The solution of all this is, that I have a new book in press. That the

_proofs_ of the same are sent to snarl me up late in the evening, just

before I go to sleep. That beside this, I am writing--well, you'll see

what, by and by. That I have had sickness in the house for six weeks.

That I am house-keeper. That I have scores of letters to read and

answer; and that I have a little duck of a grandchild, who every hour

or two wants me "to tell her a story that is _new_ and _true_." Am I

excused?

Shall I relate my first theft? Well, I had bought a new muff; that is

nothing surprising in a city where women trim their dresses with

diamonds. But there is a story to that muff. With a wholesome horror

of _female_ shoplifters, I had attached to it a silk cord, which I

could pass over my neck; thus placing beyond their reach the

temptation to appropriate it, should I lay it down temporarily on some

counter, while shopping. Thus armed, I went forth.

Well, as I say, thus armed, I went out to buy some little matters

needed in my household. After paying for them, I took a muff from the

counter before me, placed my hands in it, and pursued my journey. I

had not proceeded more than a block, before a bare-headed clerk came

rushing after me, jostling the crowd on either side, and placing his

hands as I thought very familiarly on my muff, took it from me,

remarking as he did so, "By your leave, madam," and disappeared with

it, instanter. I looked about me for a policeman, when just then my

hand became entangled in the string around my neck. Good heavens! I

had then taken some other lady's muff from the counter! I had walked

out with _two_ muffs. One about my neck, one in my hands. I did not

pursue my search for that policeman. I was also seized with such a

violent fit of laughter at the ludicrousness and novelty of my

position, that I was quite incapable of locomotion.

Just then I met a lady friend, to whom I told the story, as well as my

frequent bursts of merriment permitted. She looked as solemn as a

hearse; she said sepulchrally, "How _can_ you laugh? I should have

died with mortification." And the more solemn she looked the more I

laughed, and I haven't done laughing yet, although it was three days

ago. I am at present looking for the finale--viz., my picture in the

Rogue's Gallery as an accomplished female shoplifter. I may have

stolen other things, but, upon my word, this is the first time I ever

stole a muff. It was so comical, that if a station-house had been my

portion I know I should have laughed all the same; besides, I always

wanted to see a station-house. I might possibly have preferred riding

there _in a carriage_, if the policeman in attendance had no

objection, or if the walking was bad, or it stormed!

Finally, my brethren, a correspondent inquires how I look? Am I tall?

have I dark, or light complexion? and what color are my eyes?

I should be very happy to answer these questions, did I know myself. I

proceed to explain why I cannot tell whether "I be I."

First--one evening I was seated at the opera, waiting patiently for

the performances to begin. In two orchestra chairs, directly in front

of me, sat a lady and gentleman, both utter strangers to me. Said the

_gentleman_ to his companion, "Do you see the lady who has just

entered yonder box?" pointing, as he did so, to the gallery;

"well, that is FANNY FERN."--"You know her, then?" asked the

lady.--"Intimately," replied this strange gentleman--"_intimately_.

Observe how expensively she is dressed. See those diamonds, and that

lace! Well, I assure you, that every cent she has ever earned by her

writings goes straightway upon her back." Naturally desiring to know

how I did look, I used my opera-glass. The lady was tall, handsome,

graceful, and beautifully dressed. The gentleman who accompanied me

began to grow red in the face, at the statement of my "intimate"

acquaintance, and insisted on a word with him; but the fun was too

good to be spoiled, and the game too insignificant to hunt; so, in

hope of farther revelations, I laughingly observed my "double" during

the evening, who looked as I have just described, for your benefit.

Again--in a list of pictures announced to be sold lately, was one

labelled "Fanny Fern." Having lost curiosity concerning that lady

myself, I did not go on a tour of inspection; but a gentleman friend

of mine who did, came back in high glee at the manner in which the

purchaser thereof, if any should be found, would be swindled--as "I

was _not_ I" in that case either.

Some time ago "Fanny Fern" was peddled round California, or at least,

so I was informed by letter. In this instance they had given her, by

way of variety, black eyes and hair, and a brunette complexion. I

think she was also taken smiling. A friend, moreover, informed me that

he had seen me, with an angelic expression, seated upon a rosy cloud,

with wings at my back. This last fact touched me. Wings are what I

sigh for. It was too cruel a mockery.

You will see from the above, how impossible it is, for such a

chameleon female, to describe herself, even to one "who likes my

writings." If it will throw any light on the subject, however, I will

inform you that a man who got into my parlor under cover of

"New-Year's calls," after breathlessly inspecting me, remarked, "Well,

now, I _am_ agreeably disappointed! I thought from the way you

_writ_, that you were a great six-footer of a woman, with snapping

black eyes and a big waist, and I _am_ pleased to find you looking so

soft and so femi_nine_!"

I would have preferred, had I been consulted, that he should have

omitted the word "soft;" but after the experiences narrated above,

this was a trifle.

* * * * *

A gentleman requested me not long since "to rebuke those men who did

not rise, when ladies entered a car, and give them a seat." Now this

would come with a bad grace from me, for the reason that I never enter

a full car without having this politeness extended to me. But mind

this, ladies, I never yet forgot to thank the man, as prettily as my

knowledge of such things serves me, for such a gracious act, and

perhaps that is the explanation. At any rate, I have been so disgusted

with the reverse, that I more often wondered that men _do_ get up,

than that they _don't_. I think ladies, too, should not _exact_ such

courtesy by look, or word, or manner, as I have often seen them do. I

find American men most courteous, most obliging to our sex. Now and

then one meets a bear. To such, a woman must of course give a wide

berth, unless she has a muzzle in the shape of a "protector" handy.

_HOSPITALITY._

If each person were asked to define this word, the answers would be

amusing. Emerson says "that we should not turn away wholly from the

routine of our daily life to make our guests welcome." He says "that

every one worthy to sit at our table knows that life has its necessary

duties; and that we should not burden our friends with the thought

that our business is suffering derangement and loss by their coming."

This is common-sense; but if we measure the majority of people by it,

then few "_are_ worthy to sit at one's table." It may be because

insincerity is so much the order of the day, that each so distrusts

the other that a person cannot say frankly to a friend, without giving

offence, I would be glad to stay longer with you, or have you stay

longer, but I really cannot now. A lady said to me, not long since, "I

never dare say truthfully that I am 'engaged' when a caller comes, no

matter how impossible circumstances make it for me to go down. If I

do, it always offends. Therefore I am obliged to send word that I am

out; then the caller leaves without any wound to his self-love." Now

this ought not to be. A straightforward honesty is much better. But

there are so many inconsiderate people, who, provided they gain their

point to see you, care little at what sacrifice on your part of time,

or at what postponement of imperative duties. _They_ have time enough.

So much that they are even puzzled what to do with it; how can it be

that _you_ have none, or so little, at the service of friends? They

cannot comprehend that one's duty, or one's labor, may tread so

closely on the heels of the other, that your remaining vitality needs

the most careful nursing and division to keep your steps from _final_

faltering. What is to be done with such rhinoceros-hided people as

these? You feel no unkindness toward them; but, like the beggar that

accosts you on the last of many curb-stones, you have simply parted

with all your pennies. Your pocket is empty.

I recollect once a lady in the same house with me, to whom I

apologized as civilly as I knew how for being obliged to leave her to

write a promised article. She bowed coolly, and, on my leaving the

room, said to a friend of mine, "I suppose she did that to get rid of

me, don't you?"

It is much easier to get along with men, because _they_ can understand

that life has its unpostponable duties, without any lifting of

eyebrows or incredulous shrugging of shoulders, or a cool salute the

next time you two meet. The intercourse of one man with another in

this regard has always elicited my admiration. They take up a

newspaper or a book, and read in each other's presence, with a tacit

understanding of its perfect propriety. If one has to leave, he often

says no more than "I'm off," or "Good-by, old fellow." Sometimes it is

only a touch of the hat, or a hand laid on the other's shoulder in

passing; and no black eyes follow, no locks of hair fly, nor do any

hard words or looks result in the future.

If ladies smoked,--which the gods forbid!--do you suppose one lady

would allow another to stop her in the street and light a cigar from

her lips, when she _never was introduced_? When she didn't even know

who her dress-maker was, or where she bought her bonnets? Good

heavens!

Did you ever notice, if anything unexpected occurs in the mutual path

of men through the same street, how naturally and frankly they accost

each other, though perfect strangers, and converse about it, and go

their several ways, to their tombstones, after it. Not so sweet woman!

Catch _her_ speaking to "that nasty thing"! How does _she_ know who or

what she is?

Children are so delicious about these matters. I saw two little girls

the other day trying to crack a nut upon the sidewalk, by pressing in

turn their tiny little shoes upon it. Despairing of success, they said

to a gentleman passing, "Man, man, crack this nut for us, will you?"

His handsome face was luminous with fun, as he pressed his polished

boot down upon it, to the delight of the youngsters and myself. Now

these little girls wouldn't have thought of asking a lady to do that,

or if they had, do you think she would have stopped to do it?

_WOMAN AND HER WATCH._

This unnatural partnership is well understood, both by watchmakers and

husbands. Who among the latter has not had occasion to mourn, seventy

times seven, that he was ever such an idiot as to present his wife

with a watch? Of what use was it, when fastening it to her belt, in

its pristine glitter and correctness, that he remarked, with uplifted

finger, "Here, my dear, be sure and remember to wind this up regularly

every night when you take it off." Of what use was it that she

bristled up, and retorted, "As if I shouldn't remember that, John, you

goose!"

Didn't John himself, after she crept into bed, that very night, ask

her had she done it; and didn't she guiltily reply, dodging the

question, "Don't bother me, John, just as I am getting sleepy!" And

didn't it run down? And didn't he face her up, the next day, with the

face of that watch behind time, at the same moment showing her

reproachfully the immaculate time-piece in his vest-pocket, which

never erred, or varied from the path of strict duty, no more than one

of his relatives! And wasn't she glad, when a pickpocket in a

street-car, shortly after, relieved her husband of this finger-post to

her transgressions! Besides, suppose her watch were a little before

or behind time, or suppose it stopped altogether, for the matter of

that; wasn't it _her_ watch, I'd like to know; and didn't his

jurisdiction over it stop when it became such? And didn't she, at

last, get so mad at his asking her every night, when they got into

bed, if it was wound up, that she let it alone from sheer perversity,

and never pretended to prevaricate on the subject, but "riz" right up

in bed, when he asked her the question, and answered boldly, "No, it

isn't!"

And how impertinent it was of the watchmaker, when, after frequent

aberrations from duty, she carried secretly this little trinket to get

it repaired, to ask what she had been doing to it; or to laugh, with

_his_ necessary knowledge of watches and women, when she replied, "I

only dropped it on the hearth." But watchmakers are often

husbands--and when you've seen one husband, you've seen the whole

tribe--always asking you what you've done, and then scolding you for

doing it; thus offering you a premium for lying the next time they

propose such a meddling question.

Do they tell "what they have been doing"? I rather think there'd be

pulling of hair if they did. Then what right have they to catechize

us?

Now I ask any candid person if a lady's watch don't _look_ just as

prettily in her belt, whether it "goes" or not? And can't she always

ask her husband what time it is? And isn't he a brute and a bear, if

he growls at telling her, even supposing he has given her a watch to

obviate that necessity? I'm sure nothing could be plainer; and I hope

nobody will say, after this, that a woman can't reason. Besides, what

right has a lazy animal like man to expect anything perpetually to

"go"? Don't _he_ lay off, on every convenient chance? Isn't he always

prefacing and winding up everything with "Be quiet"? Of course he is.

Every wife from Maine to Florida knows that. I tell you they expect

too much from women and their watches, and it's high "time" they knew

it, and got used to having both run like fury one minute, and stand

still the next.

* * * * *

Will people who attend lectures and concerts cease drumming with their

fingers on the back of seats, or with canes or feet on the floor, till

the services begin? One cannot help remarking, in such vicinity, how

few persons are really well-bred. Dress certainly is no indication of

it, judged by this rule. If a tattoo must be performed, why not go out

in the lobby or vestibule, and have the war-dance out? This thing has

come to be such an intolerable nuisance, that the paradoxical

regulation, "No _gentlemen_ are allowed to smoke in the ladies'

cabin," may as well be imitated by--"No _gentleman_, in a concert or

lecture-room, is allowed to drum on the back of a lady's chair before,

or after, or during the entertainment."

"_MY DOCTOR._"

You have one, of course; and of course he never opens his mouth

without dropping pearls. (I hope the printer will not print this last

word _pills_.) _Your_ doctor believes in flannel next the skin, all

the year round. Mrs. Jones' doctor, who "knows much more than your

doctor," thinks that a person of discretion may occasionally, in the

dog-days, lay flannel on the shelf and no coffin be imminent. _Your_

doctor says that young children's necks and shoulders should always be

covered, even in warm weather. Mrs. Smith's doctor, who, she says,

"stands at the head of his profession" says that is all nonsense, and

that children should go through a toughening process, which will

render changes of temperature harmless. _Your_ doctor advises you

never to cross the street, or go down-stairs, unless accompanied by

quinine. Mrs. Smith's doctor tells her if she wants poison she had

better get ratsbane, and then she will know what she is swallowing.

Now each of you believe that "_my_ doctor" is infallible; that is a

great comfort to you, and very satisfactory to them, especially

pocket-wise. "My doctor" hasn't dealt with women so long, and failed

to see their blind side. He knows what "brutes" husbands are, and how

like flints they will oppose the sea-shore, merely because their wives

want to go there. What is the use of "my doctor," unless he comforts

you under this affliction, and declares that to be the only place

where you can regain your lost appetite? No wonder you like him; no

wonder life is a blank to you when his carriage is not before your

door. There is healing in the very sight of his beard and moustache;

and how much handsomer they are than the "brute's." Ah! had you met

"my doctor" years ago, you say; not stopping to reflect, that in that

case he would have been attending women who paid fees, and left you,

his wife, to some medical friend for pills and consolation. It is

better as it is, you see. Well, it _is_ comforting "that he

understands you better than anybody else, and seems to know just what

you want." And then he shows such an absorbing interest in your

symptoms, that you almost feel cured by his sympathy alone, before you

swallow a single powder; and, since my ears are out of your reach, I

will remark, that well you may, when, half the time, nothing in the

world ails you but the want of some absorbing occupation or interest.

Colored water and bread pills are safe prescriptions for that

complaint; meantime it wont hurt the "brute" to pay for the wear and

tear of the doctor's carriage in coming and going. If "my doctor"

laughs in his sleeve, occasionally, when he thinks what funny

creatures women are, you are none the wiser or the angrier for it. He

don't dislike, after all, their little cuddlesome, trusting, confiding

ways; possibly not so much as his wife does, whose acquaintance you

had better not make. As I before remarked, his medical friends can

take care of her; it is no business of yours, her disgusting ails and

aches.

But what a thing it is when "my doctor" was also "_ma's doctor_"! If

he don't know all the ins and outs, then "may the divel fly away

wid--him!"

The moral of all this is, that "my doctor's" life is not without its

consolations, and the most astonishing part of it is, that husbands

are so blear-eyed to this subject. It wont harm them to hint that in

sympathy and courteousness they had better not present too sharp a

contrast to "my doctor."

_A WOMAN AT A LECTURE._

If you want to see a woman act more like a goose than she need, watch

her when she enters a place of public performance, where the seats are

at the mercy of first-comers. Notice her profound survey of the

situation, as she stands, preceding her John, who is supposed to know

nothing about such things, poised on one foot, while she measures

distances, drafts, and acoustics with the eye of a connoisseur. Now

she decides! At last she swoops down on _the_ seat in all the house

which she prefers. John follows, with the shawl and family umbrella.

He faintly suggests the possible obstruction of a pillar between the

seat she has chosen and the speaker, but he follows. Directly she is

seated, and the shawl and umbrella located without inconvenience to

themselves, or infringement of the comfort of their neighbors, when

she coolly remarks, "John, 'tis true, that pillar _is_ right between

me and the speaker." John's ears redden; but he is in public, so he

don't say, "Didn't I tell you so?" but rises with shawl and umbrella,

the former catching by the fringe on every seat as he passes, and the

latter slipping to the floor while he tries to disentangle the shawl.

Meantime my lady is on her triumphal march for that "best seat."

Now she alights! It wont do. There's a tall man in front of her; she

is always fated to sit behind a tall man. She tries another; there's

the phantom pillar again. Yet another; that's the end seat, and every

horrid man that comes along will be treading on her dress and knocking

her bonnet over her eyes all the evening. Meantime John gets redder in

the face; he can't even ease himself with a customary growl. Ah! now

she has got the seat at last, and stands beckoning to John to follow.

Her friend Miss Frizzle is beside her, and she is happy. There is only

one seat, to be sure, but "John can find one somewhere else, or

perhaps he would like to take a walk outside and call for her when

lecture is over--only he must be sure to be back in time." So down she

sits, while John wanders off for a possible stray seat. Now she draws

off the glove that hides her one diamond ring, and settles the

bracelet on the wrist of that hand. Then she tumbles up her front

hair, lest it might have got smooth coming. Then she picks out the

bows of the natty little ribbon under her dimpled chin. It was that

chin that victimized John! Then she draws from her pocket her scented

pocket-handkerchief and gives it a little incense-waft into the air,

magnetizing a young man in front, who turns round to find the owner of

that delicious gale from Araby the blest. Then she takes out her

opera-glass and peeps about, not so much that her sight is defective,

but that her diamond-ring and gold bracelets gleam prettily in the

operation. John, meantime, has found a seat in a draft, and is

sitting with bent brows and a turned-up coat-collar--which last is

sufficient to make a ruffian of a man without any woman's help--in the

back part of the house. Confidences, millinery, mantua-makery, and

matinée-y are meanwhile exchanged between his wife and dear Miss

Frizzle, who is an acknowledged man-killer, and keeps a private

grave-yard of her own for deceased lovers.

Now the lecturer rises. "Pooh! he's an ugly man. Well, they need't

look at him; and perhaps he'll be funny--who knows?" He isn't funny.

He is talking about Plato and Epictetus; who the goodness are they?

But there's an end to all things, and so there is to the lecture. Now,

John is wanted, and, to tell the truth, for the first time thought of!

Ah, there he is! but how sulky, and how ugly he looks with his

coat-collar turned up! He might have some regard to appearances when

he goes with _her_. People will think she has such a horrid taste in

husbands.

"Why don't you talk?" says the little woman, when they get outside.

"It was too bad you couldn't sit by me, John; I missed you so! but,

you see, there was but one seat."--"Not just in that locality, I

suppose," muttered John. But the street-lamp just then shone on that

cunning little dimpled chin, and its owner said, coaxingly, "O-o-h,

now, John! don't be cross with its little wife!" and it's my private

opinion he wasn't. Would you have been, sir?

_CAN'T BE SUITED._

Look at those long-faced Christians coming home from church, says

Find-Fault; "it is enough to make one sick--gloomy, morose-looking

beings. I wonder do they think there is any religion in that? The fact

is, religion is played out." Now, Find-Fault _wants_ religion to be

played out, so he looks at it always through that pair of spectacles.

If he sees a mistake in that direction, he never thinks, as in other

cases, of making reasonable allowance for it. He can understand how

really good men may have narrow views of business, or of politics, or

of any such secular matters; but if they blunder through narrowness of

view on the _religious_ question, he immediately sets them down as

hypocrites and pretenders. Now I believe that there is many a "Worthy

the Lamb" being sung heartily in heaven to-day, by those mistaken

Christians who thought it right to groan and sigh all the time they

were on earth. It is a pity, to be sure, especially in view of such

people as Find-Fault, that they had not occasionally given us a

cheerful chirp before they went, but "religion" still lives all the

same.

Then Find-Fault is not very consistent, even on his own showing.

"_There's_ a pretty minister for you," he says, as he comes out of the

Rev. Mr. Spring-morning's church; "there's a pretty minister for

you--making his congregation smile during the services! A clergyman

shouldn't let himself down that way. It is undignified." You tell him

that the clergyman in question believes in a cheerful religion, and

wishes to do away with the long-faced Christianity which brings

religion into disrepute with just such people as himself. Finding

himself in a corner, he only gives you his stereotyped answer, that

"religion is played out, anyhow."

Find-Fault isn't a bad man: it only pleases him to be thought so. The

other day, in speaking of a man who made great efforts to overcome

intemperate habits, and failed, he said, "Poor fellow! somebody ought

to take hold and help him to help himself." But, mind you, he never

thinks of applying the same rule to a church-member for whom Satan, in

a moment of weakness, is too strong; no matter how sincere his

repentance, he only says, "_there's your religion again!_"

Ginger-Snaps · 第 10 / 17 段