Newcastle or mankind. The situation, too, was materially changed: the

weight of Russia was transferred from the hostile to the friendly

scale; Martinico was fallen; and Europe could scarce amass the symptom

of a fleet. A mind less versatile than Newcastle’s could not want

arguments against a precipitate treaty. Yet was it not Newcastle,

nor a scandalous treaty that shook the Favourite’s power. It was his

ignorance of the world; it was a head unadapted to government, and

rendered still less proper for it by morose and recluse pride, and a

heart that was not formed to bear up a weak head, that made him embark

imprudently, and retreat as unadvisedly.

Lord Bute, on the resignation of the Duke of Newcastle, was immediately

declared First Lord of the Treasury. George Grenville succeeded him as

Secretary of State, and Sir Francis Dashwood was made his Chancellor of

the Exchequer; a system that all the lustre of the Favourite’s power

could not guard from being ridiculous, though to himself mankind bowed

with obsequious devotion. Grenville was ignorant of foreign affairs,

and, though capable of out-talking the whole corps diplomatique, had no

address, no manner, no insinuation, and had, least of all, the faculty

of listening. The Favourite himself had never been in a single office

of business, but for the few months that he had held the seals: of the

revenue he was in perfect ignorance, knew nothing of figures, and was

a stranger to those Magi to the east of Temple-Bar, who, though they

flock to a new star, expect to be talked to in a more intelligible

language than that of inspiration. When a Lord Treasurer or a First

Lord of the Treasury is not master of his own province, it suffices if

the Chancellor of the Exchequer is a man of business, and capable of

conducting the revenue, of planning supplies, and of executing the

mechanic duties of that high post. But in the new dispensation it was

difficult to say which was the worst suited to his office, the minister

or his substitute. While the former shrouded his ignorance from vulgar

eyes, and dropped but now and then from a cloud an oracular sentence;

the deputy, with the familiarity and phrase of a fish-wife, introduced

the humours of Wapping behind the veil of the Treasury. He had a

coarse, blunt manner of speaking, that, looking like honesty, inclined

men to hold his common sense in higher esteem than it deserved; but,

having neither knowledge[226] nor dignity, his style, when he was to

act as minister, appeared naked, vulgar, and irreverent to an assembly

that expects to be informed, and that generally chooses to reprehend,

not to be reprehended. When a statesman ventures to be familiar, he

must captivate his audience by uncommon graces, or win their good-will

by a humane pleasantry that seems to flow from the heart, and to be

the effusion of universal benevolence. This was the secret as well as

character of Henry the Fourth of France: even the semblance of it stood

his grandson, our Charles the Second, in signal stead, and veiled his

unfeeling heart, and selfish and remorseless insensibility.

Men were puzzled to guess at the motive of so improper a choice as

this of Sir Francis Dashwood. The banner of religion was displayed at

Court, and yet all the centurions were culled from the most profligate

societies. Sir Francis had long been known by his singularities and

some humour. In his early youth, accoutred like Charles the Twelfth,

he had travelled to Russia in hopes of captivating the Czarina; but

neither the character nor dress of Charles were well imagined to catch

a _woman’s_ heart. In Italy, Sir Francis had given in to the most

open profaneness; and, at his return, had assembled a society[227]

of Young Travellers, to which a taste for the arts and antiquity, or

merely having travelled, were the recommendatory ingredients. Their

pictures were drawn, ornamented with symbols and devices; and the

founder, in the habit of St. Francis, and with a chalice in his hand,

was represented at his devotions before a statue of the Venus of

Medicis, a stream of glory beaming on him from behind her lower hand.

These pictures were long exhibited in their club-room at a tavern

in Palace Yard; but of later years Saint Francis had instituted a

more select order. He and some chosen friends had hired the ruins of

Medmenham Abbey, near Marlow, and refitted it in a conventual style.

Thither at stated seasons they adjourned; had each their cell, a proper

habit, a monastic name, and a refectory in common--besides a chapel,

the decorations of which may well be supposed to have contained the

quintessence of their mysteries, since it was impenetrable to any

but the initiated. Whatever their doctrines were, their practice was

rigorously pagan: Bacchus and Venus were the deities to whom they

almost publicly sacrificed. The old Lord Melcomb was one of the

brotherhood. Yet their follies would have escaped the eye of the

public, if Lord Bute from this seminary of piety and wisdom had not

selected a Chancellor of the Exchequer. But politics had no sooner

infused themselves amongst these rosy anchorites, than dissensions

were kindled, and a false brother arose, who divulged the arcana, and

exposed the good Prior, in order to ridicule him as Minister of the

Finances. But, of this, more hereafter.

Memoirs of the Reign of King George the Third, Volume 1 (of 4) · 第 11 / 29 章